The Patagonian Icefields in the Andes Mountains represent South America’s largest solid freshwater reserves and are highly sensitive indicators of regional climate variability. This study analyzes the contrasting behaviors of two emblematic Glaciers of the Southern Patagonia Icefield: Upsala Glacier, characterized by sustained retreat and Perito Moreno Glacier, historically considered relatively stable. Using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imageries from 1997–2023, we provide a quantitative assessment of frontal displacement, area change, and retreat dynamics, offering additional insights beyond prior studies. For Upsala Glacier, we confirm and refine earlier reports of significant retreat, measuring ∼6989 ± 0.56 m of frontal loss, an average retreat rate of −304.55 ± 0.78 m/year (p < 0.05), and a statistically significant acceleration of −1.9 ± 1.11 m/year2. Surface area declined by ∼ 73.5 ± 0.22 km2 (∼9% of its 1997 extent), at an average rate of −3 ± 0.17 km2/year, with continued retreat after 2023 (100 ± 15 m in 2024 and 291.5 ± 15 m in 2025). In contrast, Perito Moreno Glacier exhibited near-equilibrium conditions with no sustained frontal retreat for most of the study period, but since 2016 has undergone a marked transition toward sustained frontal retreat, with retreat rates reaching −55 ± 0.78 m/year and accounting for nearly two-thirds of its total area loss since 1997 (∼3 ± 0.15 km2), with spatially asymmetric retreat–advance dynamics. Recent observations further confirm this shift, with a pronounced retreat event in 2025 reaching ∼−385 ± 15 m representing the largest frontal recession recorded over the study period. These contrasting Glacier responses highlight the strong influence of Glacier geometry and local dynamics on frontal behavior, emphasizing the importance of sustained satellite monitoring and the integration of complementary datasets for understanding the future evolution of Patagonian Glaciers.
Abdel JaberWRottHFloricioiuD, et al. (2019) Heterogeneous spatial and temporal pattern of surface elevation change and mass balance of the Patagonian ice fields between 2000 and 2016. The Cryosphere13(9): 2511–2535. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2511-2019
2.
AbdullahTRomshooSA (2024) A comprehensive inventory, characterization, and analysis of rock Glaciers in the Jhelum Basin, Kashmir Himalaya, using high-resolution googleearth data. Water16(16): 2327. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162327
3.
AlifuHTateishiRJohnsonB (2015) A new band ratio technique for mapping debris-covered Glaciers using landsat imagery and a digital elevation model. International Journal of Remote Sensing36: 2063–2075. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2015.1034886
4.
AlifuHJohnsonBTateishiR (2016) Delineation of debris-covered Glaciers based on a combination of geomorphometric parameters and a tir/nir/swir band ratio. Ieee Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing9: 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500906
5.
AniyaM (1999) Recent Glacier variations of the hielos patago´nicos, south America, and their contribution to sea-level change. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research31(2): 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230430.1999.12003293
6.
AniyaMSatoHNaruseR, et al. (1997) Recent glacier variations in the Southern Patagonia Ice-field, South America. Arctic and Alpine Research, 29: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1551831, In press.
7.
ArmestoJRozziRSmith-RamirezC, et al. (1998) Ecology: conservation targets in South American temperate forests. Science282(5392): 1271–1272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5392.1271
8.
BaiJPerronP (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica66(1): 47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998540
9.
BarryRG (2006) The status of research on Glaciers and global Glacier recession: a review. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment30(3): 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133306pp478ra
10.
BownFRiveraAPetlickiM, et al. (2019) Recent ice dynamics and mass balance of Jorge Montt Glacier, Southern Patagonia Icefield. Journal of Glaciology65(253): 732–744. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2019.47
11.
BraunMHMalzPSommerC, et al. (2019) Constraining Glacier elevation and mass changes in south America. Nature Climate Change9(2): 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0375-7
12.
BravoCBozkurtDGonzalez-ReyesA, et al. (2019) Assessing snow accumulation patterns and changes on the Patagonian icefields. Frontiers in Environmental Science7: 30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00030
Copé de los MozosR (2014) Cálculo del retroceso glaciar en isla livingston y de su l´ınea de costa para actualizacio´n de cartograf´ıa. [Tesis de máster]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/27071/1/TFM_Cop%C3%A9.pdf
15.
CoppelILlorenteE (2001) El Satélite Landsat: analisis visual de imágenes obtenidas del sensor ETM+ Satélite Landsat. Universidad de Valladolid. https://books.google.cl/books?id=elyoygAACAAJ
16.
