This study provides a decision-grade synthesis of floating vertical axis wind turbines (F-VAWTs) for deep-water wind energy, integrating device physics, platform dynamics, farm effects, and bankability over 2012–2025. Standardized searches across Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis, and SpringerLink returned 237 records; a PRISMA-aligned, motion-aware eligibility cascade and expert adjudication refined this to 123 critical studies. Publication activity rose from one paper in 2012 to a peak of 18 in 2022, then stabilized at 14 in 2023 and 12 per year in 2024–2025, signaling maturation toward fully coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic modeling. The corpus is dominated by engineering (83) and energy (76) outputs, with growing emphasis on environmental science (42) and mathematics (27), while computer science (5) and earth & planetary sciences (4) remain under-represented—highlighting opportunities for digital twins, physics-informed ML surrogates, and uncertainty-aware control. Geographically, China leads (53 studies), followed by the United Kingdom (20), with Norway and Italy (14 each) forming a robust second tier. Key outlets were Energy and Renewable Energy (∼13 each), Ocean Engineering (12), and Energies (11). Synthesized technical results show that controller-in-the-loop co-design with floater/mooring stiffness can mitigate negative aero-damping and reduce fatigue-critical load spectra; motion-conditioned array layouts (including counter-rotation and staggered spacing) can accelerate wake recovery while easing cable/tendon demands; and validated digital-twin workflows can shorten design loops and enable condition-based O&M. A phase-gated global roadmap is proposed: standards and pilots (2025–2030), 100–300 MW arrays (2031–2040), and autonomous, resilience-oriented fleets (2041–2050), supported by finance and permitting instruments that de-risk motion-coupled offshore assets.
AdjiriSDaaou NedjariH (2025) Development of HAWT wake under thermal stratification conditions. Wind Engineering49: 1133–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241269388
3.
AgborMEUdoSOEwonaIO, et al. (2023) Potential impacts of climate change on global solar radiation and PV output using the CMIP6 model in West Africa. Cleaner Engineering and Technology13: 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100630
4.
AhsanFGriffithDT (2023) Impact of aerodynamic modeling assumptions on flutter speeds of vertical-axis wind turbines. AIAA Journal61: 5377–5389. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j062912
5.
AhsanFGriffithDTGaoJ (2022) Modal dynamics and flutter analysis of floating offshore vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy185: 1284–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.041
6.
AkimotoHTanakaKUzawaK (2013) A conceptual study of floating axis water current turbine for low-cost energy capturing from river, tide and ocean currents. Renewable Energy57: 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.002
7.
AlhousniFKNwokoloSCMeyerEL, et al. (2025) Multi-scale computational fluid dynamics and machine learning integration for hydrodynamic optimization of floating photovoltaic systems. Energy Informatics8: 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-025-00567-9
8.
AnagnostopoulouCKagemotoHSaoK, et al. (2016) Concept design and dynamic analyses of a floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine: case study of power supply to offshore Greek islands. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy2: 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-015-0034-2
9.
Arredondo-GaleanaABrennanF (2021) Floating offshore vertical Axis Wind Turbines: opportunities, challenges and way forward. Energies14: 8000. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238000
10.
BarnardDRFawkesHT (2025) Simulation of performance enhancement of horizontal Axis Wind Turbine with guide ring. Wind Engineering49: 1504–1521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251355816
11.
BastinJHaribhaskaranABoopathiK, et al. (2023) Wind characteristics of Tamil Nadu Coast towards development of microgrid-A case study for simulation of small scale hybrid wind and solar energy system. Ocean Engineering277: 114282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114282
12.
BattistiLBeniniEBrighentiA, et al. (2016) Wind tunnel testing of the DeepWind demonstrator in design and tilted operating conditions. Energy111: 484–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.080
13.
BeitelmalWHNwokoloSCMeyerEL, et al. (2024) Exploring adaptation strategies to mitigate climate threats to transportation infrastructure in Nigeria: Lagos city, as a case study. Climate12: 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12080117
14.
