Traditional monitoring (e.g., in-water based surveys) of eelgrass meadows and perennial macroalgae in coastal areas is time and labor intensive, requires extensive equipment, and the collected data has a low temporal resolution. Further, divers and Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) have a low spatial extent that cover small fractions of full systems. The inherent heterogeneity of eelgrass meadows and macroalgae assemblages in these coastal systems makes interpolation and extrapolation of observations complicated and, as such, methods to collect data on larger spatial scales whilst retaining high spatial resolution is required to guide management. Recently, the utilization of Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has gained popularity in ecological sciences due to their ability to rapidly collect large amounts of area-based and georeferenced data, making it possible to monitor the spatial extent and status of SAV communities with limited equipment requirements compared to ROVs or diver surveys. This paper is focused on the increased value provided by UAV-based, data collection (visual/Red Green Blue imagery) and Object Based Image Analysis for gaining an improved understanding of eelgrass recovery. It is demonstrated that delineation and classification of two species of SAV (Fucus vesiculosus and Zostera marina) is possible; with an error matrix indicating 86–92% accuracy. Classified maps also highlighted the increasing biomass and areal coverage of F. vesiculosus as a potential stressor to eelgrass meadows. Further, authors derive a statistically significant conversion of percentage cover to biomass (R2 = 0.96 for Fucus vesiculosus, R2 = 0.89 for Zostera marina total biomass, and R2 = 0.94 for AGB alone, p < 0.001). Results here provide an example of mapping cover and biomass of SAV and provide a tool to undertake spatio-temporal analyses to enhance the understanding of eelgrass ecosystem dynamics.
BaatzMSchapeA (2000) Multiresolution segmentation-An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In: AGIT Symposium Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII. http://www.ecognition.com/sites/default/files/405_baatz_fp_12.pdf (accessed 18 April 2020).
4.
BarilléLRobinMHarinN, et al. (2010) Increase in seagrass distribution at bourgneuf bay (France) detected by spatial remote sensing. Aquatic Botany92(3): 185–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2009.11.006.
5.
BarrellJGrantJ (2015) High-resolution, low-altitude aerial photography in physical geography: A case study characterizing eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) landscape mosaic structure. Progress in Physical Geography39(4): 440–459. DOI: 10.1177/0309133315578943.
6.
BellSSRobbinsBDJensenSL (1999) Gap dynamics in a Seagrass landscape. Ecosystems2(6): 493–504. DOI: 10.1007/s100219900097.
7.
BensonJLSchlezingerDHowesBL (2013) Relationship between nitrogen concentration, light, and Zostera marina habitat quality and survival in southeastern Massachusetts estuaries. Journal of Environmental Management131C: 129–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.033.
8.
BlaschkeT (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing65(1): 2–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004.
9.
BoströmCBonsdorffE (2000) Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity–the importance of seagrass, shoot-density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series205: 123–138. DOI: 10.3354/meps205123.
10.
BruhnAHøgslundSDahlK, et al. (2017) Ålegræs og anden Vegetation på Kystnær Blød Bund (Danish) Technical Report M18. Roskilde: DCE, pp. 1–28.
11.
Canal-VergésPPetersenJKRasmussenEK, et al. (2016) Validating GIS tool to assess eelgrass potential recovery in the Limfjorden (Denmark). Ecological Modelling338: 135–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.04.023.
12.
Canal-VergésPPotthoffMHansenFT, et al. (2014) Eelgrass re-establishment in shallow estuaries is affected by drifting macroalgae–Evaluated by agent-based modeling. Ecological Modelling272: 116–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.008.
13.
Canal VergésPVedelMValdemarsenTB, et al. (2010) Resuspension created by bedload transport of macroalgae: implications for ecosystem functioning. Hydrobiologia. 649: 69–76. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0259-y.
14.
CarstensenJKrause-JensenDBalsbyTJS (2016) Biomass-cover relationship for eelgrass meadows. Estuaries and Coasts39(2): 440–450. DOI: 10.1007/s12237-015-9995-6.
15.
ChoHJLuD (2010) A water-depth correction algorithm for submerged vegetation spectra. Remote Sensing Letters1(1): 29–35. DOI: 10.1080/01431160903246709.
