Wind energy development requires accurate resource assessment at increasing turbine hub heights. Tall meteorological masts are costly and logistically complex, making remote sensing technologies like SoDAR a practical alternative—provided they are rigorously validated. This study validates a Vaisala Triton SoDAR against a 120 m met mast over 1 year at the Kayathar site in India. Correlation analysis of 10-minute records at 60 m, 90 m, and 120 m revealed strong agreement in wind speed (R2 > 0.95) and direction (R2 > 0.99), with minor deviations at greater heights. A comparison of Power Law and Logarithmic Law extrapolation methods showed comparable results below 60 m, but notable divergence above that level, highlighting the need for height-dependent wind shear coefficients. The findings offer practical guidance for wind measurement and prediction, with direct relevance to modern tall wind turbine deployments.
Bañuelos-RuedasFAngeles-CamachoCRios-MarcuelloS (2010) Analysis and validation of the methodology used in the extrapolation of wind speed data at different heights. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews14(8): 2383–2391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.05.001
2.
BradleyS (2013) Aspects of the correlation between sodar and mast instrument winds. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology30(10): 2241–2247. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-12-00256.1
3.
CaiBVoPSritharanS, et al. (2021) Wind energy potential at elevated hub heights in the US Midwest region. Journal of Energy Engineering147(4): 04021023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000760
4.
CañadillasBWesterhellwegANeumannT (2020) Testing the performance of a ground-based wind LiDAR system: One-year intercomparison at the offshore platform FINO1. DEWI Magazin38: 58–64.
5.
CariouNWagnerRGottschallJ (2010) Analysis of vertical wind direction and speed gradients for data from the met. In: Mast at Høvsøre. Risoe-R No. 1733(EN). Danmarks Tekniske Universitet. Risø Nationallaboratoriet for Bæredygtig Energi.
6.
CliftonAHodgeBMDraxlC, et al. (2018) Wind and solar resource assessments for the United States and its territories. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews82: 1611–1625.
7.
CorscaddenKWThomsonAYoonesiB, et al. (2016) The impact of variable wind shear coefficients on risk reduction of wind energy projects. International Scholarly Research Notices2016: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5790464
8.
ElkintonMRRogersALMcGowanJG (2006) An investigation of wind-shear models and experimental data trends for different terrains. Wind Engineering30(4): 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1260/030952406779295417
9.
EmeisS (2014) Current issues in wind energy meteorology. Meteorological Applications21(4): 803–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1472
10.
EmeisS (2018) Wind Energy Meteorology: Atmospheric Physics for Wind Power Generation. 2nd edition. Springer International Publishing.
GottschallJCourtneyMSWagnerR, et al. (2012) Lidar profilers in the context of wind energy — a verification procedure for traceable measurements. Wind Energy15(1): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.518
13.
GualtieriG (2017) Wind resource extrapolating tools for modern multi-MW wind turbines: Comparison of the Deaves and Harris model vs. the power law. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics170: 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.08.007
14.
GualtieriGSecciS (2012) Methods to extrapolate wind resource to the turbine hub height based on power law: a 1-h wind speed vs. Weibull distribution extrapolation comparison. Renewable Energy43: 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.12.022
HasagerCBVejenFBechJI, et al. (2023) Assessment of the rain and wind retrieval from the RainCube radar for wind energy applications. Remote Sensing15(9): 2285. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092285
17.
IEA Wind Task 32 (2021) Wind Lidar Systems: Roadmap for Wind Energy Applications. International Energy Agency. Available at: https://iea-wind.org/task32/
18.
IEC 61400-12-1 (2017) Wind Turbines – Part 12-1: Power Performance Measurements of Electricity Producing Wind Turbines. 1st edition. International Electrotechnical Commission.
19.
KimDKimTOhG, et al. (2021) A comparison of ground-based LiDAR and met mast wind measurements for wind resource assessment over various terrain conditions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics158: 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104587
20.
LabanONMaghangaCMJoashK (2019) Determination of the surface roughness parameter and wind shear exponent of Kisii region from the on-site measurement of wind profiles. Journal of Energy2019: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8264061
21.
LantzERobertsONunemakerJ, et al. (2019) Increasing Wind Turbine Tower Heights: Opportunities and Challenges. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-73629.
22.
LuoWTaylorMCParkerSR (2008) A comparison of spatial interpolation methods to estimate continuous wind speed surfaces using irregularly distributed data from England and Wales. International Journal of Climatology28(7): 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1583
23.
MaXYanJHanS, et al. (2014) Research on fitting method of wind shear exponent in wind farm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Renewable Power Generation Conference (RPG 2014). Institution of Engineering and Technology, pp. 1–6.
24.
MachidonDIstrateMBeniugaR (2024) Wind shear coefficient estimation based on LIDAR measurements to improve power law extrapolation performance. Remote Sensing17(1): 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010023
25.
ManwellJFMcGowanJGRogersAL (2009) Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons.
26.
MEASNET (2022) Procedure: Evaluation of Site-specific Wind Conditions. Version 3. MEASNET.
NedaeiMAssarehEBiglariM (2014) An extensive evaluation of wind resource using new methods and strategies for development and utilizing wind power in Mah-shahr station in Iran. Energy Conversion and Management81: 475–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.025
29.
OptisMBodiniNDebnathM, et al. (2021) New methods to improve the vertical extrapolation of near-surface offshore wind speeds. Wind Energy Science6(4): 935–948. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-935-2021
30.
PérezIAGarcíaMASánchezML, et al. (2004) Analysis of height variations of sodar-derived wind speeds in Northern Spain. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics92(10): 875–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.05.002
PichaultMVincentCSkidmoreG, et al. (2021) Characterization of wind gusts: a focus on their impact on the fluctuating wind power. Energies14(21): 7190. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217190
33.
RayMLRogersALMcGowanJG (2006) Analysis of wind shear models and trends in different terrainsProceedings of the American Wind Energy Association Windpower Conference. AWEA. [Note: URL missing from manuscript — please verify].
34.
Renewable Energy Task Force (2023) Best practices for wind measurement campaigns in complex terrain. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy15(3): 033301. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0139847
35.
SantosPMannJVasiljevicN, et al. (2020) Turbulence characterization with a Doppler lidar for wind energy applications. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1618(3): 032048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032048
36.
ŞenZAltunkaynakAErdikT (2012) Wind velocity vertical extrapolation by extended power law. Advances in Meteorology2012: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/178623
37.
TroenIPetersenEL (1989) European Wind Atlas. Risø National Laboratory.
38.
VasiljevićNVignaroliABechJI, et al. (2022) Digitalization of scanning lidar measurement campaigns for enhanced wind resource assessment. Wind Energy Science7(2): 593–612. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-593-2022