BenatallahMBailekNBouchouichaK, et al. (2024) Solar radiation prediction in Adrar, Algeria: a case study of hybrid extreme machine-based techniques. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa68: 151–164. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-vh0u4y
15.
BianchiniABalduzziFFerraraG, et al. (2018) Detailed analysis of the wake structure of a straight-blade H-Darrieus wind turbine by means of wind tunnel experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power140: 032604. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037906
16.
Bin Abu SofianADALimHRSiti Halimatul MunawarohH, et al. (2024) Machine learning and the renewable energy revolution: exploring solar and wind energy solutions for a sustainable future including innovations in energy storage. Sustainable Development32: 3953–3978. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2885
17.
BlusseauPPatelMH (2012) Gyroscopic effects on a large vertical Axis Wind Turbine mounted on a floating structure. Renewable Energy46: 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.02.023
18.
BooSYShelleySAGriffithDT, et al. (2023) Responses of a modular floating wind TLP of MarsVAWT supporting a 10 MW vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Wind3: 513–544. https://doi.org/10.3390/wind3040029
19.
BoopathiKKushwahaRBalaramanK, et al. (2021) Assessment of wind power potential in the coastal region of Tamil Nadu, India. Ocean Engineering219: 108356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108356
20.
BoopathiKKrishnanBBastinJ, et al. (2024) Feasibility study of offshore wind energy on the Coast of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Green Energy21: 2065–2083. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2023.2281354
21.
BorgMColluM (2015a) A comparison between the dynamics of horizontal and vertical axis offshore floating wind turbines. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences373 (2035): 20140076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0076
22.
BorgMColluM (2015b) Offshore floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. Part III: hydrodynamics and coupled modelling approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews46: 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.100
23.
BorgMColluMKoliosA (2014a) Offshore floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. Part II: mooring line and structural dynamics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews39: 1226–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.122
24.
BorgMShiresAColluM (2014b) Offshore floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. Part I: aerodynamics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews39: 1214–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.096
25.
CaoQChenYZhangK, et al. (2023) Design approach of thrust-matched rotor for basin model tests of floating straight-bladed vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy15: 063308. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0176064
26.
CaoQZhangXChenY, et al. (2025) Overall design and performance analysis of the semi-submersible platform for a 10 MW vertical-Axis Wind Turbine. Energies18: 3488. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18133488
27.
CarstensenSMandviwallaXVitaL, et al. (2014) Lift of a rotating circular cylinder in unsteady flows. Journal of Ocean and Wind Energy1: 41–49.
28.
CevascoDColluMRizzoCM, et al. (2018) On mooring line tension and fatigue prediction for offshore vertical Axis Wind Turbines: a comparison of lumped mass and quasi-static approaches. Wind Engineering42: 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x18756962
29.
ChenJZhangQLiuJ, et al. (2022) Control research on axial-flux hybrid-excitation generator for offshore vertical axis maglev wind turbine. Energy Reports8: 1045–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.230
30.
ChengZWangKGaoZ, et al. (2015) Dynamic response analysis of three floating wind turbine concepts with a two-bladed darrieus rotor. Journal of Ocean and Wind Energy2: 213–222. https://doi.org/10.17736/jowe.2015.jcr33
31.
ChengZMadsenHAChaiW, et al. (2017a) A comparison of extreme structural responses and fatigue damage of semi-submersible type floating horizontal and vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy108: 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.067
32.
ChengZMadsenHAGaoZ, et al. (2017b) A fully coupled method for numerical modeling and dynamic analysis of floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy107: 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.028
33.
ChengZWenTROngMC, et al. (2019) Power performance and dynamic responses of a combined floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine and wave energy converter concept. Energy171: 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.157
34.
ChowdhuryAMAkimotoHHaraY (2016) Comparative CFD analysis of vertical Axis Wind Turbine in upright and tilted configuration. Renewable Energy85: 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.037
35.
ColluMBrennanFPatelMH (2014) Conceptual design of a floating support structure for an offshore vertical Axis Wind Turbine: the lessons learnt. Ships and Offshore Structures9: 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2012.698896
36.
