Addison, J.1705: Remarks on several parts of Italy. In Greene, G. W., editor, The works of James Addison. II, 339-40. New York (1854).
2.
1712: The Spectator no. 412. In Greene, G. W., editor, The works of James Addison. VI, 327-30. New York (1856).
3.
Allen, B.S.1937: Tides in English taste (1619-1800): a background for the study of literature. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
4.
Appleton, J.H.1975a: The experience of landscape. Chichester : John Wiley.
5.
1975b: Landscape evaluation: the theoretical vacuum. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers66, 120-3.
6.
Barrell, J.1972: The idea of landscape and the sense of place 1730-1840: an approach to the poetry of Johen Clare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bentley, R.1693: The folly and unreasonableness of atheism demonstrated from the origin and frame of the world. London.
8.
Berg, van der,J. H.1965: The subject and his landscape. In Kohl, H., editor, The age of complexity , New York: Mentor Books.
9.
Berlyne, D.E.1971: Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10.
Berger, J.1976: Drawn to that moment. New Society37, 81-2.
11.
Blaeksell, M. and Gilg, A.W.1975: Landscape evaluation in practice-the case of south-east Devon. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers66, 135-40.
12.
Bonacina, L.C.W.1921: The science of natural beauty [letter]. Geographical Review11, 160.
13.
Bosanquet, B.1932: A history of aesthetic from the Greeks to the twentieth century. London: Macmillan.
14.
Brush, R.O.1976: Perceived quality of scenic and recreational environments: some methodological issues. In Craik, K. H. and Zube, E. H., editors, Perceiving envirommental quality: research and applications, New York: Plenum Press, 47-58.
15.
Brush, R.O. and Shafer, E.L.1975: Application of a landscape-preference model to land management . In Zube et al. editors, 1975, 168-82.
16.
Burnet, T.1684: The sacred theory of the earth ... London.
17.
Calvin, J.S., Dearinger, J.A. and Curten, M.E.1972: An attempt at assessing preferences for natural landscapes . Environment and Behavior4, 447-70.
18.
Catton, W.R. Jr1966: From animistic to naturalistic sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Clark, K.1956: Landscape into art. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
20.
Clifford, D.1962: A history of garden design. London : Faber and Faber.
21.
Cole, T.1836: Essay on American scenery. (American Monthly MagazineI.) In Conron.J., editor, 1973: The American landscape: a critical anthology of prose and poetry, New York: Oxford University Press, 568-78.
Cornish, V.1935: Scenery and the sense of sight. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24.
1943 : The beauties of scenery: a geographical survey. London: Frederick Muller.
25.
Coughlin, R.E. and Goldstein, K.A.1970: The extent of agreement among observers on environmental attractiveness. Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia, Discussion Paper Series no. 37.
26.
Coventry-Solihull-Warwickshire1971: A strategy for the sub-region: the report on the sub-regional planning study. Coventry City Council, Solihull County Borough Council and Warwickshire County Council.
27.
Cowley, G.1973: County Review Landscape Aspect Report, Consultation Draft . Bedfordshire County Council.
28.
Craik, K.H.1971: The assessment of places. In McReynolds, P., editor, Advances in psychological assessment , Volume II, Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books, 40-62.
29.
1972: Appraising the objectivity of landscape dimensions. In Krutilla, J. V., editor, Natural environments: studies in theoretical and applied analysis, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press, 292-346.
30.
1975 . Individual variations in landscape description. In Zube et al., editors, 1975, 130-50.
31.
1976: The personality research paradigm in environmental psychology. In Wapner, S.,Cohen, S. B. and Kaplan, B., editors, Experiencing the environment, New York: Plenum Press, 55-79.
32.
Craik, K.H. and McKechnie, G.E.1977: Editor's introduction: personality and the environment . Environment and Behavior9, 155-68.
33.
Craik, K.H. and Zube, E.H.1971: The development of perceived environmental quality indices . In Craik, K. H. and Zube, E. H., editors, Perceiving environmental quality: research and applications, New York: Plenum Press, 3-20.
34.
Crofts, R.S. and Cooke, R.U.1974: Landscape evaluation: a comparison of techniques . University College London, Department of Geography Occasional Paper no. 25.
35.
Davenport, N.1974: Memoirs of a City radical. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
36.
Derham, W.1713: Pliysico-theology; or, a demonstration of the being and attributes of God, from the works of His Creation. London .
37.
Dicken, P. and Robinson, M.E.1976: Place preferertces and information. University of Manchester, School of Geography Research Paper no. i.
38.
