During recent decades, the use of high-resolution light detection and ranging altimetry (LiDAR) data in fluvial studies has rapidly increased. Airborne laser scanning (ALS) can be used to extensively map riverine topography. Although airborne blue/green LiDAR can also be utilized for the mapping of river bathymetry, the accuracy levels achieved are not as good as those of terrain elevation measurements. Moreover, airborne bathymetric LiDAR is not yet suitable for mapping shallow water areas. More detailed topographical data may be obtained by fixed-position terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) or mobile terrestrial laser scanning (MLS). One of the newest applications of MLS approaches involves a boat/cart-based mobile mapping system (BoMMS/CartMMS). This set-up includes laser scanning and imaging from a boat moving along a river course and may be used to expand the spatial extent of terrestrial scanning. Detailed digital terrain models (DTMs) derived from LiDAR data can be used to improve the recognition of fluvial landforms, the geometric data of hydraulic modelling, and the estimation of flood inundation extents and fluvial processes.
AggettGRWilsonJP (2009) Creating and coupling a high-resolution DTM with a 1-D hydraulic model in a GIS for scenario-based assessment of avulsion hazard in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology113: 21–34.
2.
AhokasEKaasalainenSHyyppäJSuomalainenJ (2006) Calibration of the Optech ALTM 3100 laser scanner intensity data using brightness targets. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Marne-la-Vallee, France, 36 (A1), CD-ROM.
3.
AlhoPHyyppäHHyyppäJ (2009a) Consequence of DTM precision for flood hazard mapping: A case study in SW Finland. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research6.
4.
AlhoPKukkoAHyyppäHKaartinenHHyyppäJJaakkolaA (2009b) Application of boat-based laser scanning for river survey. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms34: 1831–1838.
5.
AlhoPVaajaMKukkoAKasviEKurkelaMHyyppäJetal. (2011) Mobile laser scanning in fluvial geomorphology: Mapping and change detection of point bars. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie55(Suppl. 2): 31–50.
6.
AllouisTBaillyJSFeurerD (2007) Assessing water surface effects on LiDAR bathymetry measurements in very shallow rivers: A theoretical study. Second ESA Space for Hydrology Workshop, Geneva, CHE, 12–14 November 2007. Montpellier: CemOA Publications – Publications scientifiques et techniques du Cemagref.
7.
AllouisTBaillyJ-SPastolYLe RouxC (2010) Comparison of LiDAR waveform processing methods for very shallow water bathymetry using Raman, near-infrared and green signals. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms35: 640–650.
8.
AndrewMEUstinSL (2009) Habitat suitability modelling of an invasive plant with advanced remote sensing data. Diversity and Distributions15: 627–640.
9.
AxelssonP (2000) DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingXXXIII (Part B4): 110–117.
10.
BaillyJSLe CoarerYLanguillePStigermarkCJAllouisT (2010) Geostatistical estimations of bathymetric LiDAR errors on rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms35: 1199–1210.
11.
BallettiCGuerraFLinguaARinaudoF (2003) True digital orthophoto of the San Marco Basilica in Venice. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information SciencesXXXIV(5/W12): 43–48.
12.
BaltsaviasE (1999a) A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing54: 83–94.
13.
BaltsaviasE (1999b) Airborne laser scanning: Basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing54: 199–214.
14.
BatesPDMarksKJHorrittMS (2003) Optimal use of high resolution topographic data in flood inundation models. Hydrological Processes17: 537–557.
15.
BilkerMKaartinenH (2001) The quality of Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS positioning. Kirkkonummi: Reports of the Finnish Geodetic Institute2001:1, 25 pp.
16.
BissonnetteLRKunzGWeiss WranaK (1997) Comparison of LiDAR and transmissometer measurements. Optical Engineering36: 131–138.
17.
BrennerC (2005) Building reconstruction from images and laser scanning. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation6: 187–198.
18.
BuftonJL (1989) Laser altimetry measurements from aircraft and spacecraft. Proceedings of the IEEE77: 463–477.
19.
BurtonSPFerrareRAHostetlerCAHairJWKittakaCVaughanMA, et al. (2010) Using airborne high spectral resolution lidar data to evaluate combined active plus passive retrievals of aerosol extinction profiles. Journal of Geophysical Research115: D00H15.
20.