Crijns-GrausWWildPAminehMP, et al. (2022) International comparison of research and investments in new renewable electricity technologies: a focus on the European Union and China. Energies15: 6383. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176383
37.
CuiJZhaiYGuoY, et al. (2023) Coupled time-domain investigation on a vertical Axis Wind Turbine supported on a floating platform. Journal of Ocean University of China22: 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-023-5148-x
38.
DabachiMRahmouniARusuE, et al. (2020) Aerodynamic simulations for floating darrieus-type wind turbines with three-stage rotors. Inventions5: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5020018
39.
DashSChakravartySGiriNC, et al. (2025) Evaluating sustainable wind energy sources with multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Computers and Electrical Engineering123: 110285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110285
40.
De TavernierDFerreiraCS (2020) A new dynamic inflow model for vertical-Axis Wind Turbines. Wind Energy23: 1196–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2480
41.
DengWYuYLiuL, et al. (2020) Research on the dynamical responses of H-type floating VAWT considering the rigid-flexible coupling effect. Journal of Sound and Vibration469: 115162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115162
42.
DengWLiuLLiY, et al. (2022b) Slack coupled modeling method and dynamic analysis on floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine with helical blades. Ocean Engineering246: 110616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110616
43.
DengWGuoYLiH (2022a) Effect of helical twist angle on the aerodynamic performance and blade dynamic characteristics of floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Marine Structures83: 103172. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103172
44.
DengWGuoYLiuL, et al. (2023) Dynamic response analysis of a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine with helical blades based on the model test. Ocean Engineering273: 113930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113930
45.
DengWLiuLDaiY, et al. (2024a) A prediction method for blade deformations of large-scale FVAWTs using dynamics theory and machine learning techniques. Energy304: 132211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132211
46.
DengWLiuLLinZ, et al. (2024b) Comparative study of dynamic characteristics between a FHAWT and a helical type FVAWT. Ocean Engineering311: 118981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118981
47.
DevinMCMendozaNRPlattA, et al. (2023) Enabling floating offshore VAWT design by coupling OWENS and OpenFAST. Energies16: 2462. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052462
48.
FranchinaNPersicoGSaviniM (2020) Three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamics of a H-shaped vertical Axis Wind Turbine over the full operating range. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics206: 104273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104273
49.
GaoJGriffithDTSakibMS, et al. (2022) A semi-coupled aero-servo-hydro numerical model for floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines operating on TLPs. Renewable Energy181: 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.076
50.
GhigoAFaraggianaEGiorgiG, et al. (2024) Floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines for offshore applications among potentialities and challenges: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews193: 114302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114302
GrzelakJCarrilloLGNakielskiJ, et al. (2024) An innovative floating system with a savonius rotor as a horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine. Polish Maritime Research31: 13–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2024-0017
54.
GuoYLiuLLiY, et al. (2019) The surge-heave-pitch coupling motions of the Φ-type vertical Axis Wind Turbine supported by the truss spar floating foundation. Journal of Hydrodynamics31: 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0158-7
55.
HandBCashmanA (2020) A review on the historical development of the lift-type vertical Axis Wind Turbine: from onshore to offshore floating application. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments38: 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100646
56.
HandBCashmanAKellyG (2017a) A low-order model for offshore floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine aerodynamics. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications53: 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2016.2606088
57.
HandBKellyGCashmanA (2017b) Numerical simulation of a vertical Axis Wind Turbine airfoil experiencing dynamic stall at high Reynolds numbers. Computers and Fluids149: 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.02.021
58.
HaoWAbdiAZhangL, et al. (2024) Performance and mechanism of adaptive pitch control in a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine with a surge motion. Energy308: 132896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132896
59.
