In recent years, geographers have evinced how infrastructure constitutes the bedrock of supply chain capitalism and its oppressions. This article interrogates how advanced automation – comprising robotics, artificial intelligence and software – is poised to politicize this infrastructural space further on the heels of the COVID-19 pandemic. Reflecting on COVID-19 developments, the article shows how logistics is turning to advanced automation to drive productivity outside labour, spur self-service consumption through digital technologies and contest labour’s future. As automated infrastructure threatens to take hold, a configuration of exchange that increasingly places labour, but not profits, outside of capital’s circulations will need to be challenged
AmooreL (2020) Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
AndersonJ (2015) Towards resonant places: reflections on the organizing strategy of the International Transport Workers’ Federation. Space and Polity19(1): 47–61.
ArboledaM (2016) Spaces of extraction, metropolitan explosions: planetary urbanization and the commodity boom in Latin America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(1): 96–112.
BarrattTGoodsCVeenA (2020) ‘I’m my own boss…’: active intermediation and ‘entrepreneurial’ worker agency in the Australian gig-economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(8): 1643–1661.
11.
BastaniA (2019) Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto. London: Verso Books.
12.
BenvegnùCHaidingerBSacchettoD (2018) Restructuring labour relations and employment in the European logistics sector. In: DoellgastVLLillieNPulignanoV (eds) Reconstructing Solidarity: Labour Unions, Precarious Work, and the Politics of Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–103.
13.
BerlantL (2016) The commons: infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space34(3): 393–419.
14.
BeunzaD (2019) Taking the Floor: Models, Morals, and Management in a Wall Street Trading Room. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
BissellD (2018) Automation interrupted: how autonomous vehicle accidents transform the material politics of automation. Political Geography65: 57–66.
16.
BissellD. (2021) Encountering automation: redefining bodies through stories of technological change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space39(2): 366–384.
17.
BissellDDel CasinoVJ (2017) Whither labor geography and the rise of the robots?Social & Cultural Geography18(3): 435–442.
18.
BoyerKEnglandK (2008) Gender, work and technology in the information workplace: from typewriters to ATMs. Social & Cultural Geography9(3): 241–256.
19.
BrennerNSchmidC (2015) Towards a new epistemology of the urban?City19(2-3): 151–182.
20.
BuddLAdeyP (2009) The software-simulated airworld: anticipatory code and affective aeromobilities. Environment and Planning A41(6): 1366–1385.
CarseALewisJA (2017) Toward a political ecology of infrastructure standards: or, how to think about ships, waterways, sediment, and communities together. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(1): 9–28.
23.
CastreeNAmooreLHughesA, et al. (2020) Boundless contamination and progress in Geography. Progress in Human Geography44(3): 411–414.
24.
ChenBMarvinSWhileA (2020) Containing COVID-19 in China: AI and the robotic restructuring of future cities. Dialogues in Human Geography10(2): 238–241.
25.
ChuJY (2014) When infrastructures attack: the workings of disrepair in China. American Ethnologist41(2): 351–367.
26.
ChuaCDanylukMCowenD, et al. (2018) Introduction: turbulent circulation: building a critical engagement with logistics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(4): 617–629.
27.
CockayneDLeszczynskiAZookM (2017) #HotForBots: sex, the non-human and digitally mediated spaces of intimate encounter. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(6): 1115–1133.
28.
CoeNM (2012) Geographies of production II: a global production network A–Z. Progress in Human Geography36(3): 389–402.
CoeNM (2021) Coping with commoditization: the third-party logistics industry in the Asia-Pacific. Competition & Change25(3–4): 281–307.
31.
CoeNMYeungHWC (2015) Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
ColettaCKitchinR (2017) Algorhythmic governance: regulating the ‘heartbeat’ of a city using the Internet of Things’. Big Data & Society4(2): 1–16.
33.
CowenD (2010) A geography of logistics: market authority and the security of supply chains. Annals of the Association of American Geographers100(3): 600–620.
34.
CowenD (2014) The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
CowenD (2020) Following the infrastructures of empire: notes on cities, settler colonialism, and method. Urban Geography41(4): 469–486.
