Processes of inclusion and exclusion raise profound questions. As scholars of exclusion, we need to determine where to train our focus; as citizens, we need to determine whether and how exclusion is deleterious. When exclusion is pursued as a form of punishment, it is most readily open to question. This review of recent literature makes clear that scholarship on exclusion is robust, multifaceted, and necessary.
Atkinson, R. and Blandy, B.2009: A picture of the floating world: grounding the secessionary affluence of the residential cruise liner. Antipode41, 92-110.
2.
Atun, R. and Doratli, N.2009: Walls in cities: a conceptual approach to the walls of Nicosia. Geopolitics14, 108-34.
3.
Barraclough, L.2009: South Central farmers and Shadow Hills homeowners: land use policy and relational racialization in Los Angeles. The Professional Geographer61, 164-86.
4.
Beckett, C.2007: Women, disability, care: good neighbours or uneasy bedfellows?Critical Social Policy27, 360-80.
5.
Beckett, K. and Herbert, S.2009: Banished: the new social control in urban America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Belina, B.2007: From disciplining to dislocation: area bans in recent urban policing in Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies14, 321-36.
7.
Bissell, D.2009: Conceptualising differently-mobile passengers: geographies of everyday encumbrance in the railway station. Social and Cultural Geography10, 173-95.
8.
Bittner, E.1967: The police on skid row: a study in peacekeeping. American Sociological Review32, 699-715.
9.
Black, D.1980: The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Blomley, N.2004: Unsettling the city: urban land and the politics of property . New York: Routledge.
11.
Blomley, N.2007: How to turn a beggar into a bus stop: law, traffic and the ‘function of the place’. Urban Studies44, 1697-712.
12.
Blomley, N.2008: Simplification is complicated: property, nature, and the rivers of law. Environment and Planning A40, 1825-42.
13.
Blumenberg, E. and Ehrenfeucht, R.2008: Civil liberties and the regulation of public space: the case of side-walks in Las Vegas. Environment and Planning A40, 303-22.
14.
Bonds, A.2009: Discipline and devolution: constructions of poverty, race and criminality in the politics of rural prison development. Antipode41, 416-38.
15.
Browne, K.2009: Womyn’s separatist spaces: rethinking spaces of difference and exclusion. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS34, 541-56.
16.
Carr, J., Brown, E. and Herbert, S.2009: Inclusion under the law as exclusion from the city: negotiating the spatial limitation of citizenship in Seattle. Environment and Planning A41, 1962-78.
17.
Cloke, P., May, J. and Johnsen, S.2008: Performativity and affect in the homeless city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26, 241-63.
18.
Cohen, S.1985: Visions of social control. Cambridge : Polity.
19.
Coleman, R.2004: Images from a neoliberal city: the state, surveillance and social control. Critical Criminology12, 21-42.
20.
Cooper, D.2007: Opening up ownership: community belonging, belongings and the productive life of property. Law and Social Inquiry32, 625-64.
21.
Coutin, S.2000: Legalizing moves: Salvadoran immigrants’ struggle for U.S. residency. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
22.
Crang, M.2002: Between places: producing hubs, flows, and networks. Environment and Planning A34, 569-74.
23.
Crawford, A.2009: Governing through anti-social behaviour: regulatory challenges to criminal justice. British Journal of Criminology49, 810-31.
24.
Cresswell, T.2006: On the move: mobility in the modern western world. London: Routledge.
25.
Cruikshank, B.1999: The will to empower: democratic citizens and other subjects . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Darling, J.2009: Becoming bare life: asylum, hospitality, and the politics of encampment . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27, 649-65.
27.
de Koning, A.2009: Gender, public space, and social segregation in Cairo: of taxi drivers, prostitutes, and professional women. Antipode41, 533-66.
28.
DeVerteuil, G., May, J. and von Mahs, J.2009: Complexity not collapse: recasting the geographies of homelessness in a ‘punitive’ age. Progress in Human Geography33, 646-66.
29.
Duneier, M.2000: Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
30.
Ericson, R.2007: Crime in an insecure world. Cambridge : Polity.
31.
Feldman, L.2004: Citizens without shelter: homelessness, democracy, and political exclusion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
Fenster, T.2005: Gender and the city: the different formations of belonging . In Nelson, L. and Seager, J., editors, A companion to feminist geography, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 242-57.
33.
Flint, J. and Nixon, J.2006: Governing neighbours: anti-social behaviour order and new forms of regulating conduct in the UK. Urban Studies43, 939-55.
34.
Franke, M.2009: Refugee reistration as foreclosure of the freedom to move: the virtualisation of refugees’ rights within maps of international protection. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27, 352-69.
35.
Gamlen, A.2008: The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination . Political Geography27, 840-56.
36.
Garnet, N.2005: Relocating disorder. Virginia Law Review91, 1075-134.
37.
Gill, N.2009: Governmental mobility: the power effects of the movement of detained asylum seekers around Britain’s detention estate. Political Geography28, 186-96.
38.
Gilliom, J.2001: Overseers of the poor: surveillance, resistance, and the limits of privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Gilmore, R.2007: Golden gulag: prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40.
Gregory, D.2004: The colonial present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Harker, C.2009: Spacing Palestine through the home. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS34, 320-32.
42.
