Anderson, F.R.1973: NEPA in the courts: a legal analysis of the National Environmental Policy Act. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
Andrews, R.N.L., Cromwell, P., Enk, G.A., Farnworth, E.G., Hibbs, J.R. and Sharp, V.L.1977: Substantive guidance for environmental impact assessment . Institute of Ecology.
3.
An Foras Forbatha1975: A study of suitable coastal locations for oil refineries in Ireland. Dublin: An Foras Forbatha .
4.
Battelle Institut1978: The selection of projects for EIA. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities Environment and Consumer Protection Service.
5.
Bishop, A.B.1976: Public participation in environmental impact assessment . In Blissett, M. editor, Environmental impact assessment, Austin, Texas: Engineering Foundation.
6.
Bisset, R.1978: Quantification, decision making and environmental impact assessment in the United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Management7, 43-58.
7.
BP1979: BP briefing paper on environmental protection. Environmental Data Services20, 19-23.
8.
Brooks, E.1976: On putting the environment in its place: a critique of EIA. In O'Riordan, T. and Hey, R., editors, Environmental impact assessment, Farnborough, Hants: Saxon House.
9.
Burchell, R.W. and Listokin, D.1975: The environmental impact handbook. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Centre for Urban Policy Research.
10.
Canter, L.1977: Environmental impact assessment. New York: McGraw Hill.
11.
Catlow, J. and Thirlwall, C.G.1976: Environmental impact analysis. London : Department of the Environment Research Report 11.
12.
CBI1979: EEC legislation on environmental impact assessments. CBI statement T. 245.79.
13.
Chapman, K.1976: North Sea oil and gas: a geographical perspective . Newton Abbot: David and Charles .
14.
Clark, B.D., Chapman, K., Bisset, R. and Wathern, P.1976: Assessment of major industrial applications: a manual . London: Department of the Environment Research Report 13.
15.
Clark, B.D., Chapman, K., Bisset, R. and Wathern, P.1978: Environmental impact assessment in the USA: a critical review. London: Department of the Environment and Transport Research Report 26.
16.
Clark, B.D., Chapman, K., Bisset, R. and Wathern, P.1979: Environmental impact assessment. In Lovejoy, D., editor, Lartd-use and landscape planning, second edition, Aylesbury: Leonard Hill Books, 51-87.
17.
Commission of the European Communities1979 : State of the environment: second report. Brussels.
18.
Cook, P.L.1975: Federal agencies impact assessment guidelines - present and future. In Hutchings, B., Forrester, A., Jain, R.K. and Balback, H., editors, Environmental impact analysis: current methodologies and future directions , Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Department of Architecture.
19.
Cunningham, P.A., Adams, S.M. and Kumar, K.D.1977: Evaluation of environmental impact predictions . Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge , National Laboratory.
20.
Curlin, J.W.1976: The role of the courts in the implementation of NEPA. In Blissett, M., editor, Environmental impact assessment, Austin, Texas : Engineering Foundation.
21.
Day, J.C., Brady, R.F., Bridger, K.C., Friesen, B.F. and Peet, S.E.1977: A strategy for hindsight evaluation of environmental impacts . In Plewes, M. and Whitney, J.B.R., editors, Environmental impact assessment in Canada: processes and approaches, Toronto: University of Toronto, Institute of Environmental Studies.
22.
Dean, F.E. and Graham, G.1978: The application of environmental impact analysis in the British gas industry (general considerations). In Proceedings of the UNECE symposium on the gas industry and the environment , 151-171.
23.
Dee, N., Baker, J.K., Drobny, N.L., Duke, K.M. and Fahringer, D.C.1972: Environmental evaluation system for water resource planning . Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Columbus Laboratories.
24.
Department of Transport1977: Report of the advisory committee on trunk road assessment. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
25.
Dobry, G.1974: Review of the development control system: final report . London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
26.
Duke, K.M., Dee, N., Fahringer, D.C., Maiden, D.C., Moody, C.W., Pomeroy, S.E. and Watkins, G.A.1977: Environmental quality assessment in multi objective planning . Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Columbus Laboratories.