36.
CramptonJW (2016) Assemblage of the vertical: commercial drones and algorithmic life. Geographica Helvetica71(2): 137–146.
37.
CresswellT (2006) On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. London: Routledge.
38.
DanylukM (2018) Capital’s logistical fix: accumulation, globalization, and the survival of capitalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(4): 630–647.
De LaraJ (2018) ‘This port is killing people’: sustainability without justice in the neo-Keynesian green city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers108(2): 538–548.
41.
De LaraJDReeseERStrunaJ (2016) Organizing temporary, subcontracted, and immigrant workers: lessons from Change to Win’s Warehouse Workers United Campaign. Labor Studies Journal41(4): 309–332.
42.
Del CasinoVJHouse-PetersLCramptonJW, et al. (2020) The social life of robots: the politics of algorithms, governance, and sovereignty. Antipode52(3): 605–618.
DenglerKMatthesB (2018) The impacts of digital transformation on the labour market: substitution potentials of occupations in Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change137: 304–316.
45.
DoddsKBrotoVCDetterbeckK, et al. (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: territorial, political and governance dimensions of the crisis. Territory, Politics, Governance8(3): 289–298.
46.
DodgeMKitchinR (2005) Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers95(1): 162–180.
47.
DodgeMKitchinR (2009) Software, objects, and home space. Environment and Planning A41(6): 1344–1365.
48.
DubeKNhamoGChikodziD (2021) COVID-19 pandemic and prospects for recovery of the global aviation industry. Journal of Air Transport Management92: 102022.
49.
EasterlingK (2014) Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso Books.
50.
EkersMPrudhamS (2017) The metabolism of socioecological fixes: capital switching, spatial fixes, and the production of nature. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(6): 1370–1388.
51.
EllemB (2016) Geographies of the labour process: automation and the spatiality of mining. Work, Employment & Society30(6): 932–948.
52.
ElwoodSLeszczynskiA (2018) Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place and Culture25(5): 629–644.
FolkersAStenmannsJ (2019) Logistical resistance against operations of capital: security and protest in supply chains and finance. Geoforum100: 199–208.
55.
FuchsC (2014) Digital Labour and Karl Marx. London: Routledge.
56.
FurlongK (2011) Small technologies, big change: rethinking infrastructure through STS and geography. Progress in Human Geography35(4): 460–482.
57.
FurlongK (2021) Geographies of Infrastructure II: concrete, cloud and layered (in)visibilities. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 190–198.
58.
GekaraVOThanh NguyenV-X (2018) New technologies and the transformation of work and skills: a study of computerisation and automation of Australian container terminals. New Technology, Work and Employment33(3): 219–233.
59.
GrahamS (1998) The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography22(2): 165–185.
60.
GrahamS (2005) Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography29(5): 562–580.
61.
GrahamSMarvinS (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
62.
GregsonNCrangMAntonopoulosCN (2017) Holding together logistical worlds: friction, seams and circulation in the emerging ‘global warehouse’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space35(3): 381–398.
63.
GuteliusB (2015) Disarticulating distribution: labor segmentation and subcontracting in global logistics. Geoforum60: 53–61.
64.
HarawayD (1991) The actors are cyborg, nature is coyote, and the geography is elsewhere: postscript to ‘cyborgs at large’. Technoculture3: 183–202.
65.
HarveyD (2014) Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
HaylesNK (2017) Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
HepworthK (2014) Enacting logistical geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32(6): 1120–1134.
68.
HerrmannABrennerWStadlerR (2018) Autonomous Driving: How the Driverless Revolution Will Change the World. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
69.
HesseMRodrigueJP (2004) The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography12(3): 171–184.
70.
HeynenNKaikaMSwyngedouwE (eds) (2006) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London: Routledge.
HuddersLDe JansSDe VeirmanM (2021) The commercialization of social media stars: a literature review and conceptual framework on the strategic use of social media influencers. International Journal of Advertising40(3): 327–375.
