The overall objective of this review is to gain insights into landslide risk reduction measures that are applied or recommended in tropical landslide-prone countries, and the challenges at play. More specifically, this review aims to (i) presenting an overview of recent studies on landslides and landslide risk reduction in these countries, (ii) exploring the factors controlling the publication output on landslides and landslide risk reduction, (iii) reviewing the various landslide risk reduction measures recommended and implemented, and (iv) identifying the bottlenecks for the implementation of these strategies. A compilation of recommended and implemented landslide risk reduction measures in 99 landslide-prone tropical countries was made, based on an extensive review of scientific literature (382 publications). The documented measures are analysed using a scheme of risk reduction measures that combines classifications of the Hyogo Framework for Action and the SafeLand project. Our literature review shows that the factors influencing the number of publications on landslides and landslide risk reduction per country are (in order of importance) the absolute physical exposure of people to landslides, the population number and the Human Development Index of a country. The ratio of publications on landslide risk reduction versus publications on landslides for landslide-prone tropical countries does not vary much between these countries (average: 0.28). A significant fraction (0.30) of all known landslide hazard reduction measures are neither implemented nor recommended according to our review. The most recommended landslide risk reduction component is ‘risk management and vulnerability reduction’ (0.38). However, the most implemented component is ‘risk assessment’ (0.57). Overall, the ratio of implemented versus recommended landslide risk reduction measures in the tropics is low (<0.50) for most landslide risk reduction components, except for ‘risk assessment’ (3.01). The most cited bottlenecks for implementing landslide risk reduction measures are scientific (0.30) and political (0.29) in nature.
AbdullahCH (2013) Landslide risk management in Malaysia. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment133: 255–265.
2.
AbellaEACvan WestenCJ (2007) Generation of a landslide risk index map for Cuba using spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Landslides4(4): 311–325.
3.
AdriaanseLRensleighC (2013) Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison. The Electronic Library31(6): 727–744.
4.
AhammadR (2011) Constraints of pro-poor climate change adaptation in Chittagong city. Environment and Urbanization23(2): 503–515.
5.
Alcántara-AyalaI (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology47: 107–124.
6.
Alcántara-AyalaICarreñoRÁvilaG. (2014) The ICL Latin American network: Past activities and challenges ahead. In: SassaKCanutiPYinY (eds) Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 181–185. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-04999-1_22(accessed 29 April 2015).
7.
AliIHattaZAAzmanA (2014) Transforming the local capacity on natural disaster risk reduction in Bangladeshi communities: A social work perspective. Asian Social Work and Policy Review8: 34–42.
8.
AlthuwayneeOFPradhanBAhmadN (2014) Estimation of rainfall threshold and its use in landslide hazard mapping of Kuala Lumpur metropolitan and surrounding areas. Landslides. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10346-014-0512-y(accessed 22 April 2015).
AndersonMGHolcombeEEsquivelM. (2010) The efficacy of a programme of landslide risk reduction in areas of unplanned housing in the eastern Caribbean. Environmental Management45(4): 807–821.
11.
AndersonMGHolcombeEHolm-NielsenN. (2014) What are the emerging challenges for community-based landslide risk reduction in developing countries?Natural Hazards Review15(2): 128–139.
12.
AndreasMAllanA (2007) Incorporating geology and geomorphology in land management decisions in developing countries: A case study in Southern Costa Rica. Geomorphology87(1–2): 68–89.
13.
AntinaoJLFarfanLM (2013) Occurrence of landslides during the approach of tropical cyclone Juliette (2001) to Baja California Sur, Mexico. Atmósfera26(2): 183–208.
14.
BandaraRMSWeerasingheKM (2013) Overview of landslide risk reduction studies in Sri Lanka. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 345–352. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_45(accessed 22 April 2015).
15.
BandaraRMSBhasinRKKjekstadO. (2013) Examples of cost effective practices for landslide monitoring for early warning in developing countries of Asia. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 581–588. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31445-2_76(accessed 22 April 2015).
16.
BergmanEM (2012) Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar. The Journal of Academic Librarianship38(6): 370–379.
17.
BhusanKKunduSSGoswamiK. (2014) Susceptibility mapping and estimation of rainfall threshold using space based input for assessment of landslide hazard in Guwahati city in North East India. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information SciencesXL-8: 15–19.