ButlerJBLaneSNChandlerJH (1998) Assessment of DEM characterizing surface roughness using close range digital photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Record16: 271–291.
21.
CandelaTRenardFBouchonMBrousteAMarsanDSchmittbuhlJetal. (2009) Characterization of fault roughness at various scales: Implications of three-dimensional high resolution topography measurements. Pure and Applied Geophysics166: 1817–1851.
22.
CareyCJBrownTGChallisKCHowardAJCooperL (2006) Predictive modelling of multiperiod geoarchaeological resources at a river confluence: A case study from the Trent-Soar, UK. Archaeological Prospection13: 241–250.
23.
CavalliMTarolliPMarchiLFontanaGD (2008) The effectiveness of airborne LiDAR data in the recognition of channel-bed morphology. Catena73: 249–260.
24.
CharltonMELargeARGFullerIC (2003) Application of airborne LiDAR in river environments: The river Coquet, Northhumberland, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms28: 299–306.
25.
CobbyDMMasonDCDavenportIJ (2001) Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing56: 121–138.
26.
CobbyDMMasonDCHorrittMSBatesPD (2003) Two dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite-element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes17: 1979–2000.
27.
CookAMerwadeV (2009) Effect of topographic data, geometric configuration and modeling approach on flood inundation mapping. Journal of Hydrology377: 131–142.
28.
CorenFSterzaiP (2006) Radiometric correction in laser scanning. International Journal of Remote Sensing27: 3097–3104.
29.
DavenportIJBradburyRBAndersonGRFHaymanJRKrebsJRMasonDCetal. (2000) Improving bird population models using airborne remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing21: 2705−2717.
30.
DoneusMBrieseCStudnickaN (2010) Analysis of full-waveform ALS data by simultaneously acquired TLS data. Towards an advanced DTM generation in wooded areas. ISPRS Commission VII Symposium, 5–7 July 2010, Vienna.
31.
EntwistleNSFullerIC (2009) Terrestrial laser scanning to derive the surface grain size facies character of gravel bars. In: HeritageGLLargeARG (eds) Laser Scanning for the Environmental Sciences, Chichester: Wiley, 102–114.
32.
European Aquatic Monitoring Network (EAMN) (2004) State-of-the-art in data sampling, modelling analysis and applications of river habitat modelling (edited by HarbyABaptistMMichaelJDunbarMJSchmutzS). COST Action Report 626.
33.
FeurerDBaillyJ-SPuechCLe CoarerYViauAA (2008) Very-high-resolution mapping of river-immersed topography by remote sensing. Progress in Physical Geography32: 403–419.
34.
FloodMGuteliusB (1997) Commercial implication of topographic terrain mapping using scanning airborne laser radar. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing66: 327–329.
35.
FonstandMAMarcusWA (2005) Remote sensing of stream depths with hydraulically assisted bathymetry (HAB) models. Geomorphology72: 320–339.
36.
FrankelKLDolanJF (2007) Characterizing arid region alluvial fan surface roughness with airborne laser swath mapping digital topographic data. Journal of Geophysical Research112: F02025.
37.
FrenchJR (2003) Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms28: 321–335.
38.
GaoJ (2009) Bathymetric mapping by means of remote sensing: Methods, accuracy and limitations. Progress in Physical Geography33: 103–116.
39.
GuentherGC (2007) Airborne lidar bathymetry. In: MauneDF (ed.) Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM User’s Manual, second edition. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 253–320.
40.
GuentherGCCunninghamAGLaRocquePERiedDJ (2000) Meeting the accuracy challenge in airborne LiDAR bathymetry. In: Proceedings of EARSeL-SIG Workshop LiDAR No. 1, Dresden, 16–17 June.
GueudetPWellsGMaidmentDRNeuenschwanderA (2004) Influence of the postspacing density of the LiDAR-derived DEM on flood modeling. Geographic Information Systems and Water Resources III – AWRA Spring Specialty Conference. AWRA, Nashville, Tennessee.
43.
HardingDJBerghoffGS (2000) Fault scarp detection beneath dense vegetation cover: Airborne LIDAR mapping of the Seattle Fault Zone, Bainbridge Island, Washington State. Proceedings of the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
44.
HayakawaYOguchiT (2005) Evaluation of gravel sphericity and roundness based on surface-area measurement with a laser scanner. Computers and Geosciences31: 735–741.