Donne, J.1611: An anatomy of the world: the first anniversary . In Hayward, J., editor, 1929: Complete poetry and selected prose, London; Nonesuch, 195-212.
39.
Dorfles, G.1969: Kitsch: the world of bad taste. London : Studio Vista.
40.
Dorset Evening Echo1971: Country life. In Punch, 22 December 1971, p. 883.
41.
Dunn, M.C.1974: Landscape evaluation: a further perspective. Planner60, 935-6.
42.
Eliade, M.1962: The sacred and the profarte; the nature of religion . New York: Harcourt, Brace.
43.
Emerson, R.W.1836: Nature. In Conron, J. , editor, 1973: The American landscape: a critical anthology of prose and poetry, New York: Oxford University Press, 579-608.
44.
Fairbrother, N.1956: Men and gardens. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
45.
Fines, K.D.1968: Landscape evaluation, a research project in East Sussex . Regional Studies2,41-55.
46.
Geikie, A.1912: Love of nature among the Romans. London : Murray.
47.
Gibbons, B.1977: Wye Island: outsiders, insiders, and resistance to change . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
Gilg, A.W.1975: The objectivity of Linton-type methods of assessing scenery as a natural resource. Regional Studies9, 181-91.
49.
Gillmor, D.A.1974: Mental maps in geographic education: spatial preferences of some Leinster school leavers. Geographical Viewpoints3, 46-66.
50.
Gould, P.R. and White, R.R.1974: Mental maps. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
51.
Graber, L.H.1976. Wilderness as sacred space. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers , Monograph Series no. 8.
52.
Graves, R. and Hogarth, P.1965: Majorca observed. London: Cassell.
53.
Greenlaw, A.1973: Observed landscape tastes. University of Manchester Centre for Urban and Regional Research, Landscape Evaluation Research Project Occasional Paper no. 4B.
54.
Hamerton, P.G.1885: Landscape. Boston: Roberts Bros.
55.
Hendee, J.C., Catton, W.R. Jr, Marlow, L.D. and Brockman, C.F.1968: Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest-their characteristics, values, and management preferences. US Forest Service Research Paper PNW-61. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Ore.
56.
Hepburn, R.W.1963: Aesthetic appreciation of nature. British Journal of Aesthetics3, 195-209.
57.
Herzog, T.R., Kaplan, S. and Kaplan, R.1976: A prediction of preferences for familiar urban scenes . Environment and Behavior8, 627-45.
58.
Hines, G.C.1938: Cathedral pilgrimages. In Williams-Ellis, C., editor, Britain and the beast, London: J. M. Dent, 160-3.
59.
Hipple, W.J. Jr1957: The beautiful, the sublime and the picturesque in eighteenth-century British aesthetic theory. Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press.
60.
Hussey, C.1927: The picturesque; studies in a point of view. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.
61.
Huth, H.1957: Nature and the American: three centuries of changing attitudes . Berkeley: University of California Press.
62.
Huxley, A.1954: The doors of perception. New York: Harper.
63.
Jackson, J.B.1970: Selected writings. E. H. Zube (editor). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
64.
Jackson, L.E. and Johnston, R.S.1972: Structuring the image: an investigation of the elements of mental maps. Environment and Planning4, 415-27.
65.
Jones, J.B.1972: The case for a subijective approach in landscape evaluation . University of Manchester, Centre for Urban and Regional Research, Landscape Evaluation Research Project Occasional Paper no. 6.
66.
Kaplan, R.1975: Some methods and strategies in the prediction of preference . In Zube, E. H. et al., editors, 1975, 118-29.
67.
1977: Patterns of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior9, 195-216.
68.
Kaplan, S.1975: An informal model for the prediction of preference . In Zube, E. H. et al., editors, 1975, 92-101.
69.
Kolodny, A.1975: The lay of the land: metaphor as experience and history in American life and letters. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
70.
Laurie, I.C.1975: Aesthetic factors in visual evaluation. In Zube, E. H. et al., editors, 1975, 102-17.
71.
Lees-Milne, J.1962: Earls of creation: five great patrons of eighteenth century art. London: Hamish Hamilton .
72.
1975 : Aruestral voices. London: Chatto and Windus.
73.
Leopold, A.1949: A Sand County almanac. New York : Oxford University Press.
Linton, D.1968: The assessment of scenery as a natural resource . Scottish Geographical Magazine84, 219-38.
76.
Litton, R.B., Jr1972: Aesthetic dimensions of the landscape. In Krutilla, J. V., editor, Natural environments: studies in theoretical and applied analysis. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press, 262-91.
77.
Lovejoy, A.O.1948: Essays in the history of ideas. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press.