18.
BilledoEBBhasinRKKjekstadO. (2013) An appraisal on ongoing practices for landslide early warning systems in selected South and East Asian Countries. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 573–580. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31445-2_75(accessed 22 April 2015).
19.
BuchanKC (2000) The Bahamas. Marine Pollution Bulletin41(1–6): 94–111.
20.
CannonT (2008) Vulnerability, ‘innocent’ disasters and the imperative of cultural understanding. Disaster Prevention and Management17(3): 350–357.
21.
CannonT and IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (eds) (2014) World Disasters Report: Focus on Culture and Risk. World disasters report, Geneva, Switzerland: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
22.
CorominasJMavrouliO-C (2011) D2.4 Guidelines for Landslide Susceptibility, Hazard and Risk Assessment and Zoning. Work Package 2.1 – Harmonisation and development of procedures for quantifying landslide hazard, Barcelona, Spain: SafeLand project.
23.
CorominasJvan WestenCFrattiniP. (2013) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8(accessed 2 March 2015).
24.
CrozierMJGladeT (2005) Landslide hazard and risk: Issues, concepts, and approach. In: ThomasGAndersonMCrozierMJ (eds) Landslide Hazard and Risk. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1–34.
25.
CrudenDM (1991) A simple definition of a landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology43(1): 27–29.
26.
CutterSLIsmail-ZadehAAlcántara-AyalaI. (2015) Global risks: Pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature522(7556): 277–279.
27.
DeGraffJV (2012) Solving the dilemma of transforming landslide hazard maps into effective policy and regulations. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science12(1): 53–60.
28.
DevoliGStrauchWChávezG. (2007) A landslide database for Nicaragua: A tool for landslide-hazard management. Landslides4(2): 163–176.
29.
DFID (2004) Disaster Risk Reduction: A Development Concern. DFID. Available at:www.engineersagainstpoverty.org(accessed 3 January 2015).
30.
DiasAAVRupasingheNGunathilakaJ (2013) Joint technical emergency operation experiences on landslide disaster mitigation event 2003, Sri Lanka. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 785–789. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31319-6_101(accessed 22 April 2015).
31.
El-MasriSTippleG (2002) Natural disaster, mitigation and sustainability: The case of developing countries. International Planning Studies7(2): 157–175.
FalagasMEPitsouniEIMalietzisGA. (2007) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal22(2): 338–342.
34.
FellRCorominasJBonnardC. (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Engineering Geology102(3–4): 85–98.
35.
GarianoSLGuzzettiF (2016) Landslides in a changing climate. Earth-Science Reviews162: 227–252.
36.
GiulianiGPeduzziP (2011) The PREVIEW Global Risk Data Platform: a geoportal to serve and share global data on risk to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences11(1): 53–66.
37.
GokceogluCSezerE (2009) A statistical assessment on international landslide literature (1945–2008). Landslides6(4): 345–351.
GorokhovichYDoocySWalyawulaF. (2013) Landslides in Bududa, Eastern Uganda: Preliminary assessment and proposed solutions. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 145–149. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31337-0_19(accessed 22 April 2015).
40.
GueS-SKarnawatiDWongS-Y (2009) Policy and institutional framework for landslide mitigation and risk reduction. In: SassaKCanutiP (eds) Landslides: Disaster Risk Reduction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
41.
GutiérrezFSoldatiMAudemardF. (2010) Recent advances in landslide investigation: Issues and perspectives. Geomorphology124(3–4): 95–101.
42.
HeinischOSteelRTorrieJ (1962) Principles and procedures of statistics. Biometrische Zeitschrift4(3): 207–208.
43.
HermelinMBedoyaG (2008) Community participation in natural risk prevention: Case histories from Colombia. Geological Society Special Publication305: 39–51.
44.
HoferT (2013) Landslides, land-use systems and food security. In: Landslide Science and Practice: Volume 4, Global Environmental Change. Berlin: Springer, 141–144.
45.
HoriTShawR (2014) Local disaster risk management in a changing climate: Perspective from central America. Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management17: 1–216.
46.
