This paper examines the recent attempts to develop geographies of science both within, and beyond, the discipline of geography. Such efforts have been most successful in work by historical geographers and historians of geography. Investigating the `geographical turn' evident across science studies more widely, this paper considers a broad range of engagements with spatiality by historians, sociologists, anthropologists and posthumanist practice theorists. In doing so, the paper thus argues that different geographies of science are emerging. Indeed, bringing together variegated conceptions of the spatiality of scientific activity will allow for wider audiences for geographies of science, inspire further investigation of the geographical sciences, and provide resources for debates regarding disciplinary histories and futures.
Anderson, W.2002: Postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science32, 643—58.
2.
Barnes, T.J.1996: Logics of dislocation: models, metaphors, and meanings of economic space. New York: Guilford Press.
3.
— 2001: `In the beginning was economic geography' — a science studies approach to disciplinary history. Progress in Human Geography25, 521-44.
4.
— 2003: The place of locational analysis: a selective and interpretive history. Progress in Human Geography27, 69—95.
5.
Barnett, C.1995: Awakening the dead: who needs the history of geography?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS20, 417—19.
6.
— 1998: Impure and worldly geography: the Africanist discourse of the Royal Geographical Society, 1831—73. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS23,239-51.
7.
Barry, A.1993: The history of measurement and the engineers of space . British Journal for the History of Science26, 459—68.
8.
Berlin, I.1960: The concept of scientific history. History and Theory1, 1—31.
9.
Bhabha, H.K.1994: The location of culture. London: Routledge.
10.
Bijker, W.E.2003: The need for public intellectuals: a space for STS. Science, Technology, and Human Values28,443-50.
11.
Bingham, N. and Thrift, N.2000: Some new instructions for travellers: the geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres. In Crang, M. and Thrift, N., editors, Thinking space, London: Routledge , 281—301.
12.
Bloor D.1991: Knowledge and social imagery (second edition; first published in 1976). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
— 1999: Anti-Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science30, 81—112.
14.
Boas, F.1887: The study of geography. Science9, 137—41.
15.
Bourdieu, P.2004: Science of science and reflexivity (first published in France in 2001 as Science de la science et réflexivité; translated by R. Nice)Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Bourguet, M.-N., Licoppe, C. and Sibum, H.O.2002: Introduction. In Bourguet, M.-N., Licoppe, C. and Sibum, H.O., editors, Instruments, travel and science: itineraries of precision from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, London: Routledge, 1—19.
17.
Bravo, M.T.1996: The accuracy of ethnoscience: a study of Inuit cartography and cross-cultural commensurability. Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology no.2Manchester: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Manchester.
18.
— 1999: Ethnographic navigation and the geographical gift. In Livingstone, D.N. and Withers, C.W.J., editors, Geography and enlightenment, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 199—235.
19.
Bravo, M. and Sörlin, S.2002: Narrative and practice — an introduction. In Bravo, M and Sörlin, S., editors, Narrating the Arctic: a cultural history of Nordic scientific practices, Canton, MA: Science History Publications/USA, 3—32.
20.
Burawoy, M.2005: For public sociology. American Sociological Review70, 4—28.
21.
Burke, P.2000: A social histor y of knowledge: from Gutenberg to Diderot . Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
Castree, N.2002: False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks. Antipode34, 111—46.
23.
— 2004: Differential geographies: place, indigenous rights and `local' resources. Political Geography23, 133—67.
24.
— 2006: Geography's new public intellectuals?Antipode38, 396—412.
25.
Chambers, D.W. and Gillespie, R.2001: Locality in the history of science: colonial science, technoscience and indigenous knowledge. In MacLeod, R., editors, Nature and empire: science and the colonial enterprise, Osiris 2nd series 15, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 221—40.
26.
Clark, W., Golinski, J., and Schaffer, S.1999a: Introduction. In Clark, W., Golinski, J. and Schaffer, S., editors, The sciences in Enlightened Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3—31.
27.
— 1999b: Preface. In Clark, W. , Golinski, J. and Schaffer, S., editors, The sciences in Enlightened Europe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ix—xi.
28.
Collins, H.1992: Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice (second edition; first published in 1985). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Collins, H.M. and Evans, R.2002: The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science32, 235—96.