78.
Lowenthal, D.1964: Is wilderness 'paradise enow'?: images of nature in America . Columbia University Forum7 (2), 34-40.
79.
1966: Assumptions behind the public attitudes. In Jarrett, H., editor, Environmental quality in a growing economy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 128-37.
80.
1968: The American scene. Geographical Review58, 61-88.
81.
1970: Recreation habits and values: implications for landscape quality. In Dansereau, P., editor, Challenge for survival: land, air, and water for man in megalopolis, New York: Columbia University Press, 103-17.
82.
Lowenthal, D. and Prince, H.C.1965: English landscape tastes. Geographical Review55, 186-222.
83.
1976: Transcendental experience. In Wapner, S.,Cohen, S. B. and Kaplan, B., editors, Experiencing the enviroonment , New York: Plenum Press, 117-31.
84.
Lowenthal, D. and Riel, M.1972: Publications in environmental perception. New York: American Geographical Society .
85.
Lucas, R.C.1964: Wilderness perception and use: the example of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Natural Resources Journal3, 394-411.
86.
Mais, S.P.B.1938: The plain man looks at England. In Williams-Ellis, C., editor, Britain and the beast, London: J. M. Dent, 212-24.
87.
Malins, E.1966: English landscaping and literature, 1660-1840. London: Oxford University Press.
88.
Manasseh, L. and partners.1975: Snowdon summit. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham.
89.
Manwaring, E.W.1925: Italian landscape in eighteenth century England . New York: Oxford University Press .
90.
Marsh, G.P.1964: Man and nature; or, physical geography as modified by human action. New York: Charles Scribner.
91.
Marx, L.1964: The machine in the garden: technology and the pastoral ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
92.
MacCannell, D.1976: The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class . New York: Schocken.
93.
McEvoy,J.1971: Appraising the utility of landscape dimensions . Paper for Multidisciplinary Workshop on Research in Wildlands, Resources for the Future, Missoula, Montana .
94.
McHarg, 1. 1969: Design with nature. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
95.
McKechnie, G.E.1974: Manual for the environmental response inventory . Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
96.
1977: The environmental response inventory in application. Environment and Behavior9, 233-76.
97.
Meinig, D.W.1976: The beholding eye: ten versions ofthe same scene . Landscape Architecture66 (1), 47-54.
98.
Moir, E.1964: The discovery of Britain: the English tourists 1540 to 1840. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
99.
Monk, S.H.1960: The srtblime: a study of critical theories in XVIII-century England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
100.
Nash, R.1967: Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
101.
New Yorker 1953: 18 June, p. 19.
102.
Newton, E.1962: The meaning of beauty. Harmondsworth : Penguin.
103.
Nicholson, N.1955: The Lakers: the adventures of the first tourists . London: Robert Hall.
104.
Nicolson, M.H.1959: Mountain gloom and mountain glory: the development of the aesthetics of the infinite. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
105.
Ogden, H.V.S. and Ogden, M.S.1955: English taste in landscape in the seventeenth century . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
106.
Olwig, K.1977: The morphology of a symbolic landscape: a geosophical case study. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota. Ann Arbor: University Microfilm.
107.
Penning-Rowsell, E.C.1973: Alternative approaches to landscape appraisal and evaluation . Enfield, Middlesex : Middlesex Polytechnic Planning Research Group Report no. II.
108.
1974 : Empirical approaches to landscape appraisal and evaluation . Unpublished paper, Geography and Planning Section, Middlesex Polytechnic, Enfield, Middlesex.
109.
1975 : Supplement [to Penning-Rowsell, 1973].
110.
Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Gullett, G.H., Searle, G.H. and Witham, S.A.1977: Public evaluation of landscape quality. Enfield, Middlesex: Middlesex Polytechnic Planning Research Group Report no. 13.
111.
Peterson, G.L.1967: A model of preference: quantitative analysis of the perception of the visual appearance of residential neighborhoods. Journal of Regional Science7, 19-31.
112.
Peterson, G.L. and Neumann, E.S.1969: Model and predicting human responses to the visual recreation environment. Journal of Leisure ResearchI, 219-37.
113.
Pevsner, N.1956 : The Englishness of English art. London : Architectural Press.
114.
Pomeroy, E.P.1957: In search of the golden West: the tourist in western America . New York: A. A. Knopf .
115.
Porter, P.W. and Lukermann, F.E.1976: The geography of utopia. In Lowenthal, D. and Bowden, M.J., editors, Geographies of the mind: essays in historical geosophy in honor of John Kirtland Wright, New York: Oxford University Press, 197-223.
116.
