This paper is positioned within theoretical perspectives that focus on welfare states as systems of power and negotiation between key social forces acting in and through the state apparatus. Despite an emerging consensus that UK welfare-state restructuring is deeply problematic, there appears to be reluctance, within the debate, to discuss viable alternatives to neoliberalism. In contrast to UK and North American strategies, Denmark has adopted a ‘welfare-through-work’ model, built around a more inclusive system of welfare reform. This article discusses its emergence, and focuses on the importance of Job Rotation as its leading-edge socio-economic strategy. It highlights recent conflicts and tensions within Job Rotation and, lastly, suggests lessons for the UK.
Aalborg LO [Aalborg TUC] (2001) Partnerskab for rummelig arbejdsmarked [Partnership for a social inclusive labour market], (Aalborg LO) Aalborg.
3.
Bason, C.C., P. Sidelman, N. Ejler & T. Bjørnkilde (2000) ‘Evaluation at European level: The Adapt community initiative’, Paper for the Fourth Conference on Evaluation of the Structural Funds, Edinburgh, 17-19 September.
4.
Bender, H., K. Knudsen, E. Petersen & L. Tvede-Jensen (1998) Arbejderbevaeglsen i Aalborg 1870-1970 [Labour Movements in Aalborg 1870-1970] (AOF) Aalborg.
5.
Bewick, T., D. Etherington & M. Jones (1997) ‘Reforming welfare->through-work: Scandinavian alternatives to neoliberal policies’,Paper Presented to the University of Manchester, International Centre for Labour Studies Conference Between Welfare and Work: International Exchanges, September.
6.
Carlson, V.L. & N.C. Theodore (1995) Are There Enough Jobs? Welfare Reform and Labor Market Reality (Centre for Urban Economic Development/Chicago Urban League) Chicago.
7.
Coates, D. (2000) Models of Capitalism (Polity) Oxford.
8.
Cochrane, A. (1993) ‘Comparative approaches and social policy’, in A. Cochrane & J. Clarke (eds.) Comparing Welfare States: Britain in International Context (Sage) London.
9.
Compston, H. & P.K. Madsen (2001) ‘Conceptual innovation and public policy: Unemployment and paid leave schemes in Denmark’,Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 11, pp. 117–132.
10.
Danish Government (2000) National Action Plan for Employment 2000 (Ministry of Labour/Ministry of Economic Affairs) Copenhagen.
11.
DfEE (1997) Design of the New Deal for 18-24 Year Olds (DfEE) London.
12.
DSS (1998) Green Paper: New Ambitions for our Country (HMSO) London.
13.
Edwards, P. & T. Elger (1999) The Global Economy, National States and the Regulation of Labour (Mansell) London.
14.
Elger, T.& P. Edwards (1999) ‘National states and the regulation of labour in the global economy: An introduction’ in P. Edwards & T.Elger, (eds.) The Global Economy, National States and the Regulation of Labour (Mansell) London.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Polity) Oxford.
16.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1992) ‘The emerging realignment between labour movements and welfare states’, in M. Regini (ed.) The Future of Labour Movements (Sage) London.
17.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Post Industrial Economies(Oxford University Press)Oxford.
18.
Etherington, D. (1997a) ‘Local Government and labour market policies in Denmark: Is there an alternative to free market policies?’Local Government Studies, vol. 23, pp. 48–58.
19.
Etherington, D. (1997b) ‘Trade unions and local economic development - Lessons from Denmark’,Local Economy, vol. 12, pp. 267–274.
20.
Etherington, D. (1998) ‘From welfare to work in Denmark: An alternative to free market policies?’Policy and Politics, vol. 26, pp. 147–161.
21.
Etherington, D., B. Evans & D. Esp (1999) ‘Feasibility and development study in job rotation project in Sheffield’ Report to Sheffield Training and Enterprise Council (University of Huddersfield) Huddersfield.
22.