30.
— 2003: King Canute meets the beach boys: responses to the third wave. Social Studies of Science33, 435—52.
31.
Cook, I.2004: Follow the thing: papaya. Antipode36, 642—64.
32.
Crang, M.1998: Places of practice, and the practice of science. Environment and Planning A30, 1971—74.
33.
Daston, L.2001: Language of power. London Review of Books 1 November, 3, 6.
34.
Dear, P.1985: Toitus in verba: rhetoric and authority in the early Royal Society. Isis76, 145—61.
35.
— 1995: Trust Boyle. British Journal for the History of Science28, 451—54.
36.
Descola, P.1996: Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice . In Descola, P. and Pálsson, G., editors, Nature and society: anthropological perspectives, London: Routledge, 82—102.
37.
— 2005: Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Bibliothèque des Sciences humaines, Éditions Gallimard.
38.
Doing, P.2004: `Lab Hands' and the Scarlet O': epistemic politics and (scientific) labor. Social Studies of Science34, 299—323.
39.
Driver, F.1994a: Making space. Ecumene1, 386—90.
40.
— 1994b: New perspectives on the history and philosophy of geography . Progress in Human Geography18, 92—100.
41.
— 1995a: Geographical traditions: rethinking the history of geography . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS20, 403—404.
42.
— 1995b: Sub-merged identities: familiar and unfamiliar histories . Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS20, 410—13.
43.
— 1996: Histories of the present? The history and philosophy of geography, part III. Progress of Human Geography20, 100—109.
44.
— 2000: Editorial: Field-work in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS25, 267—68.
45.
— 2001: Geography militant: cultures of exploration and empire . Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
Eddy, M.D.2004: Fallible or inerrant? A belated review of the `constructivist's bible'. British Journal for the History of Science37, 93—98.
47.
Fairhead, J. and Leach, M.2003: Science, society and power: environmental knowledge and policy in West Africa and the Caribbean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Finnegan, D.2004: The work of ice: glacial theory and scientific culture in early Victorian Edinburgh. British Journal for the History of Science37, 29—52.
49.
— 2005: Natural history societies in late Victorian Scotland and the pursuit of local civic science. British Journal for the History of Science38, 53—72.
50.
Forgan, S.1998: `But indifferently lodged ...': Perception and place in building for science in Victorian London. In Smith, C. and Agar, J., editors, Making space for science: territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 195—215.
51.
Franklin, S.1995: Science as culture, cultures of science. Annual Review of Anthropology24, 163—84.
52.
Fuller, S.2006: The philosophy of science and technology studies. London: Routledge.
53.
Galison, P.1985: Bubble chambers and the experimental workplace. In Achinstein, P. and Hannaway, O., editors, Observation, experiment and hypothesis in modern physical science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 309—73.
54.
— 1999: Buildings and the subject of science. In Galison, P. and Thompson, E., editors, The architecture of science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1—25.
55.
Garfinkel, H.1967: Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56.
Gieryn, T.F.1983: Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48, 781—95.
57.
— 1998: Biotechnology's private parts (and some public ones). In Smith, C. and Agar, J., editors, Making space for science: territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 281—312.
58.
— 1999a: Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
— 1999b: Two faces on science: building identities for molecular biology and biotechnology. In Galison, P. and Thompson, E., editors, The architecture of science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 423—55.
60.
— 2000: A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology26, 463—96.
61.
— 2002: Three truth-spots. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences38, 113—32.
62.
Golinski, J.2005: Making natural knowledge: constructivism and the history of science (second edition; first published in 1998). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63.
Gorman, M.E.2002: Levels of expertise and trading zones: a framework for multidisciplinary collaboration. Social Studies of Science32, 933—38.
64.
Granovetter, M.1973: The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology76, 1360—80.
65.
Gregory, D.1995: A geographical unconscious: spaces for dialogue and difference . Annals of the Association of American Geographers85, 175—86.
66.
— 1998: Explorations in critical human geography. Hettner-Lectures1 (1997). Heidelberg: Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
67.
— 2000: Cultures of travel and spatial formations of knowledge . Erdkunde54, 297—319.