16.
CongaltonRGGreenK (2009) Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data - Principles and Practices (2nd edition), Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 121–127.
17.
Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) (2016) Extracted Dataset of the Years 2009-2014. Denmark: Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI).
DuffyJPPrattLAndersonK, et al. (2018) Spatial assessment of intertidal seagrass meadows using optical imaging systems and a lightweight drone. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science200: 169–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.11.001.
22.
European parliament (2000) Directive 2000/60/ec of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL327/1: 1–71.
23.
FlindtMRSalomonsenJCarrerM, et al. (1997) Loss, growth and transport dynamics of Chaetomorpha aerea and Ulva rigida in the Lagoon of Venice during an early summer field campaign. Ecological Modelling102(1): 133–141. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00093-8.
24.
FlindtMRPardalMÂLillebøAI, et al. (1999) Nutrient cycling and plant dynamics in estuaries: A brief review. Acta Oecologica20(4): 237–248. DOI: 10.1016/S1146-609X(99)00142-3.
25.
FlindtMNetoJAmosCL, et al. (2004) Plant bound nutrient transport. Mass transport in estuaries and lagoons. In: Nielsen SL, Banta GT, Pedersen MF. The influence of primary producers on estuarine nutrient cycling (93-128). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
FlindtMRPedersenCBAmosCL, et al. (2007) Transport, sloughing and settling rates of estuarine macrophytes: Mechanisms and ecological implications. Chemical Society Reviews27(8): 1096–1103. DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2006.08.011.
27.
FlindtMRRasmussenEKValdemarsenT, et al. (2016) Using a GIS-tool to evaluate potential eelgrass reestablishment in estuaries. Ecological Modelling338: 122–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.07.005.
28.
FonsecaMSBellSS (1998) The influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series171: 109–121. DOI: 10.3354/meps171109.
29.
FoodyG (2008) Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing29(11): 3137–3158. DOI: 10.1080/01431160701442120.
30.
FrederiksenMKrause-JensenDHolmerM, et al. (2004) Long-term changes in area distribution of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Danish coastal waters. Aquatic Botany78(2): 167–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2003.10.002.
31.
HansenJW (ed.), (2018) Marine Områder 2016 NOVANA (Danish). Aarhus Universitet, DCE–Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi–Scientific Report, pp. 1–140. Available at: http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR253.pdf (accessed 05 April 2020).
32.
HaynesDMüllerJCarterS (2000) Pesticide and herbicide residues in sediments and seagrasses from the great barrier reef world heritage area and queensland coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin41(7–12): 279–287. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00097-7.
33.
HemmingaMADuarteCM (2000) Seagrass Ecology. UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HirstJAAttrillMJ (2008) Small is beautiful: An inverted view of habitat fragmentation in seagrass beds. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science78(4): 811–818. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2008.02.020.
35.
HogrefeKRWardDHDonnellyTF, et al. (2014) Establishing a baseline for regional scale monitoring of eelgrass (Zostera marina) habitat on the lower alaska peninsula. Remote Sensing6(12): 12447–12477. DOI: 10.3390/rs61212447.
36.
HossainMSBujangJSZakariaMH, et al. (2015) The application of remote sensing to seagrass ecosystems: an overview and future research prospects. International Journal of Remote Sensing36(1): 61–113. DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2014.990649.
37.
HowardJMcLeodEThomasS, et al. (2017) The potential to integrate blue carbon into MPA design and management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems27(S1): 100–115. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2809.
38.
HussonEEckeFReeseH (2016) Comparison of manual mapping and automated object-based image analysis of non-submerged aquatic vegetation from very-high-resolution UAS images. Remote Sensing8(9): 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/rs8090724.
39.
JoyceKEDuceSLeahySM, et al. (2017) Principles and practice of acquiring drone-based image data in marine environments. Marine and Freshwater Research70(7): 952–963. DOI: 10.1071/MF17380.
40.
Krause-JensenDDuarteCM (2016) Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration. Nature Genetics9: 737–742.
41.
KristensenE (1990) Characterization of biogenic organic matter by stepwise thermogravimetry (STG). Biochemistry9(2): 135–159. DOI: 10.1007/BF00692169.
42.
