Ahas, R. and Mark, U.2005: Location based services -new challenges for planning and public administration?Futures37, 547-561 .
2.
Albrecht, K. and McIntyre, L.2005: Spychips: how major corporations and government plan to track your every move with RFID. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson .
3.
Armstrong, M. P. and Ruggles, A. J.2005: Geographic information technologies and personal privacy . Cartographica40(4), 63-73 .
4.
Chrisman, N.2002: Exploring geographic information systems. New York: Wiley .
5.
Chrisman, N.2005: Full circle: more than just social implications of GIS . Cartographica40(4), 23-35 .
6.
Corbett, J. M. and Keller, C. P.2005: An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS) . Cartographica40(4), 91-102 .
7.
Craig, W. J. , Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. , editors 2002: Community participation and geographic information systems. London and New York: Taylor and Francis .
8.
Crampton, J.1995: The ethics of GIS . Cartography and geographic information systems22, 84-89 .
9.
Crampton, J.2002: Guest editorial: The risks of security . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20, 631-635 .
10.
Crampton, J.2006: Mapping: a critical introduction to GIS and cartography. Oxford: Blackwell , in press.
11.
Cromley, E. K. , Cromley, R. G. and Ye, Y.2004: Online reporting and mapping of spatially aggregated individual records selected by user queries . Cartographica39(2), 5-13 .
12.
Curry, M. R.1995: GIS and the inevitability of ethical inconsistency. In Pickles, J. , editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press , 68-87.
13.
Curry, M. R.1998: Digital places: living with geographic information technologies. London: Routledge .
14.
Curry, M. R.1999: Rethinking privacy in a geocoded world. In Longley, P. A. , Goodchild, M. F. , Maguire, D. J. and Rhind, D. W. , editors, Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications, New York: Wiley , 757-766.
15.
Dangermond, J.2002: Mutualism in strengthening GIS technologies and democratic principles: perspectives from a GIS software vendor. In Craig, W. J. , Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. , editors, Community participation and geographic information systems, London and New York: Taylor and Francis , 297-308.
16.
Dobson, J. E. and Fisher, P. F.2003: Geoslavery . IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Spring, 47-52 .
17.
Duckham, M. and Kulik, L. 2005: A formal model of obfuscation and negotiation for location privacy . In Gellersen, H. W. , Want, R. and Schmidt, A. , editors, Pervasive Computing Third International Conference, PERVASIVE 2005, Munich, Germany Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3468, Berlin: Springer, 152-170 .
18.
Elwood, S. A.2002: GIS use in community planning: a multidimensional analysis of empowerment . Environment and Planning A34, 905-922 .
19.
Flowerdew, R.1998: Reacting to Ground truth . Environment and Planning A32, 289-301 .
20.
Foresman, T. W. , editor 1998: The history of geographic information systems: perspectives from the pioneers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
21.
Ghose, R.2001: Use of information technology for community empowerment: transforming geographic information systems into community information systems . Transactions in GIS5, 141-163 .
22.
Goodchild, M. F.1991: Just the facts . Political Geography Quarterly10, 335-337 .
23.
Goss, J.1995a: Marketing the new marketing: the strategic discourse of geodemographic information systems. In Pickles, J. , editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press , 130-170.
24.
Goss, J.1995b: ‘We know where you are and we know where you live’: the instrumental rationality of geodemo-graphic information systems . Economic Geography71, 171-198 .
25.
Hägerstrand, T.1982: Diorama, path and project . Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie73, 323-339 .
26.
Hanson, S. M.2002: Connections . Gender, Place and Culture9, 301-303 .
27.
Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D.1996: GIS and society: the social implications of how people, space and environment are represented in GIS. Report of the Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting, March 2-5, 1996, Koinoinia Retreat Center, South Haven, MN. Technical Report 96-7. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis .
28.
Harris, T. M. , Weiner, D. , Warner, T. and Levin, R.1995: Pursuing social goals through participatory GIS: redressing South Africa’s historical political ecology. In Pickles, J. , editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press , 196-222.
29.
Harvey, F.2000: The social construction of geographic information systems . International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 713-716 .
30.
Harvey, F. , Kwan, M.-P. and Pavlovskaya, M.2005: Introduction: critical GIS . Cartographica40(4), 1-4 .
31.
Jordan, G.2002: GIS for community forestry user groups in Nepal: putting people before the technology. In Craig, W. J. , Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. , editors, Community participation and geographic information systems, London and New York: Taylor and Francis , 232-245.
32.
Kwan, M.-P.2002a: Introduction: feminist geography and GIS . Gender, Place and Culture9, 261-262 .
33.
Kwan, M.-P.2002b: Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s . Gender, Place and Culture9, 271-279 .
34.
Kwan, M.-P.2002c: Feminist visualization: re-visioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research . Annals of the Association of American Geographers92, 645-661 .
35.
Kwan, M.-P. and Lee, J.2004: Geovisualization of human activity patterns using 3D GIS: a time-geographic approach. In Goodchild, M. and Janelle, D. , editors, Spatially integrated social science, New York: Oxford University Press , 48-66.
36.
Kyem, P. A. K.2004: Of intractable conflicts and participatory GIS applications: the search for consensus amidst competing claims and institutional demands . Annals of the Association of American Geographers94, 37-57 .
37.
Larson, E.1992: The naked consumer: how our private lives become public commodities. New York: Penguin .
38.
Lake, R. W.1993: Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems . Progress in Human Geography17, 404-413 .
39.
Lobley, J.1999: It’s all about money stupid! In Longley, P. A. , Goodchild, M. F. , Maguire, D. J. and Rhind, D. W. , editors, Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications, New York: Wiley , 19-19.
40.