45.
HeritageGHetheringtonD (2007) Towards a protocol for laser scanning in fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms32: 66–74.
46.
HeritageGLMilanDJ (2009) Terrestrial laser scanning of grain roughness in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology113: 4–11.
47.
HetheringtonDHeritageGMilanDWallingDEHorowitzAJ (2005) Daily fine sediment dynamics on an active Alpine glacier outwash plain. Sediment Budgets, International Symposium on Sediment Budgets held at the 7th Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences291: 278–284.
48.
HickmanGDHoggJE (1969) Application of an airborne pulsed laser for near shore bathymetric measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment1: 47–58.
49.
HilldaleRCRaffD (2008) Assessing the ability of airborne LiDAR to map river bathymetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms33: 773–783.
50.
HodgeRBrasingtonJRichardsK (2009a): Analysing laser-scanned digital terrain models of gravel bed surfaces: Linking morphology to sediment transport processes and hydraulics. Sedimentology56: 2024–2043.
51.
HodgeRBrasingtonJRichardsK (2009b) In situ characterization of grain-scale fluvial morphology using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms34: 954–968.
52.
HodgsonEBresnahanP (2004) Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation: Empirical assessment and error budget. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing70: 331–339.
53.
HodgsonMEJensenJRSchmidtLSchillSDavisB (2003) An evaluation of lidar- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs. Remote Sensing of Environment84: 295–308.
54.
HöfleBPfeiferN (2007) Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing62: 415–433.
55.
HollausMWagnerWKrausK (2005) Airborne laser scanning and usefulness for hydrological models. Advances in Geosciences5: 57–63.
56.
HopkinsonCChasmerLMunroSDemuthMN (2010) The influence of DEM resolution on simulated solar radiation-induced glacier melt. Hydrological Processes24: 775–788.
57.
HuisingEJGomes PereiraLM (1998) Errors and accuracy of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing53: 245–261.
58.
HyyppäHYuXHyyppäJKaartinenHHonkavaaraERönnholmP (2005) Factors affecting the quality of DTM generation in forested areas. In: Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop Laser Scanning 2005, 12–14 September, Enschede, Netherlands, (Netherlands: GITCbv), XXXVI(Part 3/W19), 85–90.
59.
HyyppäJHyyppäHLeckieDGougeonFYuXMaltamoM (2008) Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing29: 1339–1366.
60.
HyyppäJSchardtMHaggrénHKochBLohrUScherrerHUetal. (2001) HIGH-SCAN: The first European-wide attempt to derive single-tree information from laser scanner data. The Photogrammetric Journal of Finland17: 58–68.
61.
IbbekenHSchleyerR (1986) Photo-sieving: A method for grain-size analysis of coarsegrained, unconsolidated bedding surfaces. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms11: 59–77.
62.
IrishJLLillycropWJ (1999) Scanning laser mapping of the coastal zone: The SHOALS system. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing54: 123–129.
JaakkolaAHyyppäJHyyppäHKukkoA (2008) Retrieval algorithms for road surface modelling using laser-based mobile mapping. Sensors8: 5238–5249.
65.
JaboyedoffMDemersDLocatJLocatALocatPOppikoferTetal. (2009) Use of terrestrial laser scanning for the characterization of retrogressive landslides in sensitive clay and rotational landslides in river banks. Canadian Geotechnical Journal46: 1379–1390.
66.
JacksonTJRitchieJCWhiteJLeschackL (1988) Airborne laser profile data for measuring ephemeral gully erosion. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing54: 1181–1185.
67.
JonesABrewerPAJohnstoneEMacklinMG (2007) High-resolution interpretative geomorphological mapping of river valley environments using airborne LiDAR data. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms32: 1574–1592.
68.
JonesKLPooleGCO’DanielSJMertesLAKStanfordJA (2008) Surface hydrology of low-relief landscapes: Assessing surface water flow impedance using LIDAR-derived digital elevation models. Remote Sensing of Environment112: 4148–4158.
69.
KaartinenHHyyppäJ (2006) Evaluation of building extraction. EuroSDR – European Spatial Data Research, Official Publication50: 9–77.
70.
KaartinenHHyyppäJKukkoM (forthcoming) On the accuracy of mobile laser scanning. Remote Sensing Open Access Journal.