Etherington, D. & M. Jones (2004) ‘Beyond contradictions of the welfare state: Denmark, welfare-through-work, and the promises of Job Rotation’Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy vol. 22, pp.129–148.
23.
European Journal of Vocational Training (2001) ‘Jobrotation’ Special Issue, no. 24, pp. 3–54.
24.
EU Jobrotation (1996) EU Jobrotation Action Now! (EU Jobrotation) Silkeborg.
25.
EU Jobrotation (2000a) Jobrotation i Danmark Ansats til status og problemfelter EU Jobrotation [Job Rotation in Denmark: Statement of status and problem areas] (EU Jobrotation) Aalborg.
26.
EU Jobrotation (2000b) Gode ideer til viderudvikling og udbredelse af Jobrotation [Ideas for further developing and expanding Job Rotation]Paper to EU Jobrotation National Conference, Copenhagen.
27.
European Commission (2000) ‘A memorandum on lifelong learning’, Commission Staff Working Paper (Commission of the European Communities) Brussels, 30 October.
28.
Fay, R.G. (1996) ‘Enhancing the effectiveness of active labour market policies: Evidence from programme evaluations in OECD countries’,Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, no. 18 (OECD) Paris.
29.
Finn, D. (2000) ‘Welfare to work: The local dimension’,Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 10, pp. 43–57.
30.
Giddens, A. (2002) ‘There is no alternative—the Third Way is the only way forward’, The Independent (Review), 8 January, p4.
31.
Ginsberg, N. (2001) ‘Globalisation and the liberal welfare states’, in R. Sykes, B. Palier & P. Prior (eds.) Globalization and European Welfare States Challenges and Change (Palgrave) Basingstoke.
32.
Goul Andersen, J. (1997) ‘The Scandinavian model in crisis? Achievements and problems of the Danish welfare state in an age of unemployment and low growth’,Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 20, pp. 1–31.
33.
Goul Andersen, J. (2002) ‘Work and citizenship: Unemployment and unemployment policies in Denmark, 1980-2000’, in J. Goul Andersen & P.H. Jensen (eds.) Changing Labour Markets, Welfare Policies and Citizenship(Policy Press)Bristol.
34.
Grover, C. (2003) ‘New Labour, welfare reform and the reserve army of labour’,Capital & Class, vol. 79, pp. 17–23.
35.
Grünewald, U. & J.H. Sørensen (2001) ‘Jobrotation experience, problems and prospects in Germany and Denmark’,European Journal of Vocational Training, vol. 24, pp. 47–52.
36.
Hamnett, C. (1996) ‘Social polarisation, economic restructuring, and welfare state regimes’,Urban Studies, vol. 33, pp. 1407–1430.
37.
Haughton, G., M. Jones, J. Peck, A. Tickell & A. While (2000) ‘Labour market policy as flexible welfare: Prototype Employment Zones and the new workfarism’,Regional Studies, vol. 34, pp. 669–680.
38.
Hay, C. (1999) The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring Under False Pretences?(Manchester University Press)Manchester.
39.
Herd, D., J. Peck & N. Theodore (1998) ‘Union Representation in New Deal Partnerships’, A Briefing Paper Prepared for the TUC (University of Manchester) School of Geography New Deal Monitoring Project.
40.
Huber, E. & J.D. Stephens (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets(University of Chicago Press)Chicago.
41.
Jessop, B. (1990) State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in their Place (Polity) Cambridge.
42.
Jessop, B. (1993) ‘Towards a Schumpeterian workfare state? Preliminary remarks on post-Fordist political economy’,Studies in Political Economy, vol. 40, pp. 7–39.
43.
Jessop, B. (1999) ‘The changing governance of welfare: Recent trends in its primary functions, scale, and modes of coordination’,Social Policy and Administration, vol. 33, pp. 348–359.
44.
Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State (Polity) Cambridge.
45.
