In our third and final report, we again prioritize the open embrace of methodological differences, seeking to span the qualitative-quantitative chasm in different ways. Amid broad focus on methodological newness, we review the importance of enduring methods such as interviewing and mapping. Amid efforts to make data and publications openly available, we review efforts to include communities in participatory research. Amid the emergence of data-extensive studies, which some call the fourth paradigm, we highlight the continuing importance of ‘small’ data and methodological pluralism.
AgnewJ (2012) A review of ‘Envisioning Landscapes, Making Worlds: Geography and the Humanities’ and ‘GeoHumanities: Art, History, Text at the Edge of Place’. Annals of the Association of American Geographers102: 514–416.
2.
AhlqvistOHarveyFBanH. (2013) Making journal articles ‘live’: Turning academic writing into scientific dialog. GeoJournal78(1): 61–68.
3.
AitkenS (2010) Not bad for a little migrant working kid. Children’s Geographies8: 363–371.
4.
AskinsKPainR (2011) Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29: 803–821.
5.
BarnesTJ (2010) Taking the pulse of the dead: History and philosophy of geography, 2008–2009. Progress in Human Geography34: 668–677.
6.
BarnesTJ (2011) This is like déjà vu all over again. The Professional Geographer63(3): 332–336.
7.
BarnesTJSheppardE (2010) ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography34(2): 193–214.
8.
BartschererTCooverR (2011) Switching Codes: Thinking Through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
9.
BerryDM (2012) Understanding Digital Humanities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
BondiL (2009) Counselling in rural Scotland: Care, proximity and trust. Gender16(2): 163–179.
11.
BörnerK (2010) Atlas of Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12.
boyddCrawfordK (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society15: 662–679.
ButzD (2008) Sidelined by the guidelines: Reflections on the limitations of standard informed consent procedures for the conduct of ethical research. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies7: 239–259.
15.
CahillCTorreME (2010) Beyond the journal article: Representations, audience, and the presentation of participatory action research. In: KindonSPainRKesbyM (eds) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Abingdon: Routledge, 196–205.
16.
CameronE (2012) New geographies of story and storytelling. Progress in Human Geography36(5): 573–592.
17.
CaquardS (2013) Cartography I: Mapping narrative cartography. Progress in Human Geography37(1): 135–144.
18.
CastledenHMulrennanMGodlewskaA (2012a) Community-based participatory research involving indigenous peoples in Canadian geography: Progress? An editorial introduction. The Canadian Geographer56: 155–159.
19.
CastledenHSloan MorganVLambC (2012b) ‘I spent the first year drinking tea’: Exploring Canadian university researchers’ perspectives on community-based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples. The Canadian Geographer56: 160–179.
20.
CastreeN (2012) Progressing physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography36(3): 298–304.
21.
ChristensenJ (2012) Telling stories: Exploring research storytelling as a meaningful approach to knowledge mobilization with Indigenous research collaborators and diverse audiences in community-based participatory research. The Canadian Geographer56: 231–242.
CresswellT (2012) Review essay. Nonrepresentational theory and me: Notes of an interested sceptic. Environment and Planning D30: 96–105.
25.
CribbJSariT (2010) Open Science. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
26.
CroganPKinsleyS (2012) Paying attention: Toward a critique of the attention economy. Culture Machine13: 1–29.
27.
CutlerAE (2013) Land diagrams: The new twinned studies. Cultural Geographies20(1): 113–122.
28.
DaviesG (2012) Caring for the multiple and the multitude: Assembling animal welfare and enabling ethical critique. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30: 623–638.
29.
de LeeuwSCameronESGreenwoodML (2012) Participatory and community-based research, indigenous geographies, and the spaces of friendship: A critical engagement. The Canadian Geographer56: 180–194.
30.
DeLyserD (2010) Writing qualitative geography. In: DeLyserDHerbertSAitkenS. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, London: SAGE, 341–358.
31.
DeLyserDKarolczykP (2010) Fieldwork and the geographical review: Retrospect and possible prospects. Geographical Review100(4): 465–475.
32.
DeLyserDPawsonE (2010) From personal to public: Communicating qualitative research for public consumption. In: HayI (ed.) Qualitative Methods in Human Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 356–367.
33.
DodgeMPerkinsC (2008) Reclaiming the map: British geography and ambivalent cartographic practice. Environment and Planning A40(6): 1271–1276.
34.
ElwoodSLeszczynskiA (2012) New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00543.x.
35.
ElwoodSMitchellK (2012) Mapping children’s politics: Spatial stories, dialogic relations and political formation. Geografiska Annaler Series B94(1): 1–15.
HalevyANorvigPPereiraFISI (2009) The unreasonable effectiveness of data. Intelligent Systems, IEEE24(2): 8–12.
47.
HeyTTansleySTolleKI (2009) The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.
48.
HeynenN (2009) Back to revolutionary theory through racialized poverty: The McGee family’s utopian struggle for Milwaukee. The Professional Geographer61(2): 187–199.
49.
