This paper is the first overview of the treatment of haptic knowledges in geography, responding to bodily sensations and responses that arise through the embodied researcher. After Crang’s (2003) article on ‘touchy-feely’ methods identifies the dearth of actual touching and embodied feeling in research methods, this article does three things. First, it clarifies the terminology, which is derived from a number of disciplines. Second, it summarizes developments in sensuous ethnographies within cultural geography and anthropology. Third, it suggests pathways to new research on ‘sensuous dispositions’ and non-representational theory. We thereby see just how ‘touchy-feely’ qualitative methods have, or might, become.
Aristotle1984: Sense and sensibilia (De sensu et sensibilibus; translated by J.I. Beare). In Ross, W.D., editor, Aristotle: works, volume II, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 693-713.
2.
Aristotle1986: De anima on the soul (translated by H. Lawson-Tancred). London: Penguin.
3.
Bendix, R.2005: Introduction: ear to ear, nose to nose, skin to skin - the senses in comparative ethnographic perspective. Special Issue, ‘The Anthropology of the Senses’. EtnofoorXVI111, 3-14.
4.
Boring, E.G., Langfeld, H.S. and Weld, H.P.1948: Foundations of psychology. New York : Wiley.
5.
Bronner, S.J.1982: The Haptic Experience of Culture. Anthropos773, 351-62.
6.
Bull, M. and Back, L., editors 2003: The auditory culture reader . Oxford: Berg.
7.
Butler, R. and Bowlby, S.1997: Bodies and spaces: an exploration of disabled people’s experiences of public space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15, 411-33.
8.
Buttimer, A. and Seamon, D.1980: The human experience of place and space. London: Croom Helm.
9.
Classen, C.1993: Worlds of sense: exploring the senses in history and across culture. London: Routledge.
10.
- 1997: Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. International Social Science Journal153, 401-12.
11.
- 1998: The color of angels: cosmology, gender and the aesthetic imagination. London: Routledge.
12.
-, editor 2005: The book of touch. Oxford: Berg.
13.
Cloke, P., Cook, I., Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J. and Philo, C.2004: Practising human geographies. London : Sage.
14.
Cole, J.1995: Pride and a daily marathon. London : MIT Press.
15.
Corbin, A.1986: The foul and the fragrant: odor and the French social imagination. Leamington Spa: Berg .
16.
- 2005: Charting the cultural history of the senses. In Howes, D., editor, Empire of the senses: the sensual culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 128-42.
17.
Crang, M.2003: Qualitative methods: touchy, feely, look-see?Progress in Human Geography274, 494-504.
18.
Crouch, D.2001: Spatialities and the feeling of doing. Social and Cultural Geography21, 61-75.
19.
Csordas, T.J.1993: Somatic modes of attention. Cultural Anthropology8, 135-56.
20.
Dewsberry, J.D., Harrison, P., Rose, M. and Wylie, J.2002: Introduction: enacting geographies. Geoforum33, 437-40.
21.
Downey, G.2002: Listening to Capoeira: phenomenology, embodiment, and the materiality of music. Ethnomusicology46, 487-509.
22.
- 2005: Learning Capoeira: lessons in cunning from an Afro-Brazilian art. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Fuller, T.1732: Gnomologia: adagies and proverbs, wise sentences and witty sayings. London: Barker, and Bettesworth and Hitch.
29.
Geurts, K.L.2002: Culture and the senses: embodiment, identity, and well-being in an African community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
- 2005: Consciousness as feeling in the body. In Howes, D., editor, Empire of the senses: the sensual culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 164-78.
31.
Gibson, J.J.1962: Observations on active touch. Psychological Review69, 477-91.
32.
- 1966: The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
33.
- 1968: On the difference between perception and proprioception . The ‘Purple Perils’ of James J. Gibson. Unpublished notes. Retrieved 26 January 2009 from http://huwi.org/gibson/difference.php
34.
- 1986: The ecological approach to visual perception. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Hetherington, K.2002: The unsightly: visual impairment, touch and the Parthenon frieze. Theory, Culture and Society195-6, 187-205.
36.
- 2003: Spatial textures: place, touch, and praesentia. Environment and Planning A3511, 1933-44.
37.
Howes, D.2003: Sensual relations: engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
38.
-, editor 2005: Empire of the senses: the sensual culture reader. Oxford: Berg.
39.
Hume, L.2007: Portals: opening doorways to other realities through the senses. Oxford: Berg.
40.
Husserl, E.1970: The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (translated by D. Carr). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
41.
Ingold, T.2000: The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge .
42.
- 2004: Culture on the ground: the world perceived through the feet. Journal of Material Culture93, 315-40.
43.
Jay, M.1994: Downcast eyes: the denigration of vision in twentieth century french thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
44.
Jones, C.A., editor 2007: Sensorium: embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art. London: MIT Press.
45.
Josipovici, G.1996: Touch: an essay. London: Yale University Press.
46.
Koffka, K.1935: Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Lund Humphries.
47.
Korsmeyer, C., editor 2005: The taste culture reader: experiencing food and drink. Oxford: Berg.
48.
Lackner, J.R. and DiZio, P.2005: Vestibular, proprioceptive, and haptic contributions to spatial orientation. Annual Review of Psychology56, 115-47.
49.
Law, L.2001: Home cooking: Filipino women and geographies of the senses in Hong Kong. Cultural Geographies83, 264-83.
50.
Leder, D.1990: The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
- 2005 : Visceral perception. In Classen, C., editor,The book of touch, Oxford : Berg, 335-41.
52.
Longhurst, R., Ho, E. and Johnston, L.2008: Using ‘the body’ as an ‘instrument of research’: kim’chi and pavlova. Area402, 208-17.
