Adams, N. M. and Hand, D. J.1999: Comparing classifiers when the misallocation costs are uncertain. Pattern Recognition32, 1139-1147.
2.
Ahlqvist, O., Keukelaar, J. and Oukbir, K.2000: Rough classification and accuracy assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 475-496.
3.
Andrefouet, S. and Roux, L.1998: Characterisation of ecotones using membership degrees computed with a fuzzy classifier. International Journal of Remote Sensing19, 3205-3211.
4.
Bastin, L., Edwards, M. and Fisher, P. 2000: Tracking the positional uncertainty in ‘ground truth’. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 39-42.
5.
Belward, A. S., Estes, J. E. and Kilne, K. D.1999: The IGBP-DIS global 1-km land-cover data set DISCover: a project overview. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1013-1020.
6.
Binaghi, E., Brivio, P. A., Ghezzi, P. and Rampini, A.1999: A fuzzy set-based accuracy assessment of soft classification. Pattern Recognition Letters20, 935-948.
7.
Bird, A. C., Taylor, J. C. and Brewer, T. R.2000: Mapping National Park landscape from ground, air and space. International Journal of Remote Sensing21, 2719-2736.
8.
Canadian Centre for Remote Sensing1999: New land cover map of Canada. Remote Sensing in Canada. Canada Centre for Remote Sensing Newsletter27, 7-9.
9.
Cheng, T., Molenaar, M. and Lin, H.2001: Formalising fuzzy objects from uncertain classification results. International Journal of Geographical Information Science15, 27-42.
10.
Cihlar, J.2000: Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: status and research priorities. International Journal of Remote Sensing21, 1093-1114.
11.
Cohen, W. B. and Justice, C. O.1999: Validating MODIS terrestrial ecology products: linking in situ and satellite measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment70, 1-3.
12.
Congalton, R. G. and Green, K.1999: Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
13.
Congalton, R. G. and Plourde, L. C. 2000: Sampling methodology, sample placement, and other important factors in assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed forest maps. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 117-124.
14.
Congalton, R. G., Balogh, M., Bell, C., Green, K., Milliken, J. A. and Ottman, R.1998: Mapping and monitoring agricultural crops and other land cover in the Lower Colorado river basin. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing64, 1107-1113.
15.
de Bruin, S. 2000: Spatial uncertainty in estimates of the areal extent of land cover types. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 137-144.
16.
DeFries, R. S. and Los, S. O.1999: Implications of land-cover misclassification for parameter estimates in global land-surface models: an example from the simple biosphere model (SiB2). Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1083-1088.
17.
DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C. and Townshend, J. R. G.2000: Global continuous fields of vegetation characteristics: a linear mixture model applied to multi-year 8km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing21, 1389-1414.
18.
DeGloria, S. D., Laba, M., Gregory, S. K., Braden, J., Ogurcak, D., Hill, E., Fegraus, E., Fiore, J., Stalter, A., Beecher, J., Elliot, R. and Weber, J. 2000: Conventional and fuzzy accuracy assessment of land cover maps at regional scale. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 153-160.
19.
Dragicevic, S. and Marceau, D. J.2000: A fuzzy set approach for modelling time in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 225-245.
20.
Edwards, T. C., Moisen, G. G. and Cutler, D. R.1998: Assessing map accuracy in a remotely sensed, ecoregion-scale cover map. Remote Sensing of Environment63, 73-83.
21.
Estes, J., Belward, A., Loveland, T., Scepan, J., Strahler, A., Townshend, J. and Justice, C.1999: The way forward. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1089-1093.
22.
Foody, G. M. 2000a: Accuracy of thematic maps derived from remote sensing. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 217-224.
23.
Foody, G. M.2000b: Mapping land cover from remotely sensed data with a softened feedforward neural network classification. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems29, 433-449.
24.
Friedl, M.A., Woodcock, C., Gopal, S., Muchoney, D., Strahler, A.H. and Barker- Schaaf, C.2000: A note on procedures used for accuracy assessment in land cover maps derived from AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing21, 1073-1077.
25.
Goodchild, M. F. and Gopal, S.1989: Accuracy of spatial databases. London: Taylor and Francis.
26.
Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E.2000: Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling135, 147-186.
27.
Husak, G. J., Hadley, B. C. and McGwire, K. C.1999: Landsat Thematic Mapper registration accuracy and its effects on the IGBP validation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1033-1039.
28.
Jager, G. and Benz, U.2000: Measures of classification accuracy based on fuzzy similarity. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing38, 1462-1467.
29.
Johnston, D. M. and Timlin, D. 2000: Spatial data accuracy and quality assessment for environmental management. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 325-328.
30.
Jones, C. B., Ware, J. M. and Miller, D. R. 2000: Bayesian probabilistic methods for change detection with area-class maps. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 329-336.
