Scholars have increasingly focused on the role of the family within border enforcement practices. In this paper, we build on and extend these research efforts to propose a research agenda driven by a new understanding of the relationship between families and immigration enforcement. Drawing on examinations of emerging enforcement strategies, including family separation and public information campaigns, we suggest that the family as a social unit and set of relationships is increasingly targeted within the regulation of transnational migration, what we term “relational enforcement.” Greater attention to relational enforcement tactics, processes, and impacts helps to frame geographies of border enforcement.
AmooreL (2006) Biometric borders: governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography25(3): 336–351. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.
2.
AnzaldúaG (1987) Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
3.
Australian National Audit Office (2016) Government Advertising: March 2013 to June 2015: Across Entities. Barton, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
4.
BartosAE (2018) The uncomfortable politics of care and conflict: Exploring nontraditional caring agencies. Geoforum88: 66–73.
5.
BastakiJ (2019) “Not Without My Daughter”: EU Asylum Law, Gender, and the Separation of Refugee Families. Refugee Survey Quarterly38(3): 266–289. DOI: 10.1093/rsq/hdz006.
6.
BatréauQTuitjerL (2021) Searching Refuge in Thailand or Brazil: Long-Distance Refugees and the Emergence of Global Asylum Hubs in Middle-Income Countries. Journal of Refugee Studiesfeaa129. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/feaa129.
7.
BonizzoniP (2018) Policing the Intimate Borders of the Nation: a review of recent trends in family-related forms of immigration control. In: MulhollandJMontagnaNSanders-McDonaghE (eds) Gendering Nationalism. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 223–239. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76699-7_12.
8.
Borges JelinicA (2019) I loved him and he scared me: migrant women, partner visas and domestic violence. Emotion, Space and Society32: 100582. DOI: 10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100582.
9.
BoyceGA (2016) The rugged border: surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the US/Mexico frontier. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34(2): 245–262. DOI: 10.1177/0263775815611423.
10.
BoyceGALauniusS (2019) The Immigration Dragnet and the Dispossession of Household and Community Wealth in the United States. Tucson, AZ: Binational Migration Institute.
11.
BrowneS (2015) Dark Matters on the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Available at:https://www.dukeupress.edu/dark-matters (accessed 22 July 2020).
DahlmanC (2018) National pasts and biopolitical futures in Serbia. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds). Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, 184–200.
15.
D’AoustA-M (2018) A moral economy of suspicion: Love and marriage migration management practices in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(1): 40–59. DOI: 10.1177/0263775817716674.
16.
DarlingJ (2010) A city of sanctuary: the relational re-imagining of Sheffield’s asylum politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35: 125–140.
17.
De GoedeM (2008) Beyond Risk: Premediation and the Post-9/11 Security Imagination. Security Dialogue39(2–3): 155–176. DOI: 10.1177/0967010608088773.
18.
DrebyJ (2015) Everyday Illegal: When Policies Undermine Immigrant Families. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
19.
ElwoodS (2020) Digital geographies, feminist relationality, Black and queer code studies: thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography45: 209–228. DOI: 10.1177/0309132519899733.
20.
EvansKKoulishR (2020) Manipulating risk: immigration detention through automation. Lewis & Clark Law Review24(3): 789–856.
21.
HallSM (2019) Everyday austerity: towards relational geographies of family, friendship and intimacy. Progress in Human Geography43(5): 769–789. DOI: 10.1177/0309132518796280.
22.
HarkerC. (2011) Geopolitics and family in Palestine. Geoforum42(3): 306–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.06.007.
23.
HarkerCMartinLL (2012) Familial relations: spaces, subjects, and politics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(4): 768–775. DOI: 10.1068/a4513.
24.
HeidbrinkL (2020) Migranthood: Youth in a New Era of Deportation. Stanford, CA: Stanford Unversity Press. Available at:http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=31467 (accessed 25 May 2021).
25.
HeymanJM (2009) Trust, privilege, and discretion in the governance of the US Borderlands with Mexico. Canadian Journal of Law and Society24(3): 367–390.
26.
HiemstraN (2019) Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
27.
HiemstraN (2021) Mothers, babies, and abortion at the border: contradictory U.S. policies, or targeting fertility?Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space39: 1692–1710. DOI: 10.1177/2399654421998368.
28.
JohnsonRLWoodhouseM (2018) Securing the return: how Enhanced US Border enforcement fuels cycles of debt migration. Antipode50(4): 976–996. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12386.
29.
KaiserR (2018) Birth and biopolitics: maternity migration, birthright citizenship and domopolitics in Hong Kong. In: EnglandMFanninMHazenH (eds) Reproductive Geographies: Bodies, Places and Politics. London: Routledge, 161–183.
30.
KallioKPHäkliJ (2019) Care as mundane politics: contested familial refugee lives in Finland. Gender, Place & Culture26(6): 795–812. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1552563.
KibriaN (2019) #FamiliesBelongTogether: Facts and Fictions of Race and Family in U.S. Immigration Policy. Sociological Forum34(4): 809–817. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12548. DOI:
34.
LeeC (2013) Fictive Kinship: Family Reunification and the Meaning of Race and Nation in American Migration. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
35.
LeeS (2019) Family separation as slow death. Columbia Law Review119(8): 2319–2384.
LloydKSuchet-PearsonSWrightS (2005) Decentring Fortress Australia: borderland geographies as relational spaces. In: MitchellBBaumSO’NeillP, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the ARCRNSISS Methodology, Tools and Techniques and Spatial Theory Paradigm Forums Workshop. Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle, 217–228.
38.
