AllBusiness2001: 21 technologies for the 21st century. Pipeline and Gas Journal 1 April. Retrieved 17 August 2009 from www.allbusiness.com/mining/supportactivities-mining-support-oil/784662-1.html
2.
Anderson, K. and Croft, H.2009: Remote sensing of soil surface properties. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
3.
Colwell, R.2004: The new landscape of science: a geographic portal. Annals of the Association of American Geographers94, 703-708.
4.
Crews, K.A. and Walsh, S.J.2009: Remote sensing and the social sciences. In Warner, T., Nellis, M.D. and Foody, G.M., editors, The Sage handbook of remote sensing, London: Sage , 437-45.
5.
Demeritt, D.2009: Geography and the promise of integrative environmental research. Geoforum40, 127-29.
6.
Estes, J.E., Jensen, J.R. and Simonett, D.S.1980: Impact of remote sensing on US geography. Remote Sensing of Environment10, 43-80.
7.
Foody, G.M., Warner, T.M. and Nellis, M.D.2009: A look to the future. In Warner, T. , Nellis, M.D. and Foody, G.M., editors, The Sage handbook of remote sensing, London: Sage , 476-81.
8.
Goetz, S.2007: Crises in Earth observation. Science315, 1767.
9.
Harris, R.2009: Remote sensing policy. In Warner, T. , Nellis, M.D. and Foody, G.M., editors, The Sage handbook of remote sensing, London: Sage , 18-29.
10.
Harrison, S., Massey, D., Richards, K., Magilligan, F.J., Thrift, N. and Bender, B.2004: Thinking across the divide: perspectives on the conversations between physical and human geography. Area36, 435-42.
11.
Kidd, C., Levizzani, V. and Bauer, P. 2009: A review of satellite meteorology and climatology at the start of the twenty-first century. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
12.
Krabach, T.2000: Breakthrough sensor technology for space exploration in the 21st century. Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 Technology Conference, 565-69.
13.
Liverman, D.M. and Cuesta, R.M.2008: Human interactions with the earth system: people and pixels revisited. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms33, 1458-71.
14.
Liverman, D., Moran, E.F., Rindfuss, R.R. and Stern, P.C., editors 1998: People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
Loarie, S.R., Jopp, L.N. and Pimm, S.L.2008: Satellites miss environmental priorities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution23, 183-84.
16.
Mas, J.F. and Flores, J.J.2008: The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing29, 617-63.
17.
Maslanik, J.A., Carsey, F., Curry, J., Drobot, S., Emery, W., Holt, B., Johnson, M. and Wadhams, P.2003: The new polar explorers of the 21st centuryautonomous vehicles.Proceedings of the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting.
18.
National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)2007: A plan for a US National Land Imaging Program. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy .
19.
National Science Board (NSB)1999: Environmental science and engineering for the 21st century. In NSB Task Force on the Environment - Interim Report, Washington, DC: NSB, 99-133.
20.
Newton, A.C., Hill, R.A., Echeverría, C., Golicher, D., Rey Benayas, J.M., Cayuela, L. and Hinsley, S.A.2009: Remote sensing and the future of landscape ecology. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
21.
Pitman, A.J.2005: On the role of geography in earth system science. GeoForm36, 137-48.
22.
Quincey, D.J. and Luckman, A.2009: Progress in satellite remote sensing of ice sheets. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
23.
Rediscovering Geography Committee, National Research Council (NRC)1997: Rediscovering geography: new relevance for science and society. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24.
Rhoads, B.L.2004: Whither physical geography?Annals of the Association of American Geographers94, 748-55.
25.
Sanchez-Hernandez, C., Boyd, D.S. and Foody, G.M.2007: One-class classification for monitoring a specific land cover class: SVDD classification of fenland. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing45, 1061-73.
26.
Skole, D.L.2004: Geography as a great intellectual melting pot and the preeminent interdisciplinary environmental discipline. Annals of the Association of American Geographers94, 739-43.
27.
Smith, M.J. and Pain, C.F.2009: Applications of remote sensing in geomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
28.
Sutton, P.C., Anderson, S.J., Elvidge, C.D., Tuttle, B. and Ghosh, T.2009: Paving the planet: impervious surface as proxy measure of the human ecological footprint. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
29.
Tang, Q., Gao, H., Lu, H. and Lettenmaier, D.P.2009: Remote sensing: hydrology. Progress in Physical Geography33, this issue.
30.
Tatem, A.J., Goetz, S.J. and Hay, S.I.2008: Fifty years of Earth-observation satellites. American Scientist96, 390-98.
31.
Teeuw, R., Aplin, P., McWilliam, N., Wicks, T., Kervyn, M. and Ernst, G.G.J.2009 In Warner, T., Nellis, M.D. and Foody, G.M., editors, The Sage handbook of remote sensing, London: Sage, 446-58.
32.
Warner, T.A., Nellis, M.D., and Foody, G.M.2009: Remote sensing scale and data issues. In Warner, T., Nellis, M.D. and Foody, G.M., editors, The Sage handbook of remote sensing, London: Sage , 3-17.
33.
Wilson, J.P. and Burrough, P.A.1999: Dynamic modelling, geostatistics, and fuzzy classification: new sneakers for a new geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers89, 736-46.
34.
Wolman, M.G.2004: The more things change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers94, 723-28.
35.
Wulder, M.A., White, J.C., Goward, S.N., Masek, J.G., Irons, J.R., Herold, M., Cohen, W.B., Loveland, T.R. and Woodcock, C.E.2008: Landsat continuity: issues and opportunities related to Landsat continuity. Remote Sensing of Environment112, 955-69.