68.
Gusterson, H.1996: Nuclear rites: a weapons laboratory at the end of the cold war. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
69.
Hannaway, O.1986: Laboratory design and the aim of science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe. Isis77,585-610.
— 1998b: Long-distance corporations, big sciences, and the geography of knowledge. Configurations6, 269—304.
72.
Heffernan, M.1996: Geography, cartography and military intelligence: the Royal Geographical Society and the First World War. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS21, 504—33.
73.
— 2001: `A dream as frail as those of ancient Time': the incredible geographies of Timbuctoo. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19, 203—25.
74.
Hess, D.J.1997: Science studies: an advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
75.
Hetherington, K. and Law, J.2000: After networks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18, 127—32.
76.
Hillier, B. and Penn, A.1991: Visible colleges: structure and randomness in the place of discovery. Science in Context4, 23—49.
77.
Hinchliffe, S.2001: Indeterminacy in-decisions — science, policy and politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS26, 182—204.
78.
Jasanoff, S.2000: Reconstructing the past, constructing the present: can science studies and the history of science live happily ever after?Social Studies of Science30, 621—31.
79.
— 2003: Breaking the waves in science studies: comment on H.M. Collins and Robert Evans, `The third wave of science studies'. Social Studies of Science33, 389—400.
80.
Keylock, C.2003: Mark Melton's geomorphology and geography's quantitative revolution. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS28, 142—57.
81.
Kirsch, S. and Mitchell, D.2004: The nature of things: dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism. Antipode36, 687—705.
82.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1983: New developments in science studies: the ethnographic challenge. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 8, 153—77.
83.
— 1992: The couch, the cathedral, and the laboratory: on the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science. In Pickering, A., editor, Science as practice and culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 113—38.
84.
— 1995: Laboratory studies: the cultural approach to the study of science. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. and Pinch, T., editors, Handbook of science and technology studies, London: Sage, 140—66.
85.
— 1999: Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
Knorr-Cetina, K. and Bruegger, U.2000: The market as an object of attachment: exploring postsocial relations in financial markets. Canadian Journal of Sociology /Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 25, 141—68.
87.
Kohler, R.E.1999: The constructivists' tool kit. Isis90, 329—31.
88.
— 2002a: Labscapes: naturalizing the lab. History of Science40, 473—501.
89.
— 2002b: Landscapes and labscapes: exploring the lab-field border in biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90.
— 2002c: Place and practice in field biology. History of Science40, 189—210.
91.
Kortelainen, J.1999: The river as an actor-network: the Finnish forest industry utilization of lake and river systems. Geoforum30, 235—47.
92.
Kuhn, T.S.1996: The structure of scientific revolutions (third edition; first published in 1962). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
93.
Kusch, M.1999: Philosophy and the sociology of knowledge. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science30,651-85.
94.
— 2001: `A general theory of societal knowledge'? Aspirations and shortcomings of Alvin Goldman's social epistemology. Studies in the Histor y and Philosophy of Science32, 183—92.
95.
— 2002: Testimony in communitarian epistemology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science33, 335—54.
96.
Kusch, M. and Lipton, P.2002: Testimony: a primer. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science33, 209—17.
97.
Labinger, J. and Collins, H.2001: Introduction. In Labinger, J. and Collins, H., editors, The one culture? A conversation about science, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1—10.
98.
Latour, B.1983: Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In Knorr-Cetina, K.D. and Mulkay, M., editors, Science observed: perspectives on the social study of science, London: Sage, 141—70.
99.
— 1987: Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100.
— 1999a: For David Bloor ... and beyond: a reply to David Bloor's `Anti Latour'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science30, 113—29.
101.
— 1999b: On recalling ANT. In Law, J. and Hassard, J., editors, Actor network theor y and after, Oxford: Blackwell, 15—25.
102.
— 1999c: Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103.
— 2004: How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society10, 205—29.
104.
— 2005: Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
105.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S.1986: Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts (second edition; first published in 1979). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
106.
Laurier, E.2001: Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19, 485—504.
107.
— 2003: Guest editorial: technology and mobility. Environment and Planning A35, 1521—27.
108.
