AcitoF.1977: An investiagtion of some data collection issues in conjoint measurement. In 1977 Educators' Conference Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 82–85.
2.
AcitoF.JainA.K.1980: Evaluation of conjoint analysis results: A comparison of methods. Journal of Marketing Research17, 106–712.
3.
AndersonN.H.1974: Information integration theory: A brief survey. In KrantzD.H.AtkinsonR.C.LuceR.C.SuppesP., editors, Contemporary developments in mathematical psychologyVol. 2, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 236–301.
4.
AndersonN.H., 1981: Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
5.
BeavonK.S.O.HayA.1977: Consumer choice of shopping centre, a hyper-geometric model. Environment and Planning A9, 1375–95.
6.
BockR.D.JonesL.V.1968: The measurement and prediction of judgement and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
7.
CarmoneF.J.GreenP.E.JainA.K.1978: Robustness of conjoint analysis: Some Monte Carlo results. Journal of Marketing Research15, 300–303.
8.
CattinP.1982: On the estimation of continuous utility functions in conjoint analysis. In LittleJ.D.ChandonJ.L., editors, Proceedings of Product Management: Quantitative Methods in Marketing, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 251–67.
9.
CattinP.BliemelF.1978: Metric vs non-metric procedures for multiattribute modelling: Some simulation results. Decision Sciences9, 472–80.
10.
CattinP.WittinD.R.1976: A Monte Carlo study of metric and non-metric estimation methods for multiattribute models. Research Paper No. 341, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
11.
CattinP., 1982: Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey. The Journal of Marketing46, 44–53.
12.
CoombsC.H.HuangL.C.1970: Polynomial psychophysics of risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology7, 317–38.
13.
CurrimI.S.SarinR.K.1982a: Measuring and estimating consumer preferences under uncertainty. Working Paper No. 118, Center for Marketing Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
14.
CurrimI.S., 1982b: A comparative evaluation of multiattribute consumer preference models. Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, unpublished paper.
15.
CurrimI.S.WeinbergC.B.WittinkD.R.1981: Design of subscription programs for a performing arts series. Journal of Consumer Research8, 67–75.
16.
CurrimI.S.WittinkD.R.1982: An empirical comparison of quantal choice and conjoint analysis models. Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, unpublished paper.
17.
CurryD.RodgersW.1976: Aggregating responses in additive conjoint measurement. Proceedings Association for Consumer Research, 35–40.
18.
DavidsonJ.D.1973: Forecasting traffic on STOL. Operations Research Quarterly24, 561–69.
19.
DyerJ.SarinR.1979: Measurable multiattribute value functions. Operations Research27, 810–22.
20.
EliashbergJ.1980: Consumer preference judgements: An exposition with empirical applications. Management Science26, 60–77.
21.
EmeryD.R.BarronF.H.1979: Axiomatic and numerical conjoint measurement: An evaluation of diagnostic efficacy. Psychometrika44, 195–211.
22.
EtgarM.MalhotraN.1978: Consumers' reliance on different product quality cues: A basis for market segmentation. In JainS., editor, Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
23.
FalmangeJ.1976: Random conjoint measurement and loudness summation. Psychological Review83, 65–79.
24.
FenwickI.1979: A problem of quantifying consumer trade-offs. Journal of the Marketing Research Society21, 206–210.
25.
FielderJ.A.1972: Condominium design and pricing: A case study in consumer trade-off analysis. In VenkatesanM., editor, Proceedings Third Annual Conference, Association for Consumer Research, 279–93.
26.
FishburnP.1967: Methods of estimating additive utilities. Management Science7, 435–53.
27.
GirtJ.L.1976: Some extensions to Rushton's spatial preference scaling model. Geographical Analysis8, 137–56.
28.
GreenP.E.1974a: On the design of multiattribute choice experiments involving a large number of factors and factor levels. In WardS.WrightP., editors, Advances in consumer researchVol. I., Urbana, Illinois: Association for Consumer Research.
29.
GreenP.E., 1974b: On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research1, 61–8.
30.
GreenP.E.CarmoneF.J.1977: Segment congruence analysis: A method for analysing association among alternative bases for market segmentation. Journal of Consumer Research3, 217–22.
31.
GreenP.E.CarmoneF.J.WachspressD.P.1976: Consumer segmentation via latent class analysis. Journal of Consumer Research3, 170–74.
32.
GreenP.E.CarmoneF.J.WindY.1972: Subjective evaluation models and conjoint measurement. Behavioral Science17, 288–99.
33.
GreenP.E.CarrollJ.D.CarmoneF.J.1978: Some new types of fractional factorial designs for marketing experiments. In ShethJ.N., editor, Research in marketingVol. I., Greenwich: JAI Press, 99–122.
34.
GreenP.E.SrinivasanV.1978: Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research5, 103–123.
