Atzema, O.A.L.C. and De Smidt, M.1992: Selection and duality in the employment structure of the Randstad. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie83, 289-305.
2.
Badcock, B.A.1989: An Australian view of the rent gap hypothesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers79, 125-45.
3.
— 1991: Neighbourhood change in inner Adelaide: an update. Urban Studies28, 553-58.
4.
— 1993: Notwithstanding the exaggerated claims, residential revitalization really is changing the form of some western cities: a response to Bourne. Urban Studies30, 191-95.
5.
Badcock, B.A. and Browett, J.M.1992: Adelaide's heart transplant, 1970-88: 3. The deployment of capital in the renovation and redevelopment sub-markets. Environment and Planning A 24, 1167-90.
6.
Bargeman, C.A., Van der Laan, L. and Lensink, E.1992: Urban revitalization and the labour market paradox in the Randstad Holland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie83, 306-16.
7.
Bassett, K. and Short, J.R.1989: Development and diversity in urban geography. In Gregory, D. and Walford, R., editors, Horizons in human geography. London: Macmillan, 175-93.
8.
Beauregard, R.A.1986: The chaos and complexity of gentrification. In Smith, N. and Williams, P. , editors, Gentrification of the city. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, 35-55.
9.
— 1990: Trajectories of neighbourhood change: the case of gentrification . Environment and Planning A22,855-74.
10.
— 1993: On Van Weesep and Musterd, urban housing for the better-off . Housing Studies8, 155-56.
11.
Birch, D.1971: Towards a stage theory of urban growth. Journal of the American Institute of Planners38, 78-88.
12.
Bondi, L.1991: Gender divisions and gentrification: a critique. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers16,290-98.
13.
Bourne, L.1993: The myth and reality of gentrification: a commentary on emerging urban forms. Urban Studies30, 183-89.
Clark, E.1991: On gaps in gentrification theory. Housing Studies7, 16-26.
16.
— 1992: On blindness, centrepieces and complementarity in gentrification theory. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers17, 359-63.
17.
Cortie, C. and Dijst, M.J.1988: Science on the move; the importance of the University of Amsterdam with regard to economic and residential revitalization of Amsterdam . Paper presented at the Conference on Housing Policy and Urban Innovation, Amsterdam.
18.
Cortie, C. and Van de Ven, J.1981: 'Gentrification'; keert de woonelite terug naar de stad ? Geografisch Tijdschrift15, 429-47.
19.
Cortie, C., Van Engelsdorp Gastelaars, R., Terhorst, P. and Van de Ven, J.1984: Nieuwe bewoners in de binnenstad van Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Sociaal Geografisch Instituut.
20.
Dangschat, J.1991: Gentrification in Hamburg. In Van Weesep, J. and Musterd, S., editors, Urban housing for the better-off: gentrification in Europe . Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken , 63-88.
21.
DeGiovanni, F.F. and Paulson, N.A.1984: Household diversity in revitalizing neighbourhoods. Urban Affairs Quarterly20, 211-32.
22.
Dicken, P.1992: Global shift: the internationalization of economic activity (2nd edition). Paul Chapman Publishing ; New York: Guilford Publications.
23.
Ebels, H.J. and Ostendorf, W.J.M.1991: Achter de schermen van de gentrification ; de bewoners van dure woningen in de centra van Den Haag en Amsterdam. Stedelijke Netwerken, Werkstukken 35. Utrecht : Stedelijke Netwerken.
24.
Fainstein, S., Gordon, I. and Harloe, M.1992: Divided cities: New York and London in the contemporary world. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell .
25.
Forrest, R. and Murie, A.1991: Housing markets, labour markets and housing histories . In Allen, J. and Hamnett, C., editors, Housing and labour markets, building the connections. London: Unwin Hyman , 63-93.
26.
Gale, D.E.1980: Neighborhood resettlement: Washington, DC. In Laska, S.B. and Spain, D. , editors, Back to the city: issues in neighborhood renovation . New York: Pergamon, 95-115.
27.
Glass, R.1964: Introduction: aspects of change. In Centre for Urban Studies, editors, London: aspects of change . London: MacGibbon & Kee.
28.
Hamnett, C.1984: Gentrification and residential location theory: a review and assessment. In Herbert, D.T. and Johnston, R.J., editors, Geography and the urban environment. Progress in Research and Applications VI. London: Wiley, 283-319.
29.
— 1991: The blind men and the elephant: the explanation of gentrification . Transactions, Institute of British Geographers16, 173-89.
30.
Hamnett, C. and Randolph, W.1988: Cities, housing and profits. London : Hutchinson.
31.
Hoover, E. and Vernon, R.1959: Anatomy of a metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Laska, S.B. and Spain, D.1979: Urban policy and planning in the wake of gentrification; anticipating renovators' demands. Journal of the American Planners Association45, 523-31.
33.