Laurier, E. and Philo, C.1999: X-morphizing: review essay of Bruno Latour's Aramis, or the love of technologyEnvironment and Planning A31, 1047—71.
109.
— 2003: The region in the boot: lone subjects and multiple objects . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21, 85—106.
110.
— 2004: Ethnoarchaeology and undefined investigations. Environment and Planning A36, 421—36.
— 1999: After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. and Hassard, J., editors, Actor network theory and after, Oxford : Blackwell, 1—14.
113.
— 2000: Transitivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18, 133—48.
114.
— 2002a: Aircraft stories: decentering the object in technoscience . Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
115.
— 2002b: Objects and spaces. Theor y, Culture and Society19(5/6), 91—105.
116.
— 2004: After method: mess in social science in research. London: Routledge.
117.
Law, J. and Mol, A.2001: Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19, 609—21.
118.
Lipton, P.1998: The epistemology of testimony. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science29, 1—31.
119.
Livingstone, D.N.1979: Some methodological problems in the history of geographical thought. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie70, 226—31.
120.
— 1984: The history of science and the history of geography: interactions and implications. Histor y of Science22, 271—302.
121.
— 1994: Science and religion: foreword to the historical geography of an encounter. Journal of Historical Geography20, 367—83.
122.
— 1995: The spaces of knowledge: contributions towards a historical geography of science. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13, 5—34.
123.
— 1996: A response to Camerini and Heffernan. Ecumene3, 358—60.
124.
— 2000a: Making space for science. Erdkunde54, 285—96.
125.
— 2000b: Putting geography in its place. Australian Geographical Studies38, 1—9.
126.
— 2002: Science, space and hermeneutics. Hettner-Lectures 5 (2001) . Heidelberg: Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
127.
— 2003: Putting science in its place: geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
128.
— 2005: Text, talk and testimony: geographical reflections on scientific habits: an afterword. British Journal for the History of Science38, 93—100.
129.
Lorimer, H.2003a: The geographical field course as active archive. Cultural Geographies10, 278—308.
130.
— 2003b: Telling small stories: spaces of knowledge and the practice of geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS28, 197—217.
131.
— 2005: Cultural geography: the busyness of being `more-than-representational' . Progress in Human Geography29, 83—94.
132.
Lorimer, H. and Spedding, N.2002a: Editorial: putting philosophies of geography into practice . Area34, 227—28.
— 2005: Locating field science: a geographical family expedition to Glen Roy, Scotland. British Journal for the History of Science38, 13—33.
135.
Lux, D.S. and Cook, H.J.1998: Closed circles or open networks?: Communicating at a distance during the scientific revolution. History ofScience36, 179—211.
136.
Lynch, M.1991: Laboratory space and the technological complex: an investigation of topical con-textures. Science in Context4, 51—78.
137.
— 1993: Scientific practice and ordinary action: ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138.
— 1995: Building a global infrastructure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science26, 167—72.
139.
— 1999: Archives in formation: privileged spaces, popular archives and paper trails. Histor y of the Human Sciences12, 65—87.
140.
— 2001: Ethnomethodology and the logic of practice. In Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E., editors, The practice turn in contemporary theory, London: Routledge, 131—48.
141.
Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S.1990: Introduction: sociological orientations to representational practice in science. In Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S., editors, Representation in scientific practice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1—18.
142.
MacLeod, R.2001: Introduction. In MacLeod, R., editor, Nature and empire: science and the colonial enterprise, Osiris 2nd series 15, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1—13.
143.
Massey, D.1999: Power-geometries and the politics of space-time. Hettner-Lectures 2 (1998). Heidelberg: Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
144.
— 2004: Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler86B, 5—18.
145.
Matless, D.1995: Effects of history. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS20, 405—409. — 2003: Original theories: science and the currency of the local . Cultural Geographies10, 354—78.
146.
McDowell, L.1997: Capital culture: gender at work in the city. Oxford: Blackwell.
147.
Mol, A.2002: The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
148.
Murdoch, J.1997: Inhuman/nonhuman/human: actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15, 731—56.
149.
— 1998: The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum29, 357—74.
150.
Murphy, A., de Blij, H.J., Turner II, B.L., Gilmore, R.W. and Gregory, D.2005: Forum: the role of geography in public debate. Progress in Human Geography29, 165—93.
