BayerriMJBergerJPaoloR. A framework for validation of computer models. Technometrics2007; 4(2): 138–154.
4.
ASME V&V 10-2006. Guide for verification & validation in computational solid mechanics. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006.
5.
SchrubenLW. Establishing the credibility of simulations. Simulation1980; 34: 101–105.
6.
PattersonEA. Cross links between computational and experimental mechanics. J Strain Anal. DOI: 10.1177/0309324714567073.
7.
TegmarkM. Our mathematical universe: my quest for the ultimate nature of reality. London: Allen Lane, 2014.
8.
BiddleJWinsbergE. Value judgments and the estimation of uncertainty in climate modeling. In: MagnusPDBuschJ (eds) New waves in philosophy of science. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp.172–197.
9.
CEN 16799. Validation of computational solid mechanics models. Brussels: Comité Europeen de Normalisation, 2014.
10.
LinYChenWArendtP. Toward a better understanding of model validation metrics. J Mech Design2011; 133: 071005 (13 pp.).
11.
LampeasGNPasialisVP. A hybrid framework for nonlinear dynamic simulations including full-field optical measurements and image decomposition algorithms. J Strain Anal Eng2013; 48(1): 5–15.
12.
DeLandaM. Philosophy and simulation: the emergence of synthetic reason. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.
13.
PinkertonAJShackletonJMoatR. The effect of process parameters on residual stresses within an inconel 718 part produced by the direct laser deposition process. In: 24th international congress on application of lasers and electro-optics: (ICALEO 2005), 31 October–3 November, 2005, Miami, FL, pp.601–610. Orlando, FL: Laser Institute of America.
14.
KamarNTHossainMMKhomenkoA. Interlaminar reinforcement of glass fiber/epoxy composites with graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Part A: Appl S2015; 70: 82–92.
15.
LambrosJPollakR. Special issue on strain measurement in extreme conditions. J Strain Anal Eng2014; 49: 202–203.
16.
WinsbergE. Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2010.
17.
VadavadagiBHShekhawatSKNarasimhanK. Improved prediction of strain distribution during mechanical and hydro-mechanical deep drawing processes using microstructure-based dynamic strain hardening and anisotropy. J Strain Anal Eng2015; 50(1): 51–60.
18.
GalleTDe PauwJDe WaeleW. Validating numerically predicted make-up of threaded connections using digital image correlation and infrared monitoring. J Strain Anal Eng2014; 49(7): 492–500.