HassanMABailekNBouchouichaK, et al. (2022) Evaluation of energy extraction of PV systems affected by environmental factors under real outdoor conditions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology150: 715–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04166-6
HuCMaYLiL, et al. (2020) Coupled motion prediction of a floating tidal current power station with vertical axis twin-rotor turbine. Journal of Coastal Research103: 784–788. https://doi.org/10.2112/si103-162.1
62.
HuCGongHLiH, et al. (2025) Optimized short-term wind power forecasting based on a combination feature selection and greater cane rat algorithm. Wind Engineering49: 1384–1398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251314114
63.
HuangPMengXZhangN, et al. (2025) Research on an evaluation method of day-ahead wind power consumption capacity of the distribution network based on comprehensive evaluation theory. Wind Engineering49(6): 1543–1564. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X251345993
64.
HulioZH (2025) Assessment of wind energy potential of remote area of Umerkot site, empowering the local population with renewable energy. Wind Engineering49: 1187–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251315384
65.
IkomaTTanLMoritsuS, et al. (2021) Motion characteristics of a barge-type floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine with moonpools. Ocean Engineering230: 109006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109006
IwamatsuSSuzukiHNiheiY (2022) Study on elastic response of double-rotor VAWTs. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering10: 1400. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10101400
68.
IwamatsuSKusanagiKSrinivasamurthyS, et al. (2023) Turning motion of multi-connection cross-flow vertical axis offshore wind turbines tension moored at a single point. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy9: 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-023-00281-2
69.
JiangYChengZChenP, et al. (2023) Performance-scaled rotor design method for model testing of floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines in wave basins. Renewable Energy219: 119425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119425
70.
JiangYChenPWangS, et al. (2024) Dynamic responses of a 5 MW semi-submersible floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine: a model test study in the wave basin. Ocean Engineering296: 117000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117000
71.
JiangYChengZChenP, et al. (2025a) Effects of aerodynamic damping and gyroscopic moments on dynamic responses of a semi-submersible floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine: an experimental study. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering147: 022004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066493
72.
JiangYChengZDengS, et al. (2025b) An experimental study on the strain responses of blades and struts of a 5MW semi-submersible floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine. Marine Structures102: 103794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2025.103794
73.
KabouriOAzeroualMBagayogoA, et al. (2025) Optimized energy management in hybrid PV-wind microgrids: fuzzy logic controller-based strategy with hydrogen system integration for DC bus stability. Wind Engineering49: 1417–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251367997
74.
KannerSKoukinaEYeungRW (2019) Power optimization of model-scale floating wind turbines using real-time hybrid testing with autonomous actuation and control. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering141: 031902. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041995
75.
KeleleHKKahsayMBNielsenTK (2025) Advancing wind turbine load mitigation: a novel beam/cable support system approach for enhanced structural integrity in extreme wind conditions. Wind Engineering49: 1169–1186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251356303
76.
Kheder-HaddoucheSNedjariHDLouassaS (2025) Improving the wind map using interpolation approach: case study of a southeastern region of Algeria. Wind Engineering49: 1157–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241269404
77.
KouaissahOFranchinaNPersicoG (2024) 3D CFD study of a DeepWind demonstrator at design, off-design and tilted operating conditions. Energy291: 130313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130313
78.
KouaissahOFranchinaNPersicoG (2025) A computational fluid dynamics study on the performance of modified H-Shaped VAWTs for tilted operation condition. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power147: 051017. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066615
79.
KuangLLuQHuangX, et al. (2022) Characterization of wake interference between two tandem offshore floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbines: effect of platform pitch motion. Energy Conversion and Management265: 115769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115769
80.
LajnefMMosbahiMAbidH, et al. (2025) Experimental and numerical investigation of Zephyr-type wind turbine. Wind Engineering49: 1103–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241269359
81.
LeeHPoguluriSKBaeYH (2022) Development and verification of a dynamic analysis model for floating offshore contra-rotating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine. Energy240: 122492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122492
82.
LeeCFChengZOngMC, et al. (2023) Extreme response analysis of a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine based on modified environmental contour method. Ocean Engineering270: 113459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113459
83.