35.
GreenP.E.De SarboW.S.1979: Componential segmentation in the analysis of consumer trade-offs. Journal of Marketing43, 83–91.
36.
GreenP.E.WindY.1973: Multiattribute decisions in marketing: A measurement approach. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
37.
HauserJ.R.UrbanG.L.1977a: A normative methodology for modelling consumer response to innovation. Operations Research25, 579–619.
38.
HauserJ.R., 1977b: Assessment of attribute importances and consumer utility functions: Von Neumann-Morgenstern theory applied to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research5, 251–62.
39.
HuberJ.C.MooreW.L.1979: A comparison of alternative ways to aggregate individual conjoint analysis. In BeckwithE., editors, 1979 Educators' Conference Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 64–68.
40.
IainA.K.AcitoF.MalhotraN.K.MahajanV.1979: A comparison of the internal validity of alternative parameter estimation methods in decompositional multiattribute preference models. Journal of Marketing Research16, 313–22.
41.
JainA.K.MalhotraN.MahajanV.1979: Aggregating conjoint data: Some methodological considerations and approaches. In LandonE.L.LocanderW., editors, 1979 AMA Educators: Conference Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
42.
JohnsonR.M.1974: Trade-off analysis of consumer values. Journal of Marketing Research11, 121–27.
43.
KeeneyR.RaiffaH.1976: Decisions with multiple consequences: Preferences and value trade-offs. New York: John Wiley.
44.
KnightR.L.MenchikM.D.1976: Conjoint preference estimation for residential land-use policy evaluation. In GolledgeR.G.RushtonG., editors, Spatial choice and spatial behavior, Columbus: Ohio University Press, 135–55.
45.
KrantzD.H.1964: Conjoint measurement: The Luce-Tukey axiomatization and some extensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology1, 248–77.
46.
KrantzD.H.TverskyA.1971: A conjoint measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology. Psychological Review78, 152–69.
47.
LouviereJ.J.1976: Information processing theory and functional measurement in spatial behavior. In GolledgeR.G.RushtonG., editors, Spatial choice and spatial behavior, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
48.
LouviereJ.J., 1981: A conceptual and analytical framework for understanding spatial and travel choice. Economic Geography57, 304–314.
49.
LouviereJ.J.MeyerR.J.1979: Behavioral analysis of destination choice. Technical Report 112, Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa.
50.
LuceR.D.1977: Conjoint measurement: A brief survey, In BellD.E.KeeneyR.L.RaiffaH., editors, Conflicting objectives in decisions, New York: John Wiley, 148–71.
51.
LuceR.D.TukeyJ.W.1964: Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology1, 1–27.
52.
MadanskyA.1980: On conjoint analysis and quantal choice models. The Journal of Business53, 537–44.
53.
MalhotraN.1982: Structural reliability and stability of non-metric conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research19, 199–207.
54.
McCulloughJ.BestR.1979: Conjoint measurement: Temporal stability and structural reliability. Journal of Marketing Research16, 26–31.
55.
McFaddenD.1973: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In ZarembaP., editor, Frontiers in econometrics, New York: Academic Press, 105–142.
56.
MeyerR.J.LevinI.P.LouviereJ.J.1979: Functional analysis of mode choice. Transportation Research Record No. 673, 1–7.
57.
MontgomeryD.WittinkD.R.1980: The predictive validity of conjoint analysis for alternative aggregation schemes. In MontgomeryD.WittinkD., editors, Market measurement and analysis, Proceedings of the ORSA/TIMS Conference, Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute, 298–309.
58.
MontgomeryD.B.WittinkD.R.GlazeT.1977: A predictive test of individual level concept evaluation and trade-off analysis. Research paper No. 415, Graduate School of Business, Standford University.
59.
MostellerF.TukeyJ.W.1977: Data analysis and regression. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
60.
NeslinS.A.1978: Linking product features to perceptions: Application and evaluation of graded paired comparisons. In JainS., editor, Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 6–11.
61.
NormanK.1976: A solution for weights and scale values in functional measurement. Psychological Review83, 80–84.
62.
van VeenW.M.L. OppedijkBeazleyD.1977: An investigation of alternative methods of applying the trade-off model. Journal of the Marketing Research Society19, 2–11.
63.
de D. OrtuzarJ.1982: Fundamentals of discrete multimodal choice modelling. Transportation Reviews2, 47–78.
64.
ParkerB.R.SrinivasanV.1976: A consumer preference approach to the planning of rural primary health care facilities. Operations Research24, 991–1025.
65.
PekelmanD.SenS.1976: Regression versus interpolation in additive conjoint measurement. Proceedings Association for Consumer Research, 29–34.
66.
PekelmanD., 1979a: Measurement and estimation of conjoint utility functions. Journal of Consumer Research5, 263–71.
