Infrastructure tends to be conceived as stabilized and ‘black-boxed’ with little interaction from users. This fixity is in flux in ways not yet fully considered in either geography or science and technology studies (STS). Driven by environmental and economic concerns, water utilities are increasingly introducing efficiency technologies into infrastructure networks. These, I argue, serve as ‘mediating technologies’ shifting long-accepted socio-technical and environmental relationships in cities. The essay argues for a new approach to infrastructure that, by integrating insights from STS and geography, highlights its malleability and offers conceptual tools to consider how this malleability might be fostered.
Akrich M. ( 1992) De-scription - how technologies are used to attempt to inscribe user behaviours. In: Bijker WE and Law J (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 205-224.
2.
Bakker K. ( 2004) An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatizing Water in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bakker K. ( 2005) Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers93: 542-565.
4.
Barnett C. ( 2005) The consolations of ‘neoliberalism’ . Geoforum36: 7-12.
5.
Berkhout F., Smith A., and Stirling A. ( 2004) Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts . In: Elzen B, Geels FW, and Green K (eds) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar , 48-75.
6.
Bijker WE and Pinch TJ ( 1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, and Pinch TJ (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 17-50.
7.
Bish RL ( 2001) Local Government Amalgamations: Discredited Nineteenth-century Ideas Alive in the Twenty-first. Ottawa, ON: C.D. Howe Institute.
8.
Boardman B. ( 1998) Energy efficiency and fuel poverty. Praseg 1998 Annual Conference. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
9.
Brand S. ( 1994) How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They Are Built . New York: Viking Press .
10.
Buzar S. ( 2007) Energy Poverty in Eastern Europe: Hidden Geographies of Deprivation. Aldershot: Ashgate .
11.
Callon M. ( 1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Law J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 132-164.
12.
Chapura M.(2009) Scale, causality, complexity and emergence: Rethinking scale’s ontological significance. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers34: 462-474.
13.
City of Calgary (2007) Water Efficiency Plan: 30-in-30, by 2033. Calgary, AB: City of Calgary, Water Resources.
14.
Coutard O. ( 1994) Economics of grid systems in reconfiguration: Competition in the electricity supply industry. In: Summerton J (ed.) Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 163-189.
15.
Coutard O. ( 1999a) Introduction: The evolving forms of governance of technical systems. In: Coutard O (ed.) The Governance of Large Technical Systems. London : Routledge, 1-16.
16.
Coutard O (ed.) (1999b) The Governance of Large Technical Systems. London: Routledge.
17.
Coutard O. ( 2008) Placing splintering urbanism: Introduction. Geoforum39: 1815-1820.
18.
Coutard O. and Guy S. ( 2007) STS and the city: Politics and practices of hope . Science Technology and Human Values32: 713-734.
19.
Coutard O., Hanley RE, and Zimmerman R. ( 2005a) Network systems revisited: The confounding nature of universal systems. In: Coutard O, Hanley RE, and Zimmerman R (eds) Sustaining Urban Networks: The Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems. New York: Routledge, 1-12.
20.
Coutard O, Hanley RE , and Zimmerman R (eds) ( 2005b) Sustaining Urban Networks: The Social Diffusion of Large Technical Systems. New York: Routledge .
21.
Cronon W. ( 1991) Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West . New York: W.W. Norton.
22.
Delaney D. and Hilda L. ( 1997) The political construction of scale. Political Geography16: 93-97.
23.
Dixon DP and Whitehead M. ( 2008) Technological trajectories: Old and new dialogues in geography and technology studies. Social and Cultural Geography9: 601-611.
24.
Elzen B, Geels FW , and Green K (eds) ( 2004) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
25.
Ewertsson L. and Ingelstam L. ( 2004) Large technical systems: A multidisciplinary research tradition. In: Olsson M-O and Sjöstedt G (eds) Systems Approaches and Their Application: Examples from Sweden. Stockholm: Kluwer, 291-309.
26.