KuusemäeKRasmussenEKCanal-VergésP, et al. (2016) Modelling stressors on the eelgrass recovery process in two Danish estuaries. Ecological Modelling333: 11–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.04.008.
43.
LangS (2008) Object-based image analysis for remote sensing applications: modeling reality–dealing with complexity. In: BlaschkeTLangSHayGJ (eds.), Object-Based Image Analysis – Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-Driven Remote Sensing Applications. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3–27.
44.
LangeTWendländerNSSvaneN, et al.Large-scale eelgrass transplantation: A measure for carbon and nutrient sequestration in estuaries. Unpub. accepted 09-2021 in Marine Ecology Progress Series: 1-12.
45.
LangeTValdemarsenTAaskovenNL, et al. (2020) Protection against physical stress enhances eelgrass (Zostera marina) transplant performance. In Development and Test of Measures Supporting Recovery of Eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Estuaries - Phd Thesis, Lange T (2020). Odense, Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, 60-74.
46.
LillesandTMKieferRWChipmanJW (2015) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. USA: John Wiley & Sons, 485–608.
47.
LorenzoJMAgregánRMunekataPES, et al. (2017) Proximate composition and nutritional value of three macroalgae: ascophyllum nodosum, fucus vesiculosus and bifurcaria bifurcata. Marine Drugs15(11): 1–11. DOI: 10.3390/md15110360.
48.
MazarrasaISamper-VillarrealJSerranoO, et al. (2018) Habitat characteristics provide insights of carbon storage in seagrass meadows. Marine Pollution Bulletin134: 106–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.059.
49.
McLeodEChmuraGLBouillonS, et al. (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: Toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment9(10): 552–560. DOI: 10.1890/110004.
50.
MoksnesPOErianderLInfantesE, et al. (2018) Local regime shifts prevent natural recovery and restoration of lost eelgrass beds along the Swedish West Coast. Estuaries and Coasts Estuaries and Coasts41(6): 1712–1731. DOI: 10.1007/s12237-018-0382-y.
51.
MyburghGvan NiekerkA (2014) Impact of training set size on object-based land cover classification: A comparison of three classifiers. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research5(3): 49–67. DOI: 10.4018/ijagr.2014070104.
52.
NahirnickNKReshitnykLCampbellM, et al. (2019) Mapping with confidence; delineating seagrass habitats using unoccupied aerial systems (UAS). Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation5(2): 121–135. DOI: 10.1002/rse2.98.
53.
ÖbergJ (2006) Primary production by macroalgae in Kattegat, estimated from monitoring data, seafloor properties, and model simulations. Chemical Society Reviews26(19): 2415–2432. DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2006.07.005.
OlesenB (1999) Reproduction in Danish eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) stands: size-dependence and biomass partitioning. Aquatic Botany65(1–4): 209–219. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00041-8.
56.
OrthRJCarruthersTJBDennisonWC, et al. (2006) A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. BioScience56: 987. DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[987:AGCFSE]2.0.CO;2.
57.
OrthRJMooreKAMarionSR, et al. (2012) Seed addition facilitates eelgrass recovery in a coastal bay system. Marine Ecology Progress Series448: 177–195. DOI: 10.3354/meps09522.
58.
OrthRJLefcheckJSMcGlatheryKS, et al. (2020) Restoration of seagrass habitat leads to rapid recovery of coastal ecosystem services. Science Advances6(41): 1–9. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abc6434.
59.
ØrbergSBGroomGBKjeldgaardA, et al. (2018) Kortlægning Af Ålegræsenge Med Ortofotos (Danish). Roskilde: Scientific ReportDCE, 265, pp. 1–70.
60.
PetersenJDRaskNMadsenHB, et al. (2009) Odense pilot river basin: implementation of the EU water framework directive in a shallow eutrophic estuary (Odense Fjord, Denmark) and its upstream catchment. Hydrobiologia629(1): 71–89. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-009-9774-0.
61.
RasmussenJROlesenBKrause-JensenD (2012) Effects of filamentous macroalgae mats on growth and survival of eelgrass, Zostera marina, seedlings. Aquatic Botany99: 41–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.01.005.
62.
