Adler, T.J. and Ben-Akiva, M.E.1976: Joint-choice model for frequency, destination and travel mode for shopping trips. Transportation Research Record569, 136-50.
2.
Ansah, J.A.1977: Destination choice set definition in travel behaviour modelling. Transportation Research11,127-40.
3.
Arnold, S.J., Oum, T.H. and Tigert, D.J.1983: Determinant attributes in retail patronage: seasonal, temporal, regional, and international comparisons. Journal of Marketing Research20, 149-57.
4.
Barnard, P.O.1987: Modelling shopping destination choice behaviour using the basic multinomial logit model and some of its extensions. Transport Reviews7, 17-51.
5.
Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S.R.1985: Discrete choice analysis. Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
Bentley, G.A., Bruce, A. and Jones, D.R.1977: Intra-urban journeys and activities linkages. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences11, 213-20.
7.
Black, W.C.1984: Choice-set definition in patronage modeling. Journal of Retailing60, 63-85.
8.
Borgers, A.W.J. and Timmermans, H.J.P.1987: Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects: a simulation experiment. Regional Science and Urban Economics17, 29-47.
9.
— 1988: A context-sensitive model of spatial choice behaviour . In Golledge, R.G. and Timmermans, H.J.P., editors, Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning, London: Croom Helm, 159-78.
10.
Burnett, K.P.1980a: Spatial constraints-oriented modelling as an alternative approach to movement. Microeconomic theory and urban policy. Urban Geography1, 53-67.
Burnett, K.P. and Hanson, S.1979: Rationale for an alternative mathematical approach to movement as complex human behavior. Transportation Research Record723, 11-24.
13.
— 1982: The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behavior in spatially-constrained situations: definitions and measurement issues. Transportation Research A16, 87-102.
14.
Carlstein, T., Parkes, D. and Thrift, N.1978: Timing Space and Spacing Time. Volume 2, Human activity and time geography. London: Edward Arnold.
15.
Clarke, M.I., Dix, M.C. and Goodwin, P.B.1982: Some issues of dynamics in forecasting travel behaviour . A discussion paper. Transportation11, 153-72.
16.
Desbarats, J.1983: Spatial choice and constraints on behavior. Annals of the Association of AmericanGeography73, 340-57.
17.
Domencich, T.A. and McFadden, D.1975: Urban travel demand: a behavioral analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
18.
Eyles, J.1971: Pouring new sentiments into old theories: how else can we look at behavioural patterns?Area3, 242-50.
19.
Fotheringham, A.S.1983: A new set of spatial interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environment and Planning A15, 15-36.
20.
— 1987: An information-processing approach to spatial choice . Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of American Geographers, Portland, Oregon, April 1987.
21.
— 1988a: Market share analysis techniques: a review and illustration of current US practice. In Wrigley, N., editor, Store choice, store location and market analysis , London: Routledge, 120-59.
22.
— 1988b: Consumer store choice and choice set definition . Marketing Science7, 299-310.
23.
Gaudry, M.J.I. and Dagenais, M.G.1979: The dogit model. Transportation Research B 13, 105-11.
24.
Gaudry, M.J.I. and Wills, M.J.1979: Testing the dogit model with aggregate time-series and cross-sectional travel data. Transportation Research B 13, 155-66.
25.
Gautschi, D.A.1981: Specification of patronage models for retail center choice . Journal of Marketing Research18, 162-74.
26.
Ghosh, A.1984: Parameter nonstability in retail choice models . Journal of Business Research12, 425-536.
27.
Goodwin, P.B.1981: The usefulness of travel budgets. Transportation Research A 15, 97-106.
Golledge, R.G. and Timmermans, H.J.P.1990: Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems I: cognition. Progress in Human Geography14, 57-99.
30.
Gray, F.1975: Non-explanation in urban geography. Area7, 228-35.
31.
Gunn, H.F.1981: Travel budgets - a review of evidence and modelling implications . Transportation Research A 15, 7-23.
