This essay explores the ways in which concepts of `scale' are deployed in political ecology to explain the outcomes of ecological and social change. It argues that political ecologists need to pay closer attention to how scale is produced and used to interpret the experience of spatiotemporal difference and change so as to make ecology the object of politics, policy-making and political action. It outlines an alternative approach that focuses on how three moments of action — operation, observation, and interpretation — work together to produce scale as a configuration and range of values that articulate differential sensibilities and political differences regarding changes to socialized landscapes. The essay uses examples from studies of plant movements to illustrate how scope and scale combine to `enframe' and interpret ecological and related social change as `disruption' to places, regional `transformation', or as regionalized `evolution'.
Awanyo, L.2001: Labour, ecology and a failed agenda of market incentives: the political ecology of agrarian reforms in Ghana. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91, 92-121.
2.
Bailey, F.G.1983: The tactical uses of passion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
Barthes, R.1972: Mythologies. New York: Noonday Press.
4.
Beinart, W. and Middleton, K.2004: Plant transfers in historical perspective: a review article . Environment and History10, 3-29.
5.
Blaikie, P. and Brookfield, H.1987: Land degradation and society. London : Methuen.
6.
Braudel, F.1972: The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II. London: Harper Collins .
7.
- 1981: The structures of everyday life: civilization and capitalism 15th to 18th century. New York: Collins.
8.
Brenner, N.2001: The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography25, 591-614.
9.
Brockway, L.1979: Science and colonial expansion: the role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens (reprinted 2002). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Browne, J.1996: Biogeography and empire. In Jardine, N., Secord, J. and Spary, E., editors, Cultures of natural history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305-21.
11.
Bryant, R. and Bailey, S.1997: Third world political ecology. London : Routledge.
12.
Callon, M.1986: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J., editor, Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 196-233.
13.
Cappuccino, N. and Arnason, J.2006: Novel chemistry of invasive exotic plants. Biology Letters2, 189-93.
14.
Carney, J.2001: Black rice: the African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Collinge, C.2006: Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: a response to Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS31, 244-51.
16.
Cronk, Q. and Fuller, J.1995: Plant invaders. London: Chapman and Hall.
17.
Cronon, W.1992: Nature, history, narrative: a place for stories . The Journal of American History78, 1347-76.
18.
Crosby, A.1972: The Columbian exchange: biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
19.
- 1986 : Ecological imperialism: the biological expansion of Europe, 900-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Delaney, D. and Leitner, H.1997: The political construction of scale. Political Geography16, 93-97.
21.
Drayton, R.2000: Nature's government: science, imperial Britain, and the `improvement' of the world. London: Yale University Press.
22.
Elden, S., Lebas, E. and Kofman, E., editors 2003: Henri Lefebvre: key writings. London : Continuum.
23.
Forsyth, T.2003: Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.
24.
Foucault, M.1980: Questions on geography. In Gordon, C., editor, Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, Michel Foucault, New York : Pantheon Books, 63-77.
25.
Freidberg, S.2001: To garden, to market: gendered meanings of work on an African urban periphery. Gender, Place and Culture8, 5-24.
26.
- 2004: French beans and food scares: culture and commerce in an anxious age. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Geertz, C.1973: The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Gezon, L.2005: Finding the global in the local: local struggles in northern Madagascar. In Paulson, S. and Gezon, L., editors, Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 135-53.
29.
Gilroy, P.1993: The black Atlantic: modernity and double consciousness . London: Verso.
30.
Gould, S.J.1989: Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history . New York: Norton.
31.
- 1997: An evolutionary perspective on strengths, fallacies, and confusions in the concept of native plants. In Wolschke-Buhlman, J., editor, Nature and ideology: natural garden design in the twentieth century, Washington, DC : Dumbarton Oaks, 11-20.
32.
Grove, R.1995: Green imperialism: colonial expansion, tropical island Edens and the origins of environmentalism 1600-1860. Delhi : Oxford University Press.
33.
Hajer, M.1995: The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford: Clarendon.
34.
Hardin, G.1968: The tragedy of the commons. Science164, 1243-48.
35.
Harlan, J.1992: Crops and man (second edition). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
36.
Hecht, S. and Cockburn, A.1989: The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. London: Verso.
37.
Henderson, S., Dawson, T. and Whittaker, R.2006: Progress in invasive plants research. Progress in Physical Geography30, 25-46.
38.
Herod, A. and Wright, M., editors 2002: Geographies of power: placing scale. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39.
Howitt, R.1998: Scale as relation: musical metaphors of geographical scale . Area30, 49-58.
40.
- 2002: Scale and the other: Levinas and geography. Geoforum33, 299-313.
41.
Jonas, A.1994: Editorial: the scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12, 257-64.
42.
Kull, C. and Rangan, H.2008: Acacia exchanges: wattles, thorn trees, and the study of plant movements. Geoforum, in press.
43.
Lam, N.2004: Fractals and scale in environmental assessment and monitoring . In Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R., editors, Scale and geographic enquiry: nature, society, and method, Oxford : Blackwell, 23-40.
44.
Latour, B.1987: Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
- 1993: We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.1986: Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts (second edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
Lebel, L., Garden, P. and Imamura, M.2005: The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong Region. Ecology and Society10(2), article 18.
48.
