AlbrightR. L.LermanS. R.ManskiC. F.1977: Report on the development of an estimation program for the multinomial probit model. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation.
2.
Ben-AkivaM. E.1973: Structure of passenger travel demand models. Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, PhD dissertation.
3.
Ben-AkivaM. E., 1977: Choice models with simple choice set generating processes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Centre for Transportation Studies, Working Paper.
4.
Ben-AkivaM. E.LermanS. R.1979: Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In HensherD. A.StopherP. R. editors, Behavioural travel modelling, London: Croom Helm, 654–79.
5.
BroomD.WrigleyN.1983: Incorporating explanatory variables into stochastic panel-data models of urban store-choice behaviour. Submitted toGeographical Analysis.
6.
BurnettP.1980: Spatial constraints-oriented modelling as an alternative to movement, microeconomic theory and urban policy. Urban Geography1, 53–67.
7.
BurnettP., 1981: Theoretical advances in modelling economic and social behaviours: Applications to geographical, policy-oriented models. Economic Geography57, 291–303.
8.
BurnettP.HansonS.1982: The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behaviour in spatially-constrained situations: Definitions and measurement issues. Transportation Research16A, 87–102.
9.
ClarkC. E.1961: The greatest of a finite set of random variables. Operations Research9, 145–62.
10.
CliffA. D.1977: Quantitative methods: Time series methods for modelling and forecasting. Progress in Human Geography1, 492–502.
11.
CliffA. D., 1979: Quantitative methods: Spatial diffusion. Progress in Human Geography3, 143–52.
12.
CliffA. D., 1980: Quantitative methods: Spatial modelling. Progress in Human Geography4, 568–76.
13.
CostanzoC. M.HalperinW. C.GaleN. D.RichardsonG. D.1982: An alternative method for assessing goodness-of-fit for logit models. Environment and Planning A14, 963–71.
14.
CoxK. R.GolledgeR. G. editors, 1981: Behavioural problems in geography revisited. London: Methuen.
15.
DaganzoC. F.1979: Multinomial probit: The theory and its application to demand forecasting. New York: Academic Press.
16.
DaganzoC. F., 1980: Optimal sampling strategies for statistical models with discrete dependent variables. Transportation Science14, 324–45.
17.
DaganzoC. F.BouthelierF.SheffiY.1977: Multinomial probit and qualitative choice: A computationally efficient algorithm. Transportation Science11, 338–58.
18.
DaganzoC. F.SheffiY.1979: Estimation of choice models from panel data. Paper presented at North American Meeting of Regional Science Association, Los Angeles, November.
19.
DalyA. J.ZacharyS.1978: Improved multiple choice models. In HensherD. A.DalviM. Q., editors, Determinants of travel choice, Farnborough, Hampshire: Teakfield, 335–57.
20.
DaviesR. B.CrouchleyR.PicklesA. R.1983: Some methods for the testing and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Environment and Planning A 15.
21.
DebreuG.1960: Review of Luce, R. D. Individual choice behaviour. InAmerican Economic Review50, 186–88.
22.
DomencichT.McFaddenD.1975: Urban travel demand: A behavioural analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23.
GalbraithR. A.HensherD. A.1982: Intra-metropolitan transferability of mode choice models. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy16, 7–29.
24.
GaudryM. J. I.1980: Dogit and logit models of travel mode choice in Montreal. Canadian Journal of Economics13, 268–79.
25.
GaudryM. J. I.DagenaisM. G.1979: The dogit model. Transportation Research13B, 105–11.
26.
GaudryM. J. I.WillsM. J.1979: Testing the dogit model with aggregate time-series and cross-sectional data. Transportation Research13B, 155–66.
27.
HalperinW. C.RichardsonG. D.GaleN. D.CostanzoC. M.1982: A generalized procedure for comparing models of spatial choice. Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara.
28.
HansonS.1980a: Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: Implications for choice theory. Geographical Analysis12, 245–57.
29.
HansonS., 1980b: The importance of the multipurpose journey to work in urban travel behaviour. Transportation9, 229–48.
30.
HausmanJ.WiseD. A.1978: A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica46, 403–26.
31.
HeckmanJ. J.1981: Statistical models for discrete panel data. In Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. 1981, 114–78.
HensherD. A.JohnsonL. W., 1981b: Behavioural response and form of the representative component of the indirect utility function in travel choice models. Regional Science and Urban Economics11, 559–72.
34.
HensherD. A.LouviereJ. J.1981: An integration of probabilistic discrete choice models and experimental design data: An application in cultural economics. School of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, NSW 2113, Australia.
35.
HensherD. A.ManefieldT.1981: A structured logit model of automobile acquisition and type choice: Some preliminary evidence. School of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, NSW 2113, Australia.
36.
HorowitzJ.1980a: The accuracy of the multinomial logit model as an approximation to the multinomial probit model of travel demand. Transportation Research14B, 331–41.
37.
HorowitzJ., 1980b: Specification tests for probabilistic choice models. Paper presented at the International Conference on Research and Applications of Dissaggregate Travel Demand Models, University of Leeds, UK, July 1980.
38.
HorowitzJ., 1981a: Identification and diagnosis of specification errors in the multinomial logit model. Transportation Research15B, 345–60.
39.
HorowitzJ., 1981b: Testing the multinomial logit against the multinomial probit without estimating the probit parameters. Transportation Science15, 153–63.
40.
HubertL. J.GolledgeR. G.1981: A heuristic method for the comparison of related structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology23, 214–26.
41.
JohnsonL. W.HensherD. A.1980: Application of multinomial probit to a two-period panel data set. Paper presented at the International Conference on Research and Applications of Disaggregate Travel Demand Models, University of Leeds, UK, July 1980 (forthcomingTransporation Research Record).