Furlong K. and Bakker K. ( 2007) Water Governance in Transition: Utility Restructuring and Demand Management in Ontario. Vancouver, BC: UBC Program on Water Governance and Infrastructure Canada.
27.
Furlong K. and Bakker K. ( 2008) Achieving Water Conservation: Strategies for Good Governance . Vancouver, BC: UBC Program on Water Governance and Infrastructure Canada.
28.
Furlong K. and Bakker K.(2010) The contradictions of ‘alternative’ service delivery: Governance, business models, and sustainability in municipal water supply . Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28: 349-368.
29.
Gandy M. ( 2002) Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
30.
Gandy M. ( 2005) Cyborg urbanization: Complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research29: 26-49.
31.
Gardner J. ( 2008) Workshop Report: Sustainable Water Infrastructure Management in Canada. Vancouver, BC: Program on Water Governance.
32.
Geels FW ( 2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy31: 1257-1274.
33.
Geels FW ( 2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy33: 897-920.
34.
Geels FW and Schot J. ( 2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways . Research Policy36: 399-417.
35.
Genus A. and Coles AM ( 2008) Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy37: 1436-1445.
36.
Gibson-Graham JK ( 2006) A Post-capitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
Gleick PH ( 2003) Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science302: 1524-1528.
38.
Graham S. ( 1997) Liberalized utilities, new technologies and urban social polarization: The UK experience. European Urban and Regional Studies4: 135-150.
39.
Graham S. ( 2002) On technology, infrastructure, and the contemporary urban condition: A response to Coutard. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26: 175-182.
40.
Graham S (ed.) (2010a) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New York: Routledge.
41.
Graham S. ( 2010b) When infrastructure fails. In: Graham, S (ed.) Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails . New York: Routledge, 1-26.
42.
Graham S. and Marvin S. ( 1995) More than ducts and wires: Post-Fordism, cities and utility networks. In: Healy P (ed.) Managing Cities: The New Urban Context. Chichester : Wiley, 169-190.
43.
Graham S. and Marvin S. ( 2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. New York: Routledge.
44.
Graham S. and Thrift N. ( 2007) Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance . Theory Culture and Society24: 1-25.
45.
Guy S. ( 2009) Fluid architectures: Ecologies of hybrid urbanism . In: White DF and Wilbert C (eds) Technonatures: Environments, Technologies, Spaces, and Places in the Twenty-first Century. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 215-237.
46.
Guy S. and Shove E. ( 2000) A Sociology of Energy, Buildings and the Environment: Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice. London: Routledge.
47.
Harvey D. ( 1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference . Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
Heynen N, Kaïka M, and Swyngedouw E (eds) ( 2006a) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. Abingdon: Routledge.
49.
Heynen N., Kaïka M., and Swyngedouw E. ( 2006b) Urban political ecology: Politicizing the production of urban natures. In: Heynen N, Kaïka M, and Swyngedouw E (eds) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. Abingdon: Routledge, 1-20.
50.
Hinchliffe S., Kearnes MB, Degen M., and Whatmore S. ( 2005) Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment . Environment and Planning D - Society and Space23: 643-658.
51.
Hinchliffe S., Kearnes MB, Degen M., and Whatmore S. ( 2007) Ecologies and economies of action - sustainability, calculations, and other things. Environment and Planning A39: 260-282.
52.
Hommels A. ( 2005) Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science Technology and Human Values30: 323-351.
53.
Hommels A. ( 2008) Unbundling Cities: Obduracy in Urban Sociotechnical Change . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
54.
Hughes TP ( 1987) The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, and Pinch TJ (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 51-82.
55.
Jacobsson S. and Bergek A. ( 2004) Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change13: 815-849.
56.
Jaffe AB, Newell RG, and Stavins RN ( 2002) Environmental policy and technological change. Environmental and Resource Economics22: 41-70.
57.
Jaglin S. ( 2008) Differentiating networked services in Cape Town: Echoes of splintering urbanism? Geoforum39: 1897-1906.
58.
