This paper argues that the Berlusconi government is seeking to replace the ‘social concertation’ arrangement between government and trade unions with ‘social dialogue’ in an effort to undermine trade union ‘power’. This endeavour by the government to impose a policy of ‘social dialogue’ would severely limit trade unions' influence in economic and social policy decision-making and leave Berlusconi free to introduce reforms favouring his friends in employer organisations. One likely outcome would be the deregulation of the Italian labour market strongly damaging workers' rights.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carrieri M. (2002) Agire per accordi. La concertazione nazionale e locale, Roma, Ediesse
2.
EIRO (2001a) Intermediate Employment Targets Agreed at Stockholm, http://eiro.eurofound.ie/print/2001/04/feature/EU014208F.html
3.
EIRO (2001b) New Metalworking Collective Agreement signed despite CGIL opposition, http://eiro.eurofound.ie/print/2001/07/feature/IT0107193F.html
4.
Giugni G. (1995) ‘La caduta delle ragioni di divisione nell'esperienza sindacale e italiane’,Prospettiva Sindacale, 87: 7–19
5.
Hyman R. (2002) Understanding European Trade Unionism. Between Market, Class & Society, London: Sage
6.
Negrelli S. (2000) ‘Social Pacts and Flexibility: the Italian Experience’ in Fajertag G. and Pochet P. (eds) Social Pacts in Europe, Brussels, etui.
7.
Pizzorno A. (1978) ‘Political Exchange and Collective Identity’ in Crouch C. and Pizzorno A. (eds)The Resurgence of Class Conflict in Western Europe Since 1968, London: Macmillan
8.
Regini M. (1984) ‘The conditions for Political Exchange’ in J. Goldthorpe (ed)Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, Oxford: Clarendon.
9.
Regini M. and Regalia I. (1998) ‘Italy: the Dual Character of Industrial Relations’ in Ferner A. and Hyman R. (eds)Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, London: Blackwell.
