Nebuchadnezzar and the animal mind (Daniel 4)

Abstract

The case of King Nebuchadnezzar’s animal episode in Daniel 4 has typically been read in ways that pathologize animality. I argue, however, that the Hebrew Bible demonstrates at least two views of animals and knowledge: one which casts them as ignorant and stupid and one which celebrates their knowledge, especially knowledge of the divine. Rather than reading Nebuchadnezzar’s experience through the former tradition, I offer an alternative reading in which nonhuman animals are seen as having knowledge, even a special knowledge of the divine. Nebuchadnezzar’s animalization need not be read as punishment or madness, but rather it is meant to educate him. When Nebuchadnezzar is given the ‘mind of an animal’ (4.13), the goal is to reach a better knowledge of God through this animal mind. Finally, I conclude with thoughts about how this interpretation avoids the pitfalls of conflating animality with madness and its relevance for animal ethics today.

Keywords

Animals animal cognition animal studies Daniel madness Nebuchadnezzar

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avalos

(2014) Nebuchadnezzar’s affliction: New Mesopotamian parallels for Daniel 4. Journal of Biblical Literature 133: 497–507.

Beaulieu

P-A

(1989) The Reign of Nabonidus, King of Babylon, 556–539 B.C. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bates

(2014) The emotional lives of dairy cows. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-emotional-lives-of-dairy-cows/.

Bekoff

(2002) Minding Animals: Awareness, Emotions, and Heart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bevan

(1892) A Short Commentary on the Book of Daniel for the Use of Students. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Boyle

(2005) Broken hearts: The violation of biblical law. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 73: 731–757.

Briggs

(1897) A study of the use of לֵב‎ and לֵבָב‎ in the Old Testament. In: Kohut

(ed) Semitic Studies in Memory of Rev. Dr. Alexander Kohut. Berlin: S. Calvary & Co., pp. 94–105.

Bunta

(2009) The mēsu-tree and the animal inside: Theomorphism and theriomorphism in Daniel 4. In: Lourié

Orlov

(eds) The Theophaneia School: Jewish Roots of Eastern Christian Mysticism. Piscataway, NJ: Georgia Press, pp. 364–384.

Cason

(2014) Confessions of an impotent potentate: Reading Daniel 4 through the lens of ritual punishment theory. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 39: 79–100.

10.

Cobern

(1901) Commentary on the Old Testament, vol. 8. New York: Eaton & Mains.

11.

Collins

(1981) Daniel, First Maccabees, Second Maccabees with an Excursus on the Apocalyptic Genre. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier.

12.

Collins

(1993) Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel. Minneapolis: Fortress.

13.

Coxon

(1993) Another look at Nebuchadnezzar’s madness. In: Van der Woude

(ed) The Book of Daniel: In the Light of New Findings. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 211–222.

14.

Forti

(2008) Animal Imagery in the Book of Proverbs. Boston: Brill.

15.

Gadd

(1958) The Harran inscriptions of Nabonidus. Annual of the Swedish Theological Institute 8: 35–92.

16.

Garrison

(2012) Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: An inversion of Gilgamesh imagery. Bibliotheca sacra 169: 172–187.

17.

Goodall

(2005) Primate spirituality. In: Taylor

(ed) Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature. London: Continuum, pp. 1303–1306.

18.

Gregoire

(2015) Cows are way more intelligent than you probably thought. Huffington Post. Available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/cows-are-way-smarter-than-you-thought_us_55b631ede4b0224d8832b382.

19.

Grelot

(1994) Nabuchodonosor changé en bête. Vetus Testamentum 44: 10–17.

20.

Gross

(2015) The Question of the Animal and Religion: Theoretical Stakes, Practical Implications. New York: Columbia University Press.

21.

Hagen

Broom

(2004) Emotional reactions to learning in cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85: 203–213.

22.

Harle

(1729) An Historical Essay on the State of Physick in the Old and New Testament and the Apocryphal Interval. London.

23.

Hartman

Di Lella

(1978) The Book of Daniel: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

24.

Hays

(2007) Chirps from the dust: The affliction of Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 4:30 in its ancient Near Eastern context. Journal of Biblical Literature 126: 305–325.

25.

Henze

(1999) The Madness of King Nebuchadnezzar: The Ancient Near Eastern Origins and Early History of Interpretation of Daniel 4. Leiden: Brill.

26.

Hommel

(1902) Die Abfassungszeit des Buches Daniel und der Wahnsinn Nabonids. Theologisches Literaturblatt 23: 145–150.

27.

Janowski

(2015) Das Herz—ein Beziehungsorgan: Zum Personverständnis des Alten Testaments. In: Janowski

Schwöbel

(eds) Dimensionen der Leiblichkeit: Theologische Zugänge. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Theologie, pp. 1–45.

28.

Johnson

(2019) Animals’ praise of God. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 73: 259–271.

29.