32.
Hägerstrand, T.1970: What about people in regional science? Papers of theRegional Science Association24, 7-21.
33.
— 1975: Space, time and human conditions. In Karlqvist, A., Lundqvist, L. and Snickars, F., editors, Dynamic Allocation of Urban Space, Farnborough : Saxon House, 3-13.
34.
Haynes, K.E. and Fotheringham, A.S.1991: The impact of space on the application of discrete choice models. Review of RegionalScience20(2), 39-49.
35.
Heggie, I.G. and Jones, P.M.1978: Defining domains for models of travel demand. Transportation7, 119-25.
36.
Hillman, M., Henderson, I. and Whalley, A.1976: Transportation realities and planning policy. London: Political and Economic Planning.
37.
Horowitz, J.L.1985: Travel and location behavior: state of the art and research opportunities. Transportation Research A 19, 441-53.
38.
Horowitz, J.L. and Louviere, J.J.1990: The external validity of choice models based on laboratory choice experiments. In Fisher, M.M., Nijkamp, P. and Papageorgiou, Y.Y., Spatial Choices and Processes , Amsterdam: North-Holland, 247-63.
Kitamura, R. and Kermanshah, M.1983: Identifying time and history dependencies of activities choice. Transportation Research Record944, 22-30.
41.
— 1984: Sequential model of interdependent activity and destination choices. Transportation Research Record987, 81-89.
42.
Kitamura, R., Kostyniuk, L.P. and Uyeno, M.J.1981: Basic properties of urban time-space paths: empirical tests. Transportation Research Record794, 8-19.
43.
Kitamura, R. and Lam, T.N.1984: A model of constrained binary choice. In Volmuller, J. and Hamerslag, R., editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Utrecht : VNU Science Press, 493-512.
44.
Kondo, K. and Kitamura, R.1987: Time-space constraints and the formation of trip chains . Regional Science and Urban Economics17, 49-65.
45.
Koppelman, F.S. and Hauser, J.R.1978: Destination choice behavior for non-grocery shopping trips . Transportation Research Record673, 157-65.
46.
Kutter, E.1973: A model for individual travel behavior. Urban Studies10, 235-58.
47.
Landau, U., Prashker, J.N. and Hirsh, M.1981: The effect of temporal constraints on household travel behavior. Environment and Planning A13, 435-48.
48.
Landau, U., Prashker, J.N. and Alpern, B.1982: Evaluation of activity constrained choice sets to shopping destination choice modelling. Transportation Research A 16, 199-207.
49.
Lenntorp, B.1976: Paths in time-space environments: a time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography Series B No. 44.
50.
— 1978: A time-geographic simulation model of individual activity programmes. In Carlstein, T., Parkes, D. and Thrift, N. , editors, Timing Space and Spacing Time, volume 2, Human activity and time geography, London: Edward Arnold, 162-80.
51.
Lerman, S.R.1985: Random utility models of spatial choice. In Hutchinson, B.G., Nijkamp, P., Batty, M., editors, Optimization and discrete choice in urban systems, Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 200-17.
52.
Lerman, S.R. and Adler, T.J.1976: Development of disaggregate trip-distribution models . In Stopher, P.R. and Meyburg, A.H., editors, Behavioral travel-demand models , Lexington: Lexington Books , 125-39.
53.
Manski, C.F.1977: The Structure of Random Utility Models. Theory and Decision8, 229-54.
54.
Manski, C.F., Lerman, S.R. and Albrecht, R.L.1977: Technical memorandum on the development and testing of a multinominal probit estimation procedure. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
McCarthy, P.S.1980: A study of the importance of generalized attributes in shopping choice behaviour. Environment and Planning A12, 1269-86.
57.
McFadden, D.1978: Modelling the choice of residential location. In Karlqvist, A., Lundqvist, L., Snickars, F. and Weibull, J.W., editors, Spatial interaction theory and planning models, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 75-96.
58.