31.
Justice, C., Belward, A., Morisette, J., Lewis, P., Privette, J. and Baret, F.2000: Developments in the ‘validation’ of satellite sensor products for the study of the land surface. International Journal of Remote Sensing21, 3383-3390.
32.
Khorram, S., editor, 1999: Accuracy assessment of remote sensing-derived change detection. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
33.
Lewis, H. G. and Brown, M.2001: A generalised confusion matrix for assessing area estimates from remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing in press.
34.
Loveland, T. R., Zhu, Z., Ohlen, D. O., Brown, J. F., Reed, B. C. and Yang, L.1999: An analysis of the IGBP global land-cover characterisation process. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1021-1032.
35.
Mickelson, J. G., Civco, D. L. and Silander, J. A.1998: Delineating forest canopy species in the Northeastern United States using multi-temporal TM imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing64, 891-904.
36.
Morisette, J. T., Khorram, S. and Mace, T.1999: Land-cover change detection enhanced with generalized linear models. International Journal of Remote Sensing20, 2703-2721.
37.
Muchoney, D., Strahler, A., Hodges, J. and LoCastro, J.1999: The IGBP DISCover confidence sites and the system for terrestrial ecosystem parameterization: tools for validating global land-cover data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1061-1067.
38.
Muller, S. V., Walker, D. A., Nelson, F. E., Auerach, N. A., Bockheim, J. G., Guyer, S. and Sherba, D.1998: Accuracy assessment of a land-cover map of the Kuparuk river basin, Alaska: considerations for remote regions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing64, 619-628.
39.
Oberthur, T., Dobermann, A. and Aylward, M.2000: Using auxiliary information to adjust fuzzy membership functions for imprpoved mapping of soil qualities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 431-454.
40.
Power, C., Simms, A. and White, R.2001: Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. International Journal of Geographical Information Science15, 77-100.
41.
Riemann, R., Hoppus, M. and Lister, A. 2000: Using arrays of small ground sample plots to assess the accuracy of Landsat TM-derived forest-cover maps. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 541-548.
42.
Roy, D. P.2000: The impact of misregistration upon composited wide field of view satellite data and implications for change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing38, 2017-2032.
43.
Scepan, J.1999: Thematic validation of high-resolution global land-cover data sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1051-1060.
44.
Scepan, J., Menz, G. and Hansen, M. C.1999: The DISCover validation image interpretation process. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing65, 1075-1081.
45.
Smits, P. C., Dellepiane, S. G. and Schowengerdt, R. A.1999: Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and proposal for a cost-based approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing20, 1461-1486.
46.
Steele, B. M., Winne, J. C. and Redmond, R. L.1998: Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps. Remote Sensing of Environment66, 192-202.
47.
Stehman, S. V.1999a: Comparing thematic maps based on map value. International Journal of Remote Sensing20, 2347-2366.
48.
Stehman, S. V.1999b: Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing20, 2423-2441.
49.
Stehman, S. V. and Czaplewski, R. L.1998: Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: fundamental principles. Remote Sensing of Environment64, 331-344.
50.
Stehman, S. V., Wickham, J. D., Yang, L. and Smith, J. H. 2000: Assessing the accuracy of large-area land cover maps: experiences from the multi-resolution land-cover characteristics (MRLC) project. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 601-608.
51.
Thierry, B. and Lowell, K.2001: An uncertainty-based method of photointerpretation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing67, 65-72.
52.
Thomlinson, J. R., Bolstad, P. V. and Cohen, W. B.1999: Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: steps toward validating global map products. Remote Sensing of Environment70, 16-28.
53.
Townsend, P. A.2000: A quantitative fuzzy approach to assess mapped vegetation classification for ecological applications. Remote Sensing of Environment72, 253-267.
54.
Vaesen, K., Lizarraga, I., Nackaerts, K. and Coppin, P. 2000: Spatial characterisation of uncertainty in forest change detection. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 671-674.
55.
Vieira, C. A. O. and Mather, P. M. 2000: Visualisation of measures of classifier reliability and error in remote sensing. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 701-708.
56.
Woodcock, C. E. and Gopal, S.2000: Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 153-172.
57.
Worboys, M.1998: Imprecision in finite resolution spatial data. GeoInformatica2, 257-279.
58.
Yang, L., Stehman, S. V., Wickham, J., Jonathan, S. and VanDriel, N. J. 2000: Thematic validation of land cover data of the eastern United States using aerial photography: feasibility and challenges. In Heuvelink, G. B. M. and Lemmens, M. J. P. M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial accuracy assessment in natural resources and environmental sciences. Delft: Delft University Press, 747-754.
59.
Zhang, J. and Foody, G. M.2001: Fully-fuzzy supervised classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery: statistical and artificial neural network approaches. International Journal of Remote Sensing22, 615-628.