Joüon

(1924) Locutions hébraïques avec la préposition עַל‎ devant לֵב‎, לֵבָב‎. Biblica 5: 49–53.

30.

Kirkpatrick

(2005) Competing for Honor: A Social-Scientific Reading of Daniel 1–6. Boston: Brill.

31.

Koosed

Seesengood

(2014) Daniel’s animal apocalypse. In: Moore

(ed) Divinanimality: Animal Theory, Creaturely Theology. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 182–195.

32.

Krüger

(2009) Das ‘Herz’ in der alttestamentlichen Anthropologie. In: Wagner

(ed) Anthropologische Aufbrüche: Alttestamentliche und interdisziplinäre Zugänge zur historischen Anthropologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 103–118.

33.

LaCocque

(1979) The Book of Daniel. Atlanta: John Knox.

34.

Lambert

(2016) Refreshing philology: James Barr, supersessionism, and the state of biblical words. Biblical Interpretation 24: 332–356.

35.

Leeb

(2008) Translating the Hebrew body into English metaphor. In: Neufeld

(ed) The Social Sciences and Biblical Translation. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, pp. 109–125.

36.

Lucas

(2002) Daniel. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.

37.

McKay

(2002) Through the eyes of horses: Representation of the horse family in the Hebrew Bible. In: Hunter

Davies

(eds) Sense and Sensitivity: Essays on Reading the Bible in Memory of Robert Carroll. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, pp. 127–141.

38.

Meadowcroft

(1997) Point of view in storytelling: An experiment in narrative criticism in Daniel 4. Didaskalia 8: 30–42.

39.

Meyer

(2018) Inner Animalities: Theology and the End of the Human. New York: Fordham University Press.

40.

Milik

(1956) ‘Prière de Nabonide’ et autres écrits d’un cycle de Daniel. Revue biblique 63: 407–415.

41.

Mitchell

(2005) Heart and mind in the Hebrew Scriptures. Touchstone 23: 5–13.

42.

Montgomery

(1927) A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Daniel. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

43.

Newsom

(2012) Models of the moral self: Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Judaism. Journal of Biblical Literature 131: 5–25.

44.

Newsom

(2013) Now you see him, now you don’t: Nabonidus in Jewish memory. In: Edelman

Ben Zvi

(eds) Remembering Biblical Figures in the Late Persian and Early Hellenistic Periods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 270–282.

45.

Newsom

(2014) Daniel: A Commentary. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

46.

Pace

(2008) Daniel. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys.

47.

Patton

(2000) ‘He who sits in the heavens laughs’: Recovering animal theology in the Abrahamic traditions. Harvard Theological Review 93: 401–434.

48.

Pinches

(1882) On a cuneiform inscription relating to the capture of Babylon by Cyrus, and the events which preceded and led to it. Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archaeology 7: 139–176.

49.

Porteous

(1965) Daniel: A Commentary. Philadelphia: Westminster.

50.

Price

(2011) Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

51.

Pritchard

(ed) (1969) Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

52.

Pusey

(1864) Daniel the Prophet: Nine Lectures Delivered in the Divinity School of the University of Oxford. Oxford: Parker.

53.

Riessler

(1899) Das Buch Daniel: Textkritische Untersuchung. Stuttgart: Roth.

54.

Schaefer

(2012) Do animals have religion? Interdisciplinary perspectives on religion and embodiment. Anthrozoös 25: 173–189.

55.

Seow

(2003) Daniel. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.

56.

Smith-Christopher

(1996) The book of Daniel: Introduction, commentary, and reflections. In: The New Interpreter’s Bible, vol. 7. Nashville: Abingdon, pp. 17–152.

57.

Smith

(1886) Daniel: An Exposition of the Historical Portion of the Writings of the Prophet Daniel. London: James Nisbet & Co.

58.

Smith

(1924) Babylonian Historical Texts Relating to the Capture and Downfall of Babylon. London: Methuen.

59.

Stökl

(2013) Nebuchadnezzar: History, memory, and myth-making in the Persian Period. In: Edelman

Ben Zvi

(eds) Remembering Biblical Figures in the Late Persian and Early Hellenistic Periods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–269.

60.

Stone

(2017) Reading the Hebrew Bible with Animal Studies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

61.

Taylor

(2017) Beasts of Burden: Animal and Disability Liberation. New York: The New Press.

62.

Valeta

(2008) Lions and Ovens and Visions: A Satirical Reading of Daniel 1–6. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.

63.

Way

(2011) Donkeys in the Biblical World: Ceremony and Symbol. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

64.

Wills

(1990) The Jew in the Court of the Foreign King: Ancient Jewish Court Legends. Minneapolis: Fortress.

65.

Wilson

(1917) Studies in the Book of Daniel: A Discussion of the Historical Questions. New York: G. P. Putman’s Sons.

66.

Winckler

(1893) Altorientalische Forschungen. Leipzig: Pfeiffer.