Alabaster, J.C. and Lloyd, R.1980: Water quality criteria for freshwater fish. London: Butterworth.
2.
Allen, A.W.1983: Habitat suitability index models: beaver. US Fish and Wildlife Service Report FWS/OBS-82/10. 30-REV.
3.
Barila, T.Y., Williams, R.D. and Stauffer, J.R.1981: The influence of stream order and selected stream bed parameters on fish diversity in Raystown Branch, Susquehanna River drainage, Pennsylvania. Journal of Applied Ecology18, 125-31.
4.
Bartschi, D.K.1976: A habitat-discharge method of determining instream flows for aquatic habitat. In Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H., editors, 1976, 285-94.
5.
Binns, N.A. and Eiserman, F.M.1979: Quantification of fluvial trout habitat in Wyoming . Transactions of the American Fisheries Society108, 215-28.
6.
Boussu, M.F.1954: Relationship between trout populations and cover on a small stream. Journal of WildlifeManagement18, 229-39.
7.
Bovee, K.D.1974: The determination, assessment and design of instream value studies for the Northern Great Plains region. University of Montana, Final Report, EDA Contract 68-01-02413.
8.
1978 : The incremental method of assessing habitat potential for coolwater species, with management implications. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 11, 340-46.
9.
Campbell, R.N.B. and Scott, D.1984: The determination of minimum discharge for 0+ brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) using a velocity response. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research18, 1-11.
10.
Chubb, M. and Baumann, E.H.1976: The RIVERS method: a pilot study of river recreation potential assessment. Department of Geography, Michigan State University , East Lansing.
11.
Cochnauer, T.1976: Instream flow techniques for large rivers. In Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H., editors, 1976, 387-93.
12.
Collings, M.R.1974: Generalisation of spawning and rearing discharges for several Pacific salmon species in westernWashington . US Geological Survey Open-File Report.
13.
Collings, M.R., Smith, R.W. and Higgins, G.T.1972: The hydrology of four streams in western Washington as related to several Pacific salmon species. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1968.
14.
Cooper, J.L.1976: United States Forest Service stream survey procedure - Northern Region. In Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H., editors, 1976, 300-13.
15.
Cooperative Instream Flow Group1982: A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology . Instream Flow Information Paper 12, US Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-82/26.
16.
Cortell, J.F. and associates 1977: Recreation and instream flow, vol. 2. Final report to US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, DIOLS 78-02.
17.
Cushing, C.E. and six others 1980: Comparative study of physical-chemical variables of streams using multivariate analyses. Archive for Hydrobiologie89, 343-52.
18.
Edington, J.M.1968: Habitat preferences in net-spinning caddis larvae with special reference to the influence of water velocity. Journal of Animal Ecology37, 675-92.
19.
Everest, F.H. and Chapman, D.W.1972: Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada29, 91-100.
20.
Farmer, A.H.1977: The Habitat Evaluation Procedure. In Marmelstein, A., editor, 1977, 407-20.
21.
Fraser, J.C.1972: Regulated discharge and the stream environment . In Oglesby, R.T., Carlson, C.A. and McCann, J.A., editors, River ecology and man, New York: Academic Press, 263-85.
22.
1978 : Suggestions for developing flow recommendations for instream uses of New Zealand streams. Water and Soil Miscellaneous Publication 6, Wellington, New Zealand.
23.
Giger, R.D.1973: Streamflow requirements for salmonids. Oregon Wildlife Commission, Federal Aid Progress Reports, Fisheries AFS-62-1.
24.
Glova, G.J., Bonnett, M.L. and Docherty, C.R.1985: Comparison of fish populations in riffles of three braided rivers of Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research19, 157-65.
25.
Glova, G.J. and Duncan, M.J.1985: Potential effects of reduced flows on fish habitats in a large braided river, New Zealand. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society114, 165-81.
26.
Gore, J.A.1978: A technique for predicting instream flow requirements of benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology8, 141-51.
27.
Gore, J.A. and Judy, R.D.1981: Predictive models of benthic macroinvertebrate density for use in instream flow studies and regulated flow management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science38, 1363-70.
28.
Gorman, O.T. and Karr, J.R.1978: Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology59, 507-15.
29.
Hawkes, H.A.1975: River zonation and classification. In Whitton, B.A., editor, River ecology, Berkeley: University of California Press , 312-74.
30.
Hawkins, C.P. and Sedell, J.R.1981: Longitudinal and seasonal changes in functional organisation of macroinvertebrate communities in four Oregon streams. Ecology62, 387-97.