Job Nord (1997) ‘Job Rotation i Nord Jylland’ [Job Rotation in North Jutland] Mimeograph (Kjeld Lang) Aalborg.
46.
Job Nord (1998) ‘Jobrotations projekter for Paedegogisk medhhjaelper/dagplejer’ [Jobrotation projects for nursery workers] Mimeograph (JobNord) Aalborg.
47.
Jobrotation International Association (2000) ‘An introduction to the Jobrotation International Association’, Press Release (EU Jobrotation Secretariat) Aalborg, 1 November.
48.
Jones, M. (1999) New Institutional Spaces: Training and Enterprise Councils and the Remaking of Economic Governance (Jessica Kingsley/Regional Studies Association) London.
49.
Jones, M. & A. Gray (2001) ‘Social capital, or local workfarism? Reflections on Employment Zones’,Local Economy, vol. 16, pp. 178–186.
50.
Jørgensen, H. (2002) Consensus, Cooperation and Conflict: The Policy Making Process in Denmark (Edward Elgar) Cheltenham.
51.
Kankaanpää-Lehtinen, K. & P. Lahtinen (2001) Job Rotation— European Model (University of Tampere Institute for Extension Studies) Tampere, Finland.
52.
Knudsen, H. & J. Lind (2000) Collective Bargaining on Employment and Competitiveness in Denmark (Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University) Aalborg.
53.
Kosonen, P. (2001) ‘Globalisation and the Nordic welfare states’, in R. Sykes, B. Palier & P. Prior (eds.) Globalisation and European Welfare States Challenges and Change (Palgrave) London.
54.
Labour Party (2001) Ambitions for Britain: Labour's Manifesto 2001 (Labour Party) London.
55.
Larsen, F., C. Hansen, H. Jorgensen, N. Lassen, B. Bagge & H. Hocker (1996) Implementering af Regional Arbejdsmarkedspolitik [Implementation of the Regional Labour Market Policy] (Centre for Labour Market Research, Aalborg University) Aalborg.
56.
Larsen, F. & J. Stamhus (2000) ‘Active labour market policy in Denmark: Labour market reform, crucial design features and problems of implementation’, Mimeograph, (Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University) Aalborg.
57.
Lavalette, M. & G. Mooney (eds.) (2000) Class Struggle and Social Welfare (Routledge) London.
58.
Lind, J. (2000) ‘The social pact in Denmark under a neoliberal regime’, in J. Lind & D. Mortimer (eds.) Worlds of Employment(Aalborg University Press)Aalborg.
59.
LGA (2001) Opportunity to Prosper Beyond the New Deal: A New Approach to Local Employment Policy (Local Government Association) London.
60.
Lødemel, I. (2000) ‘Discussion: Workfare in the welfare state’, in I. Lødemel & H. Trickey (eds.) An offer you can't refuse: Workfare in international perspective(Policy Press)Bristol.
61.
Lødemel, I. & Trickey (eds.) (2000) An offer you can't refuse: Workfare in international perspective(Policy Press)Bristol.
62.
MacLeod, G. & Jones, M. (1999) ‘Reregulating a regional rustbelt: Institutional fixes, entrepreneurial discourse, and the “politics of representation”’,Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 17, pp. 575–605.
63.
Mead, L. (ed.) (1997) The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty(Brookings Institution Press)Washington.
64.
Moller, I.H. (1999) ‘Trends in the Danish social mode of economic regulation’, in J. Lind & I.H. Moller (eds.) Inclusion and Exclusion: Unemployment and Non Standard Employment in Europe (Ashgate) Aldershot.
65.
Moller, I. H. & J. Lind (2000) ‘The labour market in process of change? Some critical comments' in J. Lind & D. Mortimer (eds.) Worlds of Employment (Aalborg University) Aalbord.
66.
Moran, J. (1997) ‘The dynamics of class politics and national economies in globalisation: The marginalisation of the unacceptable’,Capital & Class, vol. 66, pp. 53–83.
67.
