Within the last decade in the United States, kinship care (placement with relatives or those non-related friends of family known as fictive kin) has evolved from an infrequently utilised option for temporary care and/or permanence, to a widely used and often preferred solution for children in need of care. Emily Jean McFadden discusses the background to this development and how it is related to the rising placement of children of colour, particularly African American children and adolescents who are over-represented in the American foster care system. Wide professional recognition of the importance of culture in identity formation and advocacy by professional groups has led to the acknowledgment of kinship care as a preferred placement option; it is now used extensively in many states, both in informal care which takes place outside of court intervention and in the formal foster care system.
BerrickJ DBarthR, ‘Research on kinship foster care: What do we know? Where do we go from here?’, Children and Youth Services Review161:1–2, pp 1–5, 1994
2.
BerrickJ DBarthRNeedellB, ‘A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship homes as family preservation’, Child Welfare Research Review16, Columbia University Press, 1993
3.
BesharovD, ‘Crack children in foster care: Reexamining the balance between children's rights and parents' rights’, Children Today, July-August, pp 21–5, 1990
4.
Child Welfare League of America, Kinship Care: A natural bridge, Washington DC: Child Welfare League of America, 1994
5.
de ToledoSBrownD, Grandparents as Parents: A survival guide for raising a second family, New York: Guilford Press, 1995
6.
FahlbergV, A Child's Journey Through Placement, London: BAAF, 1994
7.
GleesonJ, ‘Kinship care and public child welfare: Challenges to social work education’, Journal of Social Work Education31, pp 182–93, 1995
8.
GleesonJ, ‘Kinship care as a child welfare service: The policy debate in an era of welfare reform’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 419–49, 1996
9.
GraySNybellL, ‘Issues in African-American Family Preservation’, Child Welfare69:6, pp 513–23, 1990
10.
GrozeVHaines-SimeonMBarthR, ‘Barriers in permanency planning for medically fragile children: Drug affected children and HIV infected children’, Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal1:1, pp 63–85, 1994
11.
HansenLOpsahlI, ‘Kinship caregiving: Law and policy’, Clearinghouse Review, September, pp 481–501, 1996
12.
HardinM, Family Group Conferences in Child Abuse and Neglect Cases: Learning from the experience of New Zealand, Washington DC: American Bar Association Centre on Children and the Law, 1996
13.
Hill-LubinM.‘The African American grandmother in autobiographical works by Frederick Doublass, Langston Hughes and Maya Angelou’, The International Journal of Ageing and human development33:3, pp 175–85, 1991
14.
HornbyHZellerDKarrakerD, Kinship Care in America: A national policy study, University of Southern Maine, 1995
15.
IglehartA, ‘Kinship foster care: Placement, service and outcome issues’, Children & Youth Services Review16, pp 107–22, 1994
16.
IngramC, ‘Kinship care: From last resort to first choice’, Child Welfare75:6, pp 551–66, 1996
17.
JacksonS, ‘The kinship triad: A service delivery model’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 583–98, 1997
18.
Krajewski-JaimeE, ‘Folk healing among Mexican American families as a consideration in the delivery of child welfare and child health care services’, Child Welfare70, pp 157–68, 1991
19.
LewisR, Strengths of the American Indian Family, Tempe: University of Arizona School of Social Work, 1983
20.
MaluccioAFeinE, ‘Permanency planning: A redefinition’, Child Welfare62:3, pp 195–201, 1983
21.
McFaddenE JDownsS W, ‘Family continuity: The new paradigm in permanence planning’, Community Alternatives7:1, pp 39–60, 1995a
McGoldrickM, Ethnicity and Family Therapy, New York: Guilford Press, 1982
24.
McLeanBThomasR, ‘Informal and formal kinship care populations: A study in contrasts’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 489–508, 1996
25.
MillsCUsherD, ‘A kinship care case management approach’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 600–17, 1996
26.
OppenheimEBussiereA, ‘Adoption: Where do relatives stand?’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 471–88, 1996
27.
SparK, Kinship Foster Care: An emerging federal issue, Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1993
28.
StackC, All our Kin: Strategies for survival in a black community, New York: Harper & Row, 1974
29.
StehnoS, ‘The elusive continuum of child welfare services: Implications for minority children and youth’, Child Welfare69, pp 551–62, 1990
30.
TataraT, Characteristics of Children in Substitute and Adoptive Care: A statistical summary of the VCIS national child welfare data base, Washington DC: American Public Welfare Association, 1993
31.
Taylor-BrownSGarciaA, ‘Social workers and HIV infected families: Is the profession prepared?’, Social Work40:1, pp 15–25, 1995
32.
TestaMShookKCohenLWoodsM, ‘Permanency planning options for children in formal kinship care’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 451–70, 1996
33.
ThorntonJ, ‘Permanency planning for children in kinship foster homes’, Child Welfare70:5, pp 593–601, 1991
34.
US General Accounting Office, Foster Parents: Recruiting and pre-service training practices and evaluation, Washington DC: US General Accounting Office, 1989
35.
WilsonDChipungaS, ‘Introduction: Special issue on kinship care’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 387–95, 1996
36.
WoodworthR, ‘You're not alone … You're one in a million’, Child Welfare75:5, pp 615–35, 1996
37.
ZuravinSBenedictMSomerfieldM, ‘Child maltreatment in family foster care’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry63, pp 589–96, 1993