53.
Lorimer, H.2005: Cultural geography: the busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’ . Progress in Human Geography29, 83-94.
54.
- 2007: Cultural geography: worldly shapes, differently arranged . Progress in Human Geography31, 89-100.
55.
Lund, K.2005: Seeing in motion and the touching eye: walking over Scotland’s mountains. Etnofoor181, 27-42.
56.
Macpherson, H.M.2009: Touch in the countryside: memory and visualization through the feet. The Senses and Society33, in press.
57.
Mauss, M.1992: Techniques of the body. In Crary, J. and Kwinter, S., editors, Zone 6:incorporations, New York: Zone.
58.
McCormack, D.P.2002: A paper with an interest in rhythm. Geoforum33, 469-85.
59.
Merleau-Ponty, M.1992[1945]: The phenomenology of perception (translated by C. Smith). London: Routledge.
60.
- 2000: The visible and the invisible (seventh edition; translated by A. Lingis; edited by C. Lefort). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
61.
Mountcastle, V.B.2005: The sensory hand: neural mechanisms of somatic sensation . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Muecke, S.2002: The fall: fictocritical writing. Parallax8(4), 108-12.
63.
Obrador-Pons, P.2007: A haptic geography of the beach: naked bodies, vision and touch. Social and Cultural Geography81, 123-41.
64.
Paterson, M.2005a: Affecting touch: towards a felt phenomenology of therapeutic touch. In Davidson, J., Bondi, L. and Smith, M., editors, Emotional geographies, Aldershot: Ashgate, 161-76.
65.
- 2005b: Consumption and everyday life. London : Routledge.
66.
- 2006a: Feel the presence: technologies of touch and distance . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space245, 691-708.
67.
Paterson, M.2006b: ‘Seeing with the hands’: blindness, touch and the Enlightenment spatial imaginary. British Journal of Visual Impairment242, 52-60.
68.
- 2006c: Seeing with the hands, touching with the eyes: vision, touch and the Enlightenment spatial imaginary. The Senses and Society12, 224-42.
69.
Paterson, M.2007: The senses of touch: haptics, affects and technologies . Oxford: Berg.
70.
- 2008: Digital craft, digital touch: haptics and design. In Hawk, B., Rieder, D. and Oviedo, O., editors, Small tech: the culture of digital tools, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
71.
- 2009: Remediating touch. Editorial in special issue ‘Re-mediating touch’. The Senses and Society2(3), in press.
72.
Pocock, D.1993: The senses in focus. Area25, 11-16.
73.
Porteous, J.D.1985: Smellscape. Progress in Human Geography93, 356-78.
74.
- 1986: Intimate Sensing. Area183, 250-51.
75.
Radley, A.1995: The elusory body and social constructionist theory. Body and Society1(2), 3-23.
76.
Ram, K.2005: Phantom limbs: South Indian dance and immigrant reifications of the female body. Journal of Intercultural Studies261-2, 121-37.
77.
Reed, E.S. and Jones, R.K.1979: James Gibson’s ecological revolution in psychology . Philosophy of the Social Sciences92, 189-204.
78.
Revill, G.1998: Samuel Coleridge-Taylor’s geography of disappointment: hybridity, identity and networks of musical meaning. In Leyshon, A., Matless, D. and Revill, G., editors, The place of music, London: Routledge , 197-221.
79.
- 2005: Vernacular culture and the place of folk music. Social and Cultural Geography6, 693-706.
80.
Rodaway, P.1994: Sensuous geographies: body, sense and place. London: Routledge.
81.
Roe, E.J.2006: Things becoming food and the embodied, material practices of an organic food consumer. Sociologia Ruralis462, 104-21.
82.
Rowles, G.D.1978: Reflections on experiential fieldwork. In Ley, D. and Samuels, M., editors, Humanistic geography: prospects and problemsi , New York: Wiley, 173-93.
83.
- 1980: Toward a geography of growing old. In Buttimer, A. and Seamon, D., editors, The human experience of space and place, London: Croom Helm, 55-72.
84.
Scarry, E.1985: The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
85.
Seremetakis, N.1994: The senses still: perception and memory as material culture in modernity. Oxford: Westview Press .
86.
Serres, M. and Latour, B.1995: Conversations on science, culture and time (translated by R. Lapilus). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
87.
Sherrington, C.1947: The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
88.
Smith, S.1994: Soundscape. Area26, 232-40.
89.
Smith, S.2000: Performing the soundworld. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18, 615-37.
90.
Stoller, P.1989: The taste of ethnographic things: the senses in anthropology . Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
91.
- 1997: Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia , PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
92.
Stoller, P.2004: Sensuous ethnography, African persuasions, and social knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry106,817-35.
93.
Straus, E.W.1966: Phenomenological psychology: the selected papers of Erwin W. Straus (translated by Erling Eng). London: Tavistock.
94.
Thrift, N.1997: The still point: resistance, embodiment and dance. In Pile, S. and Keith, M., editors, Geographies of resistance, London: Routledge, 134-152.
95.
- 2000: Afterword. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18, 213-255.
96.
- 2004: Movement-space: the changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness. Economy and Society334, 582-604.
Tuan, Y.-F.1974: Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
99.
- 1977: Space and place: the perspective of experience. London: Edward Arnold.
100.
van den Berg, J.H.1952: The human body and the significance of human movement: A phenomenological study. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research132, 159-83.
101.
Wylie, J.2002: An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum33, 441-54.
102.
- 2005: A single day’s walking: narrating self and landscape on the South West Coast Path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS30, 234-47.
103.
Yusoff, K.2007: Antarctic exposure: archives of the feeling body. Cultural Geographies14, 211-33.
