Although one cannot deny that chiasmus was one structuring device used by ancient Hebrew composers, the explosion of identification of this device in the past half century has made many scholars sceptical. This study draws together recent research on the criteria for identifying and denying the presence of chiasmus in Hebrew litera ture and then applies those criteria to a recent study of one composition. It reveals that Loren Bliese's identification of chiasmus in Nehemiah 9 is only in the eye of the beholder.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blenkinsopp, J.1988Ezra-Nehemiah: A Commentary ( OTL; Philadelphia: Westminster Press).
2.
Bliese, L.F.1988 'Chiastic Structures, Peaks and Cohesion in Nehemiah 9.6-37'. BT39: 208-15.
3.
Butterworth, M.1992Structure and the Book of Zechariah (JSOTSup, 130; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
4.
Carrez, M. et al. (eds.) 1981De la Tôrah au Messie: Mélanges Henri Cazelles (Paris: Desclee ).
5.
Clines, D.J.A.1984Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther (NCB; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).
6.
Emerton, J.A.1987'An Examination of Some Attempts to Defend the Unity of the Flood Narrative in Genesis', VT37: 401-420.
7.
1988 'An Examination of Some Attempts to Defend the Unity of the Flood Narrative in Genesis', VT38: 1-21.
8.
Gilbert, M.1972'La Prière de Daniel. Dn 9,4-19', RTL 3: 297-98.
1981'La place de la Loi dans la prière de Néhémie 9', in Carrez et al. (eds.) 1981: 307-16.
11.
Giraudo, C.1981La Struttura Letteruria della Preghiera Eucharistica: Saggio sulla genesi letteraria di una forma (AnBib, 92; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute ).
12.
1987 'Confession of Sins in the Old Testament', Concilium190: 85-95.
13.
Goshen-Gottstein, M. (ed.) 1988Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress of Jewish Studies—Panel Sessions: Bible Studies and Ancient Near East (Jerusalem: Magnes Press ).
14.
Holmgren, F.C.1992 'Faithful Abraham and the 'amanâ Covenant of Nehemiah 9,6-10,1', ZAW104: 249-54.
Kühlewein, J.1973Geschichte in den Psalmen (Calwer Theologische Monographien; Stuttgart: Calwer).
17.
Laurentin, A.1964 'We'attah-kai nun. Formule charactérestique des textes juridiques et liturgiques à propos de Jean 17,5', Biblica45: 168-97.
18.
Longman, T.1982 'A Critique of Two Recent Metrical Systems', Biblica 63: 230-54. 1987 Literary Approaches to Biblical Interpretation ( Grand Rapids: Zondervan).
19.
Radday, Y.T.1981 'Chiasmus in Hebrew Biblical Narrative', in Welch1981: 50-117.
20.
Rudolph, W.1949Esra und Nehemia Samt 3. Esra (HAT, 20; Tübingen: Mohr).
21.
Throntveit, M.A.1992Ezra-Nehemiah (Interpretation; Louisville: John Knox).
22.
Watson, W.G.E.1981 'Chiastic Patterns in Biblical Hebrew Poetry', in Welch1981: 118-68.
23.
1986Classical Nebrew Poetry: A Guide to Its Techniques (JSOTSup, 26; Sheffield: JSOT Press).