Abstract
The concept of state sovereignty has, since Hobbes, been a highly contentious and much-debated issue. Marx's critique that institutional detachments obscure the modern state's embodiment in socioeconomic relations encapsulates the reason why sovereignty is not simply a political issue. This paper argues that the guild socialist theorist G. D. H. Cole completes Marx's analysis, effectively filling out Marx's critique of the liberal state as a mask behind which capitalist power thrives. In seeking to defend Cole from his critics, the paper shows that while Cole's scheme permits a sovereign body to exist, the manner in which its powers are exercised is constitutionally restricted. Such formal limitations successfully redefine the substance of sovereignty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
