Abstract
This article examines proverbs in which the fit between the lines (cola) is awkward. This may sometimes be a flaw, but in quite a few of cases it seems intended for a particular rhetorical effect. Imperfect parallelism leaves a gap between the lines. When the missing component–a premise or a conclusion–is mentally supplied, the couplet gains cohesiveness and a tighter linkage. Such ‘disjointed' proverbs are a type of enthymeme which involves the audience in its own persuasion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
