A BEM theory adaption for inclusion of hub ratio effects in HAWT rotor design and analysis

Abstract

A large hub ratio in a horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) rotor can provide aerodynamic and structural design benefits, but the flow effects are not accounted for in the classical Blade Element Momentum Method (BEMM). Research into the effect of HAWT rotor hub ratio, necessitated development of an adaption to the BEMM, so that rotors with large hub ratios, could be designed to be aerodynamically efficient, and so that the flow effects could be included in performance prediction. Results from the BEMM with large-hub adaption were compared with results from using the classical BEMM and with results from CFD simulation. Two sets of rotors were analysed, one set in a viscous flow regime and the other in a turbulent flow regime. The BEMM with large-hub adaption, was found to provide rotor designs with better performance and provided a more accurate prediction of relative rotor power than the classical BEMM.

Keywords

BEMM BEM blade element momentum adaption wind turbine hub ratio large hub hub

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buhl

(2005) A New Empirical Relationship between Thrust Coefficient and Induction Factor for the Turbulent Windmill State. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, Colo. Technical Report: NREL/TP-500-36834

El-Okda

(2015) Design methods of horizontal axis wind turbine rotor blades. International Journal of Industrial Electronics and Drives 2(3): 135–150.

Froude

(1878) On the elementary relation between pitch, slip and propulsive effciency. Transactions of the Royal Institute of Naval Architects 19(47): 47–57.

Glauert

(1926) The analysis of experimental results in the windmill brake and vortex ring states of an airscrew. ARCR R&M No. 1026.

Glauert

(1935) Airplane propellers. In: Durand

(ed.) Aerodynamic Theory. New York, NY: Springer, pp.169–360.

Glauert

(1983) The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Science Classics. Cambridge University Press.

Hansen

MOL

(2008) Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, 2nd edn. London: Earthscan.

Hau

(2006) Wind Turbines – Fundamentals, Technologies, Applications, Economics, 2nd edn. Heidelberg: Springer.

Johnson

Bortolotti

Dykes

, et al. (2019) Investigation of Innovative Rotor Concepts for the Big Adaptive Rotor Project. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, pp.5000–73605.

10.

Kaufmann

(1931) Angewandte Hydro Mechanik, vol. 1. Heidelberg: Springer.

11.

Kennard

(1967) Irrotational flow of frictionless fluids mostly of invariable density. US Navy, Research and Development Report 2299. Washington D.C.

12.

Kersale

(n.d) Chapter 4: Potential flows. Unpublished notes. Leeds: University of Leeds.

13.

Koning

WJF

(2019) Airfoil Selection for Mars Rotor Applications. Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.

14.

Libii

(2013) Comparing the calculated coefficients of performance of a class of wind turbines that produce power between 330 kW and 7,500 kW. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 11(1): 36–40.

15.

Manwell

McGowan

Rogers

(2009) Wind Energy Explained – Theory, Design and Application, 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

16.

Moriarty

Hansen

(2005) AeroDyn Theory Manual. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, Colo. Technical Report: NREL/TP-500-36881.

17.

Rankine

WJM

(1865) On the mechanical principles of the action of propellers. Transactions of the Royal Institute of Naval Architects 6: 13–30.

18.

Ruiz-Jarabo

(n.d) ENERCON 3 MW and 7,5 MW Portfolio E-82 E3, E-101 and E-126. Slide presentation: ENERCON GmbH. Spain.