— editors, 1980: Back to the city: issues in neighborhood renovationNew York: Pergamon.
34.
Lauria, M.1982: Selective urban redevelopment: a political economic perspective . Urban Geography3, 224-39.
35.
Lee, B.A. and Mergenhagen, P.M.1984: Is revitalization detectable? Evidence from five Nashville neighbourhoods. Urban Affairs Quarterly19, 511-38.
36.
Ley, D.1980: Liberal ideology and the post-industrial city. Annals of the Association of American Geographers70, 238-58.
37.
— 1986: Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification . Annals of the Association of American Geographers76, 521-35.
38.
— 1992: Gentrification in recession: social change in six Canadian inner cities, 1981-1986. Urban Geography13, 230-56.
39.
— 1993: Past elites and present gentry: neighborhoods of privilege in the inner city. In Bourne, L.S. and Ley, D., editors, The changing social geography of Canadian cities. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press, 214-33.
40.
Lipton, G.1977: Evidence of central city revival. Journal of the American Institute of Planners43, 136-47.
41.
Machielse, E.C.M.1989: Stedelijke elite, terug van weggeweest? Eeen analyse van de aantrekkingskracht van de stad voor hogere inkomensgroepen. In Bovenkerk, F. and Brunt, L., editors, De andere stad. Achter de facade van de nieuwe stedelijke vitaliteit. Stedelijke Netwerken, Werkstukken 16. Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken, 147-57.
42.
Marcuse, P.1989: Gentrification, homelessness, and the work process: housing markets and labour markets in the quartered city. Housing Studies4, 211-20.
43.
Mollenkopf, J.H. and Castells, M., editors, 1991: Dual city: restructuringNew York. New York: Russell Sage.
44.
Rose, D.1984: Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory. Environment and Planning D,Environment and Space1, 47-74.
45.
— 1987: Un apercu féministe sur la restructuration de l'emploi et sur la gentrification; le cas de Montréal. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec31, 205-24.
46.
Sassen-Koob, S.1984: The new labor demand in global cities. In Smith, M.P., editor, Cities in transformation: class, capital and the state. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 139-71.
47.
Smith, M.P.1988: City, state and market: the political economy of urban society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
48.
Smith, N.1979: Toward a theory of gentrification: a back-to-the-city movement by capital, not by people. Journal of the American Planners Association45, 538-48.
49.
— 1982: Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography58, 138-55.
50.
— 1987: Of yuppies and housing: gentrification, social restructuring, and the urban dream. Environment and Planning D, Society and Space5, 151-72.
51.
— 1991a: On gaps in our knowledge of gentrification. In Van Weesep, J. and Musterd, S., editors, Urban housing for the better-off: gentrification in Europe. Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken , 52-62.
52.
— 1991b: New city, new frontier: the lower east side as Wild West . In Sorkin, M., editor, Variations on a theme park: scenes from the new American city. New York: Hill & Wang.
53.
— 1992: Blind man's bluff, or, Hamnett's philosophical individualism in search of gentrification. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers17, 110-15.
54.
Smith, N., Duncan, B. and Reid, L.1989: From disinvestment to reinvestment: tax arrears and turning points in the East Village. Housing Studies4, 238-52.
55.
Smith, N. and Herod, A.1991: Gentrification, a comprehensive bibliography. Discussion Papers, Department of Geography, Rutgers University. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
56.
Smith, N. and Van Weesep, J.1992: De herovering van de stad. Uiteenlopende verklaringen voor gentrification. Geografie1, 28-32.
57.
Smith, N. and Williams, P. , editors, 1986: Gentrification of the city . Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin .
58.
Soja, E.W.1989: Postmodern geographies: the reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
59.
Spain, D.1991: A gentrification research agenda for the 1990s. Journal of Urban Affairs14, 125-34.
60.
Stewart, I.1993: A new order. New Scientist, 6 February (supplement), 2-3.
61.
Van de Kaa, D.1987: Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin42. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
62.
Van Kempen, E.1992: Tussen zorg en zakelijkheid. Institutionele organisatie en lokale praktijken rond het huurschuldvraagstuk in drie probleemgebieden. Stedelijke Netwerken, Werkstukken 43 (M.m.v. J. Kullberg). Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken.
63.
Van Weesep, J., Hulsebosch, T.J. and Maas, M.W.A.1986: Revitalization in Amsterdam: the sponsors' perspective . In van Weesep, J., editor, Condominium, a new housing sector in The Netherlands. Utrecht: Geografisch Instituut Rijksuniversiteit, 77-94.
64.
Van Weesep, J. and Musterd, S., editors, 1991: Urban housing for the better-off: gentrification in Europe. Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken.
65.
Warde, A.1991: Gentrification as consumption: issues of class and gender. Environment and Planning D, Society and Space9, 223-32.
66.
Wilson, W.J.1987: The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
67.
Zeitz, E.1979: Private urban renewal: a different residential trend. Lexington, MA: Heath.