HitchingsR (2012) People can talk about their practices. Area44(1): 61–67.
50.
HolmesC (2009) Destabilizing homonormativity and the public/private dichotomy in North American lesbian domestic violence discourses. Gender16(1): 77–95.
51.
HudalahDWinarsoHWoltjerJ (2010) Planning by opportunity: An analysis of periurban environmental conflicts in Indonesia. Environment and Planning A42: 2254–2269.
52.
JacksonPWardNRussellP (2009) Moral economies of food and geographies of responsibility. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers34: 12–24.
53.
JacobsJ (2009) Have sex will travel: Romantic ‘sex tourism’ and women negotiating modernity in the Sinai. Gender16(1): 43–61.
JensenKBGlasmeierAK (2010) Policy, research design and the socially situated researcher. In: DeLyserDHerbertSAitkenS. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography, London: SAGE, 82–93.
56.
JiangB (2011) Making GIScience research more open access. International Journal of Geographical Information Science25(8): 1217–1220.
57.
KanngieserA (2012) A sonic geography of voice: Towards an affective politics. Progress in Human Geography36(3): 336–353.
58.
KindonS (2010) Participation. In: SmithSPainRMarstonS. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Geographies. London: SAGE, 517–545.
59.
KindonSPainRKesbyM (eds) (2010a) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Abingdon: Routledge.
60.
KindonSPainRKesbyM (2010b) Participatory action research: Origins, approaches and methods. In: KindonSPainRKesbyM (eds) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. Abingdon: Routledge, 9–18.
61.
KitchinRGleesonJDodgeM (2012) Unfolding mapping practices: A new epistemology for cartography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00540.x.
LawJ (2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
65.
LonghurstRJohnstonLHoE (2009) A visceral approach: Cooking ‘at home’ with migrant women in Hamilton, New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers34: 333–345.
66.
LowenthalD (1969) Ephraim Ketchall: Forgotten pioneer of modern geography. The Professional Geographer21(1): 5–7.
67.
McLeishC (2010) Opening up the secret city of Stepnogorsk: Biological weapons in the former Soviet Union. Area42(1): 60–69.
68.
ManovichL (2011) Trending: The promises and thechallenges of big social data. In: GoldMK (ed.) Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 460–475.
69.
MartinR (2000) Editorial: In memory of maps. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers25(1): 3–6.
70.
MennisJMasonMJCaoY (2013) Qualitative GIS and the visualization of narrative activity space data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science27(2): 267–291.
71.
MitchellKElwoodS (2012) Mapping children’s politics: the promise of articulation and the limits of nonrepresentational theory. Environment and Planning D30(5): 788–804.
72.
MyersJ (2010) Moving methods: Constructing emotionally poignant geographies of HIV in Auckland, New Zealand. Area42(3): 328–338.
73.
NakayaT (2010) ‘Geomorphology’ of population health in Japan: Looking through the cartogram lens. Environment and Planning A42(12): 2807–2808.
74.
National Science Foundation (US) Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (2011) Rebuilding the mosaic: Fostering research in the social, behavioral, and economic sciences at the National Science Foundation in the next decade. BiblioGov. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/nsf11086/nsf11086.pdf.
75.
PainRKesbyMAskinsK (2011) Geographies of impact: Power, participation and potential. Area43(2): 183–188.
76.
PhillipsJ (2012) Storytelling in earth sciences: The eight basic plots. Earth-Science Reviews115: 153–162.
77.
PicklesJStallmannT (2013) Mapping and social theory. In: MonmonierM (ed.) The History of Cartography: Twentieth Century. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press (forthcoming).
78.
ProudfootJ (2010) Interviewing enjoyment, or the limits of discourse. The Professional Geographer62(4): 507–518.
79.
RapleyC (2012) Climate science: Time to raft up. Nature488: 583–584.
80.
SkupinAEsperbéA (2011) An alternative map of the United States based on an n-dimensional model of geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing22(4): 290–304.
81.
SteinigerSHunterAJS (2012) Free and open source GIS software for building a spatial data infrastructure. In: BocherENetelerM (eds) Geospatial Free and Open Source Software in the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer, 247–261.
82.
SuiDZ (2012) GIS and the emerging open science: The road taken, the road still beckoning. GeoWorld (June): 15–17.
83.
SuiDZDeLyserD (2012) Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm I: Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography36(1): 111–124.
84.
TraversM (2009) New methods, old problems: A sceptical view of innovation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research9(2): 161–179.
VinciguerraSTaylorPJHoylerM. (2010) Contemporary Mappa Mundi: American exceptionalism in the world city network. Environment and Planning A42(6): 1271–1272.
YuanM (2012) GIS as a platform for spatial narrative generation. Annual project meeting of Understanding Social Networks within Complex, Nonlinear Systems: Geographically Integrated History and Dynamics GIS, 7–8 August, Boise, ID.
95.
ZelinskyW (1973) The first and last frontier of communication: The map as mystery. Special Libraries Association, Geography and Map Division, Bulletin94 (December): 2–8.