LeeYParkJChungWC (2025) Dynamic response of a floating dual vertical-axis tidal turbine system with taut and catenary mooring under extreme environmental conditions in non-operating mode. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering13: 1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13071315
84.
LeiHZhouDBaoY, et al. (2017a) Numerical simulations of the unsteady aerodynamics of a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine in surge motion. Energy127: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.087
85.
LeiHZhouDLuJ, et al. (2017b) The impact of pitch motion of a platform on the aerodynamic performance of a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Energy119: 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.086
86.
LeiHSuJBaoY, et al. (2019) Investigation of wake characteristics for the offshore floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines in pitch and surge motions of platforms. Energy166: 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.101
87.
LeroyVGilloteauxJCLynchM, et al. (2019) Impact of aerodynamic modelling on seakeeping performance of a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Wind Energy22: 1175–1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2348
88.
LiYLiuLGuoY, et al. (2022) Numerical prediction on the dynamic response of a helical floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine based on an aero-hydro-mooring-control coupled model. Energies15: 3726. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103726
89.
LiuLGuoYZhaoH, et al. (2017) Motions of a 5 MW floating VAWT evaluated by numerical simulations and model tests. Ocean Engineering144: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.004
90.
LiuLZhaoHXuW, et al. (2018) Structural strength analysis of a tri-floater floating foundation for offshore VAWT. Journal of Ocean University of China17: 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-018-3434-9
91.
LiuLZhaoHZhaoJR, et al. (2019) Motions of the floating VAWT considering the viscous damping of the spar type floating foundation. Chuan Bo Li Xue/Journal of Ship Mechanics23: 1110–1121.
92.
LiuQBashirMIglesiasG, et al. (2024) Investigation of aero-hydro-elastic-mooring behavior of a H-type floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine using coupled CFD-FEM method. Applied Energy372: 123816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123816
93.
LiuDDengWLiuL, et al. (2025) A numerical framework for analyzing the coupled aero-wake-hydro-structural dynamics of large floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Energy335: 137941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137941
94.
LuoWLiuWYangM, et al. (2023) Load characteristics and extreme response of straight-bladed floating VAWT using a fully coupled model. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering11: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11010185
95.
LuoWLiuWChenS, et al. (2024) Development and application of an FSI model for floating VAWT by coupling CFD and FEA. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering12: 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040683
96.
MaYHuCLiL (2021) Hydrodynamics and wake flow analysis of a Π-type vertical axis twin-rotor tidal current turbine in surge motion. Ocean Engineering224: 108625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108625
97.
MaftouniNLivaniAJ (2025) A CFD study of the effects of shroud geometry and flange thickness on the harvested power of a shrouded micro wind turbine. Wind Engineering49: 1325–1346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251317186
98.
MartenDBianchiniAPechlivanoglouG, et al. (2017) Effects of airfoil's polar data in the stall region on the estimation of darrieus wind turbine performance. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power139: 022606. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034326
99.
MartenDPechlivanoglouGNayeriCN, et al. (2018) Nonlinear lifting line theory applied to vertical Axis Wind Turbines: development of a practical design tool. Journal of Fluids Engineering140(2): 021107. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037978
100.
MartinHSpanoGKüsterJF, et al. (2013) Application and extension of the TOPSIS method for the assessment of floating offshore wind turbine support structures. Ships and Offshore Structures8: 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2012.718957
101.
MerzKSvendsenHG (2013) A control algorithm for the deepwind floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy5: 063136. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4854675
102.
MezianeFBoudiaSMNouicerI, et al. (2025) Assessing offshore wind plants for energy and green hydrogen production: a case study in the Mostaganem coastal region, Algeria. Wind Engineering49: 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241269367
103.
MohamedOSMelaniPFBalduzziF, et al. (2022) An insight on the key factors influencing the accuracy of the actuator line method for use in vertical-axis turbines: limitations and open challenges. Energy Conversion and Management270: 116249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116249
104.
