American Society of Landscape Architects Foundation1975: Barrier-free site design. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2.
AndersonS, editor, 1978: On streets. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
3.
AppleyardD. N. D.: Professional priorities for environmental psychology. Urban Design Programme, University of California, Berkeley (mimeo.).
4.
BentleyI.1983: Bureaucratic partonage and local urban form. Proceedings of Seminar D: Design and Development, PTRC, 11 th Summer Meeting, 1–12.
5.
BentleyI.AlcockA.MurrainP.McGlynnS.SmithG.1985: Responsive environments: A manual for designers. London: Architectural Press.
6.
BishopJ.1985: Public and professional views of Milton Keynes. Places1 (4), 9–14.
7.
BoechensteinW.1985: Chester, England: Urban design ideas from an ancient source. Places2 (4), 3–16.
8.
ColemanA.1984: Trouble in Utopia: 1. Design influences in blocks of flats. Geographical Journal150, 351–62.
9.
ColemanA., 1985: Utopia on trial: Vision and reality in planned housing. London: Hilary Shipman.
10.
DatelR. E.DingemansD. J.1984: Environmental perception, historical preservation and sense of place. In SaarinenT. F.SeamonD.SellJ. L., editors, Environmental perception and behaviour: An inventory and prospect, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Research Paper 209, 131–44.
11.
Dunbar (Melville Dunbar Associates)1986: Lady grove design guide: Consultative draft. Wallingford: South Oxfordshire District Council.
12.
EdwardsM.1986: Aesthetic control — A mythconception. The Planner72 (4), 27.
13.
FindlayR. A.1984: Urban form: Expectations for the shape and organization of Downtown Minneapolis. Minneapolis: City Planning Department.
14.
FuschR.FordL. R.1983: Architecture and the geography of the city. Geographical Review73, 322–44.
15.
GaleN.DohertyS.PellegrinoT. W.GolledgeR. G.1985: Towards reassembling the image. Children's Environments Quarterly, 2 (3), 10–18.
16.
GoldJ. R.1982: Territoriality and human spatial behaviour. Progress in Human Geography6, 44–67.
17.
GoldJ. R.GoodeyB.1983: Behavioural and perceptual geography. Progress in Human Geography7, 578–86.
18.
GoldJ. R.GoodeyB., 1984: Behavioural and perceptual geography: Criticisms and response. Progress in Human Geography7, 544–50.
GoodeyB.1985: Urban design: Context, style and history in the postmodern era. Planning History Bulletin7 (3), 46–52.
21.
GoodeyB., 1986: The current condition of urban design: The significance of Lynch's final question. In L'analisi del ‘Luogo’–teorie e metodi del Urban Design, Institute of Architecture and Urbanistics, University of Naples, in press.
22.
GoodeyB.GoldJ. R.1985: Behavioural and perceptual geography: From retrospect to prospect. Progress in Human Geography9, 585–95.
23.
GreenbieB. B.1981: Spaces: Dimensions of the human landscape. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
24.
HardyD.WardC.1984: Arcadia for all: The legacy of a makeshift landscape. London: Mansell.
25.
HareN.BuchananP.KrierL.1986: Grand ideas. Architects' Journal, 28 May, 36–51.
26.
HillierB.1986: Cities of Alice's dreamsArchitects' Journal, 9 July, 39–41.
27.
JohnsonC. editor, 1985: The city in conflict. London: Mansell.
28.
LaddF. C.1985: An interview with Kevin Lynch. Children's Environments Quarterly2 (3), 4–6.
29.
LehtonenH.HurneR.MantyJ.1984: Kostamuksen Kaupunkikuva. Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Research Note 287. Los Angeles.
30.
LehtonenH.HurneR.MantyJ., 1971: The visual environment of Los Angeles. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Department of City Planning.
31.
LynchK.1981: A. theory of good urban form. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
32.
MaitlandB. S.1983: The future townscape. In DaviesR. L.ChampionA. G., editors, The future of the city centre, IBG Special Publications 19, London: Academic Press, 61–81.
33.
MannD. A.1985: Between traditionalism and modernism: Approaches to a vernacular architecture. Journal of Architectural Education39 (2), 10–16.
34.
MaxwellR.1976: An eye for an I: The future of the townscape tradition. Architectural Design46, 534–36.
35.
Minneapolis City Planning1985: Metro 2000: Open space, preliminary draft. Minneapolis: Minneapolis City Planning Department.
36.
MoudonA. V.1986: Platting versus planning: Housing at the household scale. Landscape29 (1), 30–38.
37.
MoudonA. V.LaconteP. editors, 1983: Streets as public property. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Washington at Seattle.
38.
NewmanO.1973: Defensible space. New York: Collier.
39.
PenninkP. K. A.de MonyeE. A. M.DekkingA. J. W.BoomO.1976: Gordon Cullen, Delft: Bouwkunde van de Technische Hogeschool.
40.
PunterJ. V.1983: Recurrent issues in aesthetic control. Proceedings of Seminar D: Design and Development, PTRC, 11th Summer Meeting, 17–29.
41.
PunterJ. V., 1986: Circular arguments: Central government and the history of aesthetic control in England and Wales. Planning History Bulletin8 (1), 51–9.
42.
SaarinenT. F.1986: Sense of place research: Panacea or will-of-the-wisp? In KrampenM., editor, Environment and human action, Berlin: Hochschule der Kunste, 75–77.
43.
SimeJ. D.1966: Creating places or designing spaces: Place affiliation and architectural design. In KrampenM., edtior, Environment and human action, Berlin: Hochschule der Kunste, 71–75.
44.
StilgoeJ. R.1982: Common landscape of America, 1580–1854. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
45.
TaylorL. editor, 1979: Urban open spaces. New York: Cooper-Hewitt Museum.
46.
WelshG. S.1966: The perception of an urban environment. In StipeR. E., editor, Perception and environment: Foundations of urban design, Chapel Hill: Institute of Government, University of North Carolina, 3–10.
47.
WhitehandJ. W. R.WhitehandS. M.1983: The study of physical change in town centres: Research procedures and types of change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series, 8, 483–507.