SalomonsenJFlindtMGeertz-HansenO, et al. (1999) Modelling advective transport of Ulva lactuca (L) in the sheltered bay, Møllekrogen, Roskilde Fjord, Denmark. Hydrobiologia. 397: 241–252. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003790625535.
63.
ShortFTPolidoroBLivingstoneSR, et al. (2011) Extinction risk assessment of the world's seagrass species. Biological Conservation144: 1961–1971. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.010.
64.
SousaAIda SilvaJFAzevedoA, et al. (2019) Blue carbon stock in Zostera noltei meadows at Ria de Aveiro coastal lagoon (Portugal) over a decade. Scientific Reports9(1): 1–13. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50425-4.
65.
SvaneNEgemoseSThomasbergerA, et al.(unpub). Working title: Identifying stress-impact on a coastal eelgrass meadow over a 6-year period – Application of UAV-based imagery and Object-Based Image Analysis.
66.
SvaneNFlindtMRKristensenE, et al. (2016) Droner–et nyt værdifuldt værktøj til kystnær overvågning (danish). Vand and Jord, E-Bog Nr3: 125–129.
67.
SvaneNEgemoseSFlindtMR (2018) Marin monitering ved brug af droner: Ålegræs-og presfaktor-kortlægning ved billedanalyse (danish). In: Conference Contribution. Danish Marine Science Meeting, Odense, Denmark.
StæhrPAGroomGBKrause-JensenD, et al. (2019) Use of Remote Sensing Technologies for Monitoring Chlorophyll a and Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Danish Coastal Waters Technical Report No. 139. Roskilde: DCE, pp. 1–66.
70.
The ministry of traffic and buildings, 2016. Act of Drone-Flight in Urban Areas (Danish). The Ministry of Traffic and Buildings: 1–14.
71.
TannerJE (2005) Edge effects on fauna in fragmented seagrass meadows. Austral Ecology30(2): 210–218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01438.x.
72.
The Agency of Data Distribution and Efficiency, 2021. DTK/Skaermkort. Downloaded May 2021.
73.
The ministry of traffic and buildings, 2017. Act of Drone-Flight Outside Urban Areas (Danish). The Ministry of Traffic and Buildings: 1–7.
74.
Trimble Inc (2020). eCognition Developer 9.3 – 9.5. Available at: http://www.ecognition.com (accessed 01 October 2020).
75.
TzotsosAArgialasD (2008) Support vector machine classification for object-based image analysis. In: BlaschkeTLangSHayGJ (eds.), Object-Based Image Analysis – Spatial Concepts for Knowledge-Driven Remote Sensing Applications. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 663–678.
76.
ValdemarsenTCanal-VergesPKristensenE, et al. (2010) Vulnerability of Zostera marina seedlings to physical stress. Marine Ecology Progress Series418: 119–130. DOI: 10.3354/meps08828.
77.
ValdemarsenTWendelboeKEgelundJT, et al. (2011) Burial of seeds and seedlings by the lugworm Arenicola marina hampers eelgrass (Zostera marina) recovery. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology410: 45–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.10.006.
78.
ValdemarsenTQuintanaCOKristensenE, et al. (2014) Recovery of organic-enriched sediments through microbial degradation: Implications for eutrophic estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series503: 41–58. DOI: 10.3354/meps10747.
79.
WardLGKempMBoyntonWR (1984) The influence of waves and seagrass communities on suspended particulates in an estuarine embayment. Marine Geology59(1–4): 85–103. DOI: 10.1016/0025-3227(84)90089-6.
80.
WarryFYHindellJSMacreadiePI, et al. (2009) Integrating edge effects into studies of habitat fragmentation: a test using meiofauna in seagrass. Oecologia159(4): 883–892. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1258-9.
81.
WaycottMDuarteCMCarruthersTJB, et al. (2009) Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the united states of America106(30): 12377–12381. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905620106.
82.
WicksECKochEWO’NeilJM, et al. (2009) Effects of sediment organic content and hydrodynamic conditions on the growth and distribution of Zostera marina. Marine Ecology Progress Series378: 71–80. DOI: 10.3354/meps07885.
83.
WilliamsSL (2007) Introduced species in seagrass ecosystems: Status and concerns. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology350(1): 89–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.05.032.