Herbert, S.1997: Policing space: territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
Herbert, S., Lopez, P. and Townley, M.2009: Assessment of three public safety projects. Seattle: City of Seattle. Retrieved 9 March 2010 from http://www.seattle.gov/council/attachments/2009costars_gots_curb_eval.pdf
44.
Hodgetts, D., Stolte, O., Chamberlain, K., Radley, A., Nikora, L., Nabalarua, E., and Groot, S.2008: A trip to the library: homelessness and social inclusion . Social and Cultural Geography9, 933-53.
45.
Home Office2007: Respect and responsibility: taking a stand against anti-social behaviour. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
46.
Hunt, S.2009: Citizenship’s place: the state’s creation of public space and street vendors’ culture of informality in Bogota, Colombia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27, 331-51.
47.
Jones, R.2009: Agents of exception: border security and the marginalization of Muslims in India. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27, 879-97.
48.
Kirby, A.2008: The production of private space and its implications for urban social relations. Political Geography27, 74-95.
49.
Laurenson, P. and Collins, D.2007: Beyond punitive regulation? New Zealand local governments’ responses to homelessness. Antipode39, 649-67.
50.
Lemanski, C. and Oldfield, S.2009: The parallel claims of gated communities and land invasions in a southern city: polarised state responses. Environment and Planning A41, 634-48.
51.
McKenzie, E.1996: Privatopia: homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
Mee, K.2009: A space to care, a space of care: public housing, belonging, and care in inner Newcastle, Australia. Environment and Planning A41, 842-58.
53.
Millie, A.2008: Anti-social behaviour, behavioural expectations and an urban aesthetic. British Journal of Criminology48, 379-94.
54.
Murphy, S.2009: ‘Compassionate’ strategies of managing homelessness: post-revanchist geographies in San Francisco. Antipode41, 305-25.
55.
Nagel, C. and Staeheli, L.2008: Integration and the negotiation of ‘here’ and ‘there’: the case of British Arab activists. Social and Cultural Geography9, 415-30.
56.
Nagle, J.2009: Sites of social centrality and segregation: Lefebvre in Belfast, a ‘divided city’. Antipode41, 326-47.
57.
Nevins, J.2007: Dying for a cup of coffee? Migrant deaths in the US-Mexico border region in a neoliberal age. Geopolitics12, 228-47.
58.
Pain, R.2006: Social geography: seven deadly myths in policy research . Progress in Human Geography30, 250-60.
59.
Ramadan, A.2009: Destroying Nahr el-Bared: sovereignty and urbicide in the space of exception . Political Geography28, 153-63.
60.
Sanchez, L.1997: Enclosure Acts and exclusionary practices: neighborhood associations, community police, and the expulsion of the sexual outlaw. In Goldberg, D., Musheno, M. and Bower, L., editors, Between law and culture: relocating legal studies, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 88-105.
61.
Schein, R.2009: Belonging through land/scape. Environment and Planning A41, 811-26.
62.
Slocum, R.2008: Thinking race through corporeal feminist theory: divisions and intimacies at the Minneapolis Farmers’ Market. Social and Cultural Geography9, 849-69.
63.
Smith, H. and Ley, D.2008: Even in Canada? The multiscalar construction and experience of concentrated immigrant poverty in gateway cities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers98, 686-713.
64.
Sparks, T.2009: As much like home as possible: geographies of homelessness and citizenship in Seattle’s Tent City 3. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Washington, Seattle.
65.
Staeheli, L., Mitchell, D., and Nagel, C.2009: Making publics: immigrants, regimes of publicity and entry to ‘the public’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27, 633-48.
66.
Stratford, E.2009: Belonging as a resource: the case of Ralphs Bay, Tasmania, and the local politics of place. Environment and Planning A, 41, 796-810.
67.
Sundburg, J.2008: ‘Trash talk’ and the production of quotidian geopolitical boundaries in the USA-Mexico borderlands. Social and Cultural Geography9, 871-90.
68.
Swanson, K.2007: Revanchist urbanism heads south: the regulation of indigenous beggars and street vendors in Ecuador. Antipode39, 708-28.
69.
Thomas, M.2005: ‘I think it’s just natural’: the spatiality of racial segregation at a US high school. Environment and Planning A37, 1233-48.
70.
Uitermark, J. and Duyvendak, J.2008: Civilizing the city: populism and revanchist urbanism in Rotterdam. Urban Studies45, 1485-503.
71.
Uteng, T.2009: Gender, ethnicity, and constrained mobility: insights into the resultant social exclusion. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1055-71.
72.
Valentine, G., Sporton, D. and Neilsen, K.2009: Identities and belonging: a study of Somali refugee and asylum seekers living in the UK and Denmark. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 27, 234-50.
73.
Veninga, C.2009: Fitting in: the embodied politics of race in Seattle’s integrated schools. Social and Cultural Geography10, 107-29.
74.
Vigneswaran, D.2008: Enduring territoriality: South African immigration control . Political Geography27, 783-801.
75.
Wacquant, L.2009: Punishing the poor: the neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
76.
Warr, D.2005: Social networks in a ‘discredited’ neighbourhood . Journal of Sociology41, 285-308.
77.
Weber, L. and Bowling, B.2009: Valiant beggars and global vagabonds: select, eject, immobilize. Theoretical Criminology12, 355-75.
