A physical and social analysis of how variations in no-till conservation practices lead to inaccurate sediment runoff estimations in agricultural watersheds

Abstract

Although agricultural influence on sediment runoff is well known, determining what sources of sediment contribute most to stream impairment has remained challenging in agricultural watersheds across the world. Therefore, methods to distinguish the sources of sediment in streams are warranted, particularly methods that incorporate information on anthropogenic practices that affect sediment runoff. In this study we examined how variations in conservation practices contributed to unidentified sources of sediment in an agricultural watershed, where 49% of sediment was sourced from agricultural fields that were assumed to have little erosional runoff. We found that variations in the way no-till agriculture is practiced significantly affected estimates of erosion in the watershed and also led agency managers to overlook sources of sediment in the watershed. In doing this research, we provide a methodological framework that may be useful to researchers who are attempting to identify sources of sediment erosion in watersheds impacted by variations in agricultural conservation practices.

Keywords

No-till conservation practices water quality sediment runoff

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bain

Selfa

Dandachi

, et al. (2017) “Superweeds” or “survivors”? Framing the problem of glyphosate resistant weeds and genetically engineered crops. Journal of Rural Studies 51: 211–221.

Barker

(2017) Occasional tillage OK to get rid of ruts on long-term no-till soils. Available at: https://www.topcropmanager.com/tillage/getting-out-of-a-rut-20772 (accessed 21 January 2019).

Blake

Ficken

Taylor

, et al. (2012) Tracing crop-specific sediment sources in agricultural catchments. Geomorphology 139–140: 322–329.

Cash

Clark

Alcock

, et al. (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14): 8086–8091.

Doyle

Lave

Robertson

, et al. (2013) River Federalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(2): 290–298. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2013.754686.

Doyle

Singh

Lave

, et al. (2015) The morphology of streams restored for market and nonmarket purposes: Insights from a mixed natural-social science approach. Water Resources Research 51(7): 5603–5622.

Engel-Di Mauro

(2014) Ecology, Soils, and the Left: An Ecosocial Approach. 1st ed . Environmental Politics and Theory. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (2012) What is a 303(d) list of impaired waters? Overview of impaired waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads program. Available at: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/overview.cfm (accessed 23 January 2017).

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (2015) Impaired waters and TMDLs in Region 10. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/tmdl/impaired-waters-and-tmdls-region-10 (accessed 22 January 2017).

10.

Environmental Working Group, EWG (2017a) Available at: https://conservation.ewg.org/whip_regions.php?fips=41000&regionname=Oregon (accessed 7 April 2017).

11.

Environmental Working Group, EWG (2017b) Subtotal, Farming Subsidies in Wasco County, Oregon, 1995–2014. Available at: https://farm.ewg.org/top_recips.php?fips=41065&progcode=totalfarm&page=0 (accessed 7 April 2017).

12.

Fazey

Evely

Reed

, et al. (2013) Knowledge exchange: A review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation 40(1): 19–36.

13.

Fernandez-Cornejo

Hallahan

Nehring

, et al. (2013) Conservation tillage, herbicide use, and genetically engineered crops in the United States: The case of soybeans. Available at: http://www.agbioforum.org/v15n3/v15n3a01-fernandez-cornejo.htm (accessed 8 May 2015).

14.

Fifteenmile Watershed and Council (2018). Available at: https://wascoswcd.org/wcswcd_020.htm. (accessed 5 October 2018).

15.

Francis

Goodman

(2010) Post-normal science and the art of nature conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation 18(2): 89–105.

16.

Friedrich

Kassam

(2012) No-till farming and the environment: Do no-till systems require more chemicals? Outlooks on Pest Management 23(4): 153–157.

17.

Fryirs

(2013) (Dis)connectivity in catchment sediment cascades: A fresh look at the sediment delivery problem. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38(1): 30–46.

18.

Chen

McCool

(2006) Modeling the impacts of no-till practice on soil erosion and sediment yield with RUSLE, SEDD, and ArcView GIS. Soil and Tillage Research 85(1): 38–49.

19.

Fulajtar

Mabit

Renschler

, et al. (2017) Use of 137Cs for soil erosion assessment. Joint FAO/IAEA program. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

20.

Government Accountability Office, GAO (2011) Drinking water: Unreliable state data limit EPA’s ability to target enforcement priorities and communicate water systems’ performance. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-381 (accessed 28 February 2018).

21.

Harrison

(2008) Abandoned bodies and spaces of sacrifice: Pesticide drift activism and the contestation of neoliberal environmental politics in California. Geoforum 39(3): 1197–1214.

22.

Houben

Wunderlich

Schrott

(2009) Climate and long-term human impact on sediment fluxes in watershed systems. Geomorphology 108(1): 1–7.

23.

Huggins

Reganold

(2008) No-till: The quiet revolution. Scientific American 299(1): 70–77.

24.

Jessup

(2016) National Water Quality Initiative technical assistance for Fifteenmile Creek (Oregon): Comparison of substrate measures through 2016. Final Report, 29 December. Pasadena, CA: Tetra Tech, Inc.

25.

Krzywoszynska

(2019) Making knowledge and meaning in communities of practice: What role may science play? The case of sustainable soil management in England. Soil Use and Management 35(1): 160–168.

26.

Malone

(2017) Using critical physical geography to map the unintended consequences of conservation management programs. Dissertations and Theses, paper 3639. Available at: https://www.pdx.edu/ (accessed 5 June 2018).

27.

Malone

Foster

(2019) A mixed-methods approach to determine how conservation management programs and techniques have affected herbicide use and distribution in the environment over time. Science of The Total Environment 660: 145–157.

