The quest for reduced levelized cost of energy has driven significant growth in wind turbine size; however, larger rotors face significant technical and logistical challenges. The largest published rotor design is 25 MW, and here we consider an even larger 50 MW design with blade length over 250 m. This paper shows that a 50 MW design is indeed possible from a detailed engineering perspective and presents a series of aero-structural blade designs, and critical assessment of technology pathways and challenges for extreme-scale rotors. The 50 MW rotor design begins with Monte Carlo simulations focused on optimizing carbon spar cap and root design. A baseline design resulted in a 250-m blade with mass of 502 tonnes. Subsequently, an aero-structural design and optimization were performed to reduce the blade mass/cost with more than 25% mass reduction and 30% cost reduction by determining optimal blade chord and airfoil thickness for best aero-structural performance.
AnandaGKBansalSSeligMS (2018) Aerodynamic design of the 13.2 MW SUMR-13i wind turbine rotor. In: 2018 wind energy symposium, Kissimmee, FL, 8–12 January 2018, p.0994 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
AshuriTMartinsJRZaaijerMB, et al. (2016) Aeroservoelastic design definition of a 20 MW common research wind turbine model. Wind Energy19(11): 2071–2087.
5.
BayCJDamianiRFingershLJ, et al. (2019) Design and testing of a scaled demonstrator turbine at the national wind technology center. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 forum, San Diego, CA, 7–11 January 2019, p.1068. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
6.
BayatiIBelloliMBerniniL, et al. (2016) On the aero-elastic design of the DTU 10MW wind turbine blade for the LIFES50+ wind tunnel scale model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series753: 022028.
7.
BergJCResorBR (2012) Numerical manufacturing and design tool (NuMAD v2. 0) for wind turbine blades: User’s guide. Technical Report No. SAND2012-728. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
8.
BortolottiPBottassoCLCroceA (2016) Combined preliminary-detailed design of wind turbines. Wind Energy Science1(1): 71.
9.
BottassoCLBortolottiPCroceA, et al. (2016) Integrated aero-structural optimization of wind turbines. Multibody System Dynamics38(4): 317–344.
10.
BottassoCLCampagnoloFCroceA (2012) Multi-disciplinary constrained optimization of wind turbines. Multibody System Dynamics27(1): 21–53.
11.
BottassoCLCampagnoloFCroceA, et al. (2014) Structural optimization of wind turbine rotor blades by multilevel sectional/multibody/3d-fem analysis. Multibody System Dynamics32(1): 87–116.
12.
BuckneyNGreenSPirreraA, et al. (2013a) On the structural topology of wind turbine blades. Wind Energy16(4): 545–560.
13.
BuckneyNPirreraAGreenSD, et al. (2013b) Structural efficiency of a wind turbine blade. Thin-Walled Structures67: 144–154.
14.
BuckneyNPirreraAWeaverP, et al. (2014) Structural efficiency analysis of the Sandia 100 m wind turbine blade. In: 32nd ASME wind energy symposium, National Harbor, Maryland, 13–17 January 2014, p.0360. ASME.
15.
ChenYEscalera MendozaASGriffithDT (2021) Experimental and numerial study of high-order complex curvature mode shape and mode coupling on a three-bladed wind turbine assembly. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing160: 107873.
16.
ChetanMGriffithDTYaoS (2019a) Flutter predictions in the design of extreme-scale segmented ultralight morphing rotor blades. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 forum, San Diego, CA, 7–11 January, p.1298. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
17.
ChetanMSakibMSGriffithDT (2019b) Aero-structural design study of extreme-scale segmented ultralight morphing rotor blades. In: AIAA aviation 2019 forum, Dallas, TX, 17–21 June 2019, p.3347. AIAA.
18.
ChetanMYaoSGriffithDT (2021) Multi-fidelity digital twin structural model for a sub-scale downwind wind turbine rotor. Wind Energy. Epub ahead of print 6 May 2021. DOI: 10.1002/we.2636.
19.
CoxKEchtermeyerA (2012) Structural design and analysis of a 10MW wind turbine blade. Energy Procedia24: 194–201.
20.
CroceASartoriLLunghiniMS, et al. (2016) Lightweight rotor design by optimal spar cap offset. Journal of Physics: Conference Series753: 062003.
21.
DNV (2015) Rotor blades for wind turbines. Standard DNVGL-ST-0376.
22.
EnnisBLKelleyCLNaughtonBT, et al. (2019) Optimized carbon fiber composites in wind turbine blade design. Technical report, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM.
GriffithDT (2013a) The SNL100-01 blade: Carbon design studies for the Sandia 100-meter blade. Sandia National Laboratories Technical Report, SAND2013-1178. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM).
26.
GriffithDT (2013b) The SNL100-02 blade: Advanced core material design studies for the Sandia 100-meter blade. Sandia National Laboratories Technical Report, SAND2013-10162. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM).
27.
GriffithDTAshwillTD (2011) The Sandia 100-meter all-glass baseline wind turbine blade: Snl100-00. Report No. SAND2011-3779: 67. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
28.
GriffithDTChetanM (2018) Assessment of flutter prediction and trends in the design of large-scale wind turbine rotor blades. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1037: 042008.
29.
