While making very substantial changes to the population's working conditions, government strategies to foster economic development in South Korea have historically attempted to keep worker involvement, in terms of influence on the process, to a bare minimum. Applying the Gramscian concept of passive revolution, this article analyses governance mechanisms and production relations over a history of authoritarianism and up to the contemporary period of democratic reform. Trasformismo, which is a strategy of limited concessions, has been provided via vocational training for workers. Despite this attempt at inclusion, it is concluded that workers have not enjoyed full participation in negotiation for their welfare at any time in Korean history.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adamson, W. (1980) Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of Antonio Gramsci's Political and Cultural Theory (University of California Press) Berkely and Los Angeles.
2.
Amoore, L. et al (2000) ‘Overturning “globalization”: Resisting teleology, reclaiming politics’, in B. K. Gills (ed.) Globalization and the Politics of Resistance (Macmillan) London.
3.
Amsden, A. (1989) Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (Oxford University Press) New York.
4.
Arrighi, G. (1993) ‘The three hegemonies of historical capitalism’, in S. Gill (ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge University Press).
5.
Appelbaum, E. & R. Batt (1994) The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States (ILR Press) Ithaca, NY.
6.
Bieler, A. (2000) Globalisation and the Enlargement of the European Union: Austrian and Swedish Social Forces in the Struggle over Membership (Routledge) London.
7.
Bieler, A. (2001) ‘Questioning cognitivism and constructivism in IR theory: Reflections on the material structure of ideas’, in Politics, vol. 21, no. 2.
8.
Bieler, A. & A. Morton (2004) ‘A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: Neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations’, in
9.
Capital & Class, no. 82
10.
Birchfield, V. (1999) ‘Contesting the hegemony of market ideology: Gramsci's “good sense” and Polanyi's “double movement”’, in Review of Political Economy, vol. 6, no. 1, Spring.
11.
Bocock, R. (1986) Hegemony (Tavistock) London.
12.
Bobrow, D. & J. Na (1999) ‘Korea's affair with globalization: Deconstructing segyehwa’, in C. I. Moon & J. R. Mo (eds.) Democratization and Globalization in Korea: Assessments and Prospects (Yonsei University Press) Seoul.
13.
Cammack, P. (2002a) ‘The mother of all governments: The World Bank's matrix for global governance’, in R. Wilkinson & S. Hughes (eds.) Global Governance: Critical Perspectives (Routledge) London.
14.
Cammack, P. (2002b) ‘Attacking the poor’, in New Left Review, vol. 2, no. 13, Jan-Feb.
15.
Cammack, P. (2001) ‘Making the poor work for globalisation?’ in New Political Economy, vol. 6, no. 3, November.
16.
Clifford, M. L. (1998) Troubled Tiger: Businessmen, Bureaucrats, and Generals in South Korea (M. E. Sharpe) New York.
17.
Cox, R. W. (1981) ‘Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory’, in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, Summer.
18.
Cox, R. W. (1983) ‘Gramsci, hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method’, in Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, Summer.
19.
Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History (Columbia University Press) New York.
20.
Cox, R. W. (1977,1996) ‘Labour and hegemony’, in Approaches to World Order (Cambridge University Press) New York.
21.
Cox, R. W. (1989/1996), ‘Middlepowermanship, Japan, and future world order’, in Approaches to World Order (Cambridge University Press) New York.
22.
Cox, R. W. (1999) ‘Civil society at the turn of the millennium: Prospects for an alternative world order’, in Review of International Studies, vol. 25, no. 1.
23.
Cumings, B. (1997) Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History (W. W. Norton & Company) New York, London.
24.
Deyo, F. (1989) Beneath the Miracle: Labour Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism (University of California Press) Berkeley and Los Angeles.
25.
Fatton, R. (1991) ‘Liberal democracy in Africa’, in Political Science Quarterly, vol. 105, no. 3.
26.
Femia, J. (1981) Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process (Oxford University Press).
27.
Forgacs, D. (ed.) (1988) A Gramsci Reader, Selected Writings 1916–1935 (Lawrence & Wishart) London.
28.
Gill, S. (1990) American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission (Cambridge University Press).