LongJC (2006) Border anxiety in Palestine-Israel. Antipode38(1): 107–127. DOI: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2006.00567.x.
39.
LongoGM (2018) Keeping it in “the Family”: how gender norms shape U.S. Marriage migration politics. Gender & Society32(4): 469–492. DOI: 10.1177/0891243218777201.
40.
LuibhéidE (2018) Heteronormativity: a bridge between Queer Migration and critical trafficking studies. Women’s Studies in Communication41(4): 305–309. DOI: 10.1080/07491409.2018.1544001.
41.
Martin LaurenL (2012a) ‘Catch and remove’: detention, deterrence, and discipline in US Noncitizen family detention practice. Geopolitics17(2): 312–334. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2011.554463.
42.
Martin LaurenL (2012b) Governing through the Family: struggles over US Noncitizen family detention policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(4): 866–888. DOI: 10.1068/a4477a.
43.
MasseyD (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: BirdJCurtisBPutnamT, et al. (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge, 59–69.
44.
MousinCB (2019) Rights Disappear when US Policy Engages Children as Weapons of Deterrence. ID 3317913, SSRN Scholarly Paper, 1 January. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at:https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3317913 (accessed 7 April 2021).
45.
NastHeidiJ (2017) Into the arms of dolls: Japan’s declining fertility rates, the 1990s financial crisis and the (maternal) comforts of the posthuman. Social & Cultural Geography18(6): 758–785.
46.
NofferiMKoulishR (2014) The immigration detention risk assessment. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal29(1): 45–94.
47.
OeppenC (2016) ‘Leaving Afghanistan! Are you Sure?’ European efforts to Deter potential migrants through information Campaigns. Human Geography9(2): 57–68. DOI: 10.1177/194277861600900206.
48.
OlwigKF (2020) The right to a family life and the biometric ‘truth’ of family reunification: Somali Refugees in Denmark. Ethnos1–15, in press. doi: 10.1080/00141844.2019.1648533.
49.
PaasiA (2012) Border studies reanimated: going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(10): 2303–2309. DOI: 10.1068/a45282.
RobbinsPSmithSH (2017) Baby bust: towards political demography. Progress in Human Geography41(2): 199–219.
53.
RodriguezC (2016) Experiencing ‘Illegality’ as a Family? immigration enforcement, social policies, and discourses targeting Mexican mixed-status families: experiencing ‘illegality’ as a family?Sociology Compass10(8): 706–717. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12393.
54.
RothBJGraceBLSeayKD (2019) Mechanisms of deterrence: federal immigration policies and the erosion of immigrant children’s rights. American Journal of Public Health110(1): 84–86. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305388.
SlackJMartínezDEWhitefordS, et al. (2015) Harm’s way: family separation, immigration enforcement programs and security on the US-Mexico Border. Journal on Migration and Human Security3(2): 109–128. DOI: 10.1177/233150241500300201.
57.
SlackJMartínezDELeeAE, et al. (2016) The geography of border militarization: violence, death and health in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Latin American Geography15(1): 7–32.
58.
SlatteryK (2003) Drowning Not Waving: The ‘Children Overboard’ Event and Australia’s Fear of the other. Media International Australia109(1): 93–108.
59.
SmithS (2021) Intimate Geopolitics: Love, Territory, and the Future on India’s Northern Threshold. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
60.
SmithSVasudevanPSerranoC, et al. (2019) Breaking families: whiteness, state violence, and the alienable rights of kin. Political Geography72: 144–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.001.
61.
StrasserEKralerABonjourS, et al. (2009) Doing family: responses to the constructions of ‘the migrant family’ across Europe. The History of the Family14(2): 165–176. DOI: 10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.02.005.
62.
SundbergJ (2011) Diabolic Caminos in the Desert and Cat Fights on the Río: a posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico Borderlands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers101(2): 318–336. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2010.538323.
63.
TarrantAHallSM (2020) Everyday geographies of family: feminist approaches and interdisciplinary conversations. Gender, Place & Culture27(5): 613–623. DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2019.1609430.
64.
TurnerJ (2020) Bordering Intimacy: Postcolonial Governance and the Policing of Family. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
ValentineG (2008) The ties that bind: towards geographies of intimacy. Geography Compass2(6): 2097–2110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00158.x.
67.
WangSH (2017) Fetal citizens? Birthright citizenship, reproductive futurism, and the “panic” over Chinese birth tourism in southern California. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(2): 263–280. DOI: 10.1177/0263775816679832.
68.
WatkinsJ (2017) Australia’s irregular migration information campaigns: border externalization, spatial imaginaries, and extraterritorial subjugation. Territory, Politics, Governance5(3): 282–303. DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2017.1284692.
69.
WatsonJ (2018) Family ideation, immigration, and the racial state: explaining divergent family reunification policies in Britain and the US. Ethnic and Racial Studies41(2): 324–342. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1324169.
70.
WilliamsJM (2019) Affecting migration: public information campaigns and the intimate spatialities of border enforcement. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38: 1198–1215. DOI: 10.1177/2399654419833384.
71.
WilsonDWeberL (2008) Surveillance, risk and preemption on the Australian Border. Surveillance & Society5(2): 124–141. DOI: 10.24908/ss.v5i2.3431.
72.
YbarraM (2019) “We are not ignorant”: Transnational migrants’ experiences of racialized securitization. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space37(2): 197–215. DOI: 10.1177/0263775818819006.
73.
YbarraMPeñaIL (2017) “We Don’t Need Money, We Need to be Together”: forced transnationality in deportation’s afterlives. Geopolitics22(1): 34–50. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1204600.