JeevanJMohd SallehNHMohd ZaideenIM, et al. (2020) Application of geoeconomics in seaport operations: a theoretical proposal for post Covid-19 recovery strategy. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs12(4): 217–242.
77.
KanngieserA (2013) Tracking and tracing: geographies of logistical governance and labouring bodies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31(4): 594–610.
78.
KattaSBadgerAGrahamM, et al. (2020) (Dis)embeddedness and (de)commodification: COVID-19, Uber, and the unravelling logics of the gig economy. Dialogues in Human Geography10(2): 203–207.
79.
KeilR (2005) Progress report—urban political ecology. Urban Geography26(7): 640–651.
80.
KhaliliL (2020) Sinews of War and Trade: Shipping and Capitalism in the Arabian Peninsula. London: Verso Books.
81.
KinsleyS (2014) The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies. Progress in Human Geography38(3): 364–384.
82.
KinsleyS (2018) Subject/ivities. In: AshJKitchinRLeszczynskiA (eds) Digital Geographies. London: Sage, pp. 153–163.
83.
KirschSMitchellD (2004) The nature of things: dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode36(4): 687–705.
84.
KitchinRDodgeM (2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85.
KlumppM (2018) Automation and artificial intelligence in business logistics systems: human reactions and collaboration requirements. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications21(3): 224–242.
86.
KrivýM (2018) Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism: the smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory17(1): 8–30.
87.
LarkinB (2013) The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology42(1): 327–343.
88.
LeCavalierJ (2016) The Rule of Logistics: Walmart and the Architecture of Fulfillment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
89.
LeeHHParkD (2020) Post-Covid Asia: Deglobalization, Fourth Industrial Revolution, And Sustainable Development. Singapore: World Scientific.
LeeKF (2018) AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
92.
LeszczynskiAKitchinR (2019) The seduction of UberCity. In: GrahamMKitchinRMatternSShawJ (eds) How to Run a City Like Amazon, and Other Fables. London: Meatspace Press, pp. 1179–1195.
93.
LevanderO (2017) Autonomous ships on the high seas. IEEE Spectrum54(2): 26–31.
94.
LevinsonM (2006) The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
95.
LinW (2019) Infrastructure’s expenditures: Changi airport, food cargo and capital’s technosphere. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research43(1): 76–93.
96.
LynchCR (2020a) Contesting digital futures: urban politics, alternative economies, and the movement for technological sovereignty in Barcelona. Antipode52(3): 660–680.
97.
LynchCR (2020b) Unruly digital subjects: social entanglements, identity, and the politics of technological expertise. Digital Geography and Society1: 100001.
98.
LynchCRDel CasinoVJ (2020) Smart spaces, information processing, and the question of intelligence. Annals of the American Association of Geographers110(2): 382–390.
99.
MacrorieRMarvinSWhileA (2021) Robotics and automation in the city: a research agenda. Urban Geography42(2): 197–217.
100.
McFarlaneC (2018) Fragment urbanism: politics at the margins of the city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space36(6): 1007–1025.
101.
McKinnonAC (2016) The possible impact of 3D printing and drones on last-mile logistics: an exploratory study. Built Environment42(4): 617–629.
102.
Murakami WoodDBallK (2013) Brandscapes of control? Surveillance, marketing and the coconstruction of subjectivity and space in neo-liberal capitalism. Marketing Theory13(1): 47–67.
103.
NagendraHR (2020) Yoga for COVID-19. International Journal of Yoga13(2): 87–88.
NewlandsG (2021) Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: the organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies42(5): 719–737.
NusselderA (2009) Interface Fantasy: A Lacanian Cyborg Ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
108.
OtterC (2017) The technosphere: a new concept for urban studies. Urban History44(1): 145–154.
109.
PachéG (2020) Inside delivery platforms: the Covid-19 pandemic and after. Journal of Supply Chain Management: Research & Practice14(2): 1–9.
110.
PickrenG (2018) The global assemblage of digital flow: critical data studies and the infrastructures of computing. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 225–243.
111.
PierceJLawhonMMcCrearyT (2019) From precarious work to obsolete labour? Implications of technological disemployment for geographical scholarship. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography101(2): 84–101.
