Wind turbine towers (WTT), as tall slender structures, are exposed to complex loading conditions that may cause excessive oscillations affecting structural fatigue life and cost of maintenance; in this regard, vortex-induced vibration (VIV) is a challenging phenomenon to mathematically formulate and attenuating its resulting response in structures through added structural damping requires certain measures especially during assembly. Passive structural control devices have proven to be an effective solution in reducing structural vibrations and certain attributes of novel devices proposed in the literature could be exploited in new applications in a manner to overcome the limitations imposed by traditional dampers. In this paper, the effect of a magnetic damper with nonlinear stiffness and eddy current damping on VIV in off-shore WTT at four stages of installation is numerically investigated. Maximum VIV response of the tower is formulated using a spectral model for the off-shore DTU 10 MW reference wind turbine (RWT), taking into account the feasibility of implementing the device in terms of required space. The study reveals that the nonlinear damping device, in a compact and portable configuration, is capable of mitigating relative maximum normalized displacement and harmonic response due to VIV in off-shore WTTs at different installation stages. Based on the obtained results, the damper may be used as an installation aiding device to help facilitate tower erection and turbine assembly.
BenacchioSMalherABoissonJ, et al. (2016) Design of a magnetic vibration absorber with tunable stiffnesses. Nonlinear Dynamics85: 893–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2731-3
4.
BerguaRRobertsonAJonkmanJ, et al. (2021) Specification Document for OC6 Phase II: Verification of an Advanced Soil-Structure Interaction Model for Offshore Wind Turbines. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5000-79938. https://doi.org/10.2172/1811648
5.
BerguaRRobertsonAJonkmanJ, et al. (2022) OC6 phase II: integration and verification of a new soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind design. Wind Energy25(5): 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2698
6.
BirG (2006) User's guide to BModes (software for computing rotating beam-coupled modes). NREL/TP-500-39133. https://doi.org/10.2172/861489
7.
ChenCZhouJLiF, et al. (2023) Nonlinear vortex-induced vibration of wind turbine towers: theory and experimental validation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing204: 110772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110772
8.
ChenXLiuCZhengB, et al. (2025) Dynamic characteristics of an annular tuned liquid multi column damper for mitigating vibrations of floating offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering337: 121919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121919
EbstrupKSørensenNBertagnolioF, et al. (2024) Numerical investigation of vortex-induced forces on a wind turbine tower segment at very high Reynolds numbers. Journal of Physics. Conference Series2767: 022048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022048
11.
EnevoldsenIMørkK (1996) Effects of a vibration mass damper in a wind turbine tower. Journal of Structural Mechanics24: 155–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905459608905260
FeudoLSTouzéCBoissonJ, et al. (2018) Nonlinear magnetic vibration absorber for passive control of a multi–storey structure. Journal of Sound and Vibration438: 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.09.007
14.
GovardhanRWilliamsonCHK (2000) Modes of vortex formation and frequency response of a freely vibrating cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics420: 85–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112000001233
HeZZhangKWangG, et al. (2024) Vortex-induced vibration of the variable cross-sectional cylinder cases in transverse direction at Re = 3900 using OpenFOAM. Ocean Engineering303: 117511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117511
17.
HemmatiAOterkusEBarltropN (2019) Fragility reduction of offshore wind turbines using tuned liquid column dampers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering125: 105705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105705
18.
JahangiriVSunC (2020) Three-dimensional vibration control of offshore floating wind turbines using multiple tuned mass dampers. Ocean Engineering206: 107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107196
19.
JauvtisNWilliamsonCHK (2003) Vortex-induced vibration of a cylinder with two degrees of freedom. Journal of Fluids and Structures17: 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(03)00051-3
20.
JauvtisNWilliamsonCHK (2004) The effect of two degrees of freedom on vortex-induced vibration at low mass and damping. Journal of Fluid Mechanics509: 23–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(03)00051-3
21.
JiangHWangBXiaoyuB, et al. (2017) Simplified expression of hydrodynamic pressure on deepwater cylindrical bridge piers during earthquakes. Journal of Bridge Engineering22: 04017014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001032
22.
KajaKZhaoMXiangY, et al. (2016) Three-dimensional numerical simulations of vortex-induced vibrations of tapered circular cylinders. Applied Ocean Research60: 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.08.004
23.
KandasamyRCuiFTownsendN, et al. (2016) A review of vibration control methods for marine offshore structures. Ocean Engineering127: 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.001
24.
KojimaHNagayaK (1985) Forced vibrations of a circular plate with a nonlinear dynamic vibration absorber. Bull JSME28(136): 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.28.309
25.