28.

Margulies

(2012) No-till agriculture in the USA. In: Lichtfouse

(ed) Organic Fertilisation, Soil Quality and Human Health. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 11–30.

29.

Montgomery

(2007) Is agriculture eroding civilization’s foundation? GSA Today 17(10): 4–9.

30.

Nagle

Ritchie

(2003) Wheat field erosion rates and channel bottom sediment sources in an intensively cropped northeastern Oregon drainage basin. Land Degradation & Development 15(1): 15–26.

31.

Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS (2006) Tillage practice guide. A guide to USDA-NRCS practice standards 329 no till/strip till/direct seed and 345 mulch till: Practice Standard 329 – no till/strip till/direct seed. US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Available at: https://prod.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_020719.pdf (accessed 1 September 2018).

32.

Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS (2015) Erosion conservation analysis. Lower Deschutes Agricultural Water Quality Plan Assessment. Presentation October 2015.

33.

Natural Resources Conservation Service, NRCS (2016). Wasco County: Information for partners and participants. Available at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/or/snow/?cid=nrcs142p2_044028 (accessed 7 July 2016).

34.

Nerbonne

Lentz

(2003) Rooted in grass: Challenging patterns of knowledge exchange as a means of fostering social change in a southeast Minnesota farm community. Agriculture and Human Values 20(1): 65–78.

35.

Neuman

Pollack

(2010) U.S. Farmers Cope With Roundup-Resistant Weeds. The New York Times, 3 May. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/business/energy-environment/04weed.html (accessed 29 June 2019).

36.

Olley

Burton

Smolders

, et al. (2013) The application of fallout radionuclides to determine the dominant erosion process in water supply catchments of subtropical South-east Queensland, Australia. Hydrological Processes 27(6): 885–895.

37.

Peart

Walling

(1988) Techniques for establishing suspended sediment sources in two drainage basins in Devon, UK: A comparative assessment. In: Sediment Budgets: Proceedings of the Porto Alegre Symposium (eds Bordas

Walling

), Porto Alegre, Brazil, 11–15 December, 41–55. Wallingford, UK: IAHA.

38.

Pullin

Knight

(2001) Effectiveness in conservation practice: Pointers from medicine and public health. Conservation Biology 15(1): 50–54.

39.

Raedeke

Rikoon

(1997) Temporal and spatial dimensions of knowledge: Implications for sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 14(2): 145–158. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007346929150.

40.

Rhoads

Lewis

Andresen

(2016) Historical changes in channel network extent and channel planform in an intensively managed landscape: Natural versus human-induced effects. Geomorphology 252: 17–31.

41.

Richter D de

(2007) Humanity’s transformation of earth’s soil: Pedology’s new frontier. Soil Science 172(12): 957–967.

42.

Rincon-Florez

Dang

, et al. (2016) Short-term impact of an occasional tillage on microbial communities in a Vertosol after 43 years of no-tillage or conventional tillage. European Journal of Soil Biology 74(C): 32–38.

43.

Schlegel

Holman

(2018) Occasional tillage in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 4(8). DOI: 10.4148/2378-5977.7629.

44.

Schreiber

Rebich

Cooper

(2001) Dynamics of diffuse pollution from US southern watersheds. Water Research 35(10): 2534–2542.

45.

Stavi

Lal

Owens

(2011) On-farm effects of no-till versus occasional tillage on soil quality and crop yields in eastern Ohio. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 31(3): 475–482. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-011-0006-4.

46.

Stout

Belmont

Schottler

, et al. (2014) Identifying sediment sources and sinks in the root river, Southeastern Minnesota. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104(1): 20–39. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2013.843434.

47.

United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, USDA ERS (2017) Soil tillage and crop rotation. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-practices-management/crop-livestock-practices/soil-tillage-and-crop-rotation/ (accessed 22 January 2018).

48.

Wade

Claassen

Wall

, et al. (2016) Conservation-practice adoption rates vary widely by crop and region. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=44030 (accessed 10 March 2018).

49.

Wainwright

Turnbull

Ibrahim

, et al. (2011) Linking environmental régimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity. Geomorphology 126(3): 387–404.

50.

Wallbrink

(2004) Quantifying the erosion processes and land-uses which dominate fine sediment supply to Moreton Bay, Southeast Queensland, Australia. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 76(1–2): 67–80.

51.

Wallbrink

Murray

(1996) Distribution and variability of 7Be in soils under different surface cover conditions and its potential for describing soil redistribution processes. Water Resources Research 32(2): 467–476.

52.

Walling

Fang

(2003) Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Global and Planetary Change 39(1): 111–126.

53.

Washington State University, Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources (2017) WSU Extension: High residue farming under irrigation. Available at: http://csanr.wsu.edu/high-residue-farming-under-irrigation/ (accessed 10 March 2017).

54.

Williams

Wuest

Long

(2014) Soil and water conservation in the Pacific Northwest through no-tillage and intensified crop rotations. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69(6): 495–504.

55.

Wortmann

Drijber

Franti

(2010) One-time tillage of no-till crop land five years post-tillage. Agronomy Journal 102(4): 1302–1307.

56.

Zapata

(ed) (2003) Handbook for the Assessment of Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Using Environmental Radionuclides. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/0-306-48054-9 (accessed 11 February 2016).

57.

Zhang XC

(John)

Zhang

Liu

, et al. (2016) Using cesium-137 to quantify sediment source contribution and uncertainty in a small watershed. Catena 140: 116–124.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.79 MB

0.06 MB