27.
Energy Research and Development Administration1977: Coal research development and demonstration program (draft EIS). Washington DC.
28.
Environment Canada1974: An environmental assessment of Nanaimo port alternatives . Ottawa: Environment Canada.
29.
Fairfax, S.K.1978: A disaster in the environmental movement. Science99, 743-48.
30.
Federal Assessment Review Office1978: Guide for environmental screening. Ottawa: Federal Activities Branch and Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Fisheries and Environment Canada.
31.
Finsterbusch, K. and Wolf, C.P. editors, 1977: Methodology of social impact assessment. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Hutchinson and Ross.
32.
Frenkiel, F.N. and Goodall, D.W. editors, 1978: Simulation modelling of environmental problems. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment 9, Chichester: Wiley.
33.
Friesma, H.P. and Culhane, P.J.1976: Social impacts, politics and the environmental impact statement process. Natural Resources Journal16, 339-56.
34.
Garner, J.F.1979: Environmental impact statements in the United States and in Britain. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy.
35.
Gilliland, M.W. and Risser, P.G.1977: The use of systems diagrams for environmental impact assessment . Ecological Modelling3, 188-209.
36.
Gladwin, T.N.1975: Environment, planning and the multinational corporation. Greenwick, Connecticut: JAI Press.
37.
Greenberg, M.R., Belnay, G., Cesanek, W., Neuman, N. and Shepherd, G.1979: A primer on industrial environmental impact. Piscataway, New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research .
38.
Henningson, J.C.1978: The responsibilities of environmental consultants . In Bendix, S. and Graham, H.R., editors, Environmental assessment: approaching maturity , Ann Arbor, Michigan: Ann Arbor Science.
39.
Holling, C.S.1978: Adaptive environmental assessment and management . Chichester: Wiley.
40.
Johnson, S.P.1979: The pollution control policy of the European communities . London: Graham and Trotman.
41.
Kerlin, G. and Rabovsky, D.1975: Cracking down: oil refining and pollution control . New York: Council on Economic Priorities.
42.
Lee, N. and Wood, C.1978: EIA - a European perspective. Built Environment4, 101-110.
43.
Leopold, L., Clarke, F.E., Hanshaw, B.B. and Balsley, J.R.1971: A procedure for evaluating environmental impact . Washington DC: US Geological Survey Circular645.
44.
Lessing, P. and Smosna, R.A.1975: Environmental impact statements, worthwhile or worthless?Geology3, 241-42.
45.
Little, Inc. A.D.1971: Transportation and environment: synthesis for action: impact of National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 on the Department of Transportation (3 volumes). Cambridge, Massachusetts: A.D. Little Inc.
46.
Local Government Operational Research Unit1976: Development plan evaluation and robustness. London: Department of the Environment Research Report 5.
47.
Manners, I.R.1978: Planning for North Sea oil: the UK experience. Austin, Texas: University of Texas at Austin, Center for Energy Studies, Policy study 6.
48.
Milne, R.1979: EIA in practice. Planning304, 8-9.
49.
Meyers, S.1976: US experience with national environmental impact legislation . In O'Riordan, T. and Hey, R., editors, Environmental impact assessment, Farnborough, Hants: Saxon House.
50.
Munn, R.E. editor, 1979: Environmental impact assessment, second edition. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment 5, Chichester: Wiley.
51.
Nash, C., Pearce, D. and Stanley, J.1975: Criteria for evaluating project evaluation techniques . Journal of the American Institute of Planners2, 83-89.
52.
O'Connor, D.1978: Environmental mediation: the state-of-the-art. EIA Review2, 9-16.
53.
Odum, H.T.1971: Environment, power and society. New York: Wiley Interscience.
54.
O'Riordan, T.1976a: Environmentalism. London: Pion. 1976b: Beyond environmental impact assessment In O'Riordan, T. and Hey, R., editors, Environmental impact assessment, Farnborough, Hants: Saxon House.
55.
Orloff, N.1978: The environmental impact statement process: a guide to citizen action. Washington DC: Information Resources Press.
56.