MooreKEnnisBL (2022) Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine steady and Unsteady aerodynamics for curved deforming blades. AIAA Journal60: 189–196. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j060476
105.
NwokoloSC (2025) Assessing the role of material substitution in cost reduction and demand mitigation for sustainable wind energy infrastructure. Cleaner Chemical Engineering11: 100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clce.2025.100203
106.
NwokoloSCOgbulezieJC (2018) A qualitative review of empirical models for estimating diffuse solar radiation from experimental data in Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews92: 353–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.118
107.
NwokoloSCAmadiSOObiwuluAU, et al. (2022a) Prediction of global solar radiation potential for sustainable and cleaner energy generation using improved Angstrom-Prescott and Gumbel probabilistic models. Cleaner Engineering and Technology6: 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100416
108.
NwokoloSCObiwuluAUOgbulezieJC, et al. (2022b) Hybridization of statistical machine learning and numerical models for improving beam, diffuse and global solar radiation prediction. Cleaner Engineering and Technology9: 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100529
109.
NwokoloSCObiwuluAUOgbulezieJC (2023a) Machine learning and analytical model hybridization to assess the impact of climate change on solar PV energy production. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth130: 103389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2023.103389
110.
NwokoloSCOgbulezieJCUshieOJ (2023b) A multi-model ensemble-based CMIP6 assessment of future solar radiation and PV potential under various climate warming scenarios. Optik285: 170956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170956
111.
NwokoloSCEyimeEEObiwuluAU, et al. (2024a) A multi-model approach based on CARIMA-SARIMA-GPM for assessing the impacts of climate change on concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) potential. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth134: 103560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2024.103560
112.
NwokoloSCObiwuluAUOkonkwoPC, et al. (2025a) Machine learning and physics-based model hybridization to assess the impact of climate change on single- and dual-axis tracking solar-concentrated photovoltaic systems. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth138: 103881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2025.103881
113.
NwokoloSCSinghRKhanS, et al. (2024b) Technological Pathways for Africa's Net-Zero Economy: Technology Solutions to Unlock Africa's Sustainable Future. Elsevier, 2024.
114.
NwokoloSCUdoSOEbongED, et al. (2025b) Machine learning and analytical hybridization models for evaluating climate change impacts on solar agrivoltaic systems and photosynthetically active radiation in Nigeria. Energy Reports14: 4015–4055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.026
115.
NwokoloSCAlsenaniTROkonkwoPC, et al. (2026) Hybridized forecasting and climate change impact analysis of six solar PV technologies under CMIP6-SSP scenarios. Energy Reports15: 108972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.108972
116.
ObiwuluAUChendoMACErusiafeN, et al. (2020) Implicit meteorological parameter-based empirical models for estimating back temperature solar modules under varying tilt-angles in Lagos, Nigeria. Renewable Energy145: 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.136
117.
ObiwuluAUErusiafeNOlopadeMA, et al. (2022) Modeling and estimation of the optimal tilt angle, maximum incident solar radiation, and global radiation index of the photovoltaic system. Heliyon8: e09598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09598
118.
OkonkwoPCNwokoloSCAlarifiSS, et al. (2025a) Bio-inspired computational intelligence metaheuristic-based optimization and sensitivity analysis approach to determine techno-economic feasibility of hydrogen refueling stations for fuel cell vehicles. Scientific Reports15: 12451. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97088-y
119.
OkonkwoPCNwokoloSCAlsenaniTR, et al. (2025b) Modeling the interactive impacts of freight movement and passenger travel patterns on Turkey’s energy consumption demand. Transportation Safety and Environment7: tdaf050. https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdaf050
120.
OkonkwoPCNwokoloSCMeyerEL, et al. (2025c) Techno-economic optimization of renewable hydrogen infrastructure via AI-based dynamic pricing. Scientific Reports15: 31529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17506-z
121.
OkonkwoPCNwokoloSCUdoSO, et al. (2025d) Solar PV systems under weather extremes: case studies, classification, vulnerability assessment, and adaptation pathways. Energy Reports13: 929–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.12.067
122.