Jensen JO ( 2001) Green buildings in an infrastructure perspective . In: Guy S, Marvin S, and Moss T (eds) Urban Infrastructure in Transition: Networks, Buildings, Plans. London: Earthscan, 120-135.
59.
Johnson-McGrath J. ( 1997) Who built the built environment? Artifacts, politics, and urban technology. Technology and Culture38: 690-696.
60.
Jonas AEG ( 2006) Pro scale: Further reflections on the ‘scale debate’ in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31: 399-406.
61.
Kaïka M. ( 2005) City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City . New York: Routledge.
62.
Kaïka M. and Swyngedouw E. ( 2000) Fetishizing the modern city: The phatasmagoria of urban technological networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24: 120-139.
63.
Kemp R. ( 1994) Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability: The problem of technological regime shifts. Futures26: 1023-1046.
64.
Kemp R., Schot J., and Hoogma R. ( 1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management10: 175-195.
65.
Kohl B. and Warner M. ( 2004) Scales of neoliberalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28: 855-857.
66.
Kooy M. and Bakker K. ( 2008) Splintered networks: The colonial and contemporary waters of Jakarta. Geoforum39: 1843-1858.
67.
Kushner J. and Siegel D. ( 2005) Are services delivered more efficiently after municipal amalgamations? Canadian Public Administration - Administration Publique Du Canada48: 251-267.
68.
Larner W. ( 2003) Neoliberalism?Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21: 509-512.
69.
Latham A., McCormack D., McNamara K., and McNeill D. ( 2009) Key Concepts in Urban Geography. London : SAGE.
70.
Latour B. ( 1991) Technology is society made durable. In: Law J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 103-131.
71.
Law J. and Bijker WE ( 1992) Postscript: Technology, stability, and social theory . In: Bijker WE and Law J (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 290-308.
72.
Leitner H. and Miller B. ( 2007) Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: a commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32: 116-125.
73.
Loftus A. ( 2006) Reification and the dictatorship of the water meter . Antipode38: 1023-1045.
74.
Lovins AB ( 1976) Energy strategy: The road not taken? Foreign Affairs55: 65-96.
75.
McFarlane C. and Rutherford J. ( 2008) Political infrastructures: Governing and experiencing the fabric of the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32: 363-374.
76.
MacLeod G. and Goodwin M. ( 1999) Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography23: 503-527.
77.
Marston SA ( 2000) The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography24: 219-242.
78.
Marston SA, Jones JP III, and Woodward K. ( 2005) Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers30: 416-432.
79.
Mauruszat R. ( 2001) The social organization of environmental design: Residential buildings in the Berlin region. In: Guy S, Marvin S, and Moss T (eds) Urban Infrastructure in Transition: Networks, Buildings, Plans. London: Earthscan, 103-119.
80.
Mayntz R and Hughes TP (eds) (1988) The Development of Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview.
81.
Moss T. ( 2000) Unearthing water flows, uncovering social relations: Introducing new waste water technologies in Berlin. Journal of Urban Technology7: 63-84.
82.
Moss T. ( 2001) Battle of the systems? Changing styles of water recycling in Berlin. In: Guy, S., Marvin, S. and Moss, T (eds) Urban Infrastructure in Transition: Networks, Buildings, Plans. London: Earthscan, 43-56.
83.
Moss T. ( 2003) Utilities, land-use change, and urban development: Brownfield sites as ‘cold-spots’ of infrastructure networks in Berlin. Environment and Planning A35: 511-529.
84.
Neumann RP(2009) Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography33: 398-406.
85.
Nielsen SB ( 2001) Decentralized technology in centralized networks: Interpretative flexibility of rainwater percolation in CopenhagenIn: Guy S., Marvin S., and Moss T. (eds) Urban Infrastructure in Transition: Networks, Buildings, Plans. London: Earthscan, 57-67.
86.
Norberg-Bohm V. ( 1999) Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms. Policy Sciences32: 13-38.
87.
Oudshoorn N and Pinch T (eds) (2003) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
88.
Parson EA (ed.) (2001) Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
89.
