This research assesses the offshore wind resource in the Administrative Marine Zone of Tamaulipas using an integrated methodology based on Geographic Information Systems. Following various published methodologies and relevant literature, a set of exclusion criteria is defined, grouped into three categories: techno-economic, social, and environmental. Additionally, the energy performance of different wind turbines is compared under the site’s specific conditions to identify the most suitable model for the marine zone. The results of the study indicate that 1.33% of the area is available for wind turbine installation, distributed across two optimal zones for offshore wind farm development. Together, these areas could support an installed capacity of approximately 12,068.1 MW of electric power.
Arenas-LópezJPBadaouiM (2022) Analysis of the offshore wind resource and its economic assessment in two zones of Mexico. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments52: 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.101997
2.
Bahamonde GarcíaMI (2019) Estudio Del Potencial Eólico En Mar Abierto Y Optimización De La Producción Energética En La Implantación De Parques Eólicos Marinos. Universidad de Huelva. Available at. https://hdl.handle.net/10272/17057
Bernal-CamachoDFFontesJVHMendozaE (2022) A technical assessment of offshore wind energy in Mexico: a case study in tehuantepec gulf. Energies15(12): 4367. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124367
CavazziSDuttonAG (2016) An offshore wind energy geographic information system (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK’s offshore wind energy potential. Renewable Energy87: 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.021
7.
ChauhanPJa’fariMJaworskiAJ (2025) A numerical study of horizontal axis wind turbine blade contamination: aerodynamic and sustainable impacts. Renewable Energy256: 124033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.124033
8.
Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP)n.d. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, Available at. https://www.gob.mx/conanp
CurcioEDi ProfioGFontananovaE, et al. (2015) Membrane technologies for seawater desalination and brackish water treatment. In: Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment. Elsevier, pp. 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-121-4.00013-7
11.
de Prado GonzálezI (2018) Estudio De Implantación De Un Parque Eólico Offshore Flotante En La Costa De Cantabria. Universidad de Cantabria. Available at. https://hdl.handle.net/10902/13336
12.
DíazHGuedes SoaresC (2020) An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews134: 110328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110328
13.
DíazHLoughneySWangJ, et al. (2022) Comparison of multicriteria analysis techniques for decision making on floating offshore wind farms site selection. Ocean Engineering248: 110751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110751
14.
GaertnerERinkerJSethuramanL, et al. (2020) Definition of the IEA 15-megawatt Offshore Reference Wind. Golden, CO: NREL. Available at. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf
HannesdóttirÁKralSTReuderJ, et al. (2024) Rain erosion atlas for wind turbine blades based on ERA5 and NORA3 for scandinavia. Results in Engineering22: 102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102010
Hernández GalvezGLiévano ChuckDMartínez SarracinoO, et al. (2022) Harnessing offshore wind energy along the Mexican coastline in the gulf of Mexico—An exploratory study including sustainability criteria. Sustainability14(10): 5877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105877
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2024) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023. International Renewable Energy Agency.
22.
JasaJBortolottiPZalkindD, et al. (2021) Effectively Using Multifidelity Optimization for Wind Turbine Design. Wind Energy Science Discussions, pp. 1–22.
KuckshinrichsW (2021) LCOE: a useful and valid indicator—Replica to james loewen and adam szymanski. Energies14(2): 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020406
LoewenJ (2020) LCOE is an undiscounted metric that inaccurately disfavors renewable energy resources. The Electricity Journal33(6): 106769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2020.106769
27.
LucasTRFerreiraAFPereiraRS, et al. (2022) Hydrogen production from the WindFloat Atlantic offshore wind farm: a techno-economic analysis. Applied Energy310: 118481.
28.
ManwellJFMcGowanJGRogersAL (2010) Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application. 2nd edition. Wiley.
29.
Meza-CarretoJRomero-CentenoRFigueroa-EspinozaB, et al. (2024) Outlook for offshore wind energy development in Mexico from WRF simulations and CMIP6 projections. Energies17(8): 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081866
30.
MusialWBeiterPJeremyJ, et al. (2020) Offshore wind in the US Gulf of Mexico: regional economic modeling and site-specific analyses. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management94.
Peña SánchezEURybergSDHeinrichsHU, et al. (2021) The potential of variable renewable energy sources in Mexico: a temporally evaluated and geospatially constrained techno-economical assessment. Energies14(18): 5779. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185779
SpyridonidouSVagionaDGLoukogeorgakiE (2020) Strategic planning of offshore wind farms in Greece. Sustainability12(3): 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030905
37.
TaoufikMFekriA (2021) GIS-based multi-criteria analysis of offshore wind farm development in Morocco. Energy Conversion and Management X11: 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100103
