AlexanderP CLupferS L, ‘Family characteristics and long-term consequences associated with sexual abuse’, Archives of Sexual Behaviour16, 1987, pp 235–45
2.
AnsonD AGoldingS LGullyK J, ‘Child sexual abuse allegations: reliability of criteria-based content analysis’. Law and Human Behaviour173, 1993, pp 331–41
3.
BekerianD ADennettJ, ‘The truth in content analysis of a child's testimony’, in LoselFBenderDBliesenerT (eds). Psychology and Law: International perspectives, Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992, pp 335–44
4.
BradfordR, ‘Developing an objective approach to assessing allegations of sexual abuse’. Child Abuse Review3, 1994, pp 93–101
5.
BulkleyJ A, ‘The impact of new child witness research on sexual abuse prosecutions’, in CeciS JRossD FTogliaM P (eds), Perspectives on Children's Testimony, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 208–29
6.
DaviesG, ‘Statement Validity Analysis: an art or a science? Commentary on Bradford’, Child Abuse Review3, 1994, pp 104–106
7.
EsplinP WHouedTRaskinD C, Application of Statement Validity Assessment; paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy, June 1988
8.
FinklehorDHotalingGLewisI ASmithC, ‘Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: prevalence, characteristics and risk factors’. Child Abuse and Neglect14, 1990, pp 385–401
9.
GoodmanG SAmanCHirschmanJ, ‘Child sexual and physical abuse: children's testimony’, in CeciS JTogliaM PRossD F (eds), Children's Eyewitness Memory, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987, pp 1–23
10.
Home Office, Memorandum of Good Practice on Video-recorded Interviews with Child Witnesses for Criminal Proceedings, London: HMSO, 1992
11.
JonesD N (ed), Understanding Child Abuse. Second Edition, London: The MacMillan Press Ltd, 1987
12.
JonesD P H, ‘Objective approaches to assessing allegations of sexual abuse: commentary on Bradford’, Child Abuse Review3, 1994, pp 101–104
13.
JonesD P HMcGrawJ M, ‘Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse to children’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence21, 1987, pp 7–45
14.
KingM AYuilleJ C, ‘Suggestibility and the child witness’, in CeciS JTogliaM PRossD F (eds), Children's Eyewitness Memory, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987, pp 24–35
15.
LandryK LBrighamJ C, ‘The effect of training in criteria-based content analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults’, Law and Human Behaviour166, 1992, pp 663–76
16.
PhillipsM, ‘Investigative interviewing: issues of race and culture’, in Stainton-RogersWWorrelM (eds), Investigative Interviewing with Children, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1993, pp 50–55
17.
RaskinD CEsplinP W, ‘Assessment of children's statements of sexual abuse’, in DavisJ (ed), The Suggestibility of Children's Recollections, Washington D C: American Psychological Association, 1991
18.
RaskinD CYuilleJ C, ‘Problems in evaluating interviews of children in sexual abuse cases’, in CeciS JRossD FTogliaM P (eds), Perspectives on Children's Testimony, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 184–207
19.
RoweM B, ‘Wait-times and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching11, 1974, pp 81–94
20.
SkinnerL JBerryK K, ‘Anatomically detailed dolls and the evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations’, Law and Human Behaviour174, 1993, pp 399–421
21.
StellerM, ‘Recent developments in statement analysis’, in YuilleJ C (ed), Credibility Assessment, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1989, pp 135–54
22.
StellerMBoychukT, ‘Children as witnesses in sexual abuse cases: investigative techniques and assessment techniques’, in DentHFlinR (eds), Children as Witnesses, Chichester: Wiley, 1992, pp 47–71
23.
StellerMKoehnkenG, ‘Criteria-Based Statement Analysis’, in RaskinD (ed), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 217–45
24.
StellerMWellershausPWolfT, Empirical Validation of Criteria-Based Content Analysis; paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy, June 1988
25.
TrankellA, Reliability of Evidence, Stockholm: Rotobeckmann, 1972(English translation of Vittnespsykologins Arbetsmetoder, Stockholm: Bokforlaget Liber, 1963)
26.
UndeutschU, ‘Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen’, in UndeutschU (ed), Handbuch der Psychologie. Bd II: Forensische Psychologie, Goettingen: Hogrefe, 1967, p 141
27.
UndeutschU, ‘The development of statement reality analysis’, in YuilleJ C (ed), Credibility Assessment, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 1989, pp 101–19
28.
VizardE, ‘Interviewing children suspected of being sexually abused: a review of theory and practice’, in HollinCHowellsK (eds), Clinical Approaches to Sex Offenders and their Victims, Chichester: Wiley, 1991
29.
WegenerH, ‘The present state of statement analysis’, in YuilleJ C (ed), Credibility Assessment, London: Kluwer, 1989
30.
WhiteSStromG ASantilliG SHalpinB M, ‘Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls’, Child Abuse and Neglect10, 1986, pp 519–29
31.
YuilleJ CHunterRJoffeRZaparniukJ, ‘Interviewing children in sexual abuse cases’, in GoodmanG SBottomsB L (eds), Child Victims, Child Witnesses, New York; London: The Guilford Press, 1993