DashAPradhanIPMahantaKK, et al. (2024) Comprehensive assessment of rock Glaciers in the Himachal Himalayas: updated inventory and labelling. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment48(4): 571–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333241263986
17.
DaviesBJDarvillCMLovellH, et al. (2020) The evolution of the Patagonian ice sheet from 35 ka to the present day (patice). Earth-Science Reviews204: 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103152
18.
DaviesBGlasserN (2017). Accelerating shrinkage of Patagonian glaciers from the Little Ice Age (∼AD 1870) to 2011. Journal of Glaciology. 58. 1063-1084. https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG12J026, In press.
19.
DonmezCCicekliSYCilekA, et al. (2021) Mapping snow cover using landsat data: toward a fine-resolution water-resistant snow index. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics133: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-020-00749-y
20.
DussaillantIBerthierEBrunF (2018) Geodetic mass balance of the northern Patagonian icefield from 2000 to 2012 using two independent methods. Frontiers in Earth Science6: 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00008
ForestaLGourmelenNWeissgerberF, et al. (2018) Heterogeneous and rapid ice loss over the Patagonian ice fields revealed by cryosat-2 swath radar altimetry. Remote Sensing of Environment211: 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.041
24.
GaurMGoyalRSahaD, et al. (2022) The estimation of snow cover distribution using satellite data in the cold arid leh region of Indian himalaya. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies31(6): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/135606
25.
Guglielmina DiolaiutiCDSmiragliaC (2003) Belvedere Glacier, monte rosa, Italian alps: tongue thickness and volume variations in the second half of the 20th century. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research35(2): 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2003)035[0255:BGMRIA]2.0.CO;2
26.
HärerSBernhardtMSiebersM, et al. (2018) On the need for a time- and location-dependent estimation of the ndsi threshold value for reducing existing uncertainties in snow cover maps at different scales. The Cryosphere12(5): 1629–1642. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1629-2018
27.
KourRPatelNKrishnaA (2015a) Assessment of relationship between snow cover characteristics (sgi and sci) and snow cover indices (ndsi and s3). Earth Science Informatics8(4): 987–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-015-0216-4
28.
KourRPatelNKrishnaAP (2015b) Development of a new thermal snow index and its relationship with snow cover indices and snow cover characteristic indices. Arabian Journal of Geosciences9(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2143-6
29.
KourRPatelNKrishnaAP (2016a) Assessment of temporal dynamics of snow cover and its validation with hydro-meteorological data in parts of chenab basin, Western Himalayas. Science China Earth Sciences59(5): 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5243-y
30.
KourRPatelNKrishnaAP (2016b) Effects of terrain attributes on snow-cover dynamics in parts of chenab basin, Western himalayas. Hydrological Sciences Journal61(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1052815
31.
LenzanoMGLannuttiETothC, et al. (2018) Analyzing the oscillations of the Perito Moreno Glacier, using time-lapse image sequences. Cold Regions Science and Technology146: 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2017.11.015
32.
Lo VecchioALenzanoMRichianoS, et al. (2016) Identificación y caracterización litológica mediante el uso del sensor ETM+ (landsat 7). Caso de estudio: entorno del glaciar Upsala, Argentina. Revista de Teledetección46: 57. https://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2016.4482
33.
Lo VecchioAVillalbaRFalaschiD, et al. (2024) Glacier fragmentation on the Southern Patagonian Icefield: a comprehensive analysis of the Upsala Glacier. Journal of Glaciology71: e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2024.91
34.
MalzPMeierWCasassaG, et al. (2018) Elevation and mass changes of the Southern Patagonia Icefield derived from tandem-x and srtm data. Remote Sensing10(2): 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020188
MarshallGDowdeswellJReesW (1994) The spatial and temporal effect of cloud cover on the acquisition of high quality landsat imagery in the European arctic sector. Remote Sensing of Environment50(2): 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)90041-8
37.
Martínez PasturGJPeriPLencinasM, et al. (2015) Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landscape Ecology31(1): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9
38.
MeierWJHGriessingerJHochreutherP, et al. (2018) An updated multi-temporal Glacier inventory for the Patagonian Andes with changes between the little ice age and 2016. Frontiers in Earth Science6 (Article 62). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00062
39.
MinowaMSchaeferMSugiyamaS, et al. (2021) Frontal ablation and mass loss of the Patagonian icefields. Earth and Planetary Science Letters561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116811, In press.
40.
