This study examines how internet use affects environmental behaviors in China, using data from the 2013 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS2013). We construct objective indices for comprehensive and consumptive environmental behaviors through factor analysis. Results from multiple linear regression and two-stage least squares (2SLS) models show that internet use significantly promotes both types of behaviors. This positive effect holds even after addressing endogeneity concerns. Mechanism analyses indicate that internet use works by raising environmental awareness and increasing environmental knowledge. Furthermore, the effects are stronger among women, urban residents, and the highly educated. These findings highlight the role of digital platforms in closing the gap between awareness and action, with implications for policies promoting sustainable hydroscapes and ecological civilization.
BerenguerJCorralizaJAMartinR (2005) Rural-urban differences in environmental concern, attitudes, and actions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment21(2): 128–138.
2.
ChenFZhangCWangW, et al. (2023) Internet use and higher farmer participation in domestic waste sorting: micro-survey data from 2126 farming households in rural China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1): 884.
3.
ChenXChengZ-FYangH-J (2024) Empowering pro-environmental behavior in tourists through digital media: the influence of eco-guilt and empathy with nature. Frontiers in Psychology15: 1387817.
4.
DongGRuoLLuM, et al. (2019) Evolution of human–environmental interactions in China from the late Paleolithic to the Bronze Age. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment44(1): 233–252.
5.
DongGLuYZhangS, et al. (2022) Spatiotemporal variation in human settlements and their interaction with living environments in Neolithic and Bronze Age China. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment46(6): 949–967.
6.
DuPZhangLX (2020) Gendered pro-environmental behavior: an analysis of the mediating effects of gender equality awareness and environmental concern. Sociological Review of China8(2): 47–60.
FisherJDFisherWAWilliamsSS, et al. (1994) Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS-preventive behavior with gay men and heterosexual university students. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association13: 238–250.
9.
FuXXinZLouZ, et al. (2019) Nudging strategies for pro-environmental behavior. Advances in Psychological Science27(11): 1939–1950.
10.
GuM (2023) A Study on the Promoting Effect of Environmental Social Games on Pro-environmental Behavior. Master’s thesis. Nanjing University of Finance and Economics.
11.
JinHJYuLHZhangGL (2017) The influence of media use on individual environmental behavior: an empirical study based on CGSS 2013 data. Journal of Research2: 46–55.
12.
KouPHanYWangF (2023) Public participation, government-business collusion and environmental pollution: the moderating role of the internet. Journal of Northeastern University25(1): 47–54.
13.
LiJS (2023) A Study on the Relationship Between Behavioral Public Policy, Political Network Embeddedness, and Public Environmental Behavior. Master’s thesis. University of Science and Technology of China. CNKI.
14.
LiHWangL (2022) Gendered perceptions of air pollution risks among highly educated individuals in China. Environmental Research Letters17(8): 084021.
15.
LiuJZhangY (2022) Internet use, environmental knowledge and public pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology24(2): 73–81.
16.
LiuCLiCTengY, et al. (2025) Study on the influence mechanism of digital literacy on rural residents’ household waste classification behavior decision. Journal of Wuxi Institute of Commerce25(3): 20–30.
17.
LuSY (2017) Civic voluntarism, mass media, and public environmental behavior: an empirical analysis based on CGSS 2013 data in China. Public Administration Review10(5): 69–85.
18.
LuSYSunZF (2018) Mass media and public environmental behavior: an empirical analysis based on CGSS 2013 data in China. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment32(1): 43–49.
19.
LuSSunZHuangM (2024) The impact of digital literacy on farmers' pro-environmental behavior: an analysis with the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems8: 1432184.
20.
MalyanSKSinghOKumarA, et al. (2022) Greenhouse gases trade-off from ponds: an overview of emission process and their driving factors. Water14(6): 970.
21.
PengDYLiYCLiCQ (2019) The impact of internet use on environmental attitudes and environmental literacy. Finance and Economics8: 97–109.