National Audit Office (2002) The New Deal for Young People: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 639 (Stationery Office) London.
68.
Nativel, C., P. Sunley & R. Martin (2002) ‘Localising welfare-to-work? Territorial flexibility and the New Deal for Young People’,Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 20, pp. 911–932.
69.
NCVO (1999) Partnerships for the New Deal: Playing an Active Role. (National Council for Voluntary Organisations) London.
70.
Nordjyllands Arbejdsmarkedraad [Northjutlands Labour Market Council] (1998) Evaluering af nordjyske jobrotations-projekter afsluttet I virksomhednes vurdering og maaling af effekt [Evaluation of North Jutland's Job Rotation Projects—Employer's assessment of impacts] (AMR) Aalborg.
71.
OECD (1998) Key Employment Policy Challenges Faced by OECD Countries (OECD) Paris.
72.
OECD (1999) The Local Dimension of Welfare-to-Work: An International Survey ((OECD)Paris.
73.
OECD (2001) Local Partnerships for Better Governance (OECD) Paris.
74.
Parker, E. (2001) ‘The development of job rotation in the UK: Implications for London’, First report for Job Rotation in London Project (Department of Geography, Queen Mary, University of London).
75.
Pascual, A.S. (2002) ‘Are European activation policies converging?’ Paper presented at the IREC Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 28 August.
76.
Peck, J. (1999) ‘New labourers? Making a new deal for the “workless class”’,Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 17, pp. 345–372.
77.
Peck, J. (2001) Workfare States (Guilford) New York.
78.
Peck, J. & N. Theodore (2000) ‘“Work first”: Workfare and regulation of contingent labour markets’,Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 24, pp.119–138.
79.
Pedersen (2000) ‘Lone mothers, poverty and employment’, in D. Gallie & S. Paugam (eds.) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe(Oxford University Press).
80.
Ploug, N. (2002) Impact Evaluation of the European Employment Strategy—Denmark Synthesis Report (The Danish National Institute of Social Research) Copenhagen.
81.
Poulantzas, N. (1978) State, Power, Socialism (New Left Books) London.
82.
Regergingen [The Government] (2002) Flere I Arbejde—Et Debat Oplaeg [More in Work—A Discussion Document] (Ministry of Labour) Copenhagen.
83.
Rosdahl, A. & H. Weise (2000) ‘When all must be active— Workfare in Denmark’ in I. Lødemel & H. Trickey (eds.) An offer you can't refuse: Workfare in international perspective(Policy Press)Bristol.
84.
Siim, B. (1998) ‘Vocabularies of citizenship and gender: Denmark’,Critical Social Policy, vol. 56, pp. 375–396.
85.
Sørensen, J.H. (2002) ‘Job Rotation schemes: A conjunctural influences instrument of active labour market policy—and its effects on the dependence of qualification strategies, pursued by enterprises' Mimeograph (CARMA, Danish Centre for Labour Market Research, Department of Economic, Politics and Administration, University of Aalborg).
86.
Sunley, P., R. Martin & C. Nativel (2001) ‘Mapping the New Deal: The local disparities in the performance of welfare-to-work’,Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 26, pp. 484–512.
87.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1996) ‘Eurosclerosis in European welfare states: Regime theory and the dynamics of change’,Policy and Politics, vol. 24, pp. 109–123.
88.
Torfing, J. (1999) ‘Workfare with welfare: Recent reforms of the welfare state’,Journal of European Social Policy, vol. 9, pp. 5–28.
89.
Turok, I. & Edge, N. (1999) The Jobs Gap in Britain's Cities: Employment Loss and Labour Market Consequences(Policy Press)Bristol.
90.
Turok, I. & D. Webster (1998) ‘The New Deal: Jeopardised by the geography of unemployment?’Local Economy, vol. 13, pp. 309–328.
91.
Went, R. (2000) Globalization, Neoliberal Challenge, Radical Responses (IIRE/Pluto) London.