71.
KaasalainenSHyyppäHKukkoALitkeyPAhokasEHyyppäJetal. (2009) Radiometric calibration of LIDAR intensity with commercially available reference targets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing47: 588–598.
72.
KinzelPJNelsonJMHeckmanAK (2009) Response of sandhill crane (Grus canadensis) riverine roosting habitat to changes in stage and sandbar morphology. River Research and Applications25: 135–152.
73.
KinzelPJWrightCWNelsonJMBurmanAR (2007) Evaluation of an experimental LiDAR for surveying a shallow, braided, sand-bedded river. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering133: 838–842.
74.
KnightonAD (1999) Downstream variation in stream power. Geomorphology29: 293–306.
75.
KnightonADNansonGC (1993) Anastomosis and the continuum of channel pattern. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms18: 613–625.
76.
KoblerAPfeiferNOgrincPTodorovskiLOstirKDzeroskiS (2007) Repetitive interpolation: A robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial Laser Scanner Data in forested terrain. Remote Sensing of Environment108: 9–23.
KrabillWFrederickEManizadeSMartinCSonntagJSwiftRetal. (1999) Rapid thinning of parts of the southern Greenland ice sheet. Science283: 1522–1524.
79.
KrausKOtepkaJ (2005) DTM modelling and visualization – the SCOP approach. In: Photogrammetric Week. Heidelberg: Wichmann Verlag, 241–252.
80.
KrausKPfeiferN (1998) Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing53: 193–203.
81.
KukkoAAndreiC-OSalminenV-MKaartinenHChenYRönnholmPetal. (2007) Road environment mapping system of the Finnish Geodetic Institute – FGI Roamer. In: RönnholmPHyyppäHHyyppäJ (eds) Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop ‘Laser Scanning 2007 and SilviLaser 2007’, Espoo, Finland, 12–14 September, 241–247.
82.
LaneSNChandlerJHRichardsKS (1998) Landform monitoring, modelling and analysis: Landform in geomorphological research. In: LaneSNRichardsKSChandlerJH (eds) Landform Monitoring, Modelling and Analysis. Chichester: Wiley, 1–18.
83.
LaneSWestawayRMHicksDM (2003) Estimation of erosion and deposition volumes in a large, gravel-bed, braided river using synoptic remote sensing. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms28: 249–271.
84.
LargeAHeritageG (2007) Terrestrial laser scanner based instream habitat quantification using a random field approach. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Society (RSPSoc2007), Newcastle Upon Tyne, 11–14 September, TS3.
85.
LargeAHeritageGL (2009) Laser scanning – evolution of the discipline. In: HeritageGLLargeARG (eds) Laser Scanning for the Environmental Sciences. Chichester: Wiley, 1–20.
86.
LawlerDM (1993) The measurement of river bank erosion and lateral channel change: A review. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms18: 777–821.
87.
LawrenceJPLeighRJMonksPS (2010) The impact of surface reflectance variability on total column differential absorption LiDAR measurements of atmospheric CO2. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions3: 147–184.
88.
LecceSA (1997) Nonlinear downstream changes in stream power on Wisconsin’s Blue River. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87: 471–486.
89.
LegleiterCJRobertsDALawrenceRL (2009) Spectrally based remote sensing of river bathymetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms34: 1039–1059.
90.
LimKTreitzPWulderMSt-OngeBFloodM (2003) LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Progress in Physical Geography27: 88–106.
MaasH-GVosselmanG (1999) Two algorithms for extracting building models from raw laser altimetry data. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing54: 153–163.
93.
MagilliganFJ (1992) Thresholds and the spatial variability of flood power during extreme floods. Geomorphology5: 373–390.
94.
MaimanTH (1960) Stimulated optical radiation in ruby. Nature187: 493–494.
95.
MandlburgerGHauerCHöfleBHabersackHPfeiferN (2009) Optimization of LiDAR derived terrain models for river flow modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences13: 1453–1466.
96.
MarcusWAFonstandMA (2008) Optical remote mapping of rivers at sub-meter resolutions and watershed extents. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms33: 4–24.
97.
MarksKBatesP (2000) Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes14: 2109–2122.
98.
MasonDCCobbyDMHorrittMSBatesPD (2003) Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes17: 1711–1732.
99.
