IRS-LISS-III satellite imagery covering Nongkhyllem Wildlife Sanctuary area located within the Ri-Bhoi District of Meghalaya State, northeast India, was used for analysis of the landcover pattern and vegetation types occurring there. A maximum likelihood classifier was used to generate a supervised classification into land-cover types and the vegetation types within the forested area. The preparation of training data sets used thematic maps of the area, and knowledge accruing from extensive personal field visits. Sample field plots were located at 30 different places in the Sanctuary for classification accuracy assessment. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was also computed from LISS-III satellite imagery. A digital elevation model (DEM) of the Sanctuary was generated using a GIS. The DEM was used to test the hypothesis that its joint use with the satellite data would increase classification accuracy. This proved to be the case. Bivariate correlation analysis was performed between spectral and DEM variables to cross-check the results. In the example used, that of the rugged terrain in mountainous parts of northeast India, such integration of satellite land-cover data and DEM information appears to be a necessity in improved land-cover mapping for resource planning and utilization.
Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T. and Witmer, R.E.1976: A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Professional Paper 964. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
2.
Baban, S.M.J. and Yusof, K.W.2001: Mapping land use/cover distribution on a mountainous tropical island using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing22, 1909-18.
3.
Benedictsson, J.A., Swain, P.H. and Ersoy, O.K.1990: Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing28, 540-51.
4.
Bolstad, P.V. and Lillesand, T.M.1992: Improved classification of forest vegetation in northern Wisconsin through a rule based combination of soils, terrain, and Landsat Thermatic Mapper data. Forest Science38, 5-20.
5.
Boresjö Bronge, L.1999: Mapping boreal vegetation using Landsat TM and topographic map data in a stratified approach. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing25, 460-74.
6.
Brivio, P.A., Colombo, R., Maggi, M. and Tomasoni, R.2002: Integration of remote sensing data and GIS for accurate mapping of flooded areas. International Journal of Remote Sensing23, 429-41.
7.
Carlotto, M.J.1986: Extracting surface features in multispectral imagery. Proceedings of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , Zurich, Switzerland, 283-88.
8.
Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K.1968: A revised survey of the forest types of India. Delhi: Government of India Press.
9.
Chen, D. and Stow, D.2002: The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68, 1151-61.
10.
Civco, D.1989: Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery . Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing55, 1303-309.
11.
Congalton, R.G.1991: A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment37, 35-47.
12.
Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B. and Lambin, E.2004: Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing25, 1565-96.
13.
Emrahoglu, N., Yegingil, I., Pestemalci, V., Senkal, O. and Kandirmaz, H.M.2003: Comparison of a new algorithm with the supervised classifications . International Journal of Remote Sensing24, 649-55.
14.
Erbek, F.S., Ozkan, C. and Taberner, M.2004: Comparison of maximum likelihood classification method with supervised artificial neural network algorithms for land use activities . International Journal of Remote Sensing25, 1733-48.
15.
Evans, I.S.1972: General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude and descriptive statistics. In Chorley, R.J., editor, Spatial analysis in geomorphology, London: Methuen, 17-90.
16.
Foody, G.M.2002: Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment . Remote Sensing of Environment80, 185-201.
17.
Foody, G.M., Campbell, N.A., Trodd, N.M. and Wood, T.F.1992: Derivation and application of probabilistic measures of class membership from maximum likelihood classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing58, 1335-41.
18.
Forest Survey of India (FSI)2005: State of forest report 2005. New Delhi: Forest Survey of India.
19.
Frank, T.D.1988: Mapping dominant vegetation communities in the Colorado Rocky Mountain front range with Landsat Thematic Mapper and digital terrain data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing54, 1727-34.
20.
Franklin, S.E.1987: Geomorphometric processing of digital elevation models . Computers and Geosciences13, 603-609.
21.
Franklin, S.E.1992: Satellite remote sensing of forest type and land cover classes in the Subalpine Forest Region, Kanaskis Valley, Alberta. Geocarto International7(4), 25-35.
Franklin, S.E. and Wilson, B.A.1992: A three stage mountain classifier for remote sensing of mountain environments. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing58, 449-54.
24.
Franklin, S.E. and Wulder, M.A.2002: Remote sensing methods in medium spatial resolution satellite data land cover classification of large areas. Progress in Physical Geography26, 173-205.
25.
Franklin, S.E., Blodgett, C.F., Mah, S. and Wrightson, C.1991: Sensitivity of CASI data to anisotropic reflectance, terrain, aspect and deciduous forest species. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing17, 314-21.