22.
QayyumHHameedA (2023) Role of media in enhancing pro-environmental knowledge, attitude and behavior. Journal of Development and Social Sciences28(4): 214–223.
23.
RazaliGIskandarYFatmawatiS, et al. (2023) Psychological factors influencing pro-environmental behavior in urban areas. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies1(7): 408–415.
24.
SmithJLeeK (2024) Connecting the dots on female digital health education. Journal of Digital Health8(1): 45–53.
25.
SongJYLiFLHeK (2024) Internet and modern energy usage behaviors of rural households: an empirical evidence from CFPS. Journal of Environmental Economics9(3): 86–108.
26.
SuYLiuP (2024) The influence of normative illusion on residents’ waste-sorting behavior. Environmental Protection Science50(2): 33–41.
27.
TanSYangLS (2023) The influence of internet use on farmers’ clean energy adoption behavior. Operations Research and Fuzziology13(5): 5326–5335.
28.
ThompsonRPatelS (2024) Socio-demographic factors influencing digital pollution literacy in the UK. Sustainability16(3): 1124.
29.
TianHLiuX (2022) Pro-environmental behavior research: theoretical progress and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(11): 6721.
30.
UpadhyayPPrajapatiSKKumarA (2023) Impacts of riverine pollution on greenhouse gas emissions: a comprehensive review. Ecological Indicators154: 110649.
31.
WangYHanD (2016) Economic development, environmental pollution and public environmental protection behavior: a multi-layer analysis based on China’s CGSS2013 data. Journal of Chinese Min University30(2): 79–92.
32.
WangXWangZLiY (2022) Internet use on closing intention–behavior gap in green consumption—A mediation and moderation theoretical model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health20(1): 10365.
33.
WooldridgeJM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd edition. MIT Press.
34.
XiaoYLiuXRenT (2022) Internet use and pro-environmental behavior: evidence from China. PLoS One17(1): e0262644.
35.
XuXZhangD (2022) Impact of internet use on farmers’ pro-environmental behavior: an empirical study based on CRHPS2019 microdata. Journal of Harbin Normal University (Social Science Edition)13(5): 59–67.
36.
YuanZJiangPY (2025) Internet use and environmental behavior evidence from the CGSS2013. Journal of Environmental Sociology44(3): 55–67.
37.
YuanMPengZ (2025) Digital literacy, environmental cognition and farmers’ adoption of green production technology. Journal of Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University42(4): 35–44.
38.
ZengGY (2019) Intergenerational Differences in Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors and Policy Recommendations. Master’s thesis. China University of Petroleum (East China). CNKI.
39.
ZhangL (2023) The Impact of Exposure to Environmental Risk Information on Audiences’ Environmental Behavior. Master’s thesis. Chengdu University of Technology. CNKI.
40.
ZhangY (2024) Research on the Impact of Digital Literacy and Farmers’ Cognition on Rural Residents’ Participation in Human Settlement Environment Improvement. Master’s thesis. Northwest A&F University.
41.
ZhangYLiuX (2023) Estimating heterogeneous effects of internet use on environmental knowledge in China. Environmental Science & Technology57(12): 4567–4575.
42.
ZhangXDWangN (2021) The influence of social capital on public participation in environmental protection. Journal of Xinxiang University38(8): 9–14.
43.
ZhouXYangYWangD (2025) Exploring the characteristics of air pollution complaint reports from a spatiotemporal perspective: evidence from 339 Chinese cities. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment49(2): 344–365.
44.
ZhuHGShanHShenY, et al. (2022) The impact of digital literacy on farmers’ willingness and behavior in household waste classification. Journal of Jiangsu University24(4): 35–53.
45.
ZhuZKChengSYLengCX (2025) A micro-perspective on how digital China facilitates beautiful China: a study of the impact of digital skills on residents’ environmental literacy. Soft Science39(3): 98–107.