MasonDCHorrittMSDall’AmicoJTScottTRBatesPD (2007) Improving river flood extent delineation from synthetic aperture radar using airborne laser altimetry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45: 3932–3943.
100.
MasonDCScottTRWangHJ (2006) Extraction of tidal channel networks from airborne scanning laser altimetry. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing61: 67–83.
101.
MilanDJ (2009) Terrestrial laser scan-derived topographic and roughness data for hydraulic modelling of gravel-bed rivers. In: HeritageGLLargeARG (eds) Laser Scanning for the Environmental Sciences. Chichester: Wiley, 133–146.
102.
MilanDJHeritageGLHetheringtonD (2007) Application of a 3D laser scanner in the assessment of erosion and deposition volumes and channel change in a proglacial river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms32: 1657–1674.
103.
MilanDJHeritageGLLargeARGEntwistleNS (2010) Mapping hydraulic biotopes using terrestrial laser scan data of water surface properties. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms35: 918–931.
104.
MillaneRPFitzsimonsMEQiMHaiderA (2006a) Analysis of gravel river beds using three-dimensional laser scanning. Image Reconstruction from Incomplete DataIV: 63160B.
105.
MillaneRPWeirMISmartGM (2006b) Automated analysis of imbrication and flow direction in alluvial sediments using laser-scan data. Journal of Sedimentary Research76: 1049–1055.
106.
MillerAJ (1990) Flood hydrology and geomorphic effectiveness in the central Appalachians. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms15: 119–134.
107.
MorcheDSchmidtKHSahlingIHerkommerMKutscheraJ (2008) Volume changes of Alpine sediment stores in a state of post-event disequilibrium and the implications for downstream hydrology and bed load transport. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography62: 89–101.
108.
NansonGCHickinEJ (1986) A statistical examination of bank erosion and channel migration in western Canada. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America97: 497–504.
109.
NelsonPASmithJAMillerAJ (2006) Evolution of channel morphology and hydrologic response in an urbanizing drainage basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms31: 1063–1079.
110.
NelsonRKrabillWMacleanG (1984) Determining forest canopy characteristics using airborne lidar data. Remote Sensing of Environment15: 201–212.
111.
NewsonMDNewsonCL (2000) Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: Mesoscale approaches to basin-scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography24: 195–217.
112.
NotebaertBVerstraetenGGoversGPoesenJ (2009) Qualitative and quantitative applications of LiDAR imagery in fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms34: 217–231.
113.
OmerCRNelsonJZundelAK (2003) Impact of varied data resolution on hydraulic modeling and floodplain delineation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association39: 467–475.
114.
Oude ElberinkSMaasH-G (2000) The use of anisotropic height texture measures for the segmentation of airborne laser scanner data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing33: 678–684.
115.
OvertonICSigginsAGallantJCPentonDByrneG (2009) Flood modelling and vegetation mapping in large river systems. In: HeritageGLLargeARG (eds) Laser Scanning for the Environmental Sciences. Chichester: Wiley, 220–244.
116.
PackmanAIBrooksNH (2001) Hyporheic exchange of solutes and colloids with moving bed forms. Water Resources Research37: 2591–2605.
117.
PackmanAIBrooksNHMorganJJ (1997) Experimental techniques for laboratory investigation of clay colloid transport and filtration in a stream with a sand bed. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution99: 113–122.
118.
ParsonLELillycropWJKleinCJIvesRCPOrlandoSP (1997) Use of LiDAR technology for collecting shallow water bathymetry of Florida Bay. Journal of Coastal Research13: 1173–1180.
119.
PereiraLMGWichersonRJ (1999) Suitability of laser data for deriving geographical information: A case study in the context of management of fluvial zones. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing54: 105–114.
120.
PerroyRLBookhagenBAsnerGChadwickOA (2010) Comparison of gully erosion estimates using airborne and ground–based LiDAR on Santa Cruz Island, California. Geomorphology118: 288–300.
121.
PriceWFUrenJ (1989) Laser Surveying. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold (International).
122.
ReutebuchSMcGaugheyRAndersenHCarsonW (2003) Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing22: 527–535.
123.
RhoadsBL (1987) Stream power terminology. Professional Geographer39: 189–195.
124.
RhoadesELO’NealMAPizzutoJE (2009) Quantifying bank erosion on the South River from 1937 to 2005, and its importance in assessing Hg contamination. Applied Geography29: 125–134.
