AndersonKGastonKJ (2013) Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment11: 138–146.
2.
BakkerMLaneSN (2017) Archival photogrammetric analysis of river–floodplain systems using Structure from Motion (SfM) methods. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42: 1274–1286.
3.
BalsiMEspositoSFallavollitaP. (2018) Single-tree detection in high-density LiDAR data from UAV-based survey. European Journal of Remote Sensing51: 679–692.
4.
BayleyDTIMoggAOMKoldeweyH. (2019) Capturing complexity: field-testing the use of ‘structure from motion’ derived virtual models to replicate standard measures of reef physical structure. PeerJ7: e6540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6540.
5.
BemisSPMicklethwaiteSTurnerD. (2014) Ground-based and UAV-based photogrammetry: A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and paleoseismology. Journal of Structural Geology69: 163–178.
6.
BirdalACAvdanUTürkT (2017) Estimating tree heights with images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk8: 1144–1156.
7.
BrunierGFleuryJAnthonyEJ. (2016) Close-range airborne structure-from-motion photogrammetry for high-resolution beach morphometric surveys: Examples from an embayed rotating beach. Geomorphology261: 76–88.
8.
BurnsJHRDelparteDGatesRD. (2015) Integrating structure-from-motion photogrammetry with geospatial software as a novel technique for quantifying 3D ecological characteristics of coral reefs. PeerJ3: e1077.
9.
CarbonneauPEDietrichJT (2017) Cost-effective non-metric photogrammetry from consumer-grade sUAS: Implications for direct georeferencing of structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42: 473–486.
10.
CasellaECollinAHarrisD. 2017. Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques. Coral Reefs36: 269–275.
11.
CastilloCPérezRJamesMR. (2012) Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal76: 1319–1332.
12.
CullenNDVermaAKBourkeMC (2018) A comparison of structure from motion photogrammetry and the traversing micro-erosion meter for measuring erosion on shore platforms. Earth Surface Dynamics6: 1023–1039.
13.
CunliffeAAndersonKBrazierRE (2016) Ultra-fine grain landscape-scale monitoring of dryland vegetation structure with drone-acquired structure-from-motion SfM photogrammetry. Remote Sensing of Environment183: 129–143.
14.
Dall’AstaEThoeniKSantiseM. (2015) Network design and quality checks in automatic orientation of close-range photogrammetric blocks. Sensors15: 7985–8008.
15.
DandoisJPEllisEC (2010) Remote sensing of vegetation structure using computer vision. Remote Sensing2: 1157–1176.
16.
DietrichJT (2017) Bathymetric structure-from-motion: Extracting shallow stream bathymetry from multi-view stereo photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42: 355–364.
17.
DowlingTReadAGallantJ (2009) Very high resolution DEM acquisition at low cost using a digital camera and free software. In: 18th world IMACS congress and MODSIM09 international congress on modelling and simulation (eds. AnderssenRSBraddockRDNewhamLTH), 2009, 2479–2485. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand and International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation.
18.
DuffyJShutlerJWittM. (2018) Tracking fine-scale structural changes in coastal dune morphology using kite aerial photography and uncertainty-assessed structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Remote Sensing10: 1494.
19.
EltnerAKaiserACastilloC. 2016. Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry–merits, limits and developments. Earth Surface Dynamics4: 359–389.
20.
FonstadMADietrichJTCourvilleBC. (2013) Topographic structure from motion: A new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms38: 421–430.
GarrettBAndersonK (2018) Drone methodologies: Taking flight in human and physical geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers43: 341–359.
23.
GlendellMMcshaneGFarrowL. (2017) Testing the utility of structure-from-motion photogrammetry reconstructions using small unmanned aerial vehicles and ground photography to estimate the extent of upland soil erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42: 1860–1871.
24.
HolmanFRicheAMichalskiA. (2016) High throughput field phenotyping of wheat plant height and growth rate in field plot trials using UAV based remote sensing. Remote Sensing8: 1031.
25.
ImmerzeelWWKraaijenbrinkPDASheaJM. (2014) High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles. Remote Sensing of Environment150: 93–103.
26.
JamesMRobsonS (2012) Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface117(F3). DOI: 10.1029/2011JF002289.
27.
JamesMRApplegarthLJPinkertonH (2012) Lava channel roofing, overflows, breaches and switching: Insights from the 2008–2009 eruption of Mt. Etna. Bulletin of Volcanology74: 107–117.
28.
JamesMRRobsonSd’Oleire-OltmannsS. (2017a) Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment. Geomorphology280: 51–66.
29.
JamesMRRobsonSSmithMW (2017b) 3-D uncertainty-based topographic change detection with structure-from-motion photogrammetry: Precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42: 1769–1788.
30.
JavernickLBrasingtonJCarusoB (2014) Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology213: 166–182.
31.
KääbAGirodLMRBerthlingIT (2014) Surface kinematics of periglacial sorted circles using structure-from-motion technology. The Cryosphere8: 1041–1056.
32.
KalacskaMChmuraGLucanusO. (2017) Structure from motion will revolutionize analyses of tidal wetland landscapes. Remote Sensing of Environment199: 14–24.
MallalieuJCarrivickJLQuinceyDJ. (2017) An integrated structure-from-motion and time-lapse technique for quantifying ice-margin dynamics. Journal of Glaciology63: 937–949.
35.
ManciniFDubbiniMGattelliM. (2013) Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for high-resolution reconstruction of topography: The structure from motion approach on coastal environments. Remote Sensing5: 6880–6898.
36.