29.
Gill, S. (1993) ‘Epistemology, ontology and the “Italian School”’, in S. Gill (ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge University Press).
30.
Gills, B. K. (1993) ‘The hegemonic transition in East Asia’, in S. Gill (ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge University Press).
31.
Godemont, F. (1999) The Downsizing of Asia (Routledge) London.
32.
Gramsci, A. (1929–1935/1999) Selections from the Prison Notebooks [referenced in text as] trans. Quintin Hoare & Geoffrey Nowell Smith (International Publishers) New York.
33.
Gramsci, A. (1949/1999) Il Risorgimento [referenced in text as Risorgimento].
34.
Gramsci, A. (1949/1999) Note sul Machiavelli, sulla politica e sullo Stato moderno [referenced in text as NM] .
35.
Gramsci, A. (1949/1999) Il Risorgimento [referenced in text as Risorgimento].
36.
Gramsci, A. (1994) Pre-Prison Writings, edited by R. Bellamy, trans. V. Cox (Cambridge University Press).
37.
Green, A. (1999) ‘East Asian skill formation systems and the challenge of globalisation’, in Journal of Education and Work, vol. 12, no. 3.
38.
Hong, S. M. (1983) ‘The Republic of Korea (South Korea)’, in R. M. Thomas & N. T. Postlethwaite (eds.) Schooling in East Asia (Pergamon Press) Oxford.
39.
Kang, C. (2000) ‘Segyehwa Reform of the South Korean Developmental State’, in S. Kim (ed.) Korea's Globalization (Cambridge University Press).
40.
Kim, Y. C. & C. I. Moon (2000) ‘Globalization and Workers in South Korea’, in S. Kim (ed.) Korea's Globalization (Cambridge University Press).
41.
Ikenberry, G. J. (ed.) (2000) America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power (Cornell Studies in Security Affairs) New York.
42.
Kim, E. Y. (1996) ‘Cultural awareness’, in Understanding Koreans (Greenwood Publishing Group) New York.
43.
Kim, Y. C. & C. I. Moon (2000) ‘Globalization and workers in South Korea’, in S. Kim (ed.) Korea's Globalization (Cambridge University Press).
44.
Kondratieff, N. D. (1984) The Long Wave Cycle, trans. G. Daniels (Richardson & Snyder) New York.
45.
Korea International Labour Federation (KOILAF) (1999a) ‘Guidelines for collective bargaining: Labour, management and the government’ (KOILAF) Seoul.
46.
KOILAF (1999b) Labour Relations in Korea (KOILAF) Seoul.
47.
Korean People's Action against Investment Treaties and the WIT (KoPA), online at http://antiwto.jinbo.net/eroom/index.html
48.
Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET), online at http://www.krivet.re.kr/cgi-bin/rabout.cgi
49.
Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET) (2000) ‘Participation factor of training programmes’ (KRIVET) Seoul.
50.
Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (KRIVET) (1999) ‘Korea's centennial history of vocational education and training’ (KRIVET) Seoul.
51.
Korean Embassy (Ottowa, Canada) (1999), online at http://www.emb-korea.ottawa.on.ca/right/news/news/Dec0299.htm
52.
Leadbeater, C. (1998) ‘Who will own the knowledge economy?’ in Political Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 4, October-December.
53.
Lee, S. R. [Minister of Labour] (1999) ‘Labour-management culture: Why it must change’, in The Korea Herald, no. 14,257, August 26.
54.
Lewis, W. A. (1984) The Rate of Growth of the World Economy (The Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica) Taipei.
55.
Magariños, C. A.[Director-General of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation Managing UN Reform] (2001) ‘UNIDO'S need-driven approach', speech given at the Royal Institute for International Affairs, Chatham House, London, 21 September.
56.
The Militant (1997) ‘S. Korea general strike answers anti-labor laws’, vol. 61, no. 2, 13 January.
57.
Ministry of Labour, South Korea (MOL) (1999) ‘Labour sector reforms gaining speed: Ministry of Labour decides to operate the second-term labour reform task force’, International Co-operation Division, online at http://www.molab.go.kr/English/English.html
58.