Patton, L.K. and Cormick, G.W.1978: Mediation and the NEPA process: the interstate 90 experience . In Jain, R.K. and Hutchings, B.L., editors, Environmental impact analysis: emerging issues in planning, Urbana, Illinois : University of Illinois.
57.
Richardson, S.E., Hansen, W.J., Solomon, R.C. and Jones, J.C.1978: Preliminary field test of the water resources assessment methodology (WRAM), Tertsas River, Louisiana. Vicksburg, Mississippi: US Army Corps of Engineers, Miscellaneous paper 7-78-1.
58.
Rodgers, J.L.1976: Environmental impact assessment, growth management and the comprehensive plan. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
59.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution1976: Nuclear power and the environment, sixth reportLondon: Her Majesty's Stationery Office .
60.
Scottish Development Department1977: National planning guidelines for petrochemical developments. Edinburgh: Her Majesty's Stationery Office .
61.
Sewell, W.R.D. and Little, B.R.1973: Specialists, laymen and the process of environmental appraisal . Regional Studies7, 161-71.
62.
Skutsch, M. McC and Flowerdew, R.1976: Measurement techniques in environmental impact assessment . Environmental Conservation3, 209-217.
63.
Sondheim, M.W.1978: A comprehensive methodology for assessing environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management6, 27-42.
64.
Sorensen, J.C.1971: A frame work for the identification and control of resource degradation and conflict in the multiple use of the coastal zone . Berkeley, California: University of California, Department of Landscape Architecture .
65.
Strathclyde Regional Council1978Environmental impact assessment: petrochemical complex. Glasgow: Department of Physical Planning.
66.
Susskind, L.1978: Its time to shift our attention from impact assessment to strategies for resolving environmental disputes. EIA Review2, 4-8.
67.
Thorburn, A.1978: EIA - the role of the planning authority. Built Environment4,122-28.
68.
Tribe, L.H., Schelling, C.S. and Voss, J.1976: When values conflict: essays on environmental analysis, discourse and decision. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
69.
United Nations Environment Programme1979: Draft guidelines for assessing industrial environmental impact and environmental criteria for the siting of industryUNEP Industry and Environment Office.
70.
United States Congress1969: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law91-190, 91st Congress, second session.
71.
United States Council on Environmental Quality1971: Statements on proposed federal actions affecting the environmentFederal Register36, 7724-29.
72.
United States Council on Environmental Quality1973: Preparation of environmental impact statements: guidelinesFederal Register38, 20550-562.
73.
United States Council on Environmental Quality1978: National Environmental Policy Act: proposed regulations for implementing procedural provisionsFederal Register43, 25230-247.
74.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development1977: Integration of environmental considerations in the comprehensive planning and management process. Washington DC.
75.
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development1978: New Castle county I-95/Route 40 growth corridor; final area-wide environmental impact statementWashington DC.
76.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission1976: Preparation of ertvironrnental reports for nuclear power stations. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulation Commission.
77.
Van Norman, M.1975: The professional theft of evaluation. DMG-DRS Journal9, 57-66.
78.
Warner, M.L. and Bromley, D.W.1974: Environmental impact analysis: a review of three methodologies . Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin, Institute of Environmental Studies.
79.
Warner, M.L. and Preston, E.H.1974: Review of environmental impact assessment methodologies . Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
80.
Warner, M.L., Moore, J.L., Chatterjee, S., Cooper, D.C. and Ifeadi, C.1974: An assessment methodology for the environmental impact of water resources projects. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Columbus Laboratories.
81.
Whitman, I.L., Dee, N., McGinnis, J.T., Fahringer, D.C. and Baker, J.K.1971: Design of an environmental evaluation system. Columbus Ohio: Battelle Columbus Laboratories .
82.
Wolf, C.P. editor, 1974: Social impact assessment. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Environmental Design Research Association.
83.
Wolsko, T.D., Nelson, K.E. and Habeggar, L.D.1974: Environmental impact handbook for highway systems. IllinoisArgonne National Laboratory.
84.
Wynne, B.1975: The rhetoric of consensus politics: a critical review of technology assessment. Research Policy4, 108-158.