67.
PekelmanD., 1979b: Improving prediction in conjoint measurement. Journal of Marketing Research16, 211–20.
68.
PessemierE.A.BurgerP.TeachR.TigertD.1971: Using laboratory preference scales to predict consumer brand purchases. Management Science17, 371–85.
69.
PipkinJ.S.1977: Some probabilistic revealed preference models of the choice process in recurrent urban travel. Geografiska Annaler B59, 82–94.
70.
PlottC.R.1980: Comments on ‘On conjoint analysis and quantal choice analysis’. The Journal of Business53, 545–46.
71.
RankinW.L.GrubeL.W.1980: A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology10, 233–46.
72.
RushtonG.1976: Decomposition of space preference functions. In GolledgeR.G.RushtonG., editors, Spatial choice and spatial behavior, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 119–33.
73.
SchulerH.J.1979: A disaggregate store-choice model of spatial decision making. The Professional Geographer31, 146–56.
74.
SchulerH.J.ProsperiD.C.1978: A conjoint measurement model of consumer spatial behavior. Regional Science Perspectives8, 122–34.
75.
ScottJ.E.WrightP.1976: Modelling an organizational buyer's product evaluation strategy: Validity and procedural considerations. Journal of Marketing Research13, 221–24.
76.
SegalM.N.1982: Reliability of conjoint analysis: Contrasting data collection procedures. Journal of Marketing Research19, 139–44.
77.
SrinivasanV.1980: Comments on ‘On conjoint analysis and quantal choice analysis’. The Journal of Business53, 547–50.
78.
SrinivasanV.ShockerA.D.1973a: Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika38, 337–69.
79.
SrinivasanV., 1973b: Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgements. Psychometrika38, 473–93.
80.
TimmermansH.J.P.1980a: Consumer spatial choice strategies: A comparative study of some alternative behavioural spatial shopping models. Geoforum11, 123–31.
TimmermansH.J.P., 1982: Consumer choice of shopping centre: An information integration approach. Regional Studies16, 171–82.
83.
TimmermansH.J.P., 1983: Non-compensatory decision rules and consumer spatial choice behaviour: A test of predictive ability. The Professional Geographer35, 449–55.
84.
TimmermansH.J.P., 1984: Decision models for predicting preferences among multiattribute choice alternatives. In BahrenbergG.FisherM.M.NykampP., editors, Theoretical and measurement issues in spatial data analysis, Aldershot: Gower, forthcoming.
85.
TimmermansH.J.P.van der HejjdenR.1984: The predictive ability of alternative decision rules in decompositional multiattribute preference models. Sistemi Urbani, forthcoming.
86.
TimmermansH.J.P.van der HeydenR.WesterveldV.H.1983: Conjoint measurement of individual preference functions: Some tests of validity. Area15, 245–50.
87.
TimmermansH.J.P., 1984a: Decision-making experiments and real-world choice behaviour: An analysis of spatial shopping behaviour using conjoint measurements. Geografiska Annaler B, forthcoming.
88.
TimmermansH.J.P., 1984b: Decision making among multiattribute choice alternatives: A model of spatial shopping behaviour using conjoint measurements. Environment and Planning A, forthcoming.
89.
TimmermansH.J.P.VeldhuisenK.J.1981: Behavioural models and spatial planning: Some methodological considerations and empirical tests. Environment and Planning A13, 1485–98.
90.
UlbrichJ.R.PainterJ.R.1974: A conjoint measurement analysis of human judgement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance12, 50–61.
91.
VeldhuisenK.J.TimmermansH.J.P.1984: Specification of individual residential utility functions: A comparative analysis of three measurement procedures. Environment and Planning A, forthcoming.
92.
WallstenT.S.1972: Conjoint measurement framework for the study of probabilistic information processing. Psychological Review79, 245–60.
93.
WittinkD.R.CattinP.1981: Alternative estimation methods for conjoint analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Marketing Research18, 101–106.
94.
WittinkD.R.KrishnamurthiL.1983: Rank order preferences and the part-worth model: Implications for derived attribute importances and choice predictions. In KeonJ.W., editor, Proceedings of the Third Annual Market Measurement and Analysis Conference, Providence: The Institute of Management Sciences.
95.
WittinkD.R.KrishamurthiL.NutterJ.B.1982: Comparing derived importance weights across Attributes. Journal of Consumer Research8, 471–74.
96.
WittinkD.R.MontgomeryD.B.1979: Predictive validity of trade-off analysis for alternative segmentation schemes. In BeckwithN., editors, 1979 Educators' Conference Proceedings, Chicago: American Marketing Association, 69–73.
97.
WrigleyN.1982: Quantitative methods: Developments in discrete choice modelling. Progress in Human Geography6, 547–62.