MarteauBVericatDGibbinsC. (2017) Application of structure-from-motion photogrammetry to river restoration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms42: 503–515.
37.
MercerJJWestbrookCJ (2016) Ultrahigh-resolution mapping of peatland microform using ground-based structure from motion with multiview stereo. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences121: 2901–2916.
38.
MessingerMAsnerGSilmanM (2016) Rapid assessments of Amazon forest structure and biomass using small unmanned aerial systems. Remote Sensing8: 615.
39.
MidgleyNGTonkinTN (2017) Reconstruction of former glacier surface topography from archive oblique aerial images. Geomorphology282: 18–26.
40.
MikitaTJanataPSurovýP (2016) Forest stand inventory based on combined aerial and terrestrial close-range photogrammetry. Forests7: 165.
41.
MlamboRWoodhouseIGerardF. (2017) Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry with drone data: A low cost method for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from forests in developing countries. Forests8: 68.
42.
MölgNBolchT (2017) Structure-from-motion using historical aerial images to analyse changes in glacier surface elevation. Remote Sensing9: 1021.
43.
MorganJABroganDJNelsonPA (2017) Application of structure-from-motion photogrammetry in laboratory flumes. Geomorphology276: 125–143.
44.
MurtiyosoAGrussenmeyerPBörlinN. (2018) Open source and independent methods for bundle adjustment assessment in close-range UAV photogrammetry. Drones2: 3.
45.
NakanoTKamiyaITobitaM. (2014) Landform monitoring in active volcano by UAV and SFM-MVS technique. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences40: 71.
46.
NiethammerURothmundSJamesM. (2010) UAV-based remote sensing of landslides. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences38: 496–501.
47.
NolanMLarsenCSturmM (2015) Mapping snow-depth from manned-aircraft on landscape scales at centimeter resolution using structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Cryosphere Discussions9: 1445–1463.
48.
O’ConnorJSmithMJJamesMR (2017) Cameras and settings for aerial surveys in the geosciences: Optimising image data. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment41: 325–344.
49.
OkAOOzdarici-OkA (2018) 2-D delineation of individual citrus trees from UAV-based dense photogrammetric surface models. International Journal of Digital Earth11: 583–608.
50.
OlsoyPJShipleyLARachlowJL. (2018) Unmanned aerial systems measure structural habitat features for wildlife across multiple scales. Methods in Ecology and Evolution9: 594–604.
51.
ProsdocimiMBurguetMDi PrimaS. (2017) Rainfall simulation and structure-from-motion photogrammetry for the analysis of soil water erosion in Mediterranean vineyards. Science of the Total Environment574: 204–215.
52.
ProsdocimiMCalligaroSSofiaG. (2015) Bank erosion in agricultural drainage networks: New challenges from structure-from-motion photogrammetry for post-event analysis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms40: 1891–1906.
53.
RosnellTHonkavaaraE (2012) Point cloud generation from aerial image data acquired by a quadrocopter type micro unmanned aerial vehicle and a digital still camera. Sensors12: 453–480.
54.
RužićIMarovićIBenacČ. (2014) Coastal cliff geometry derived from structure-from-motion photogrammetry at Stara Baška, Krk Island, Croatia. Geo-Marine Letters34: 555–565.
55.
RyanJCHubbardALBoxJE. (2015) UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet. The Cryosphere9: 1–11.
56.
SmithMWVericatD (2015) From experimental plots to experimental landscapes: Topography, erosion and deposition in sub-humid badlands from structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms40: 1656–1671.
57.
SmithMWCarrivickJHookeJ. (2014) Reconstructing flash flood magnitudes using ‘Structure-from-Motion’: A rapid assessment tool. Journal of Hydrology519: 1914–1927.
58.
StimpsonIGertisserRMontenariM. (2010) Multi-scale geological outcrop visualisation: Using Gigapan and Photosynth in fieldwork-related geology teaching. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 4702.
59.
StorlazziCDDartnellPHatcherGA. (2016) End of the chain? Rugosity and fine-scale bathymetry from existing underwater digital imagery using structure-from-motion (SfM) technology. Coral Reefs35: 889–894.
60.
TurnerDLucieerAWatsonC (2012) An automated technique for generating georectified mosaics from ultra-high resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery, based on Structure from Motion (SfM) point clouds. Remote Sensing4: 1392–1410.
61.
VarelaMRPatrícioARAndersonK. (2019) Assessing climate change associated sea-level rise impacts on sea turtle nesting beaches using drones, photogrammetry and a novel GPS system. Global Change Biology25(2): 753–762.
62.
Vázquez-TarríoDBorgnietLLiébaultF. (2017) Using UAS optical imagery and SfM photogrammetry to characterize the surface grain size of gravel bars in a braided river (Vénéon River, French Alps). Geomorphology285: 94–105.
63.
WallaceLLucieerAMalenovskyZ. (2016) Assessment of forest structure using two UAV techniques: A comparison of airborne laser scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) point clouds. Forests7: 62.
64.
WebsterCWestobyMJRutterN. (2018) Three-dimensional thermal characterization of forest canopies using UAV photogrammetry. Remote Sensing of Environment209: 835–847.
65.
WeltyEPfefferWAhnY (2010) Something for everyone: Quantifying evolving (glacial) landscapes with your camera. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
66.
WestobyMJBrasingtonJGlasserNF. (2012) ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology179: 300–314.
67.
WoodgetASCarbonneauPEVisserF. (2015) Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms40: 47–64.
68.
ZahawiRADandoisJPHollKD. (2015) Using lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles to monitor tropical forest recovery. Biological Conservation186: 287–295.