LiSYLiuMLiHX, et al. (2018) Effects of structural damping on wind-induced responses of a 243-meter-high solar tower based on a novel elastic test model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics172: 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.027
LuZWangZZhouY, et al. (2018) Nonlinear dissipative devices in structural vibration control: a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration423: 18–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.052
ManolasDChaviaropoulosPKRiziotisV (2022) Assessment of vortex induced vibrations on wind turbines. Journal of Physics. Conference Series2257: 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2257/1/012011
30.
MorseTLWilliamsonCHK (2009) Prediction of vortex-induced vibration response by employing controlled motion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics634: 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009990516
31.
MurtaghPJGhoshABasuB, et al. (2008) Passive control of wind turbine vibrations including blade/tower interaction and rotationally sampled turbulence. Wind Energy11: 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.249
32.
NaikKAChandraPG (2016) Improved fluctuation behavior of SCIG based wind energy system using hybrid pitch angle controller. In: 2016 IEEE Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Electronics Engineering (UPCON). Varanasi, India, 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPCON.2016.7894706
33.
NaikKAChandraPG (2016) Improved oscillatory behavior of a grid connected wind farm using IMC-PID based pitch angle controller. In: 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS). New Delhi, India, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPES.2016.7584113
34.
NaikKAChandraPG (2018) Output power smoothing and voltage regulation of a fixed speed wind generator in the partial load region using STATCOM and a pitch angle controller. Energies11(1): 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010058
PourjafarR (2026) Seismic response mitigation in wind turbine towers using a nonlinear magnetic damper. Discover Civil Engineering, PREPRINT, available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8886132/v1
37.
PourjafarPRazzaghiP (2025) Performance of a nonlinear tuned mass damper in structural vibration control of multi degree of freedom systems. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Epub ahead of print 22 September 2025. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7480797/v1
38.
PourjafarRHansenMOLRazzaghiJ (2025) Passive control of wind turbine tower using nonlinear magnetic vibration absorber and eddy current damping. Wind Engineering49: 1439–1457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X251317514
39.
RahmanMOngZCChongWT, et al. (2015) Performance enhancement of wind turbine systems with vibration control: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews51: 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.078
StewartGLacknerM (2013) Offshore wind turbine load reduction employing optimal passive tuned mass damping systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology21: 1090–1104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2013.2260825
43.
StewartGMLacknerMA (2014) The impact of passive tuned mass dampers and wind-wave misalignment on offshore wind turbine loads. Engineering Structures73: 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.045
44.
SunCJahangiriV (2018) Bi-directional vibration control of offshore wind turbines using a 3D pendulum tuned mass damper. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing105: 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.12.011
45.
SunHKimESNowakowskiG, et al. (2016) Effect of mass-ratio, damping, and stiffness on optimal hydrokinetic energy conversion of a single, rough cylinder in flow induced motions. Renewable Energy99: 936–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.024
46.
TamimiVZeinoddiniMBakhtiariA (2014) Vortex shedding characteristics of tapered cylinders at turbulent wake. J OST1: 25–38.
47.
TongXZhaoXZhaoS (2015) Load reduction of a monopile wind turbine tower using optimal tuned mass dampers. International Journal of Control90: 1283–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2015.1124143
48.
VickeryBJBasuR (1983a) Simplified approaches to the evaluation of the across-wind response of chimneys. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics14(1–3): 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90019-3
49.
VickeryBJBasuRI (1983b) Across-wind vibrations of structures of circular cross-section. Part I. Development of a mathematical model for two-dimensional conditions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics12(1): 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90080-6
50.
VimalKumarSDe TavernierDvon TerziD, et al. (2024) Force partitioning analysis of vortex-induced vibrations of wind turbine tower sections. Wind Energy Sci9: 1967–1983. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-9-1967-2024
51.
ViréADerksenAFolkersmaM, et al. (2020) Two-dimensional numerical simulations of vortex-induced vibrations for a cylinder in conditions representative of wind turbine towers. Wind Energy Sci5: 793–806. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-5-793-2020
ZhangJLiuZSunK, et al. (2025) Vibration control and parametric optimization of tuned liquid column damper for offshore wind turbines during shutdown. Energy338: 138831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138831
54.
ZhaoBGaoHWangZ, et al. (2018) Shaking table test on vibration control effects of a monopile offshore wind turbine with a tuned mass damper. Wind Energy21(12): 1309–1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2256
55.
ZuoHBiKHaoH (2020) A state-of-the-art review on the vibration mitigation of wind turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews121: 109710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109710