125.
RitchieJCJacksonTJ (1989) Airborne laser measurements of the surface-topography of simulated concentrated flow gullies. Transactions of the ASAE32: 645–648.
126.
RönnholmPHyyppäHPöntinenPHaggrénHHyyppäJ (2003) A method for interactive orientation of digital images using backprojection of 3D data. The Photogrammetric Journal of Finland18: 58–69.
127.
RumsbyBTBrasingtonJLanghamJAMclellandSJMiddletonRRollinsonG (2008) Monitoring and modelling particle and reach-scale morphological change in gravel-bed rivers: Applications and challenges. Geomorphology93: 40–54.
128.
SandersBF (2007) Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modelling. Advances in Water Resources30: 1831–1843.
129.
SchreierHLougheedJTuckerCLeckieD (1985) Automated measurement of terrain reflection and height variations using an airborne infrared laser system. International Journal of Remote Sensing6: 101–113.
130.
ShanJTothCK (eds) (2009) Topographic Laser Ranging and Scanning. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 590 pp.
131.
SitholeGVosselmanG (2004) Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing59: 85–101.
132.
SmullinsLDFioccoG (1962) Optical echoes from the Moon. Nature194: 1267.
133.
SolodukhinVZukovAMazuginI (1977) Possibilities of laser aerial photography for forest profiling. Lesnoe Khozyaisto (Forest Management)10: 53–58(in Russian).
134.
StraatsmaMW (2008) Quantitative mapping of hydrodynamic vegetation density of floodplain forests under leaf-off conditions using airborne laser scanning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing74: 987–998.
135.
StraatsmaMWBaptistM (2008) Floodplain roughness parameterization using airborne laser scanning and spectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment112: 1062–1080.
136.
StraatsmaMWMiddelkoopH (2006) Airborne laser scanning as a tool for lowland floodplain vegetation monitoring. Hydrobiologia565: 87–103.
137.
TakedaH (2004) Ground surface estimation in dense forest. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences35 (part B3): 1016–1023.
138.
ThomaDPGuptaSCBauerMEKirchoffCE (2005) Airborne laser scanning for riverbank erosion assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment95: 493–501.
139.
TsubakiRFujitaI (2010) Unstructured grid generation using LiDAR data for urban flood inundation modelling. Hydrological Processes24: 1404–1420.
140.
VosselmanGMaasH-G (2010) Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Dunbeath: Whittles Publishing, 336 pp.
141.
WadhamsPWallisM (1995) Arctic sea-ice extent and thickness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A352: 301–319.
142.
WagnerW (2010) Radiometric calibration of small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanner measurements: Basic physical concepts. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing65: 505–513.
143.
WagnerWUllrichADucicVMelzerTStudnickaN (2006) Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitizing airborne laser scanner. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing60: 100–112.
144.
WangC-KPhilpotWD (2007) Using airborne bathymetric lidar to detect bottom type variation in shallow waters. Remote Sensing of Environment106: 123–135.
145.
WangYZhengT (2005) Comparison of light detection and ranging and National Elevation Dataset digital elevation model on floodplains of North Carolina. Natural Hazards Review6: 34–40.
146.
WechslerNRockwellTKBen-ZionY (2009) Application of high resolution DEM data to detect rock damage from geomorphic signals along the central San Jacinto Fault. Geomorphology113: 82–96.
WheatonJMBrasingtonJDarbySESearDA (2009) Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: Improved sediment budgets. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms35: 136–156.
149.
WilkinsBCSnyderNP (2010) Geomorphic comparison of two Atlantic coastal rivers: Toward an understanding of physical controls of Atlantic salmon habitat. River Research and Applications27: 135–156.
150.
WilkinsonSNKellerRJRutherfurdID (2004) Phase-shift in shear stress as an explanation for the maintenance of pool-riffle sequences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms29: 737–753.
151.
WolmanMG (1954) A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union35: 951–956.
152.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (1994) Guide to Hydrological Practices: Data Acquisition and Processing, Analysis, Forecasting and Other Applications, fifth edition. Geneva: WMO-No. 168, 730 pp.
153.
ZhaoHShibasakiR (2003) A vehicle-borne urban 3-D acquisition system using single-row laser range scanners. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics33: 658–666.