GriffithDTJohannsW (2013) Large blade manufacturing cost studies using the Sandia blade manufacturing cost tool and Sandia 100-meter blades. Sandia National Laboratories Technical Report, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM.
30.
GriffithDTRichardsPW (2014) The SNL100-03 blade: Design studies with flatback airfoils for the Sandia 100-meter blade. Technical report SAND2014-18129 537751, Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
31.
HaymanG (2012) Mlife theory manual for version 1.00 74. Technical report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
32.
International Electrotechnical Standard (2005) Part 1: Design requirements. International Standard IEC: 61400–1.
33.
JonkmanJMBuhlMLJr (2005) FAST user’s guide. Technical Report No. NREL/EL-500-38230. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
34.
JuSHHuangYCHuangYY (2020) Study of optimal large-scale offshore wind turbines. Renewable Energy154: 161–174.
35.
JureczkoMPawlakMMężykA (2005) Optimisation of wind turbine blades. Journal of Materials Processing Technology167(2): 463–471.
36.
KianbakhSMartinDJohnsonK, et al (2021) Design space exploration and decision making for a segmented ultralight morphing 50 mw wind turbine. In preparation.
MacquartTMaesVLangstonD, et al. (2017) A new optimisation framework for investigating wind turbine blade designs. In: SchumacherAVietorTFiebigS, et al. (eds) World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation. Cham: Springer, pp.2044–2060.
39.
MandellJFSamborskyDD (1997) DOE/MSU Composite Material Fatigue Database: Test Methods, Materials, and Analysis. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque.
40.
MendozaASEChetanMGriffithDT (2021a) Quantification of extreme-scale wind turbine performance parameters due to variations in beam properties. In: AIAA Scitech 2021 forum, 11–15 & 19–21 January 2021.
41.
MendozaASEYaoSChetanM, et al. (2021b) Design and cost analysis of segmented blades for a 50mw wind turbine rotor. In preparation.
42.
MüllerKChengPW (2018) Application of a monte carlo procedure for probabilistic fatigue design of floating offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy Science3(1): 149–162.
43.
NijssenRLahuertaFWandjiWN, et al. (2016) INNWIND deliverable 4.15 innovations on component level for coming 20MW turbines (final report). Technical report. Available at: http://www.innwind.eu/publications/deliverable-reports (accessed 30 September 2020).
44.
NingSADamianiRMoriartyPJ (2014) Objectives and constraints for wind turbine optimization. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering136(4): 041010.
45.
NoyesCLothEQinC (2017) A FAST investigation of a 2 blade, load-aligned, downwind rotor for a 13.2 MW wind turbine. In: 35th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Denver, CO, 5–9 June 2017, p.4074. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
46.
NoyesCQinCLothE (2018) Pre-aligned downwind rotor for a 13.2 MW wind turbine. Renewable Energy116: 749–754.
PaoLYZalkindDSGriffithDT, et al. (2021) Control co-design of 13 mw downwind two-bladed rotors to achieve 25% reduction in levelized cost of wind energy. Annual Reviews in Control. Epub ahead of print 22 March 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.02.001.
49.
QinCCLothEZalkindDS, et al. (2020) Downwind coning concept rotor for a 25 MW offshore wind turbine. Renewable Energy156: 314–327.
50.
QinCLothELeeS, et al. (2016) Blade load reduction for a 13 MW downwind pre-aligned rotor. In: 34th wind energy symposium, San Diego, CA, 4–8January2016, p.1264.
51.
SartoriLBelliniFCroceA, et al. (2018) Preliminary design and optimization of a 20MW reference wind turbine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series1037: 042003.
SUMR (2015) Segmented ultralight morphing rotors enable 50-megawatt wind turbines that may reduce off-shore energy costs by 50%. SUMR. Available at: https://sumrwind.com/ (accessed 21 May 2021).
54.
TangSSweetmanBGaoJ (2021) Nonlinear effects and dynamic coupling of floating offshore wind turbines using geometrically-exact blades and momentum-based methods. Ocean Engineering229: 108866.
USDOE (2008) 20% wind energy by 2030. Technical report DOE/GO-102008-2567. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Lab.
57.
VeersPDykesKLantzE, et al. (2019) Grand challenges in the science of wind energy. Science366(6464): eaau2027.
58.
Vision (2015) A new era for wind power in the United States, US Department of Energy, 2015.
59.
WiserRHandMSeelJ, et al. (2016) Reducing wind energy costs through increased turbine size: Is the sky the limit? Rev. Berkeley National Laboratory Electricity Markets and Policy Group 121.
60.
YaoSChetanMGriffithDT (2021) Structural design and optimization of a series of 13.2mw downwind rotors. Wind Engineering. Epub ahead of print 12 January 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0309524X20984164.
61.
YaoSGriffithDTChetanM, et al. (2019) Structural design of a 1/5th scale gravo-aeroelastically scaled wind turbine demonstrator blade for field testing. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 forum, San Diego, CA, 7–11January2019, p.1067. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
62.
YaoSGriffithDTChetanM, et al. (2020) A gravo-aeroelastically scaled wind turbine rotor at field-prototype scale with strict structural requirements. Renewable Energy156(C): 535–547.
63.
ZalkindDSAnandaGKChetanM, et al. (2019) System-level design studies for large rotors. Wind Energy Science4(4): 595–618.
