This paper shows that interpretations of Marx's value theory which value inputs and outputs simultaneously imply that surplus-labor is not the sole source of profit—even in the absence of joint production. Contrary results, such as the Fundamental Marxian Theorem, rely crucially on restrictive and implausible conditions that are shown to be unnecessary for reproduction. In contrast, the temporal single-system interpretation conforms to the exploitation theory of profit under completely general conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dmitriev, V.K. (1974) Economic Essays on Value, Competition and Utility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2.
Duménil, G. (1983) ‘Beyond the Transformation Riddle: A labor theory of value’, in Science and Society47: 4.
3.
Duménil, G. and D. Lévy (2000) ‘The Conservation of Value: A rejoinder to Alan Freeman’, in Review of Radical Political Economics 32: 1.
4.
Ernst, J.R. (1982) ‘Simultaneous Valuation Extirpated: a contribution to the critique of the neo-Ricardian concept of value’, in Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 2.
5.
Foley, D.K. (1982) ‘The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power, and the Marxian Transformation Problem’, in Review of Radical Political Economics 14: 2.
6.
Foley, D.K. (1997) ‘Recent Developments in the Labor Theory of Value’. Presented at the International Working Group in Value Theory mini-conference at the Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.
7.
Freeman, A, and G. Carchedi (eds.) (1996) Marx and Non-equilibrium Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.
8.
Giussani, P. (1991-92) ‘The Determination of Prices of Production’, in International Journal of Political Economy21: 4.
9.
Howard, M.C. and J.E. King (1992) A History of Marxian Economics: Volume II, 1929-1990. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10.
Kliman, A.J. (1997) ‘A Contribution to the Ongoing Inquiry into the Existence of Marx's Marxism’. Submitted for discussion to the International Working Group in Value Theory mini-conference at the Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.
11.
Kliman, A.J. and T. McGlone (1988) ‘The Transformation Non-Problem and the Non-Transformation Problem’, in Capital & Class 35.
12.
Lee, C.-O. (1993) ‘Marx's Labour Theory of Value Revisited’, in Cambridge Journal of Economics17: 4.
13.
Maldonado-Filho, E. (1997) ‘Release and Tying up of Productive Capital and the “Transformation Problem”.’ Presented at the International Working Group in Value Theory mini-conference at the Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.
14.
Morishima, M. (1973) Marx's Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and GrowthCambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15.
Moseley, F. (1993) ‘Marx's Logical Method and the “Transformation Problem”’, in F. Moseley (ed.) Marx's Method in Capital: a re-examination. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.
16.
Okishio, N. (1993a) ‘A Mathematical Note on Marxian Theorems’, in Nobuo Okishio—Essays on Political Economy: Collected Papers, M. Krüger and P. Flaschel (eds.), Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
17.
Okishio, N. (1993b) ‘Three Topics on Marxian Fundamental Theorem’, in Nobuo Okishio—Essays on Political Economy: Collected Papers, M. Krüger and P. Flaschel (eds.), Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
18.
Ramos, A. (1997) ‘Labor, Money, Labor-Saving Innovation, and the Falling Rate of Profit’. Presented at the International Working Group in Value Theory mini-conference at the Eastern Economic Association conference, April, Washington, D.C.
19.
Roemer, J. (1981) Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20.
Steedman, I. (1977) Marx After Sraffa. New Left Books, London.
21.
Wolff, R., A. Callari and B. Roberts (1984) ‘A Marxian Alternative to the Traditional Transformation Problem’, in Review of Radical Political Economics 16: 2, 3.