42.
KoppelmanF. S.1981: Non-linear utility functions in models of travel choice behaviour. Transportation10, 127–47.
43.
LeeL. F.1981: Simultaneous equations models with discrete and censored dependent variables. In Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. 1981, 346–64.
44.
LermanS. R.ManskiC. F.1979: Sample design for discrete choice: State of the art. Transportation Research13A, 29–44.
45.
LouviereJ. J.1981a: On the identification of the functional form of the utility expression and its relationship to discrete choice. Appendix B in Hensher, D. A. and Johnson, L. W., 1981a.
46.
LouviereJ. J., 1981b: A conceputal and analytical framework for understanding spatial and travel choices. Economic Geography57, 304–14.
47.
LuceR. D.1959: Individual choice behaviour: A theoretical analysis. New York: John Wiley.
48.
LuceR. D., 1977: The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology15, 215–33.
49.
LuceR. D.SuppesP.1965: Preference, utility and subjective probability. In LuceR. D.BushR.GalanterE., editors, Handbook of mathematical psychology, volume 3, New York: John Wiley, 249–410.
50.
ManskiC. F.1977: The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision8, 229–54.
51.
ManskiC. F., 1981: Structural models for discrete data: The analysis of discrete choice. In LeinhardtS. editor, Sociological methodology 1981, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 58–109.
52.
ManskiC. F.McFaddenD. editors, 1981: Structural analysis of discrete data: With econometric applications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
53.
ManskiC. F.McFaddenD., 1981: Alternative estimators and sample design for discrete choice analysis. In Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D. 1981, 2–50.
54.
McFaddenD.1974: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In ZarembkaP. editor, Frontiers in econometrics, New York: Academic Press.
55.
McFaddenD., 1979: Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals: Some recent developments. In HensherD. A.StopherP. R., editors, Behavioural travel modelling, London: Croom Helm, 279–318.
56.
McFaddenD., 1981: Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In Manski, C. F. and McFadden, D., 1981, 198–272.
57.
McFaddenD.TrainD.TyeW.1977: An application of diagnostic tests for the independence from irrelevant alternatives property of the multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Record637, 39–45.
58.
MeyerR. J.EagleT. C.1981: A parsimonious multinomial choice model recognizing alternative interdependence and context-dependent utility functions Carnegie-Mellon University; Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Working Paper 26–80–81.
59.
MeyerR. J.EagleT. C., 1982: Context-induced parameter instability in a disaggregate stochastic model of store choice. Journal of Marketing Research19, 62–71.
60.
MillerE. J.LermanS. R.1981: Disaggregate modelling and decisions of retail firms: A case study of clothing retailers. Environment and Planning A13, 729–46.
61.
O'BrienL. G.1982: Categorical data analysis for geographical research: With applications to public sector residential mobility. Department of Geography, University of Bristol, PhD dissertation.
62.
O'BrienL. G.WrigleyN.1980: Computer programs for the analysis of categorical data. Area12, 263–68.
63.
OrtuzarJ. D.1980: Modelling park'n ride and kiss'n ride as submodal choices. Transportation9, 287–91.
64.
PipkinJ. S.1981a: Cognitive behavioural geography and repetitive travel. In Cox, K.R. and Golledge, R. G. 1981, 145–81.
65.
PipkinJ. S., 1981b: The concept of choice and cognitive explanations of spatial behaviour. Economic Geography57, 315–31.
RushtonG.1982: Review of Gold, J. R. An introduction to behavioural geography. InEnvironment and Planning A14, 275–76.
68.
SmithT. R.SlaterP. B.1981: A family of spatial interaction models incorporating information flows and choice set constraints applied to US interstate labour flows. International Regional Science Review6, 15–31.
69.
SobelK. L.1980: Travel demand forecasting, with the nested multinomial logit model. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 59th Annual Meeting, January 1980.
70.
StoneR.1954: Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: An application to the pattern of British demand. Economic Journal64, 511–27.
71.
TardiffT. J.1980: Definition of alternatives and representation of dynamic behaviour in spatial choice models. Transportation Research Record723, 25–30.
72.
ThriftN. J.1981: Behavioural geography. In WrigleyN.BennettR. J., editors, Quantitative geography: A British view, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 352–65.
73.
TverskyA.1972a: Elimination-by-aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review79, 281–99.
74.
TverskyA., 1972b: Choice-by-elimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology9, 341–67.
WilliamsH. W. C. L.1977: On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A9, 285–344.
77.
WilliamsH. W. C. L., 1981: Random utility theory and probabilistic choice models. In WilsonA. G.CoelhoJ. D.MacGillS. M.WilliamsH. C. W. L.Optimization in locational and transport analysis, Chichester: John Wiley, 46–84.
78.
WilliamsH. C. W. L.OrtuzarJ. D.1982: Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models. Transportation Research16B, 167–219.
79.
WrigleyN.1979: Developments in the statistical analysis of categorical data. Progress in Human Geography3, 315–55.
80.
WrigleyN., 1981a: Quantitative methods: A view on the wider scene. Progress in Human Geography5, 548–61.
81.
WrigleyN., 1981b: Categorical data analysis. In WrigleyN.BennettR. J., editors, Quantitative geography: A British view, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 111–22.
82.
WrigleyN., 1983: Categorical data analysis for geographers and environmental scientists. London: Longman.
83.
WrigleyN.LongleyP. A.1983: Discrete choice modelling in urban analysis. In HerbertD. T.JohnstonR. J. editors, Geography and the urban environment, volume 6, Chichester: John Wiley.