26.
Franklin, S.E., Connery, D.R. and Williams, J.A.1994: Classification of alpine vegetation using Landsat Thematic Mapper, SPOT HRV and DEM data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing20, 49-56.
27.
Franklin, S.E., Wulder, M.A., Skakun, R. and Carroll, A.2003: Mountain pine beetle red-attack forest damage classification using stratified Landsat TM data inBritish Columbia. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing69, 283-88.
28.
Friedl, M., Brodley, C. and Strahler, A.1999: Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing37, 969-77.
29.
Gong, P. and Howarth, P.1990: An assessment of some factors influencing multispectral landcover classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing56, 597-603.
30.
Guidon, B., Goodenough, D.G. and Teillet, P.M.1982: The role of digital terrain models in the remote sensing of forests. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing8, 5-16.
31.
Hall-Konyves, K.1987: The topographic effect on Landsat data in gentle undulating terrain in southern Sweden. International Journal of Remote Sensing8, 157-68.
32.
Hardin, P.J.1994: Parametric and nearest-neighbour methods for hybrid classification: a comparison of pixel assignment accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing60, 1439-48.
33.
Helmer, E.H., Brown, S. and Cohen, W.B.2000: Mapping montane tropical forest successional stage and land use with multi-date Landsat imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing21, 2163-83.
34.
Hirata, M., Kogab, N., Shinjo, H., Fujita, H., Gintzburger, G. and Miyazaki, A.2001: Vegetation classification by satellite image processing in a dry area of north-eastern Syria. International Journal of Remote Sensing22, 507-16.
35.
Holben, B. and Justice, C.1981: An examination of spectral band ratioing to reduce the topographic effect on remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing2, 115-33.
36.
Homer, C.G., Ramsey, R.D., Edwards, T.C. Jr and Falconer, A.1997: Landscape cover-type modeling using a multi-scene Thematic Mapper mosaic. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing63, 59-67.
37.
Hudson, R.J.M., Gherini, S.A. and Goldstein, R.A.1994: Modelling the global carbon cycle: nitrogen fertilization of the terrestrial biosphere and the missing CO2 sink. Global Biogeochemical Cycles8, 307-33.
38.
Hutchinson, C.F.1982: Techniques for combining Landsat and ancillary data for digital classification improvement. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing48, 123-30.
39.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)2007: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
40.
Irons, J.R., Johnson, R. and Linebaugh, G.1987: Multiple-angle observations of reflectance anisotropy from an airborne linear array sensor. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing25, 372-83.
41.
Irons, J.R., Ranson, K.J., Williams, D., Irish, R. and Huegel, F.1991: An off-nadir-pointing imaging spectroradiometer for terrestrial ecosystem studies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing29, 66-74.
42.
Jackson, M.J.1992: Integrated geographic information systems. International Journal of Remote Sensing13, 1343-51.
43.
Jensen, J.R.2004: Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective (third edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Kriebel, K.T.1978: Measured spectral bidirectional reflection properties of four vegetated surfaces. Applied Optics17, 249-53.
45.
Leprieur, C.E., Durand, J.M. and Peyron, J.L.1988: Influence of topography on forest reflectance using Landsat Thematic Mapper and digital terrain data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing54, 491-96.
46.
Letts, P.J. and Rochon, G.1980: Generation and use of digital elevation data for large areas. Proceedings of the 6th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 597-602.
47.
Li, G. and Weng, Q.2007: Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing28, 249-67.
48.
Liu, Q.J., Takamura, T., Takeuchi, N. and Shao, G.2002: Mapping of boreal vegetation of a temperate mountain in China by multitemporal Landsat TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing23, 3385-405.
49.
Loveland, T.R., Sohl, T.L., Stehman, S.V., Gallant, A.L., Sayler, K.L. and Napton, D.E.2002: A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land-cover changes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing68, 1091-100.
50.
Mather, P.M.2004: Computer processing of remotely sensed images: an introduction (third edition). Chichester: Wiley .
51.
Mutanga, O. and Rugege, D.2006: Integrating remote sensing and spatial statistics to model herbaceous biomass distribution in a tropical savanna. International Journal of Remote Sensing27, 3499-514.
52.
Olthof, I., King, D. and Lautenschlager, R.A.2004: Mapping deciduous storm damage using Landsat and environmental data. Remote Sensing of Environment89, 484-96.