31.
Herrington, R.B. and Dunham, D.K.1967: A technique for sampling general fish habitat characteristics of streams. US Forest Service Research Paper INT-41.
32.
Isaacson, J.A.1976: Determining instream flows using the sag tape method and R2CROSS computer program. In Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H., editors, 1976, 314-21.
33.
Jowett, I.G.1982: The incremental approach to studying stream flows: New Zealand case studies. In McColl, R.H.S. , editor, River low flows: conflicts of water use, Water and Soil Miscellaneous Publication 47, 9-15.
34.
Kadlec, J.A.1976: Methodologies for assessing instream flows for wildlife . In Stalnaker, C.B. and Arnette, J.L., editors, 1976, 139-47.
35.
Keller, E.A. and MacDonald, A.1983: Large organic debris and anadromous fish habitat in the coastal redwood environment: the hydrologic system. NITS Report PB83-222240, California Water Resources Centre, Technical Completion Report, California University, Santa Barbara.
36.
Kellerhals, R., Church, M. and Bray, D.I.1976: Classification and analysis of river processes. Journal of the Hydraulics DivisionASCE102, HY7, 813-29.
37.
Leatherberry, E.C.1979: River amenity evaluation: a review and commentary . Water Resources Bulletin15, 1281-92.
38.
Leopold, L.B.1969: Quantitative comparison of some aesthetic factors among rivers. US Geological SurveyCircular620.
39.
Lewis, S.L.1969: Physical factors influencing fish populations in pools of a trout stream. Transactions, American Fisheries Society98, 14-19.
40.
Loar, J.M. and Sale, M.J.1981: Analysis of environmental issues related to small-scale hydro-electric development. V: Instream flow needs for fishery resources. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division , Publication 1829.
41.
Marmelstein, A. editor, 1977: Classification, inventory and analysis of fish and wildlife habitat: the proceedings of a national symposium. Biological Services Program, US Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-78/76.
42.
Milhous, R.T. and Grenney, W.J.1980: The quantification and reservation of instream flows. Progress in Water Technology13, 129-54.
43.
Moreau, G. and Legendre, L.1979: Relation entre habitat et peuplements de poissons: essai de definition d'une méthode numerique pour des rivières nordiques. Hydrobiologia67, 81-87.
44.
Morisawa, M.1971: Evaluating riverscapes. In Coates, D.R., editor, Environmental geomorphology, Binghamton, Publications in Geomorphology, State University of New York, 91-106.
45.
Mosley, M.P.1981: Semi-determinate hydraulic geometry of river channels, South Island, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms6, 127-37. 1982a: A procedure for characterising river channels. Water and Soil Miscellaneous Publication 32, Wellington, New Zealand.
46.
1982b: Critical depths for passage in braided rivers, Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research16, 351-57.
47.
1982c: Analysis of the effects of changing discharge on channel morphology and instream uses in a braided river, Ohau River, New Zealand. Water Resources Research18, 800-12.
48.
1983a: Flow requirements for recreation and wildlife in New Zealand rivers- a review. Journal of Hydrology (NZ)22, 152-74.
49.
1983b: Response of braided rivers to changing discharge. Journal of Hydrology (NZ)22, 18-67.
50.
Mosley, M.P. and Jowett, I.G. forthcoming: Fish habitat analysis using river flow simulation. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, forthcoming.
51.
Moyle, P.B., Baltz, D.M. and Knight, N.J.1983: Instream flow requirements of native California stream fishes. California Water Resources Center Completion Report OWRT B-210-CAL(1), University of California, Davis.
52.
Neill, C.R. and Galay, V.J.1967: Systematic evaluation of river regime. Journal of the Waterways and Harbours Division, ASCE93, WW 1, 25-53.
53.
Newcombe, C.1981: A procedure to estimate changes in fish populations caused by changes in stream discharge. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society110, 382-90.
54.
North Central Forest Experiment Station1977 : River recreation management and research, symposium proceedings . US Forest Service General Technical Report NC-28.
55.
O'Donnell, C.F.J. and Moore, S.M.1983: The wildlife and conservation of braided river systems in Canterbury. Fauna Survey Unit Report 33, New Zealand Wildlife Service, Wellington.
56.
Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H. editors, 1976: Instream flow needs. Boise Symposium Proceedings Vol. 2. American Fisheries Society and American Society of Civil Engineers.
57.