Parthasarathy S. ( 2003) Knowledge is power: Genetic testing for breast cancer and patient activism in the United States and Britain. In: Oudshoorn N and Pinch T (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 133-150.
90.
Renzetti S. ( 2005) Economic instruments and Canadian industrial water use . Canadian Water Resources Journal30: 21-30.
91.
Rip A. and Kemp R. ( 1998) Technological change. In: Rainer S and Malone E (eds) Human Choice and Climate Change. Columbus, OH : Battelle Press, 327-399.
92.
Robbins P. ( 2007) Lawn People: How Grasses, Weeds, and Chemicals Make Us Who We Are. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
93.
Rutherford J. ( 2008) Unbundling Stockholm: The networks, planning and social welfare nexus beyond the unitary city. Geoforum39: 1871-1883.
94.
Salamah MB, Kapoor A., Savsar M., Ektesabi M., and Abdekhodaee A. ( 2009) The importance of accurate water metering in resource management. Sustainable Development and PlanningIV: 1007-1015.
95.
Sayre NF ( 2005) Ecological and geographical scale: Parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography29: 276-290.
96.
Shove E. and Walker G. ( 2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A39: 763-770.
97.
Smith A. ( 2003) Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches? Science and Public Policy30: 127-135.
98.
Smith N. ( 1992) Geography, difference and the politics of scale . In: Doherty J, Graham E, and Malek M (eds) Postmodernism and the Social Sciences. London : Macmillan, 57-79.
Summerton J. ( 1994b) Introductory essay: The systems approach to technological change. In: Summerton J (ed.) Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1-21.
101.
Swyngedouw E. ( 1992) Territorial organization and the space/technology nexus . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers17: 417-433.
102.
Swyngedouw E. ( 2004) Social Power and the Urbanization of Water. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103.
Swyngedouw E. ( 2007) Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco’s hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939-1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers32: 9-28.
104.
Swyngedouw E. ( 2009) Circulations and metabolisms: (Hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. In: White DF and Wilbert C (eds) Technonatures: Environments, Technologies, Spaces, and Places in the Twenty-first Century. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 61-84.
105.
Thorne MG ( 1998) Execution of Agreement for Additional Water Supply to the Region of York. MetropolitanToronto, ON: Metro Works.
106.
Truffer B. ( 2008) Society, technology and region: Contributions from the social study of technology to economic geography. Environment and Planning A40: 966-985.
107.
Usselman SW ( 1994) Changing embedded systems: The economics and politics of innovation in American railroad signaling, 1876-1914. In: Summerton J (ed.) Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 93-116.
108.
van de Poel I. ( 2003) The transformation of technological regimes. Research Policy32: 49-68.
109.
van Oost E. ( 2003) Materialized gender: How shavers configure the users’ feminity and masculinity. In: Oudshoorn N and Pinch T (eds) How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 209-228.
110.
Veritec Consulting and Koeller and Company ( 2007) Maximum Performance (MaP) Testing of Popular Toilet Models: A Cooperative Canadian and American Project. Toronto: CWWA and CUWCC.
111.
von Meier A. ( 1994) Integrating supple technologies into utility power systems: Possibilities for reconfiguration. In: Summerton J (ed.) Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 211-230.
112.
von Schnitzler A. ( 2008) Citizenship prepaid: Water, calculability, and techno-politics in South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies34: 899-917.
113.
White DF and Wilbert C. ( 2009a) Introduction: Inhabiting technonatural time/spaces . In: White DF and Wilbert C (eds) Technonatures: Environments, Technologies, Spaces, and Places in the Twenty-first Century. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press, 1-30.
114.
White DF and Wilbert C (eds) (2009b) Technonatures: Environments, Technologies, Spaces, and Places in the Twenty-first Century. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
115.
Woolgar S. ( 1991) Configuring the user: The case of usability trials . In: Law J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 57-99.
116.
Yates CD ( 2005) Water Accountability at the Halifax Regional Water Commission . In: Liemberger R (ed.) Leakage 2005. Halifax, NS: International Water Association and the Halifax Regional Water Commission , 15-21.