Lefebvre, H.1991: The production of space. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
49.
Leitner, H.2004: The politics of scale and networks of spatial connectivity: transnational interurban networks and the rescaling of political governance in Europe. In Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R., editors, Scale and geographic enquiry: nature, society, and method, Oxford: Blackwell, 236-55.
50.
Marston, S.2000: The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography24, 219-42.
51.
Marston, S. and Smith, N.2001: States, scale and households: limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography25, 615-19.
52.
Marston, S., Jones, J.P. and Woodward, K.2005: Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS30, 416-32.
53.
Massey, D.2005: For space. London: Sage.
54.
McCarthy, J.2005a: Guest editorial. Environment and Planning A37, 953-58.
55.
- 2005b: Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance . Antipode37, 731-53.
56.
Mintz, S.1985: Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history . New York: Penguin Books .
57.
Neumann, R.2005: Making political ecology. New York : Hodder Arnold.
58.
Paasi, A.2004: Place and region: looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography28, 536-46.
59.
Parry, B.2000: The fate of collections: social justice and the annexation of plant genetic resources. In Zerner, C. , editor, People, plants, and justice: the politics of nature conservation, New York: Columbia University Press, 374-402.
60.
- 2004 : Trading the genome: investigating the commodification of bio-information . New York: Columbia University Press.
61.
Paulson, S. and Gezon, L., editors 2005: Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
62.
Paulson, S., Gezon, L. and Watts, M.2005: Politics, ecologies, genealogies. In Paulson, S. and Gezon, L., editors, Political ecology across spaces, scales, and social groups, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 17-40.
63.
Peet, R. and Watts, M., editors 1996: Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements. London: Routledge.
64.
Peterson, G.2000: Political ecology and ecological resilience: an integration of human and ecological dynamics. Ecological Economics35, 323-36.
65.
Phillips, J.2004: Independence, contingency, and scale linkage in physical geography. In Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R., editors, Scale and geographic enquiry: nature, society, and method, Oxford : Blackwell, 86-100.
66.
Richardson, D. and Pyšek, P.2006: Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography30, 409-31.
67.
Ridley, H.1930: The dispersal of plants throughout the world. Ashford: Reeve.
68.
Robbins, P.2001: Tracking invasive covers in India, or, why our landscapes have never been modern. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91, 637-59.
69.
- 2002: Obstacles to a First World political ecology? Looking near without looking up. Environment and Planning A34, 1509-13.
70.
- 2004a: Comparing invasive networks: cultural and political biographies of invasive species. The Geographical Review94, 139-56.
71.
- 2004b: Political ecology. Oxford: Blackwell.
72.
Rocheleau, D. and Ross, L.1995: Trees as tools, trees as text: struggles over resources in Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic. Antipode27, 407-25.
73.
Sauer, C.1969: Agricultural origins and dispersals (second edition) . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74.
Sayre, N.2005: Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Progress in Human Geography29, 276-90.
75.
Schroeder, R.1999: Shady practices: agroforestry and gender politics in the Gambia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
76.
- 2005: Debating the place of political ecology in the First World . Environment and Planning A37, 1045-48.
77.
Schroeder, R. and Suryanata, K.2004: Gender and class power in agroforestry systems: case studies from Indonesia and West Africa. In Peet, R. and Watts, M. editors, Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements (second edition) , London: Routledge, 299-315.
78.
Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R., editors 2004: Scale and geographic enquiry: nature, society, and method. Oxford: Blackwell.
79.
Smith, N.1984: Uneven development: nature, capital and the production of space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
80.
Soja, E.1996: Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.
81.
Strauss, S., Lau, J. and Carroll, S.2006: Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecology Letters9, 357-74.
82.
Swyngedouw, E.1997: Neither global nor local: `glocalization' and the politics of scale. In Cox, K., editor, Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local , New York: Guilford, 137-66.
83.
- 2004: Scaled geographies: nature, place, and the politics of scale. In Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R., editors, Scale and geographic enquiry: nature, society, and method, Oxford: Blackwell, 129-53.
84.
Taylor, P.1984: Introduction: geographical scale and political geography . In Taylor, P. and House, J., editors, Political geography: recent advances and future directions, London: Croom Helm, 1-7.
85.
- 2004: Is there a Europe of cities? World cities and the limitations of geographical scale analyses. In Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R., editors, Scale and geographic enquiry: nature, society, and method, Oxford: Blackwell, 213-35.
86.
Turner, M.D.2003: Environmental science and social causation in the analysis of Sahelian pastoralism. In Zimmerer, K. and Bassett, T., editors, Political ecology: an integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies, New York: Guilford, 159-80.
87.
Turner, M.G., O'Neill, R., Gardner, R. and Milne, B.1989: Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology3, 153-62.
88.
Tyrrell, I.1999: True gardens of the gods: Californian-Australian environmental reform, 1860-1930. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
89.
Vayda, A.1983: Progressive contextualization: methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology11, 265-81.
90.
Wainwright, J.2005: The geographies of political ecology after Edward Said . Environment and Planning A37, 1033-43.
91.
Walker, P.2005: Political ecology: where is the ecology? Progress in Human Geography29, 73-82.
92.
Zimmerer, K. and Bassett, T., editors 2003: Political ecology: an integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. New York: Guilford.
