A CFD-based assessment and validation of the NREL Phase-VI Sequence-S rotor at seven wind speeds presented here. The ability of a three-dimensional, unstructured, unsteady RANS solver in successfully predicting the wind flow interactions with a rotating, twisted and tapered rotor is described. The uRANS equations were coupled with SST κ-ω turbulence model and a correlation-based Gamma-Theta transition model. The simulations were performed in ANSYS CFX using both Single Reference Frame (SRF) and Multiple Reference Frame (MRF) modelling approaches. A good agreement with measurements is observed at six of seven wind speeds when comparing the integral quantities, the spanwise and chordwise distributions. The only exception is the 10 m/s wind speed case, attributed to the onset of a massive leading edge stall around the mid-span region. It is successfully demonstrated here how uRANS-based CFD computations can be effectively employed in the study of wind turbine rotor aerodynamics.
BechmannASørensenNNZahleF (2011) Cfd simulations of the MEXICO rotor. Wind Energy14(5): 677–689.
8.
DuqueEPNBurklundMDJohnsonW (2003) Navier-Stokes and comprehensive analysis performance predictions of the NREL phase VI experiment. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering125(4): 457–467.
9.
EleniDCAthanasiosTIDionissiosMP (2012) Evaluation of the turbulence models for the simulation of the flow over a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 0012 airfoil. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research4(3): 100–111.
10.
GerberBSTanglerJLDuqueEPN, et al. (2005) Peak and post-peak power aerodynamics from phase VI NASA Ames wind turbine data. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering127(2): 192–199.
11.
GielenDGoriniRWagnerN, et al. (2018) Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
12.
HandMMSimmsDAFingershLJ, et al. (2001) Unsteady aerodynamics experiment phase VI: Wind tunnel test configurations and available data campaigns. In: National Renewable Energy Lab., No. NREL/TP-500-2995. Golden, CO, USA.
13.
HimmelskampH (1947) Profile Investigations on a Rotating Airscrew. Ministry of Aircraft Production.
14.
JohansenJSørensenNN (2004) Aerofoil characteristics from 3D CFD rotor computations. Wind Energy7(4): 283–294.
15.
LanzafameRMauroSMessinaM (2013) Wind turbine CFD modeling using a correlation-based transitional model. Renewable Energy52: 31–39.
16.
MenterFR (1993) Zonal two equation kw turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In: 23rd fluid dynamics, plasmadynamics, and lasers conference, p.2906.
MoJOLeeYH (2012) Cfd investigation on the aerodynamic characteristics of a small-sized wind turbine of NREL PHASE VI operating with a stall-regulated method. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology26(1): 81–92.
19.
OhyaYKarasudaniT (2010) A shrouded wind turbine generating high output power with wind-lens technology. Energies3(4): 634–649.
20.
OhyaYKarasudaniTNagaiT, et al. (2017) Wind lens technology and its application to wind and water turbine and beyond. Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability2(2): 2.
21.
PotsdamMMavriplisD (2009) Unstructured mesh CFD aerodynamic analysis of the NREL Phase VI rotor. In: 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p.1221.
22.
SadorskyP (2021) Wind energy for sustainable development: Driving factors and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production289: 125779.
23.
SchepersJGBoorsmaKGomez-IradiS, et al. (2014) Final report of IEA Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 2). ECN-E-14-060, Energy Research Center of the Netherlands.
24.
SimmsDSchreckSHandM, et al. (2001) NREL unsteady aerodynamics experiment in the NASA-Ames wind tunnel: A comparison of predictions to measurements. In: National Renewable Energy Lab., No. NREL/TP-500-29494, Golden, CO, United States.
25.
SongYPerotJB (2015) Cfd simulation of the NREL phase VI rotor. Wind Engineering39(3): 299–309.
26.
SubramanianBChokaniNAbhariRS (2015) Drone-based experimental investigation of three-dimensional flow structure of a multi-megawatt wind turbine in complex terrain. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering137(5): 1–10.
27.
SørensenN (2008) CFD modeling of laminar-turbulent transition for airfoils and rotors using the γ-θ Model. In: 26th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, p.7323.
28.
SørensenNNMichelsenJASchreckS (2002) Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80 ft × 120 ft wind tunnel. Wind Energy5(2-3): 151–169.
29.
TaylorJ (1997) Introduction to error analysis, the study of uncertainties in physical measurements.
30.
DAVIDWilcox (1991) A half century historical review of the k-omega model. In: 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, p.615.
31.
XuGSankarLN (2000) Computational study of horizontal axis wind turbines. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering122(1): 35–39.
32.
YelmuleMMVsjEA (2013) CFD predictions of NREL phase VI rotor experiments in NASA/AMES wind tunnel. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research3(2): 261–269.
33.
ZhangYSunZvan ZuijlenA, et al. (2017) Numerical simulation of transitional flow on a wind turbine airfoil with RANS-based transition model. Journal of Turbulence18(9): 879–898.
34.
ZhongWTangHWangT, et al. (2018) Accurate RANS simulation of wind turbine stall by turbulence coefficient calibration. Applied Sciences8(9): 1444.
35.
ZhouY (2017) Investigation of applying CFD models to 3D wind turbine simulation. Doctoral dissertation, UNSW Sydney.
36.
ZhuCChenJQiuY, et al. (2021) Numerical investigation into rotational augmentation with passive vortex generators on the NREL Phase VI blade. Energy223: 120089.