Longley, P. A.2005: Geographical information systems: a renaissance of geodemographics for public service delivery . Progress in Human Geography29, 57-63 .
41.
Matthews, S. A. , Detwiler, J. E. and Burton, L. M.2005: Geo-ethnography: coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research . Cartographica40(4), 75-90 .
42.
McHaffie, P. H.1995: Manufacturing metaphors: public cartography, the market and democracy. In Pickles, J. , editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press , 113-129.
43.
McHaffie, P. H.2000: Surfaces: tacit knowledge, formal language, and metaphor at the Harvard Lab for Computer Graphics and Spatial Analysis . International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 755-773 .
44.
McLafferty, S.2002: Mapping women’s worlds: knowledge, power and the bounds of GIS . Gender, Place and Culture9, 263-269 .
45.
McLafferty, S.2005: Women and GIS: geospatial technologies and feminist geographies . Cartographica40(4), 37-45 .
46.
Obermeyer, N. J.1998: The evolution of public participation GIS . Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2), 65-65 .
47.
Onsrud, H. J.1995: Identifying unethical conduct in the use of GIS . Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22, 90-97 .
48.
Onsrud, H. J.2003: Access to geographic information: openness versus security. In Cutter, S. , Richardson, D. and Wilbanks, T. , editors, Geographic dimensions of terrorism, New York and London: Routledge , 207-213.
49.
Onsrud, H. J. , Johnson, J. and Lopez, X.1994: Protecting personal privacy in using geographic information systems . Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote SensingLX, 1083-1095 .
50.
Openshaw, S.1991: A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again . Environment and Planning A23, 621-628 .
51.
Openshaw, S.1992: Further thoughts on geography and GIS: a reply . Environment and Planning A24, 463-466 .
52.
Openshaw, S.1997: The truth about Ground truth . Transactions in GIS2, 7-24 .
53.
O’Sullivan, D.2005: Geographical information science: time changes everything . Progress in Human Geography29, 749-756 .
54.
Parker, C. and Pascual, A.2002: A voice that could not be ignored: Community GIS and gentrification battles in San Francisco. In Craig, W. J. , Harris, T. M. and Weiner, D. , editors, Community participation and geographic information systems, London and New York: Taylor and Francis , 55-64.
55.
Pavlovskaya, M. E.2002: Mapping urban change and changing GIS: other views of economic restructuring . Gender, Place and Culture9, 281-289 .
56.
Pickles, J. , editor 1995: Ground truth: the social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford .
57.
Pickles, J.1997: Tool or science? GIS, technoscience and the theoretical turn . Annals of the Association of American Geographers87, 363-372 .
58.
Pickles, J.1999: Arguments, debates and dialogues: the GIS social theory debate and the concern for alternatives. In Longley, P. A. , Goodchild, M. F. , Maguire, D. J. and Rhind, D. W. , editors, Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications, New York: Wiley .
59.
Rushton, G. , Armstrong, M. P. , Gittler, J. D. , Greene, B. R. , Pavlik, C. E. , West, M. M. and Zimmerman, D. L.2006: Geocoding in cancer research: a review . American Journal of Preventive Medicine30(2S), S16-S24 .
60.
Schuurman, N.1999a: An interview with Michael Goodchild, January 6, 1998, Santa Barbara, California . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17, 3-17 .
Schuurman, N.2000: Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s . Progress in Human Geography24, 569-590 .
63.
Schuurman, N.2003: GIS: a short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell .
64.
Schuurman, N.2005: Social perspectives on semantic interoperability: constraints on geographical knowledge from a data perspective . Cartographica40(4), 47-61 .
65.
Schuurman, N. and Kwan, M.-P.2004: Guest editorial: Taking a walk on the wild side of GIS . Cartographica39(1), 1-3 .
66.
Schuurman, N. and Pratt, G.2002: Care of the subject: feminism and critiques of GIS . Gender, Place and Culture9, 291-299 .
67.
Sharp, J.2005: Geography and gender: feminist methodologies in collaboration and in the field . Progress in Human Geography29, 304-309 .
68.
Sheppard, E.1995: GIS and society: toward a research agenda . Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22, 5-16 .
69.
Sheppard, E.2005: Knowledge production through critical GIS: genealogy and prospects . Cartographica40(4), 5-21 .
70.
Sheppard, E. and Poiker, T., editors 1995: GIS and society . Special issue of Cartography and Geographical Information Systems, 22(1).
71.
Sieber, R. E.2000: Conforming (to) the opposition: the social construction of geographical information systems in social movements . International Journal of Geographical Information Science14, 775-793 .
72.
Sieber, R. E.2004: Rewiring for a GIS/2 . Cartographica39(1), 25-39 .
73.
Taylor, P. J.1990: GKS . Political Geography Quarterly9, 211-212 .
74.
Taylor, P. J. and Overton, M.1991: Further thoughts on geography and GIS . Environment and Planning A23, 1087-1090 .
75.
Timander, L. and McLafferty, S.1998: Breast cancer in West Islip, NY: a spatial clustering analysis with covariates . Social Science and Medicine46, 1623-1635 .
76.
Veregin, H.1995: Computer innovation and adoption in geography: a critique of conventional technological models. In Pickles, J. , editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press , 88-112.
77.
Weiner, D. , Harris, T. M. and Craig, W. J.2002: Community participation and geographic information systems. In Craig, W. J. , Harris, T. M. , Weiner, D. , editors, Community participation and geographic information systems, London and New York: Taylor and Francis , 3-16.
78.
Wright, D. J. , Goodchild, M. F. and Proctor, J.1997: Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as ‘tool’ versus ‘science’ . Annals of the Association of American Geographers87, 346-362 .