OkonkwoPCNwokoloSCAlsenaniTR, et al. (2026a) A hybrid CARIMA-SARIMA-logistic model for multi-scenario hydrogen demand forecasting: insights from global economies. Energy Reports15: 108982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.108982
123.
OkonkwoPCNwokoloSCMeyerEL, et al. (2026b) Reinforcement learning-driven stochastic optimization and blockchain-enabled demand response to determine the techno-economic feasibility of hydrogen fueling stations in Australia. Energy Reports15: 108949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.108949
124.
PourjafarRHansenMORazzaghiJ (2025) Passive control of wind turbine tower using nonlinear magnetic vibration absorber and eddy current damping. Wind Engineering49(6): 1439–1457. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X251317514
125.
RajeswariKNallayarasuS (2022) Experimental and numerical investigation on the suitability of semi-submersible floaters to support vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Ships and Offshore Structures17: 1743–1754. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2021.1938800
126.
RangarajASrinathYBoopathiK, et al. (2024) Statistical post-processing of numerical weather prediction data using distribution-based scaling for wind energy. Wind engineering48: 824–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241238353
127.
RaschioniFLongoRMehmanparastA, et al. (2020) Mooring system design and verification for a floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Journal of Multiscale Modelling11: 2050003. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1756973720500031
128.
RathinavelARamyaR (2025) Offshore wind energy in India: a comprehensive review and strategic prospects. Wind Engineering49: 1565–1587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251383624
129.
RaturiASJarialRKSoodYR (2025) Modified GWO algorithm-based optimal power flow analysis integrated with renewable energy sources and plug-in electric vehicles. Wind Engineering49: 1458–1486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251345549
130.
RehmanSAlhemsLMAlamMM, et al. (2023) A review of energy extraction from wind and ocean: technologies, merits, efficiencies, and cost. Ocean Engineering267: 113192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113192
131.
Rosado HauNAugierBPaillardB, et al. (2023) The assessment of a fast computational method in predicting the unsteady loads of vertical Axis Wind Turbines undergoing floating motion. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics240: 105449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105449
132.
SakibMSGriffithDT (2022) Parked and operating load analysis in the aerodynamic design of multi-megawatt-scale floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbines. Wind Energy Science7: 677–696. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-677-2022
133.
Salvador-GutiérrezBSánchez CortezLHinojosa-ManriqueM, et al. (2025) Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines in emerging energy applications (1979–2025): global trends and technological gaps revealed by a bibliometric analysis and review. Energies18(14): 3810. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en18143810
134.
Samuel ChukwujinduN (2017) A comprehensive review of empirical models for estimating global solar radiation in Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews78: 955–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.101
135.
SengaHUmemotoHAkimotoH (2022) Verification of tilt effect on the performance and wake of a vertical Axis Wind Turbine by lifting line theory simulation. Energies15: 6939. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196939
136.
SengaHKunishiKFujitaG, et al. (2024) Experimental study for understanding the characteristics of a floating Axis Wind Turbine under wind and wave conditions. Energies17: 3285. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133285
137.
ShakenovKAzatSAskarulyK, et al. (2025) Improving the efficiency of a closed-type wind turbine through an integrated approach. Wind Engineering49: 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251374548
138.
ShiresA (2013) Design optimisation of an offshore vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Energy166: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1680/ener.12.00007
139.
Stallon Samuel RajDRajkumar ManokaranNMuthusamyS, et al. (2025) A novel method for fault detection and diagnosis in DFIG coupled grid connected wind energy systems using spiking deep residual network. Wind Engineering49: 1233–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241307315
140.
SuJLiYChenY, et al. (2021) Aerodynamic performance assessment of φ-type vertical Axis Wind Turbine under pitch motion. Energy225: 120202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120202
141.
SunXZhuJHanifA, et al. (2020) Effects of blade shape and its corresponding moment of inertia on self-starting and power extraction performance of the novel bowl-shaped floating straight-bladed vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments38: 100648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100648
142.