IbadangoCEEscarateSJacksonL. (2007) Application of landslide studies for risk reduction in the Andean community of Reinaldo Espinoza, southern Ecuador. In: International Conference on Landslides and Climate Change, Ventnor, UK, 481–488.
47.
IgweO (2013) ICL/IPL activities in West Africa: Landslide risk assessment and hazard mapping approach. Landslides10(4): 515–521.
48.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and EdenhoferO (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change: Working Group III contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
49.
JacobsLMaesJMertensK.. (2016). Reconstruction of a flash flood event through a multi-hazard approach: Focus on the Rwenzori Mountains, Uganda. Natural Hazards. Epub ahead of print 12 July. DOI:10.1007/s11069-016-2458-y.
50.
JaiswalPvan WestenC (2013) Use of quantitative landslide hazard and risk information for local disaster risk reduction along a transportation corridor: A case study from Nilgiri district, India. Natural Hazards65: 887–913.
51.
JaramilloMM (2008) Guidelines for landslide hazard mapping in the Andes: Speaking one language. Geological Society Special Publication305: 53–61.
52.
KervynMPoesenJVrankenL. (2015) AfReSlide. AfReSlide. Available at: www.afreslide.africamuseum.be(accessed 25 June 2015).
53.
KirschbaumDStanleyTZhouY (2015) Spatial and temporal analysis of a global landslide catalog. Geomorphology249: 4–15.
54.
KjekstadO (2007) The challenges of landslide hazard mitigation in developing countries. In: North-American Landslide Conference, Vail, USA, 1–25.
55.
KohHLTehSYMajidTA. (2012) Earthquake and tsunami research in USM: The role of Disaster Research Nexus. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology20(1): 151–163.
56.
KünzlerMHuggelCRamírezJM (2012) A risk analysis for floods and lahars: Case study in the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Natural Hazards64(1): 767–796.
LeroiE (2005) Global rockfalls risk management process in ‘La Désirade’ Island (French West Indies). Landslides2(4): 358–365.
59.
LiaoZHongYAdlerRF. (2011) A physically based SLIDE model for landslide hazard assessments using remotely sensed data sets. In: International Symposium on Geomechanics and Geotechnics: From Micro to Macro, Shangai, China, 807–813.
60.
LongNTYenTHCarrollD. (2010) Application of GIS based mapping for integrated disaster risk management planning at the provincial level. In: MICRODIS Symposium on Disasters Impacts and Assessment in Asia, Hue, Vietnam.
61.
MajidRShaharomSMohamadA. (2007) GPS and GIS based technique for a full-system of registration, management and publishing information of slopes along highways in JKR (PWD) Malaysia. In: International Conference on Landslides and Climate Change 2007, Ventnor, UK, 171–174.
62.
MalamudBDReichenbachPRossiM. (2014) D6.3 Report on standards for landslide susceptibility modelling and terrain zonations. Working Package 6.3, London, UK: Seventh Framework Programme Collaborative project.
63.
Malik K, United Nations Development Programme and Human Development Report Office (2014) Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr14-report-en-1.pdf(accessed 16 March 2015).
64.
ManyenaSBMavhuraEMuzendaC. (2013) Disaster risk reduction legislations: Is there a move from events to processes?Global Environmental Change23(6): 1786–1794.
65.
MarcianoJr JSZarcoMAHTalampasMCR. (2011) Real-world deployment of a locally-developed tilt and moisture sensor for landslide monitoring in the Philippines. IEEE, 344–349. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6103662(accessed 22 April 2015).
MechlerRHochrainerSPflugG. (2010) Assessing the financial vulnerability to climate-related natural hazards: background paper for the world development report 2010 ‘Development and Climate Change’. Policy Research Working Paper 5232. Washington, DC: World Bank.
68.
MertensKJacobsLMaesJ. (2016) The direct impact of landslides on household income in tropical regions: A case study on the Rwenzori Mountains in Uganda. Science of the Total Environment. Epub ahead of print 6 February. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.171.
69.
MillerSBrewerTHarrisN (2009) Rainfall thresholding and susceptibility assessment of rainfall-induced landslides: application to landslide management in St Thomas, Jamaica. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment68(4): 539–550.
70.
MotoyamaEAbdullahCH (2013) Landslide public awareness and education programs in Malaysia. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 291–296. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_38(accessed 22 April 2015).
