In this second report, I discuss the role of newness in GIScience, drawing distinctions between ‘the new’, as a state of emergent technology and technical situation, and imminence, a state of happenings and becomings. I suggest that GIScience often reduces the two to each other – what is imminent is that which is new – with specific implications for the use of geospatial techniques and technologies in explicitly radical, critical, and anti-racist projects. To engage in this work means often to make do with what is available and accessible, with no less need for experimentation and innovation.
BarrettEBosseAJ (2021) Community geography for precarious researchers: examining the intricacies of mutually beneficial and co-produced knowledge. GeoJournalDOI: 10.1007/s10708-020-10358-2. Online ahead of print.
3.
BenjaminR (2019) Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity.
4.
BoeingG (2020) The right tools for the job: the case for spatial science tool-building. Transactions in GIS24: 1299–1314.
5.
BriggsCBurfurdIDuckhamM, et al. (2020) Bridging the geospatial gap: data about space and Indigenous knowledge of place. Geography Compass14: e12542.
6.
BrowneS (2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
ChenXZhangAWangH, et al. (2021) Compliance and containment in social distancing: mathematical modeling of COVID-19 across townships. International Journal of Geographical Information Science35(3): 446–465.
8.
ChowTEChoiYYangM, et al. (2020) Geographic pattern of human mobility and COVID-19 before and after Hubei lockdown. Annals of GIS27: 127–138.
9.
ClarkRM (2020) Geospatial Intelligence: Origins and Evolution. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10.
ColemanMKocherA (2019) Rethinking the “gold standard” of racial profiling: §287(g), secure communities and racially discrepant police power. American Behavioral Scientist63(9): 1185–1220.
11.
ComandulliC (2021) Digital technology in the jungle: a case study from the Brazilian Amazon. In: SkarlatidouAHaklayM (eds) Geographic Citizen Science Design: No One Left Behind. London: UCL Press. pp. 302–316.
12.
CorbettJMDerricksonA (2021) Developing a referrals management tool with First Nations in northern Canada: an iterative programming approach. In: SkarlatidouAHaklayM (eds) Geographic Citizen Science Design: No One Left Behind. London: UCL Press. pp. 209–227.
13.
DeleuzeG (1997) Immanence: a life…. Theory, Culture & Society14(2): 3–7.
14.
DiAngeloRJ (2018) White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
15.
ElwoodSA (2021) Digital geographies, feminist relationality, Black and queer code studies: Thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography45(2): 209–228.
16.
ElwoodSALeszczynskiA (2018) Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place and Culture25(5): 629–644.
17.
EubanksV (2017) Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
KendiIX (2019) How to Be an Antiracist. New York, NY: One World.
32.
KnowlesAKPearceM (2021) Listening: Conversation around Maps and Stories with Anne Kelly Knowles & Margaret Wickens Pearce. Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling (COHDS/CHORN), Concordia University. Available at: https://vimeo.com/517296481 (accessed 1 July 2021).
33.
LanYDesjardinsMRHohlA, et al. (2021) Geovisualization of COVID-19: state of the art and opportunities. Cartographica56(1): 2–13.
34.
LeeRAhtoneTPearceM, et al. (2020) Land-grab universities. Available at: https://www.landgrabu.org. (accessed 8 April 2021).
35.
LeszczynskiA (2020) Digital methods III: the digital mundane. Progress in Human Geography44(6): 1194–1201.
36.
LeszczynskiAZookMA (2020) Viral data. Big Data & Society7(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951720971009.
37.
LinW (2018) Volunteered geographic information constructions in a contested terrain: a case of openstreetmap in china. Geoforum89: 73–82.
38.
MasseyD (2005) For Space. London: Sage.
39.
McCallMK (2021) Participatory mapping and PGIS: secerning facts and values, representation and representativity. International Journal of E-Planning Research10(3): 105–123.
40.
McElroyE (2020) Property as technology: temporal entanglements of race, space, and displacement. City24(1-2): 112–129.
41.
McKittrickK (2021) Dear Science and Other Stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
McPhersonT (2018) Feminist in a Software Lab: Difference + Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
MinerJD (2020) Informatic tactics: indigenous activism and digital cartographies of gender-based violence. Information, Communication & Society1–8. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1797851.
44.
MottCCockayneD (2017) Citation matters: mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’. Gender, Place and Culture24(7): 954–973.
45.
O’SullivanD (2021) Things are how they are because of how they got that way: thoughts from the beach, on 50 years of geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis53: 157–163.
46.
O’SullivanDGaheganMExeterDJ, et al. (2020) Spatially explicit models for exploring COVID-19 lockdown strategies. Transactions in GIS24: 967–1000.
47.
OtterstromSMHochbergL (2021) Relative concentrations and diffusion of COVID-19 across the United States in 2020. Cartographica56(1): 27–43.
48.
Pajarito GrajalesDMaasSAttardM, et al. (2021) Path of least resistance: using geo-games and crowdsourced data to map cycling frictions. In: SkarlatidouAHaklayM (eds) Geographic Citizen Science Design: No One Left Behind. London: UCL Press. pp. 165–185.
49.
PalmerMHKorsonC (2020) Decolonizing world heritage maps using indigenous toponyms, stories, and interpretive attributes. Cartographica55(3): 183–192.
50.
PaseAPrestiLLRossettoT, et al. (2021) Pandemic cartographies: a conversation on mappings, imaginings and emotions. Mobilities16(1): 134–153.
51.
PayneWB (2021) Powering the local review engine at Yelp and Google: intensive and extensive approaches to crowdsourcing spatial data. Regional Studies1–12. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1910229.
52.
PearceMWHornsbySJ (2020) Making the coming home map. Cartographica55(3): 170–176.
53.
PreisBJanakiramanABobA, et al. (2021) Mapping gentrification and displacement pressure: an exploration of four distinct methodologies. Urban Studies58(2): 405–424.
54.
RankinW (2020) Race and the territorial imaginary: reckoning with the demographic cartography of the United States. Modern American History3: 199–230.
55.
ReidGSieberRE (2020) Learning from critiques of GIS for assessing the geoweb and indigenous knowledges. GeoJournal: 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-020-10285-2.
56.
ReidGSieberRE (2021) Unavoidable expertise, ‘technocratic positionality,’ and GIScience: eliciting an indigenous geospatial ontology with the Eastern Cree in Northern Quebec. Gender, Place and Culture28(4): 541–563.
57.
RinnerC (2021) Mapping COVID-19 in context: promoting a proportionate perspective on the pandemic. Cartographica56(1): 14–26.
Roberts-GregoryF (2021) Integrating Black Feminist Ecologies and Critical Environmental Justice: the Praxis of Ecowomanist Autoethnography. Lecture at the University of Kentucky Department of Geography. 2 April.
60.
Rose-RedwoodRKitchinRApostolopoulouE, et al. (2020) Geographies of the COVID-19 pandemic. Dialogues in Human Geography10(2): 97–106.
61.
SchuurmanN (2009) Is the rubric “critical giscience” effective? an argument for theoretical GIScience. Cartographica44(1): 10–11.