TanLIkomaTAidaY, et al. (2021) Mean wave drift forces on a barge-type floating wind turbine platform with moonpools. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering9: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9070709
143.
TandeJOGMerzKPaulsenU, et al. (2015) Floating offshore turbines. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment4: 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.130
144.
ThomasMBoettcherNHuishC, et al. (2025) Assessing wind turbine blade durability longevity utilizing national renewable energy laboratory tools. Wind Engineering49: 1145–1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x241269390
145.
TummalaSRPendyalaS (2025) Design methodology and geometry optimization for wind turbine towers. Wind Engineering49: 1399–1416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251362688
146.
VeeramanikandanPVeenaGNGGiri PrasadR, et al. (2025) Optimizing DC-DC converter topologies for enhanced efficiency in hybrid renewable energy systems using hybrid techniques. Wind Engineering49(6): 1487–1503. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X251347665
147.
VeerasamyBShuaib YassinMSampathS (2025) Enhanced power quality in a transformer-less eleven-level cascaded H-bridge inverter with hybrid PV-wind sources using enhanced Humboldt squid optimization. Wind Engineering49: 1359–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524x251371552
148.
VergaerdeADe TroyerTCarbó MolinaA, et al. (2019) Design, manufacturing and validation of a vertical-Axis Wind Turbine setup for wind tunnel tests. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics193: 103949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.103949
149.
VergaerdeADe TroyerTMuggiascaS, et al. (2020) Experimental characterisation of the wake behind paired vertical-Axis Wind Turbines. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics206: 104353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104353
150.
WangKMoanTHansenMOL (2016) Stochastic dynamic response analysis of a floating vertical-Axis Wind Turbine with a semi-submersible floater. Wind Energy19: 1853–1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1955
151.
WenTRWangKChengZ, et al. (2018) Spar-type vertical-Axis Wind Turbines in moderate water depth: a feasibility study. Energies11: 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11030555
152.
XuGLiHWangS (2019) Numerical study on the vertical-axis tidal current turbine with coupled motions (part I). Journal of Coastal Research97: 273–288. https://doi.org/10.2112/si97-040.1
153.
YangYPengBWangJ, et al. (2023) A short review on the time-domain numerical simulations for structural responses in horizontal-axis offshore wind turbines. Sustainability15(24): 16878. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416878
154.
YangHZhengXChenY, et al. (2024) Coupled dynamic response and energy conversion characteristics of 10 MW floating vertical Axis Wind Turbine with different configurations. Ocean Engineering309: 118610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118610
155.
YangHZhaoMTianZ, et al. (2025) Aerodynamic response and wake evolution of floating vertical Axis Wind Turbines under different motion modes and parameters. Energy337: 138680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138680
156.
YeYLuYWangS, et al. (2025) Speed control and hydrodynamic performance analysis of vertical axis tidal turbine under surge motion. Renewable Energy251: 123464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123464
157.
ZhangLWangAQuJ, et al. (2023) Study on aerodynamic performance of inverted cone vertical Axis Wind Turbine with different rotor configurations. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy15: 033305. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145195
158.
ZhaoZWangDWangT, et al. (2022) A review: approaches for aerodynamic performance improvement of lift-type vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments49: 101789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101789
159.
ZhengXYZhengHDLeiY, et al. (2019) Offshore steel fish farming facility integrated with multi vertical-Axis Wind Turbines: a conceptual design and hydrodynamic analysis. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering8: 133–139.
160.
ZhengXYZhengHDLeiY, et al. (2020) An offshore floating wind–solar–aquaculture system: concept design and extreme response in survival conditions. Energies13: 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030604
161.
ZhengXYZhengHDLeiY, et al. (2021) Nonlinear stochastic responses of a newly developed floating wind-solar-aquaculture system. Ocean Engineering241: 110055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110055
162.
ZhengHDZhengXYLeiY, et al. (2022) Experimental validation on the dynamic response of a novel floater uniting a vertical-Axis Wind Turbine with a steel fishing cage. Ocean Engineering243: 110257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110257
