Abstract
Amphi-Pacific organismal distributions form the ingredients of trans-Pacific biogeo graphic tracks, which may either be explained as the result of dispersal or vicariance. Under a vicariance paradigm the classical predrift reconstruction of Pangea cannot adequately explain trans- Pacific tracks. Alternative paleogeographic models that have been invoked as explanations for such tracks are discussed: the lost continent Pacifica, island integration, a new reconstruction of eastern Gondwanaland, and the expanding earth theory. None of these models is fully compatible with all geologic and biogeographic data available at present. Incompatibility of geological and biogeo graphical hypotheses could well result from different time scales involved. It is stressed that biogeographic data and theories should not be made subservient to geological theories but that both biological and geological information should shed their light on the causal explanation of trans- Pacific organismal tracks.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