53.
Ortiz, M.J., Formaggion, A.R. and Epiphanio, J.C.N.1997: Classification of croplands through integration of remote sensing, GIS and historical database. International Journal of Remote Sensing18, 95-105.
54.
Pal, M. and Mather, M.P.2003: An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sensing of Environment86, 554-65.
55.
Paola, J.D.1994: Neural network classification of multispectral imagery. MSc thesis, University of Arizona.
56.
Paola, J.D. and Schowengerdt, R.A.1995: A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing33, 981-96.
57.
Puri, G.S.1960: Indian forest ecology. New Delhi: Oxford Book and Stationery Co.
58.
Rao, R.R.1994: Biodiversity in India: floristic aspects. Dehradun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.
59.
Richetti, E.2000: Multispectral satellite image and ancillary data integration for geological classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing66, 429-36.
60.
Rogan, J., Miller, J., Stow, D., Franklin, J., Levien, L. and Fischer, C.2003: Land cover change mapping in California using classification trees with Landsat TM and ancillary data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing69, 793-804.
61.
Roy, P.S. and Joshi, P.K.2002: Forest cover assessment in north-east India - the potential of temporal wide swath satellite sensor data (IRS-1C WiFS). International Journal of Remote Sensing23, 4881-96.
62.
Running, S.W., Nemani, R.R., Peterson, D.L., Band, L.E., Potts, D.F., Pierce, L.L. and Spanner, M.A.1989: Mapping regional forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by coupling satellite data with ecosystem simulation. Ecology70, 1090-101.
63.
Sader, S.A., Waide, R.B., Lawrence, W.T. and Joyce, A.T.1989: Tropical forest biomass and successional age class relationships to a vegetation index derived from Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment28, 143-56.
64.
Sader, S.A., Bertrand, M. and Wilson, E.H.2003: Satellite change detection patterns on an industrial forest landscape. Forest Science49, 341-53.
65.
Schlesinger, M.E. and Mitchell, J.F.B.1987: Climate model simulations of the equilibrium climatic response to increased carbon dioxide. Reviews of Geophysics25, 760-98.
66.
Senoo, T., Kobayashi, F., Tanaka, S. and Sugimura, T.1990: Improvement of forest type classification by SPOT HRV with 20 m mesh DTM. International Journal of Remote Sensing11, 1011-22.
67.
Sirikulchayanon, P., Sun, W. and Oyana, T.J.2008: Assessing the impact of the 2004 tsunami on mangroves using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing29, 3553-76.
68.
Strahler, A., Logan, T.L. and Bryant, N.A.1978: Improving forest classification accuracy from Landsat by incorporating topographic data. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 927-42.
69.
Talbot, S.S. and Markon, C.J.1986: Vegetation mapping of Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska using Landsat MSS Digital Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing66, 305-17.
70.
Teillet, P.M., Guidon, B. and Goodenough, D.G.1982: On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing8, 84-106.
71.
Thomson, A.G., Fuller, R.M. and Eastwood, J.A.1998: Supervised versus unsupervised methods of classification of coasts and river corridors from airborne remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing19, 3423-31.
72.
Tokola, T., Sarkela, J. and van der Linden, M.2001: Use of topographic correction in Landsat TMbased forest interpretation in Nepal. International Journal of Remote Sensing22, 551-63.
73.
Trietz, P. and Howarth, P.2000: Integrating spectral, spatial and terrain variables for forest ecosystem classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing66, 305-17.
74.
Walsh, S.J.1980: Conifer tree species mapping using Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment9, 11-26.
75.
White, J.D., Kroh, G.S. and Pinder, J.E.1995: Forest mapping at Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, using Landsat TM data and geographical information system. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing61, 299-305.
76.
Woodcock, C.1982: Reducing the influence of topography on the classification of remotely sensed data. Unpublished MA thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 69 pp.
77.
Wulder, M.A., Franklin, S.E., White, J., Cranny, M. and Dechka, J.2004: Inclusion of topographic attributes in an unsupervised classification of satellite imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing30, 137-49.
78.
Yang, X.2007: Integrated use of remote sensing and geographic information systems in riparian vegetation delineation and mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing28, 353-70.
79.
Zhuang, X., Engel, B.A., Xiong, X. and Johannsen, C.J.1995: Analysis of classification results of remotely sensed data and evaluation of classification algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing61, 427-33.