MinowaMSugiyamaSSakakibaraD, et al. (2015) Contrasting Glacier variations of Glaciar Perito Moreno and glaciar Ameghino, Southern Patagonia Icefield. Annals of Glaciology56(70): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3189/2015AoG70A020
41.
MinowaMSugiyamaSSakakibaraD, et al. (2017) Seasonal variations in ice-front position controlled by frontal ablation at Glaciar Perito Moreno, the Southern Patagonia Icefield. Frontiers in Earth Science5: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00001
42.
MillanR.RignotE.RiveraA., et al. (2019) Ice Thickness and Bed Elevation of the Northern and Southern Patagonian Icefields. Geophysical Research Letters46(12): 6626–6635. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082485
43.
MinowaMPodolskiyEASugiyamaS, et al. (2018) Glacier calving observed with time-lapse imagery and tsunami waves at Glaciar Perito Moreno, Patagonia. Journal of Glaciology64(245): 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.28
44.
MinowaMSchaeferMSkvarcaP (2023) Effects of topography on dynamics and mass loss of lake-terminating Glaciers in Southern Patagonia. Journal of Glaciology69(276): 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.42
45.
Montoya-JaraNLoayzaHGutiérrez-RosalesRO, et al. (2024) Estimation of glacier outline and volume changes in the Vilcanota range snow-capped Mountains, Peru, using temporal series of landsat and a combination of satellite radar and aerial LIDAR images. Remote Sensing16(20): 3901. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203901
46.
MoraguesSLenzanoMRiveraA, et al. (2021) Caracterización de la inestabilidad de laderas del canal Upsala: Deslizamiento Agassiz, Patagonia austral, Argentina. Andean Geology48(3): 335–350. https://doi.org/10.5027/andgeoV48n3-3350
47.
NaruseRSkvarcaPTakeuchiY (1997) Thinning and retreat of Glaciar Upsala, and an estimate of annual ablation changes in Southern Patagonia. Annals of Glaciology24: 38–42. https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500011903
48.
OzelkanE (2019) Water body detection analysis using NDWI indices derived from Landsat-8 OLI. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies29(3): 2095–2101. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/110447
49.
PandeyPRamanathanAVenkataramanG (2016) Remote sensing of mountain Glaciers and related hazards. In: MarghanyM (ed) Environmental Applications of Remote Sensing (Chap. 5). IntechOpen.
50.
PasquiniAIDepetrisPJ (2007) Discharge trends and flow dynamics of south American rivers draining the southern Atlantic seaboard: an overview. Journal of Hydrology333(2–4): 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.005
51.
PaulFBarrandNEBaumannS, et al. (2013) On the accuracy of Glacier outlines derived from remote-sensing data. Annals of Glaciology54(63): 171–182. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013aog63a296
52.
PaulFBolchTBriggsK, et al. (2017) Error sources and guidelines for quality assessment of Glacier area, elevation change, and velocity products derived from satellite data in the Glaciers_cci project. Remote Sensing of Environment203: 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.038
PiconeSE (2020) Áreas protegidas e acesso a terra: o caso de el Chaltén no Parque Nacional Los Glaciares (Patagonia Argentina). Confins47: 1–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/confins.32276
55.
RabatelACastebrunetHFavierV, et al. (2011) Glacier changes in the Pascua-Lama region, Chilean andes (29◦ S): recent mass balance and 50 yr surface area variations. The Cryosphere5(4): 1029–1041. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-5-1029-2011
56.
RabatelASirgueyPDrolonV, et al. (2017) Annual and seasonal Glacier-wide surface mass balance quantified from changes in Glacier surface state: a review on existing methods using optical satellite imagery. Remote Sensing9(5): 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050507
57.
RajeshwariD (2014) Estimation of land surface temperature of Dindigul district using Landsat 8 data. International Journal of Renewable Energy Technology3(5): 122–126. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2014.0305025
58.
RGI Consortium (2017) Randolph Glacier Inventory - A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines. (NSIDC-0770, Version 6). National Snow and Ice Data Center. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7265/4m1f-gd79, In press.
59.
RichterAGrohAHorwathM, et al. (2019) The rapid and steady mass loss of the Patagonian icefields throughout the GRACE era: 2002–2017. Remote Sensing11(8): 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080909
60.
RiveraABenhamTCasassaG, et al. (2007) Ice elevation and areal changes of Glaciers from the northern Patagonia icefield, Chile. Global and Planetary Change59(1–4): 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.037
61.