Orsborn, J.F. and Deane, F.D.1976: Investigation into methods for developing a physical analysis for evaluating instream flow needs. Completion Report, Project OWRT A-084-WASH, Washington State University, Pullman.
58.
Orth, D.J. and Maughan, O.E.1981a: Evaluation of the 'Montana method' for recommending instream flows in Oklahoma streams. Proceedings, Oklahoma Academy ofScience61, 62-66.
59.
1981b: Estimated stream flow requirements for fishes of the Washita River below Foss Reservoir, western Oklahoma. Water Resources Bulletin17, 831-43.
60.
Orth, D.J. and Maughan, O.E.1982: Evaluation of the incremental methodology for recommending instream flows for fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society11, 413-45.
61.
Pennack, R.W.1971: Toward a classification of lotic habitats. Hydrobiologia38, 321-34.
62.
Pfankuch, D.J.1978: Stream reach inventory and channel stability evaluation . US Forest Service, Northern Region.
63.
Pitt, D.G.1976: Physical dimensions of scenic quality in streams . In Zube, E.H., editor, Studies in landscape perception, Publication R76-1, Institute for Man and Environment, Amherst, 147-65.
64.
Platts, W.S.1979: Relationships among stream order, fish populations and acquatic geomorphology in an Idaho river basin. Fisheries4, 5-9.
65.
Platts, W.S., Megahan, W.F. and Minshall, G.W.1983: Methods for evaluating stream, riparian and biotic conditions . US Forest Service General Technical Report INT-138.
66.
Robertson, C.J.R., O'Donnell, C.F.J. and Overmars, F.B.1983: Habitat requirements of wetland birds in the Ahuriri River catchment, New Zealand. Occasional Publication 3, New Zealand Wildlife Service, Wellington, New Zealand.
67.
Seegrist, D.W. and Gard, R.1972: Effects of floods on trout in Sagehan Creek, California . Transactions of the American Fisheries Society101, 478-82.
68.
Shirvell, C.D. and Dungey, R.G.1983: Microhabitats chosen by brown trout for feeding and spawning in rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society112,355-67.
69.
Smith, A.K.1973: Development and application of spawning velocity and depth criteria for Oregon salmonids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society102, 312-16.
70.
Smith, G.L. editor, 1979: Proceedings, Workshop in Instream Flow Habitat Criteria and Modelling. Colorado Water Resources Research Institute Information Series 40, Fort Collins, USA.
71.
Sparrowe, R.D. and Sparrowe, B.F.1977: Use of critical parameters for evaluating wildlife habitat . In Marmelstein, A., editor, 1977, 385-406.
72.
Stalnaker, C.B. and Arnette, J.L. editors, 1976: Methodologies for the determination of stream resource flow requirements: an assessment. Office of Biological Services, US Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-76/03.
73.
Swank, G.W. and Phillips, R.W.1976: Instream flow methodology for the Forest Services in the Pacific North west region. In Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H., editors, 1976, 334-43.
74.
Swanston, D.B., Meehan, W.R. and McNutt, J.A.1977: A quantitative geomorphic approach to predicting productivity of pink and chum salmon streams in southeast Alaska. US Forest Service Research Paper PNW-227.
75.
Tennant, D.L.1976: Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries1, 6-10.
76.
Thompson, K.E.1972: Determining stream flows for fish life. In Proceedings, Instream Flow Requirement Workshop, Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission, Portland, Oregon, 31-50.
77.
Tierney, L.1982: Instream Flow Group (IFG). Freshwater Catch14, 11-14.
78.
Vannote, R.L. and four others1980: The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science37, 130-37.
79.
Wesche, T.A. and Rechard, P.A.1980: A summary of instream flow methods for fisheries and related research needs. Eisenhower ConsortiumBulletin9.
80.
White, R.J.1973: Stream channel suitability for coldwater fish. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Soil Conservation Society of America, Hot Springs, Arkansas, 61-79.
81.
White, R.G.1976: A methodology for recommending stream resource maintenance flows for large rivers. In Orsborn, J.F. and Allman, C.H., editors, 376-86.
82.
White, R.G. and four others 1981: Effects of reduced stream discharge on fish and aquatic macroinvertebrate populations. Technical Completion Report OWRT B-045-IDA(1), Idaho Water and Energy Resources Research Institute, Moscow, Idaho.
83.
Wright, J.F., Moss, D., Armitage, P.D. and Furse, M.T.1984: A preliminary classification of running water sites in Great Britain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwater Biology14, 221-56.