Using the native/alien classification for description not prescription: a response to Christopher Preston

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davis, M.A. 2009: Invasion biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 244 pp.

Fortwangler, C. 2009: A place for the donkey: natives and aliens in the US Virgin Islands . Landscape Research 34, 205-22.

Gozlan, R.E. and Newton, A.C. 2009: Biological invasions: benefits versus risks. Science 324(5930), 1015.

Head, L. and Atchison, J. 2009: Cultural ecology: emerging human-plant geographies. Progress in Human Geography 33, 236-45.

Lees, A.C. and Bell, D.J. 2008: Conservation paradox for the 21st century: the European wild rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, an invasive alien and an endangered native species. Mammal Review 38, 304-20.

Mackey, B.G. 2008: Boundaries, data and conservation. Journal of Biogeography 35, 392-93.

Preston, C. 2009: The terms ‘native’ and ‘alien’ - a biogeographical perspective. Progress in Human Geography , DOI: 10.1177/0309132509105002.

Warren, C.R. 2007: Perspectives on the ‘alien’ versus ‘native’ species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography 31, 427-46.