Price, C.1976: Subjectivity and objectivity in landscape evaluation . Environment and Planning8, 829-38.
117.
Priestley, J.B.1937: Midrtight on the desert: a chapter of autobiography . London: W. M. Heinemann.
118.
Rabinowitz, C.B. and Coughlin, R.E.1970: Analysis of landscape characteristics relevant to preference . Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, Discussion Paper no. 38.
119.
Ray, J.1691: The wisdom of God manifested in the works of the Creation . London.
120.
Reiff, D.D.1972: Memorial Hall: the splendor beneath the dust. Harvard Bulletin3,27-42.
121.
Relph, E.1976: Place and placelessness. London : Pion.
122.
Ruskin,J.1886: Modern painters. New York: John Wiley.
123.
Santayana, G.1896: The sense of beauty, being the outline of aesthetic theory . New York: Charles Scribner's Sons .
124.
Santymer, H.H.1962: Ohio town. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
125.
Sargent, F.O.1966: Ideas and attitudes: a scenery classification systern . Journal of Soil and Water Conservation21, 26-7.
Shafer, E.L.Jr, Hamilton, J.F. Jr and Schmidt, E.A.1969: Natural landscape preferences: a predictive model . Journal of Leisure Research1, 1-19.
128.
Shepard, P.1961: The cross valley syndrome. Landscape10 (3), 4-8.
129.
1967 : Man in the landscape: a historic view of the esthetics of nature. New York: A. A. Knopf.
130.
1973 : The tender carnivore and the sacred game. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
131.
Shoard, M.1979: The lure of the moors. (In press.)
132.
Sickman, L.C. and Soper, A.1968: The art and architecture of China. Baltimore: Penguin.
133.
Sircello, G.1975: A new theory of beauty. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
134.
Sonnenfeld, J.1966: Variable values in space and landscape: an inquiry into the nature of environmental necessity. Journal of Social Issues22, 71-82.
135.
Stapledon, R.G.1942: Hill farming and national parks. Council for the Preservation of Rural England, Sheffield and Peak District Branch, Sheffield.
136.
Stolnitz, J.1961: 'Beauty': some stages in the history of an idea . Journal of the History of Ideas22, 185-204.
137.
Stroud, D.1950: Capability Brown. London: Country Life.
138.
1962 : Humphry Repton. London: Country Life.
139.
Sullivan, M.1962: The birth of landscape painting in China. Berkeley: University of California Press .
140.
Taine, H.1957 edn: Notes on England. London : Thames and Hudson.
141.
Tandy, C.R.V.1971: Landscape evaluation technique. West Sussex County Council. Land Use Consultants, Croyden.
142.
Taylor, N.1973: The village in the city. London : Temple Smith.
143.
Tuan, Y.-F.1974: Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
144.
1977 : Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
145.
Turner, J.R.1975: Applications of landscape evaluation: a planner's view . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , 66, 156-61.
146.
University of Manchester1976: Landscape evaluation: report of the landscape evaluation research project, 1970-75. Centre for Urban and Regional Research, University of Manchester.
147.
Unwin, K.I.1975: The relationship of observer and landscape in landscape evaluation. Transactins of the Institute of British Geographers66, 130-4.
148.
Warren, E.1690: Geologia; or, a discourse concerning the earth before the deluge... London.
Weinstein, N.D.1976: The statistical prediction of environmental preferences: problems of validity and application. Environment and Behavior8, 611-26.
152.
Whyte, A.1977: Guidelines for field studies in environmental perception. MAB Technical Notes 5. Paris: UNESCO .
153.
Wohlwill, J.F.1974: The place of aesthetics in studies of the environment . Paper prepared for Symposium on Experimental Aesthetics and Psychology of the Environment, International Congress of Applied Psychology, Montreal, July 1974.
154.
Wordsworth, W.1835: A guide through the district of the Lakes in northern England. Kendal.
155.
Younghusband, F.1920: Natural beauty and geographical science. Geogrdphical Journal56, 1-13.
156.
Zaring, J.1977: The romantic face of Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers67, 397-418.
157.
Zube, E.H.1973: Rating everyday rural landscapes of the northeastern US . Landscape Architecture63, 370-5.
158.
Zube, E. H.,Brush, R. O. and Fabos,J. G., editors, 1975: Landscape assessment: values, perceptions, and resources . Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
159.
Zube, E.H., Pitt, D.G. and Anderson, T.W.1975: Perception and prediction of scenic resource values of the northeast. In Zube, E. H. et al., editors, 1975, 151-67.
160.
Zube, E. H. and Zube, M.J., editors, 1977: Changing rural landscapes . Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