Moon, C. I. (2002) ‘Between learning and innovation: Japanese economic institutions and South Korea's industrial policy in the 1960s’, paper presented at International Studies Association Convention Dissolving Boundaries: The Nexus Between Comparative Politics and International Relations, New Orleans, 27 March.
59.
Morton, A. (2003) ‘Structural change and neoliberalism in Mexico: “Passive Revolution” in the Global Political Economy’, in Third World Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4.
60.
Morton, A. (2000), ‘Mexico, neoliberal restructuring and the EZLN: A neo-Gramscian analysis’, in B. Gills (ed.) Globalization and the Politics of Resistance (MacMillan Press) Basingstoke.
61.
Ogle, G. E. (1990) South Korea: Dissent Within the Economic Miracle (Zed Books) Atlantic Highlands, NJ.
62.
O'Brien, R. (2000) ‘Labour and IPE: Rediscovering human agency’, in R. Palan (ed.) Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories (Routledge) London.
63.
Okonogi, M. (1988) ‘South Korea's experiment in democracy’, in Japan Review of International Affairs, Spring/Summer.
64.
Overbeek, H. (ed.) (1993) Restructuring Hegemony in the Global Political Economy: The Rise of Transnational Neoliberalism in the 1980s (Routledge) London.
65.
Ravenhill, J. (1986) ‘Africa's continuing crisis: The elusiveness of development’, in J. Ravenhill (ed.) Africa in Economic Crisis (Columbia University Press) New York.
66.
Rowley, C. & J. Bae (2002) ‘Globalization and transformation of human resource management in South Korea’, in International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 13, no. 1.
67.
Rupert, M. (1995) Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power (Cambridge University Press).
68.
Salamon, M. (1997) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice (Prentice Hall) London.
69.
Shambaugh, D. (1991) Beautiful Imperialist: China Perceives America, 1922–1990 (Princeton University Press).
70.
Shin, D. C. (2000) ‘The evolution of popular support for democracy during Kim Young Sam's government’, in L. Diamond & D. C. Shin (eds.) Institutional Reform and Democratic Consolidation in Korea (Hoover Institution Press Publication) Stanford.
71.
Showstack Sassoon, A. (1982) ‘Passive revolution and the politics of reform’, in A. Showstack Sassoon (ed.) Approaches to Gramsci (Writers and Readers) London.
72.
Showstack Sassoon, A. (1987) Gramsci's Politics, 2nd edition (Minnesota University Press).
73.
Simon, R. (1982) Gramsci's Political Thought: An Introduction (Lawrence & Wishart) London.
74.
Sklair, L. (1997) ‘Social movements for global capitalism: The transnational capitalist class in action’, in Review of International Political Economy, vol. 4, no. 3.
75.
Sklair, L. (2001a) The Transnational Capitalist Class (Blackwell) Oxford.
76.
Sklair, L. (2001b) ‘The transnational capitalist class and the discourse of globalization’, Global Dimensions, LSE Centre for the Study of Global Governance, online at http://www.globaldimensions.net/articles/sklair/LSklair.html
77.
UNEVOC (UNESCO International Project on Technical and Vocational Education) (2002) online at http://www.unevoc.de/
78.
Van der Pijl, K. (1993) ‘State socialism and passive revolution’, in S. Gill (ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge University Press).
79.
Van der Pijl, K. (1997) ‘Transnational class formation and state forms’ in S. Gill & J. H. Mittlelman (eds.) Innovation and Transformation in International Studies (Cambridge University Press).
80.
Van der Pijl, K. (1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations (Routledge) London.
81.
Williamson, J. (1990) ‘What Washington means by policy reform’, in J. Williamson (ed.) Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? (Institute for International Economics) Washington.
82.
Wolfensohn, J. D. (1999) ‘A proposal for a comprehensive development framework memo to the board, management and staff of the World Bank Group’, World Bank, 21 January.
83.
World Bank (2002) A Preliminary Strategy to Develop a Knowledge Economy in European Union Accession Countries, prepared for the Knowledge Economy Forum (Paris, 20–22 February) organised in coordination with the European Commission (EC) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
