This commentary is a direct response to the Forum article ‘Environmentalist thinking and/in geography’ by Radcliffe et al. (2010). Two main problems are addressed: the perpetuation of a false analogy between cultural and biological evolution, and a misunderstanding of memes. I review the literature and summarize the main issues in cultural and biological evolution and in the related field of memetics, noting ways in which the Forum’s authors’ arguments might be strengthened. In conclusion, some suggestions are made for how geographers might productively engage with innovative ideas from other closely related disciplines.
BlackmoreS (2010) Memetics does provide a useful way of understanding cultural evolution. In AyalaFArpR (eds) Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Blackwell, 255–272.
3.
BoydRRichersonP (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Cavalli-SforzaLFeldmanM (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
DalbyS (2002) Environmental Security. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
DalbyS (2009) Security and Environmental Change. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
DawkinsR (1976): The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
DawkinsR (1982) The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
DistinK (2005) The Selfish Meme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
DistinK (2011) Cultural Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fernández-ArmestoF (2010) Part II: Questioning the notion of human culture versus the environment. Progress in Human Geography34: 107–111.
13.
JablonkaELambM (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
RadcliffeS (2010) Introduction: The status of the environment in geographical explanations. Progress in Human Geography34: 98–101.
15.
RadcliffeSWatsonESimmonsIFernández-ArmestoFSluyterA (2010) Forum: Environmentalist thinking and/in geography. Progress in Human Geography34: 98–116.
16.
RichersonPBoydR (2005) Not By Genes Alone. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
SayreN (2008) The genesis, history, and limits of carrying capacity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers98: 120–134.
18.
ScottC (1983) The semiotics of material life among Wemindji Cree hunters. PhD Dissertation, McGill University.
19.
ShennanS (2002) Genes, Memes and Human History. London: Thames and Hudson.
20.
SimmonsI (2010) Environmental determinism in geographers’ environments. Progress in Human Geography34: 105–107.
21.
SluyterA (2010) Part III: Engaging with the politics of determinist environmental thinking. Progress in Human Geography34: 111–114.
22.
ThorntonT (2008) Being and Place Among the Tlingit. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
23.
WatsonE (2010) Part I: Types of determinist environmental thinking. Progress in Human Geography34: 101–105.