Meyer, R.1980: Theory of destination choice-set formation under informational constraints. Transportation Research Record750, 6-12.
59.
Meyer, R.J. and Eagle, T.C.1982: Context-induced parameter instability in a disaggregate-stochastic model of store choice. Journal of Marketing Research19,62-71.
60.
Miller, E.J. and O'Kelly, M.E.1983: Estimating shopping destination models from travel diary data. Professional Geographer35, 440-49.
61.
Parkes, D. and Thrift, N.1980: Times, spaces, and places. New York : John Wiley.
62.
Pipkin, J.S.1978: Fuzzy sets and spatial choice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers68, 196-204.
63.
Pirie, G.H.1976: Thoughts on revealed preferences and spatial behaviour . Environment and Planning A8, 947-56.
64.
Recker, W.W., McNally, M.G. and Root, G.S.1986a: A model of complex travel behavior. Part I: Theoretical development. Transportation Research A 20,307-18.
65.
— 1986b: A model of complex travel behavior. Part II: An operational model. Transportation Research A 20,319-30.
66.
Richards, M.G. and Ben-Akiva, M.E.1975: A disaggregate travel demand model. Lexington: Lexington Books.
67.
Salomon, I. and Ben-Akiva, M.1983: The use of the life-cycle concept in travel demand models . Environment and Planning A15, 623-38.
68.
Sheppard, E.S.1980: The ideology of spatial choice. Papers of theRegional Science Association45, 197-213.
69.
Southworth, F.1981: Calibration of multinomial logit models of mode and destination choice. Transportation Research A 15, 315-25.
70.
Swait, J.D. and Ben-Akiva, M.E.1986: Constraints on individual travel behavior in a Brazilian city. Transportation Research Record1085, 75-85.
71.
— 1987a: Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation. Transportation Research B 21, 91-102.
72.
— 1987b: Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: mode choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research B 21, 103-15.
73.
Tardiff, T.J.1979: Definition of alternatives and representation of dynamic behavior in spatial choice models. Transportation Research Record723, 25-30.
74.
Thill, J.-C. and Horowitz, J.L.1991: Estimating a destination-choice model from a choice-based sample with limited information. Geographical Analysis, 23,298-315.
75.
Thrift, N.1977: An introduction to time-geography. Norwich: Geobooks.
76.
Timmermans, H.J.P.1984: Discrete choice models versus decompositional multiattribute preference models: a comparative analysis of model performance in the context of spatial shopping behaviour. In Pitfield, D., editor, Discrete choice models in regional science, London: Pion, 88-101.
77.
Timmermans, H.J.P. and Golledge, R.G.1990: Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems II: preference and choice. Progress in Human Geography14, 311-54.
78.
Timmermans, H.J.P., van der Heijden, R.E.C.M. and Westerveld, H.1984: Decision making between multiattribute choice alternatives: a model of spatial shopping behaviour using conjoint measurements. Environment and Planning A 16, 377-87.
79.
Tyson, W.J.1978: Evaluation of the benefits of changes in public transport schedules. International Journal of TransportationEconomics5, 165-72.
80.
Van der Heijden, R.E.C.M. and Timmermans, H.J.P.1984: Modelling choice-set-generating processes via stepwise logit regression procedures: some empirical results . Environment and Planning A 16, 1249-55.
81.
Van derHoorn, T.1983: Experiments with an activity-based travel model . Transportation12, 61-77.
82.
Weisbrod, G.E., Parcells, R.J. and Kern, C.1984: A disaggregate model for predicting shopping area market attraction. Journal of Retailing60, 65-83.
83.
Wigan, M.R. and Morris, J.M.1981: The transport implications of activity and time budget constraints. Transportation Research A 15, 63-86.
84.
Williams, H.C.W.L. and Ortuzar, J.D.1982: Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models. Transportation Research B 16, 167-219.
85.
Wrigley, N.1982: Quantitative methods: developments in discrete choice modelling. Progress in Human Geography6, 547-62.
