This study presents a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) investigation of a flanged conical diffuser, focusing on the aerodynamic benefits of integrating an inlet nose geometry. Simulations were conducted in Ansys 2019 R3 using the SST k–ω turbulence model with non-linear eddy viscosity corrections to capture flow separation and reattachment. Validation against experimental data showed excellent agreement for the baseline case. The nosed configuration yielded marked improvements: higher peak velocity ratios, increased maximum pressure coefficients, and enhanced overall pressure recovery. Flow-field analysis revealed that the inlet nose effectively mitigates adverse pressure gradients, delays boundary layer separation, and weakens recirculation zones. Turbulence kinetic energy was significantly reduced near walls and in the core region, indicating lower energy dissipation. Overall, the results demonstrate that the nose geometry functions as an efficient passive flow control device, offering substantial aerodynamic gains for diffuser-augmented wind turbines and other renewable energy systems.
AbeK-IOhyaY (2004) An investigation of flow fields around flanged diffusers using CFD. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics92(3–4): 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.12.003
2.
AbeKJangY-JLeschzinerMA (2003) An investigation of wall-anisotropy expressions and length-scale equations for non-linear eddy-viscosity models. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow24(2): 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-727x(02)00237-0
3.
AlmeidaPCostaVDa SilvaA, et al. (2023) Structural and aerodynamic optimization of small-scale diffuser-augmented wind turbines. Energy Reports9: 1256–1271.
4.
AndersonJD (2011) Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. McGraw-Hill.
5.
AranakeACLakshminarayanVKDuraisamyK (2015) Computational analysis of shrouded wind turbine configurations using a 3D RANS solver. Journal of Fluids Engineering137(2): 021103.
6.
BardinaJEHuangPGCoakleyTJ (1997) Turbulence modeling validation, testing, and development. NASA Technical Memorandum1(NASA Ames Research Center): 110446.
7.
BetzA (1920) Das Maximum der theoretisch m¨oglichen Ausn¨utzung des Windes durch Windmotoren. Zeitschrift f¨ur das gesamte Turbinenwesen26: 307–309.
8.
BurtonTJenkinsNSharpeD, et al. (2011) Wind Energy Handbook. John Wiley Sons.
9.
CebeciTBradshawP (1977) Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers. Hemisphere Publishing.
10.
CelikIBGhiaURoachePJ, et al. (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering130(7): 078001.
11.
ChenXTanakaRRyiJ, et al. (2022) Advanced wall treatment methods for y+ insensitive near-wall modeling in RANS simulations. AIAA Journal60(4): 2156–2170.
DavidsonL (2017) Fluid Mechanics, Turbulent Flow and Turbulence Modeling. Chalmers University of Technology.
14.
DurbinPAReifBAP (2011) Statistical Theory and Modeling for Turbulent Flows. John Wiley Sons.
15.
ErikssonSBernhoffHLeijonM (2008) Evaluation of different turbine concepts for wind power. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews12(5): 1419–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.017
16.
FerzigerJHPericM (2002) Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer.
17.
FujimotoTNakayamaYShengW, et al. (2023) High-fidelity LES analysis of vortex dynamics in flanged diffusers. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics238: 105423.
18.
Gad-el-HakM (2000) Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management. Cambridge University Press.
19.
GarciaMSantosPOliveiraT, et al. (2023) Mesh quality metrics for accurate prediction of boundary layer separation in CFD simulations. Journal of Computational Physics486: 112145.
20.
GWEC (2023) Global Wind Report 2023. Global Wind Energy Council.
21.
HansenMOL (2015) Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines. Routledge.
22.
IEA (2023) Renewables 2023: Analysis and Forecast to 2028. International Energy Agency.
23.
IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press.
24.
JamiesonP (2011) Innovation in Wind Turbine Design. John Wiley Sons.
25.
KatzJPlotkinA (2001) Low-Speed Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
26.
KumarSPatelVSelvarajM, et al. (2022) Experimental investigation of inlet geometry effects on diffuser performance. Journal of Fluids Engineering144(8): 081402.
27.
LaunderBESpaldingDB (1974) The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering3(2): 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
28.
LiHThompsonDSpietzH, et al. (2022) Performance benchmarking of various turbulence models for ducted flow applications. Applied Mathematical Modelling108: 1–18.
29.
ManwellJFMcGowanJGRogersAL (2009) Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. John Wiley Sons.
MenterFRFerreiraJCTofaneliL, et al. (2023) The SST turbulence model with improved curvature correction for rotating and curved flows. Computers & Fluids258: 105833.
32.
MoriartyPHonneryD (2019) Small-scale wind energy: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews116: 109433.
33.
NguyenTSchmidtJKrammG, et al. (2023) Sustainable design approaches for urban wind energy harvesting systems. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments57: 103245.
34.
OhyaYKarasudaniT (2010) A shrouded wind turbine generating high output power with wind-lens technology. Energies3(4): 634–649. https://doi.org/10.3390/en3040634
35.
ParkJLeeSKimH (2023) Experimental validation of CFD predictions for flanged diffuser performance using PIV measurements. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science142: 110835.
36.
PatankarSV (1980) Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow. Hemisphere Publishing.
37.
PhillipsDG (2003) An Investigation on Diffuser Augmented Wind Turbine Design. PhD Thesis. University of Auckland.
38.
PopeSB (2000) Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.
39.
REN21 (2023). Renewables 2023 global status report.
40.
RoachePJ (1998) Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers.
41.
RodriguezAMartinezLMagalhãesT, et al. (2022) Quantitative analysis of turbulence kinetic energy transport in separated diffuser flows. Physics of Fluids34(7): 075115.
ShihTHLiouWWShabbirA, et al. (1995) A new k-eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids24(3): 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-t
44.
SilvaRJohnsonMRamos GarciaN, et al. (2023) Passive flow control techniques for performance enhancement of diffuser-augmented wind turbines. Renewable Energy210: 632–645.
SpezialeCG (1991) Analytical methods for the development of Reynolds-stress closures in turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics23(1): 107–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.23.1.107
48.
TennekesHLumleyJL (1972) A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
49.
ToshimitsuKKikugawaHSatoK, et al. (2008) Investigation of the effect of flange on the performance of a wind turbine with a brimmed diffuser. Journal of Thermal Science17(3): 225–230.
50.
Van BusselGJW (2007) The science of making more torque from wind: diffuser experiments and theory revisited. Journal of Physics: Conference Series75: 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012010
51.
VermaASJiangZRenZ, et al. (2021) Diffuser augmented wind turbine (DAWT) technologies: a review. International Journal of Energy Research45(5): 6513–6542.
52.
VersteegHKMalalasekeraW (2007) An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. Pearson Education.
53.
WhiteFM (2011) Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill.
54.
WilcoxDC (2006) Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries.
55.
ZhangHLiuYWangC (2022) Enhanced non-linear eddy viscosity models for separated flows in diffusing passages. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow96: 109024.