151.
Nader, L.1969: Up the anthropologist — perspectives gained from studying up. In Hymes, D., editor, Reinventing anthropology, New York: Pantheon Books, 284—311.
152.
— 1996: Introduction: anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge. In Nader, L., editor, Naked science: anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge, London: Routledge , 1—25.
153.
Naylor, S.2002: The field, the museum and the lecture hall: the spaces of natural history in Victorian Cornwall. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS27, 494—513.
154.
— 2005a: Historical geography: knowledge, in place and on the move. Progress in Human Geography29, 626—34.
155.
— 2005b: Introduction: historical geographies of science — places, contexts, cartographies. British Journal for the History of Science38, 1—12.
156.
Nothnagel, D.1996: The reproduction of nature in contemporary high-energy physics. In Descola, P and Pálsson, G., editors, Nature and society: anthropological perspectives, London: Routledge , 256—74.
157.
Ophir, A. and Shapin, S.1991: The place of knowledge: a methodological survey. Science in Context4, 3—21.
158.
Philip, K.1998: English mud: toward a critical cultural studies of colonial science. Cultural Studies12, 300—31.
159.
Philo, C. and Wilbert, C.2000: Animal spaces, beastly places: an introduction. In Philo, C. and Wilbert, C., editors, Animal spaces, beastly places: new geographies of human-animal relations, London: Routledge, 1—34.
160.
Pickering, A.1992: From science as knowledge to science as practice. In Pickering, A., editor, Science as practice and culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-26.
161.
— 1995: The mangle of practice: time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
162.
— 2001: Practice and posthumanism: social theory and a history of agency. In Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E., editors, The practice turn in contemporary theory, London: Routledge, 163—74.
163.
Plantinga, A.1993: Warrant and proper function. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
164.
Powell, R.C.2002: The Sirens' voices? Field practices and dialogue in geography . Area34, 261—72. — 2007: `The rigours of an arctic experiment': the precarious authority of field practices in the Canadian High Arctic, 1958—1970 . Environment and Planning A39, in press.
165.
Powell, R.C. and Vasudevan, A.2007: Geographies of experiment. Environment and Planning A39, in press.
166.
Pyenson, L.2002: An end to national science: the meaning and the extension of local knowledge. History of Science40, 251—90.
167.
Raj, K.2002: When human travellers become instruments. The Indo-British exploration of Central Asia in the nineteenth century. In Bourguet, M.-N., Licoppe, C. and Sibum, H.O., editors, Instruments, travel and science: itineraries of precision from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, London: Routledge, 156—88.
168.
Rentetzi, M.2005: Designing (for) a new scientific discipline: the location and architecture of the Institut für Radiumforschung in early twentieth-century Vienna. British Journal for the History of Science38, 275—306.
169.
Rip, A.2003: Constructing expertise: in a third wave of science studies?Social Studies of Science33, 419—34.
170.
Rupke, N.2002: The Göttingen location. In Rupke, N.A., editor, Göttingen and the development of the natural sciences, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 19—32.
171.
Schaffer, S.1991a: The eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science22,174-92.
172.
— 1991b: The history and geography of the intellectual world: Whewell's politics of language. In Fisch, M. and Schaffer, S., editors, William Whewell: a composite portrait, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 201—31.
173.
— 1998: Physics laboratories and the Victorian country house. In Smith, C. and Agar, J., editors, Making space for science: territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 149—80.
174.
— 2002: Golden means: assay instruments and the geography of precision in the Guinea trade. In Bourguet, M.-N., Licoppe, C. and Sibum, H.O. , editors, Instruments, travel and science: itineraries of precision from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, London: Routledge, 20—50.
175.
Schatzki, T.R.2001: Introduction: practice theory. In Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E., editors, The practice turn in contemporary theory, London: Routledge, 1—14.
176.
Secord, J.A.2004: Knowledge in transit. Isis95, 654—72.
177.
Senker, P.2003: Editorial (Special section: science, technology, and inequality) . Science, Technology, and Human Values28, 5—14.
178.
Shapin, S.1984: Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle's literary technology . Social Studies of Science14, 481—520.