RiveraAAravenaJCUrraA, et al. (2023) Chilean Patagonian glaciers and environmental change. In: CastillaJCArmesto ZamudioJJMartínez-HarmsMJ, et al. (eds) Conservation in Chilean Patagonia. Integrated Science. Springer, Vol. 19, pp. 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39408-9_15
SaezNStaubGAbarca-del RioR (2019) Monitoring Glacier retreat in the Chilean Southern Patagonian Icefield. IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium36: 4169–4171. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2019.8899295
64.
SakakibaraDSugiyamaS (2014) Ice-front variations and speed changes of calving Glaciers in the Southern Patagonia Icefield from 1984 to 2011. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface119(11): 2541–2554. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003148
65.
SakakibaraDSugiyamaSSawagakiT, et al. (2013) Rapid retreat, acceleration and thinning of glaciar Upsala, Southern Patagonia Icefield, initiated in 2008. Annals of Glaciology54(63): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013AoG63A236
66.
SenZ (2017) Innovative Trend Methodologies in Science and Engineering. Springer.
67.
ShawTBrockBFyffeC, et al. (2016) Air temperature distribution and energy-balance modelling of a debris-covered Glacier. Journal of Glaciology62(231): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.31
68.
ShuklaSKansalMLJainSK (2016) Snow cover area variability assessment in the upper part of the Satluj river basin in India. Geocarto International32(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1206975
69.
SkvarcaPNaruseR (2006) Overview of the ice-dam formation and collapse of glaciar Perito Moreno, Southern Patagonia, in 2003/04. Journal of Glaciology52(178): 476–478. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828539
70.
SkvarcaP.RottH.NaglerT. (1995b) Drastic retreat of Upsala Glacier, Southern Patagonia, revealed by ERS-1/SAR images and field survey. Proceedings ERS-1/SPOT Workshop “Antarctica: a Continent revealed” (Ushuaia, Argentina): 27–31.
71.
StueferMRottHSkvarcaP (2007) Glaciar Perito Moreno, Patagonia: climate sensitivities and Glacier characteristics preceding the 2003/04 and 2005/06 damming events. Journal of Glaciology53(180): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.3189/172756507781833848
72.
SugiyamaSMinowaMSakakibaraD, et al. (2016) Thermal structure of proglacial lakes in Patagonia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface121(12): 2270–2286. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004084
73.
TaschnerSRanziR (2002) Comparing the opportunities of landsat-tm and aster data for monitoring a debris covered Glacier in the Italian alps within the glims project. IGARSS 2002. 2002 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37380)2: 1044–1046. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1025770
74.
TaylorLSQuinceyDJSmithMW, et al. (2021) Remote sensing of the mountain cryosphere: current capabilities and future opportunities for research. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment45(6): 931–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333211023690
75.
TheilH (1992) A rank-invariant method of Linear and polynomial regression analysis. In: Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics. Springer, pp. 345–381.
76.
WarrenCRSugdenDE (1993) The Patagonian icefields: a glaciological review. Arctic and Alpine Research25(4): 316–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1551915
77.
WarrenCRGreeneDRGlasserNF (1995) Glaciar Upsala, Patagonia: rapid calving retreat in fresh water. Annals of Glaciology21: 311–316. https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500015998
78.
WGMS & National Snow and Ice Data Center (Comps.) (1999) World Glacier Inventory. (G01130, Version 1). National Snow and Ice Data Center. https://doi.org/10.7265/N5/NSIDC-WGI-2012-02, In press.
79.
WillisMJMelkonianAKPritchardME, et al. (2012) Ice loss from the Southern Patagonian Icefield, South America, between 2000 and 2012. Geophysical Research Letters39: 17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053136
80.
WindnagelARegineHMaussionF, et al. (2023) Which glaciers are the largest in the world?Journal of Glaciology69(274): 301–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2022.61
81.
XiaoXShenZQinX (2001) Assessing the potential of vegetation sensor data for mapping snow and ice cover: a normalized difference snow and ice index. International Journal of Remote Sensing22(16): 3327–3341. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160010002902
82.
YangSWangFXieY, et al. (2023) Delineation evaluation and variation of debris-covered glaciers based on the multi-source remote sensing images, take glaciers in the Eastern Tomur peask region for example. Remote Sensing15(10): 2575. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102575
83.
YueSWangC (2004) The Mann-Kendall test modified by effective sample size to detect trend in serially correlated hydrological series. Water Resources Management18(3): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:warm.0000043140.61082.60
84.
ZolitschkaBFeyMJanssenS, et al. (2019) Southern hemispheric westerlies control sedimentary processes of Laguna Azul (south-eastern Patagonia, Argentina). The Holocene29(3): 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683618816446
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