112.
RichardsonL (2020) Platforms, markets, and contingent calculation: the flexible arrangement of the delivered meal. Antipode52(3): 619–636.
113.
RichardsonLBissellD (2019) Geographies of digital skill. Geoforum99: 278–286.
114.
RietveldP (1989) Infrastructure and regional development. The Annals of Regional Science23(4): 255–274.
115.
RitzerGJurgensonN (2010) Production, consumption, prosumption: the nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture10(1): 13–36.
116.
RobertsonJ (2010) Gendering humanoid robots: robo-sexism in Japan. Body & Society16(2): 1–36.
117.
Rose-RedwoodRKitchinRApostolopoulouE, et al. (2020) Geographies of the COVID-19 pandemic. Dialogues in Human Geography10(2): 97–106.
118.
RossiterN (2016) Software, Infrastructure, Labor: A Media Theory of Logistical Nightmares. London: Routledge.
119.
SalazarNB (2021) Existential vs. essential mobilities: insights from before, during and after a crisis. Mobilities16(1): 20–34.
ShethJ (2020) Impact of Covid-19 on consumer behavior: will the old habits return or die?Journal of Business Research117: 280–283.
122.
SiemiatyckiMEnrightTValverdeM (2020) The gendered production of infrastructure. Progress in Human Geography44(2): 297–314.
123.
SilverBJ (2003) Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124.
SimoneAM (2004) People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture16(3): 407–429.
125.
SmithA (2015) The state, institutional frameworks and the dynamics of capital in global production networks. Progress in Human Geography39(3): 290–315.
126.
SmithN (2007) Nature as accumulation strategy. Socialist Register43: 16–36.
127.
StenmannsJ (2019) Logistics from the margins. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space37(5): 850–867.
128.
StraussK (2020) Labour geography III: precarity, racial capitalisms and infrastructure. Progress in Human Geography44(6): 1212–1224.
ThriftNFrenchS (2002) The automatic production of space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers27(3): 309–335.
131.
TorrensPM (2010) Geography and computational social science. GeoJournal75(2): 133–148.
132.
TsingA (2009) Supply chains and the human condition. Rethinking Marxism21(2): 148–176.
133.
Van DoornNBadgerA (2020) Platform capitalism’s hidden abode: producing data assets in the gig economy. Antipode52(5): 1475–1495.
134.
VeenABarrattTGoodsC (2020) Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’for control: a labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society34(3): 388–406.
WanTBWahELCMengLC (1992) The use of information technology by the port of Singapore authority. World Development20(12): 1785–1795.
138.
WellsKJAttohKCullenD (2020) “Just-in-Place” labor: driver organizing in the Uber workplace. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space53(2): 315–331.
139.
WestDM (2018) The Future of Work: Robots, AI, and Automation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
140.
WhileAKovacicMMarvinS (2021) Urban robotic experimentation: San Francisco, Tokyo and Dubai. Urban Studies58(4): 769–786.
141.
WrigleyNLoweM (2014) Reading Retail: A Geographical Perspective on Retailing and Consumption Spaces. London: Routledge.
142.
XiangB (2007) Global ‘Body Shopping’: An Indian Labor System in the Information Technology Industry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
143.
YangYLiuHChenX (2020) COVID-19 and restaurant demand: early effects of the pandemic and stay-at-home orders. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management32(12): 3809–3834.
144.
YeoSJILinW (2020) Autonomous vehicles, human agency and the potential of urban life. Geography Compass14(10): 1–12.
145.
ZengZChenPJLewAA (2020) From high-touch to high-tech: COVID-19 drives robotics adoption. Tourism Geographies22(3): 724–734.
146.
ZhuckovskayaIFPanshinIVMarkhaichukMM (2020) Digitalization of labor as a key factor in the development of logistic activities in the conditions of COVID-19. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research489: 274–281.
147.
ZookMABlankenshipJ (2018) New spaces of disruption? The failures of Bitcoin and the rhetorical power of algorithmic governance. Geoforum96: 248–255.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