179.
— 1988: The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England . Isis79, 373—404.
180.
— 1991: `The mind is its own place': science and solitude in seventeenth-century England. Science in Context4, 191—218.
181.
— 1994: A social history of truth: civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
182.
— 1995a: Cordelia's love: credibility and the social studies of science. Perspectives on Science3, 255—75.
183.
— 1995b: Here and everywhere: sociology of scientific knowledge . Annual Review of Sociology21, 289—321.
184.
— 1998: Placing the view from nowhere: historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS23, 5—12.
185.
— 1999: Rarely pure and never simple: talking about truth. Configurations7, 1—14.
186.
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S.1985: Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
187.
Simonsen, K.1996: What kind of space in what kind of social theory?Progress in Human Geography20, 494—512.
188.
Smith, C. and Agar, J.1998: Introduction: making space for science. In Smith, C. and Agar, J., editors, Making space for science: territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge, Basingstoke: Macmillan , 1—23.
189.
Smith, N.1992: History and philosophy of geography: real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography16, 257—71.
190.
Soja, E.W.1996: Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.
191.
Strathern, M.1996: Cutting the network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute NS2, 517—35.
192.
Thrift, N.2000: Performing cultures in the new economy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers90, 674—92.
193.
Thrift, N. and Olds, K.1996: Refiguring the economic in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography20,311-37.
194.
Thrift, N., Driver, F. and Livingstone, D.1995: The geography of truth. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13, 1—3.
195.
Traweek, S.1988: Beamtimes and lifetimes: the world of high energy physicists . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
196.
— 1992: Border crossings: narrative strategies in science studies and among physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan. In Pickering, A., editor, Science as practice and culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 429—65.
197.
— 1996: Kokusaika, Gaiatsu, and Bachigai: Japanese physicists' strategies for moving into the international political economy of science . In Nader, L., editor, Naked science: anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge , London: Routledge, 174—97.
198.
Turnbull, D.1997: Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions . Futures29, 551—62.
199.
— 2000: Masons, tricksters and cartographers: comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
200.
— 2002: Travelling knowledge: narratives, assemblage and encounters . In Bourguet, M.-N., Licoppe, C. and Sibum, H.O. , editors, Instruments, travel and science: itineraries of precision from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, London: Routledge, 273—94.
201.
Vasudevan, A.2007: Symptomatic acts, experimental embodiments: theatres of scientific protest in interwar Germany. Environment and PlanningA39, in press.
202.
Verran, H.2002: A postcolonial moment in science studies: alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and aboriginal landowners. Social Studies of Science32, 729—62.
203.
Watson-Verran, H. and Turnbull, D.1995: Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. and Pinch, T., editors, Handbook of science and technology studies, London: Sage, 115—39.
204.
Whatmore, S.1999a: Editorial: Geography's place in the life-science era ? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS24, 259—60.
205.
— 1999b: Hybrid geographies: rethinking the `human' in human geography . In Massey, D., Allen, J. and Sarre, P., editors, Human geography today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 22—39.
— 2003: From Banana wars to Black Sigatoka. Another case for a more-than-human geography. Geoforum34, 139.
208.
Withers, C.W.J.1999a: Reporting, mapping, trusting: making geographical knowledge in the late seventeenth century. Isis90, 497—521.
209.
— 1999b: Towards a history of geography in the public sphere. History of Science37, 45—78.
210.
— 2001: Geography, science and national identity: Scotland since 1520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
211.
— 2002: The geography of scientific knowledge. In Rupke, N.A., editor, Göttingen and the development of the natural sciences, Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 9—18.
212.
— 2005: History and philosophy of geography 2002-2003: geography in its place. Progress in Human Geography29, 64—72.
213.
Withers, C.W.J. and Mayhew, R.J.2002: Rethinking `disciplinary' history: geography in British universities, c.1580—1887. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS27, 11—29.
214.
Woodhouse, E., Hess, D., Breyman, S. and Martin, B.2002: Science studies and activism: possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas. Social Studies of Science32, 297—319.
215.
Wynne, B.2003: Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: response to Collins and Evans (2002). Social Studies of Science33, 401—17.