71.
MycooM (2011) Natural hazard risk reduction: Making St Lucia safe in an era of increased hurricanes and associated events. Natural Hazards Review12(1): 37–45.
72.
NadimFLacasseS (2008) Strategies for mitigation of risk associated with landslides. In: SassaKCanutiP (eds) Landslides: Disaster Risk Reduction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 31–61.
73.
NGI (2013) Global Risk Data Platform. PreventionWeb. Available at: http://preview.grid.unep.ch(accessed 11 March 2015).
74.
ParkashS (2013) Education, training and capacity development for mainstreaming landslides risk management. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 257–264. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_33(accessed 22 April 2015).
75.
PayetRA (2005) Climate policy implications of the recent ENSO events in a small island context. In: LowPS (ed.) Climate Change and Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–239. Available at:http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511535864A043(accessed 24 February 2016).
76.
PetleyD (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology40(10): 927–930.
77.
SantiPMHewittKVanDineDF. (2011) Debris-flow impact, vulnerability and response. Natural Hazards56(1): 371–402.
78.
ScolobigAKomendantovaNPattA. (2014) Multi-risk governance for natural hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe. Natural Hazards. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-014-1152%20-1(accessed 22 April 2015).
79.
SeneviratneSINichollsNEasterlingD. (2012) Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment. In: FieldCBBarrosVStockerTF (eds) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–230.
80.
SepúlvedaSAPetleyDN (2015) Regional trends and controlling factors of fatal landslides in Latin America and the Caribbean. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions3(4): 2777–2809.
81.
ShawRTakeuchiYRoubhanB (2009) Education, capacity building and public awareness for disaster reduction. In: SassaKCanutiP (eds) Landslides Disaster Risk Reduction. Berlin: Springer, 499–516.
82.
SolerLSGregorioLTGonçalvesD. (2013) Challenges and perspectives of innovative digital ecosystems designed to monitor and warn natural disasters in Brazil. In: International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 254–262.
83.
TalebNN (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, 1st ed. New York: Random House.
UNISDR (2012) Status report on implementation of Africa Regional Strategy and Hyogo Framework for Action. United Nations. Available at: www.unisdr.org/africa(accessed 2 January 2015).
88.
UNISDR (2013) From Shared Risk to Shared Value: The Business Case for Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR).
89.
UNISDR (2014) Progress and Challenges in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Contribution towards the Development of Policy Indicators for the Post-2015 Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction. Summary and Main Findings. Geneva, Switzerland: The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR).
VaciagoG (2013) The SafeLand compendium of landslide risk mitigation measures. In: MargottiniCCanutiPSassaK (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 683–689. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-31319-6_87(accessed 2 March 2015).
92.
van WestenCJJaiswalPGhoshS. (2012) Landslide inventory, hazard and risk assessment in India. In: PradhanBBuchroithnerM (eds) Terrigenous Mass Movements. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 239–282. Available at:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-25495-6_9(accessed 5 April 2016).
93.
VrankenLVantiltGVan Den EeckhautM. (2015) Landslide risk assessment in a densely populated hilly area. Landslides12(4): 787–798.
94.
WachingerGRennOBeggC. (2013) The risk perception paradox: Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis33(6): 1049–1065.
95.
WamslerC (2007) Bridging the gaps: Stakeholder-based strategies for risk reduction and financing for the urban poor. Environment and Urbanization19(1): 115–142.
96.
WamslerCBrinkERantalaO (2012) Climate change, adaptation, and formal education: The role of schooling for increasing societies’ adaptive capacities in El Salvador and Brazil. Ecology and Society17(2). Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss2/art2/(accessed 22 April 2015).
97.
WattsM (1983) On the poverty of theory: Natural hazards research in context. In: HewittK (ed.) Interpretations of Calamities from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University, 231–262.
98.
WieczorekGFLeahyPP (2008) Landslide hazard mitigation in North America. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience14(2): 133–144.
99.
WisnerBBlaikiePCannonT. (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, 2nd ed. New York, USA: Routledge.
100.
WuXChenXZhanFB. (2015) Global research trends in landslides during 1991–2014: A bibliometric analysis. Landslides. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10346-015-0624-z(accessed 23 September 2015).
